Article 8 Evaluation Flashcards

1
Q

I- What is Article 8?

A

The right to respect for family, private life, home and correspondence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

I-Proportionality

A

Balance between individual and community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

I-Margin of appreciation

A

Amount of discretion the ECHR will give state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

I-Living instrument principle

A

State has positive obligation to review law and change if necessary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

I-Living instrument principle case

A

Sheffield

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Qualified right A01

A

Need to strike a balance between rights of individual and community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a qualified right usually balanced with?

A

Article 10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Qualified right A03 Positive

A

Balance rights of individual with community.
Check state interference is proportionate with margin of appreciation.
Keep law under review with living instrument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Qualified right A03 Negative

A

Several reasons it can be restricted.
Often in conflict with other rights.
Court has to use proportionality and decide on facts which can be contradictory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Family Life A01

A

Includes various types of family relationships.
Right of a child will always be paramount.
Removing a child from family needs to be proportionate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Removing a child from family needs to be proportionate case

A

Johansen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Family life A03 Positive

A

Wide definition and under living instrument so recognise families take different forms.
Right seen as important so protected.
HRA principles of Human dignity and freedom are protected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Recognise families take different forms example

A

Same sex marriages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Right seen as important so protected

A

Johansen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Family life A03 negative

A

Having boyfriends did not stop uk refusal of application of two woman living in the Uk illegally.
State has power to take children which the ECHR does not intervene with.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

refusal of application of two woman living in the Uk illegally case

A

agyrako

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Private life A01

A

Includes photographic images and personal data.
Includes phone conversations.
Includes Medical records.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Photographic images and personal data

A

Gillian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Phone conversations

A

Halford

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Medical records

A

Axon

21
Q

Private life A03 positive

A

Wide definition lots of protection to individuals.
Many of Uk and ECHR cases protect right and are quick to find a violation.
Acts of parliament protect the right.

22
Q

Acts of parliament protect the right

A

Axon
Data protection

23
Q

What does Axon protect?

A

Medical data

24
Q

What does Data protection protect?

A

Personal data

25
Q

Private life A03 Negative

A

Cases highlight there could still be an improvement.
No comprehensive definition or general right to privacy.
Celebrities have benefited more than the public.

26
Q

What case highlights private life could be improved?

A

Marper

27
Q

What happened in Marper?

A

DNA samples held by police of people never charged with offence.

28
Q

Correspondence A01

A

Includes telephone conversations, text, email.
Investigatory powers act 2016 allows state hacking and surveillance for public safety.

29
Q

Investigatory powers act 2016 example

A

Snoopers charter

30
Q

Correspondence A03 Negative

A

Investigatory powers act 2016 allows hacking and surveillance which is deemed as a breach of Art8.
GCHQ monitor millions of communications and share with USA.
ECHR rarely intervene.

31
Q

Correspondence A03 Positive

A

Effectively balances rights between individuals and the way community deals with correspondence.
Access items by using 3 requirements in Art8(2)
Strict uk laws argue need to protect from potential terrorists.

32
Q

What are the three requirements in Art8?

A

In accordance with law
Meet a legitimate aim
Necessary in a democratic society

33
Q

Accordance with law example

A

Data protection

34
Q

Accordance with law case

A

Germany

35
Q

Meet a legitimate aim example

A

National security

36
Q

What does it mean for something to be necessary in a democratic society?

A

Proportionate
Margin of appreciation

37
Q

What did Lord Walker say about family life?

A

Words are unclear so rights developed from article could be seen as ‘volatile and abstract’

38
Q

How is private life established?

A

On a case law basis so key areas can be set out.

39
Q

Case law basis case

A

Pretty

40
Q

No general right to privacy case

A

Peck

41
Q

Celebrities have benefited more than the public case

A

Campbell

42
Q

Many of UK and ECHR cases protect right and are quick to find a violation case

A

Handyside

43
Q

National security A01

A

IPA
Wide scope

44
Q

IPA scope

A

Snooper’s charter

45
Q

National security A03 Positive

A

State is able to protect from terroritsts.

46
Q

State is able to protect from terrorists case

A

Ripper

47
Q

National security A03 Negative

A

Rarely intervene
Too much power to state
Failed to take into account the discriminatory impact of facial recognition.
Wide national security leaves citizens not properly protected.

48
Q

Failed to take into account discriminatory impact of facial recognition case

A

South Wales