hegemonic cycles and war Flashcards
General war
Wars which include most of the world’s major powers, defined as states that constitutes at least 10% of the world’s power
How general wars matter
These 10 wars wars account for 90% of all war deaths as compared with the thousands of other inter-state wars in the period of 1494-2001
Ten general wars - background
- There is dispute of the identity of the ten general or world wars
- These wars are dated from about AD 1500 because it was at this time that th Europeans came to dominate the world’s oceans far beyong the capacity of any non-European state to resist, and this rendered them invulnerable to foreign conquest. The Europeans were seeking to trade with Eastern Asia, bypassing the heavily taxed caravan routes dominated by the Moslem states
- Europeans capability was based on the convergence of heavy state financing, and key technologies such as the Ocean-going ship, the compass, and various mechanical chronometers and mathematical means to facilitate navigation.
- The European states and their colonies continue to control to this day, though they may not forever: the US and its European allies, plus the Russians, control some 90% of the world’s naval military power. The Chinese and Japanese navies are the only significant non-European naval powers.
- China did make an earlier attempt to explore the world using naval powers in 1405-1433, under Cheng Ho, but abandoned firther attempts and thereby suffered control of the Oceans to the Europeans 50 years later.
Italian Wars 1494-1517
- It has been a very peculiar phenomena that at sea there has been a winner-take-all phenomena in which the strongest naval state typically dominates all of the world’s oceans.
- This is because the ease of movement across the world’s seas has permitted rapid domination of them by navies with only slight technological advantages over their opponents. If one navy is only slightsly more powerful than another, it will take it only a short amount of time to complete the conquest, after which point it will dominate trade and make it difficult for its opponents to accumulate the resources to oppose it.
- Early naval states imposed a system of free trade in which they used force to obtain permission to sell goods in the markets of other states.
Organski’s Power Transition Theory (first theory)
- Organski conducted statistical tests and found that wars between the most powerful states o any period occurred as the two states pass or are about to pass each other in total power. In other words, was happens when one of the states is in relative decline
- In every power transition there is a status quo state - the established power which is in relative decline and which has a interest in preserving the current international order
- There is also a challenger or revisionist state, which seeks to over-turn the international system and defeat the status quo power. The challenger state is usually rising rapidly in power in comparison with the status quo states and wants therefore to take over the international system. Satisfied challenger states will inherit and not overturn the internation system.
Status inconsistency theory
- Measured differences between national aspirations and the distribution of benefits has been found to lead to war
- War occurs during power transition - when a challenger state almost approximates the power level of the dominant status quo state (and its allies).
- HOWEVER, before the challenger state surpasses the status quo state, the status quo state typically begins a preventive war to defeat the challenger before the transition occurs.
- War is more likely in a power transition during abrupt downward and upward shifts in power changes
- A rapid rise (eg, industrialization) leads to externalization of domestic dissatisfaction
Distinction between status quo/challenger and rational deterrence theory
Deterrence is about who attacks first, where status quo/challenger is about who wants to change the system
War of Dutch Independence 1585-1609 (3 of 5 great powers)
While most of Europe was involve in a Catholic- Protestant civil war, the Dutch revolted against Spanish rule and in 1585, the British intervened on their behalf, provoking the unsuccessful Spanish Armada, the Spanish attempt to dominate Europe and the world’s oceans, and the dutch occupied the vacuum.
Criticism of power transition theory
- It was found in the COW dataset that 30 states account for 70% of MID initiation and 60% targets in MID.
- Initiation and target correlations indicate that revisionist and status quo distinction does not carry well in multiple incidents
- Rapid relative shifts increase the likelihood of war 800 times
Long Cycle Theory and Hegemonic Wars (second theory)
There are sets of theories, grouped under the title of Long Cycle Theories, that seek to explain the periodic dominance of the international system by the single most powerful state termed the hegemon, and the transition of power from one hegemonic power to the next typically occurs through a general or world war.
- The precise timing of these hegemonic states is in perpetual scholarly dispute, but there is general consensus on the broad outlines of the succession and its nature. The hegemonic cycle starts with the rise of Europe in world affairs around AD 1500.
Statistical evidence for long cycle theory
Hegemonic wars follow the pattern of probing, adjusting and hegemonic wars: 100 year cycle from 1494-1973
the hegemonic cycle
Hegemonic states invariable had pre-eminent naval power that was grounded in commercial trade and technological dominance. As long as these states are dominant, they shape the structure of international commerce, typically pursuing free trade. But as they become over-extended in defending their interests, they fall behind technologically and ultimately commercially to a rising challenger.
EG: the UK declined from 58% of the world’s economy in the 1850s to 2% in 2001 - too much money spent on a large navy and not enough on research and development in new technologies. Germany, which had a smaller military, spent more on industrialization and new technologies and surpassed England.
- Because the dominant state obtains resources benefits by controlling the international system, they rarely make room for challengers. - For a hegemon, trade and financial power in the form of banks matters more for maintaining naval dominance that natural resources such as wood (since natural resources can always be traded for)
- The the challenger is a naval power, it defeats and takes over the empire of the preceding status quo power, and becomes the new status quo power.
Modelski and Thomas on land-maritime power transitions
The challenger, if it is a land power, is defeated, but so weakens the hegemonic state that another maritime power inherits the position as hegemon
results of power transition
- Victory by a new hegemon brings a restructuring of the international system, which typically includes a new set of international institutions and structure of trade.
- World commerce did not exist until the European navies, specifically the Portugese, cleared the trade routes of hostile navies, in the sixteenth century.
- The command of the world’s oceans has since passed to the Dutch, then the British, and now the United States Navy.
- In each period, free trade is preferentially established around the hegemonic power.
Hegemony and peace
Periods of peace have been periods of preponderance by a hegemon, and periods of war have been periods of decline of the hegemon (Pax Britannica, Cold War)
EG: What would happen to the United Nations, the World Bank, attempts at liberalizing world trade through the World Trade Organization, without a hegemonic power like the U.S.? (Answer: It would fall, since these are in essence institutions set up for American benefit at the beginning of the period of hegemony at the end of the Second World War and would not persist without it.