Group Counseling Flashcards
Types of Groups
Counseling
Guidance
Psychotherapy
Psychoeducation
Structured
Self-Help
T-Group (training group)
Task/Work Groups
Counseling Groups
purpose: growth, devpmt, removing barriers, prevention
ppl to address problems in a group environment
means there is no DSM diagnosis
Guidance Groups
goal: provide information
Discuss how the info is relevant to members (eg, schools)
Psychotherapy groups
goal: remediation, treatment, personality reconstruction
in agencies, clinics, hospitals
may run longer than others
means there IS a DSM diagnosis
Psychoeducation groups
goal: acquiring info and skill building
- can be preventative, growth oriented, or remedial
found in social service, mental health settings, universities
Structured group
goal: focused on a central theme
eg. learning job search skills, anger mgmt, loss/grief
most often product groups; no expectation of cohesion
Self-help group
goal: support systems for help w/psychological stress
eg.,: weight control, survivors of incest, child loss
Usually NOT professionally run (12 steps, gambler’s anonymous)
T-Group
(training groups)
Goal: examine and improve interpersonal skills
Task/work groups
Committees, study groups, planning groups to accomplish specific goals. may be interdisciplinary teams too
defn of Group Counseling and who is associated with it?
George Gazda (Gs=Group)
interaction bw ppl for prevention or remediation of difficulties or the enhancement of personal growth through the interaction of those who meet together for common purpose
Group member roles
facilitator/building. helps members feel welcome
maintenance. helps with bonding
blocker. attempts to hinder group formation
regarding leadership styles, if a group is committed toward a common goal then the _____style yields the best results
laissez faire (member free to do as they choose)
Universality/mutuality (groups)
feeling that one is not alone or unique; that others share similar problems/situations
Intellectualization in groups
keeping content on a cognitive level
Issues regarding co-leaders in groups
- members benefit from additional insight
- co-leaders can re-create roles and serve as models, so more linking is possible
- receive feedback from other co-leaders
- helpful to have male and female
- different reactions and feedback from leaders may enhance energy and discussion
- should share theoretical orientations with other leader
- no power struggles
- good way to start out ‘new’ leaders
open vs closed groups
Open groups
- replace members who leave, new members provide new insights, ideas
Closed groups
- do not admit new members, building and maintaining trust and cohesion is facilitated
Optimal group size and time duration?
8 for adults, up to 2 hrs
3-4 members for children ages 5-6 is ideal and may only last 20-30 minutes
Tuckman model
forming, storming, norming, performing, mourning/adjourning
Irvin Yalom group stages
orientation, conflict, cohesion, termination
Corey et al group stages
pre-group, initial, transition, working, final
difference bw process and product group?
process: goal is to let guard down (tuckman model)
product group: goal is to graduate/get a certificate
Irvin yalom found how many curative factors existent in successful groups?
11
UI AIS DIIGCE
Universality
Imitative behavior
Altruism
Instillation of hope
Simulation of primary family (corrective recapitulation)
Development of social techniques
Importing information 
Interpersonal learning
Group cohesion
Catharsis
Existential factors 
Irvin Yalom suggested how many ldrsp functions were present in groups no matter what?
what are they and what amount of each is recommended?
4
emotional stimulation (moderate amount)
caring (consistent use)
meaning attribution (frequent use)
executive direction/function (moderate amount)
Michael waldo
suggested different levels of exec ldrsp needed depending on the clinical setting (eg., in vs outpatient, time constraints, goals of group)
ex:
-emotional stimulation may decrease
-exec direction may increase
-caring depends on client demographic (ie sociopathic, schizophrenic…)
-meaning attribution relative to the cognitive level of the group