IMH Topic 1: The historical context of mental health Flashcards
aminism
a supernatural explanation
- belief that everyone and everything has a soul and that evil spirits have taken possession of an individual and controlled their behaviour.
- ppl could be possessed by different kinds of spirits e.g. ancestors, animals, gods - enter through their own cunning - magical powers or lack of faith
- some skulls of paleolithic cave dwellers had holes (trepanes), which were chipped out by stone instruments.
- thought that trepanning was performed to provide the demon or evil spirit with an exit from the skull
humourism
a somatogenic explanation
- Hippocrates first identified mental illness as a scientific phenomenon.
- thought madness resulted from an imbalance of the four humours
- four humours: blood, phlegm, yellow bile, black bile
- behavioural or personaility issue believed to be caused by an excess or lack of each of the humours
- this would determine treatment given to try to realign the levels of each humour to restore balance and therefore mental health
For example, depression was thought to be a result of excess black bile, and therefore diets, laxatives, bloodlettings would rebalance this excess.
animalism
based on a somatogenic explanation
- in 18th century, the main view was to treat the mentally ill like animals
- believed that the madness had resulted from animalism - person lost the capacity of reason - what distinguished them from animals
- treatment was to restore reason through fear
- person would be kept locked up, chained and possibly whipped
- other treatments such as bleeding, blistering, making them sick and drugs were given with the belief that the insane didn’t have sensitivities of human beings
evaluate the historical views in relation to individual/situational debate
individual:
differences in symptoms
situational:
the environment they were in, the treatment they were given could’ve made them worse - no beds, fleas when locked up
four ways of defining abnormality
statistical infrequency
failure to function adequately
deviation from social norms
deviation from ideal mental health
outline statistical infrequency
behaviour is abnormal if it falls outside of the norm
e. g. the avg IQ is 100, those with very high or very low IQs would be considered abnormal
3. 45% of population with schizophrenia - relatively rare so considered abnormal
problems with statistical infrequency
numerical data can be falsified
to be abnormal doesn’t actually mean that there must be a diagnosis of a psychological disorder
outline failure to function adequately
when an individual is unable to meet the expectations of how people should live their life and if they cannot live a normal life they are seen as functioning inadequately
problems with functioning adequately
subjective - who decides what a normal life is?
the definition doesn’t confer the label of mental illness on that person
outline deviation from social norms
expected or approved way of behaving
abnormal behaviour may be seen as that which deviates from social norms
may indicate the presence of a psychological disorder
problems with deviation from social norms
If someone doesn’t follow a society’s norms, it doesn’t necessarily indicate a psychological disorder
outline deviation from ideal mental health
ideal mental health could be: feeling positive about yourself, act independently, positive social interactions, accurate perception of reality and coping with demands of reality.
may be abnormal if they display one of the following: suffering, maladaptiveness, unconventional behaviour, unpredictablility/loss of control, observer discomfort etc
problems with deviation from ideal mental health
some of the criteria could be hard to quantify
6 points about DSM
- First published in 1952
- It’s on the fifth edition (DSM-5)
- 22 categories of mental disorder
- It begins with diagnosis from developmental processes that manifest early in life (e.g. neurodevelopmental and schizophrenia spectrum etc)
- Then followed by diagnosis that manifest in adolescence and young adulthood (e.g. bipolar, depressive and anxiety disorders)
- Ends with diagnosis relevant to adulthood and later life (e.g. neurocognitive disorders)
usefulness of defining abnormality
only useful if ways of defining are accurate - then treatment can be given
not useful if way of defining is subjective - ppl could be considered abnormal when they are not