Human Rights Act Evaluation Flashcards
Introduction A01
HRA came into force in 2000 to bring rights home Labour manifesto promise.
S7 allows Uk citizens to bring a case against a public body in UK courts for breach of convention right.
If they are or would have been victim in unlawful act.
Introduction A03
Must have standing so limits who can claim acts as filter removing bad claims.
HR breach can be included in court proceeding.
Public body is wide does not specify every circumstance.
Limits who can claim acts as filter remove bad claims case
Steel
HR breach can be included in court proceeding case
Higgs
s2 precedent A01
UK court should follow UK court but refer case to appeal at ECtHR.
Appeal court can decide whether or not to change law.
Must take into account all past judgements, decisions and declarations of ECtHR.
s2 precedent A03
Ct led to rewrite act.
Ct does not have to follow ECtHR allows flexibility but confusion.
Police argued immunity from civil action of negligence.
Ct led to rewrite act case
Mendoza
Police argued immunity from civil action of negligence case
Osman
S3- Interpretation A01
Courts should interpret Acts of P in way which is compatible with convention rights ‘so far as it’s possible to do’
Creates burden on judges
S3- Interpretation A03
parliament passed GRA change produced.
Improved legal position of same sex partners.
Pushed moral boundaries away from traditional marriage.
parliament passed GRA change produced case
Bellinger
S4- Declaration of Incompatibility A01
If courts think an act is incompatible with ECHR make declaration of incompatibility.
Then up to parliament to decide if they want to change the law.
Judges can not overturn a statute but can reinterpret it.
up to parliament to decide if they want to change the law case
Bellinger
S4- Declaration of Incompatibility A03
issued re Arts 8 and 12.
decided incompatible with Art 6, amended law in CJA 2003.
HL decided incompatible with Art 5 and 15.
Issued re Arts 8 and 12 case.
Bellinger