Hearsay - Exceptions I Flashcards

1
Q

When could hearsay be admissible?

A

1) The witness is unavailable
2) It is a business document (court has discretion on reliability)
3) It is in the interests of justice to admit it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What constitutes a witness being unavailable?

A

1) Dead
2) Unfit to be witness
3) Outside of UK, not reasonably practicable to secure attendance
4) Relevant person cannot be found, although they reasonably tried
5) Fear of relevant person, and court gives leave for statement to be given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can the Court admit evidence of a person not identified?

A

Absolutely not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Does unfit to be a witness need to be a medical condition?

A

No, can also be trauma such as victim of sexual assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What constitutes fear in hearsay evidence for a witness?

A
  • Fear of death or injury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What must court regard in admitting evidence in the interests of justice if the witness is not available due to fear?

A

a) Statement’s contents
b) Any risk of admission / exclusion on unfairness
c) If a direction under s19 special measures could be made
d) Any other relevant circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In a witness’s fear, does it need to be caused by the D

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What must be established between fear and failure to give evidence?

A

A causative link between the fear and failure to give evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happens if the intimidation of a witness is proved by the Court?

A

The evidence is likely admissible, and the defence should not cry about the right to a fair trial being infringed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When could business documents, etc be admissible?

A

If the following apply:
1) Document containing statement was created in course of business
2) Person who supplied information contained in statement had or reasonably supposed to have personal knowledge on the matters
3) Each person through whom information was supplied from relevant person received the information in the course of business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What other documents constitute business documents?

A
  • Medical documents
  • Statement written down by feds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What conditions must be satisfied under s117 for documents to be admissible?

A
  • One of five conditions in s116 satisfied, or
  • Person who supplied information cannot be expected to have recollection of matters with in the statement (having regard to the time)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does the court have exclusionary discretion even if conditions are satisfied?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When does s78 PACE allow court to exclude document evidence that would otherwise be admissible under s117?

A

If there is doubt on its content, the source, or other circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the questions the court can ask when determining interests of justice in evidence (s114)?

A

1) How much probative value?
2) What other evidence can be given?
3) How important is the matter or evidence?
4) The circumstances of statement
5) How reliable is the maker
6) How reliable the evidence is
7) Whether oral evidence of the matter can be given, if not, why
8) The amount of difficulty involved in challenging statement
9) The extent to which that difficult would prejudice the party facing it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a prime example of interests of justice case failing?

A

Where witness reluctant to come to court to give evidence not to relive trauma of sexual assaults

17
Q

Can the Court rely on interests of justice if they did not take reasonable steps to find or secure witness?