Industrial/Organizational Flashcards
Adverse Impact vs. Unfairness vs. Differential Validity
Adverse impact is based on the 80% or 4/5th rule, which states that the percentage of minorities selected must be at leat 4/5th of the percentage of non-minorities selected.
Unfairness occurs when minorities and non-minorities score differently on the predictor test yet perform similarly on the criterion. Graphically, unfairness is depicted as 2 parallel lines. Example, whites and blacks scores differently on the MCAT, but both graduate medical school and practice medicine.
Differential validity occurs when there are significantly different criterion-related validity coefficients for different groups on the same test. Example, the MCAT and white vs. black performance
Job Analysis vs. Job Evaluation
Job analysis describes in specific terms of the component tasks performed by workers on a particular job.
Job evaluation is a formal process that determines the financial worth of a specific job to an organization.
Biodata
Biographical Information (Biodata) a the forms that are used to collect information on potential employee. There are 3 major types: standard application blank, the weighted applications blank, and the biographical inventory.
Holland’s Occupational Themes, Personality-Job fit theory
Holland’s Occupatonal Themes:
- realistic- perfers physical activities that require skill, strength, and coordination
- investigative-perfers activities that involve thinking, organizing, and understanding.
- artistic- prefers ambiguous and unsystematic activities that allow creative expression.
- social-perfers activities that involve helping and developing others.
- enterprising- prefers activities with opportunity to influence others and obtain power.
- conventional-prefers rule-regulated, orderly, and unambiguous activities.
Assessment Center; in-basket techniques
An assessment center is a method of selection that places new job applicants and candidates for promotions in a simulated job situation so that their behavior under stresscan be observed or evacuated.
Assessment center utilize in-basket technique or the leaderless group discussion activities.
The in-basket technigew presents applicants with typical problems and questions that managers would expect to find when they return from a vaction. Applicants process this information in a fixed period of time, and after the exercise they may be required to justifiy their decisions.
In the leaderless group discussion, applicants meet as a group to discuss an actural business problem. As the candidates interact with each other, their leaderhsip qualities and communication styles are observed.
Contrast vs. Halo Effect
Interviewer biases
Interviews have the worst criterion-related validity (.01 -.19) they are better if structured, use multiple interviewres who have been trained.
There are several interviewer biases:
- First impressions
- Negative information
- Interviewer prejudices
- Contrast effect- occurs when an interviewer’s ratings of a candidate are affected by the performance of the previous candidate.
- . Halo effect- involves generalizing from one characteristics to the entire candidate in either a positive or negative direction. For example, if he is handsome, he must be smart
Cognitive Ability vs. Interest vs. Personality Tests related to job performance
Test of cognitive abilities and aptitude are a good predictor of job success.
Interest teas are a poor predictors of job success/performance but they do correlate with job satisfaction.
Personality tests are poor predictors of job performance.
Comparative vs. Individual or Absolute Methods of Appraisal
Sujective methods of evaluating others via ratings tools, fall into 2 categories either comparative or individual/absolute.
The comparative methods are based on comparing one employee performance with other employees. There are 3 types:
- Straight rakings- involve listing workers from best to worst.
- Forced distribution- people are ranked to fit a distribution (a bell-curve)
- Paired comparison- each employee is compare to every other employee in pairs
The individual or absolute method consist of 5 types:
- Graphic rating scale- involves ratings on several aspects of a job.
- BARS (Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales)- are based on critical incidents, there are expensive and time-consuling to develop, and relate to hypicalthical situations rather than day-to-day activities.
- BOS (Behavioral Observation Scale)- involves rating the extent to which a person engages in every behavior.
- Forced choice- the rater must choose between two seemingly equally desirable or undesirable choices. This method controllers for the helo effect, as weel as biases due to leniency and strictness.
- Behavioral checklist- a rater uses a behavioral checklist and check off all the adjective or descriptors that apply to the employee being rated.
Transcanctional vs. Transformational Leader
Transactional leader is the more traditional leader who influences subordinates through daily, fairly emotionless exchanges., aims to secure the agreed upon level of performance from subordinates, and may sue rewards, management by objectives and other conventional means.
Transformational leaders aims to broaden and elevate the goals of the subordinates, utilize charisma, inspiration, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration
Forced Choice vs. Paired Comparisons vs. Forced Distribution
Subjective Methods of rating others
Forced choice- the rater must choose between two seemingly equally desirable or undesirable choices. This method controllers for the helo effect, as weel as biases due to leniency and strictness.
Paired comparison- each employee is compared to every other employee in pairs
Forced distribution- people are ranked to fit a distribution (a bell-curve).
Effects of Training
Training is best when trainees have high motivation, are actively engaged, the training is delivered in a spaced manner, in smaller units, provides for application, and the learner is given feedback and continuous reinforcement initially and then is thinned as the content is mastered
Job Rotation and Japanese Management
Methods used by most Japanese companies
Job rotation involves exposing trainees (usually managers) to different jobs and departments to acquaint them with all facets of the organization.
The Theory Z describes 3 critical Japanese management strategies: (1) life-long employment with an emphasis on loyalty (2) slow promotion with an emphasis on non-specalized career paths, and (3) high levels of group decision making.
Scientific Management vs. Human Relations Approach
Leadership Theories and Approaches
Scientific Management (proposed by Frederick Taylor) view workers as extension of machines, who are lazy, dishonest, and have low levels of interrigence. It is the foreman’s job to use autocratic behavior, aggressiveness, and physical intimidation to force workers to produce. This method is also referred to as Theory X as described by McGregor (1960)
The human relations appraoch rose out of the Hawthorne studies that focused on worker needs rather than production. These studies examined the effects on environment factors (light, temp. and rest periods) on productivity. They also found that if leaders allowed workers to have input and socialize work performance improved. In fact psychological factors were more important than environmental factors in improving productivity. This method is also referred to as the Theory Y as describe by McGregor (1960).
Theory X vs. Theory Y vs. Theory Z
McGregor vs. Ouchi Leardership Theories
Theory X assumes workere are lazy and must be coerced and directed since they have no ambition and no sense of responsibility. It theory underlies typical bureaucracies. (McGregor 1960)
Theory Y assumes that people find satisfaction with their work, and that control and punishment are not necessary to bring about good performance. This theory proposes that people are industrious and creative, seek challenge and responsibility, and function best under a leadership style that is participative. (McGregor 1960)
Theory Z describes 3 critical Japanese management strategies: (1) life-long employment with an emphasis on loyalty (2) slow promotion with an emphasis on non-specalized career paths, and (3) high levels of group decision making. (Ouchi 1981)
Authoritarian vs. Democratic vs. Laissez Faire
Authoritarian leaders use power, rewards and punishment to lead and workers have no input.
Democratic leader get staff input and allow workers work independently
Laissez Faire leaders let the worker run the show.
Most workers do best in a democratic leaders.