Globalisation And International Trade Flashcards

1
Q

Intro

A

Globalisation definition, macro econ performance definnition
Globalisation has largely been of benefit- ‘played its paprt in teh success of uk econ’- as one of most open econ in world
Yet does experience negative consequences of globalisation too- problems it may also have created’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Main three themes globalisation sucess essay

A

Impact onn exports, gdp growth, current account bop
Impact on structural econ change and equity
Impact on inflation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Globalisation definition

A

Greater international interdependence
More free movement of the factors of production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Macroeconomic performance

A

Can be assessed in terms of macroeconomic objectives
Bop balanced equilibrium, growth gdp, full employment, equity, low stable inflation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Impact of globalisation on exports, gdp growth, current account bop benefit

A

Globalisation decreases barriers to trade- remove tarrifs, exchange controls, deregulation of financial services sector-
Former membership of eu lead to inward investment from foreign multinationals, growth financial services sector, aeronautical products, pharmaceuticals

Fdi- nissan car batery plant- boost exports of ehiccles
Foreign investment invest exports financial servcs
All boost gdp growth, employment, positive impact of 63 wuaters of uninterupetd growth 1993-2008

Growth financial services huge increase in hot money flows in uk econ money markets, expanding bank lending and fuelling consumer credit bom
Increasinng consumer spending incentivising a rise in investment and property bom (increase constructuonq

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Impact on exports gdp growth bop- cons

A

Growth in consumer credit and high mpm- persistent and increasing defifitc ion current account bop despite significant increase exports
Lathough since brexit and partial retreat from gobalisation, exporys fallen 14% yet imports have not reduced
Our dependence on financial services ssector and globailsation- ‘has made it likely that econ problems in one part ofthe world will spreadto other parts’

Overall- largely enefitcial, but more need for checks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Impact on sturctural econ change and equity- benefits

A

Gloablisation as previously stated has seen growth indsutry, financial services, retailing- due to availability of cheap imports such as clothing and manufactured consumer goods
‘Developed nations have benefitted from low cost manufatured imports’ ‘seek new comparative adv in high tech and service sector activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Impact on structural econ change and equity- cons

A

Decline of laour intensive manufacturing sector- due to ower cost labour abroad-led to icreasing structural unemployment
Decreased wages of lower skilled workers- less unionised as servcie sector fragmented so cant bargain higher wages
Increased demand of skilled labour leading to greater inequality- financial services, law (mergers)

Overall- net increase jobs but increasing inequality and structural unemployment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Impact on inflation- globalisation benefits

A

Developed nations have benefitted from low cost manufactured imptrs
Clothing consumer manufactured goods, food- decrease pressure on cost push inflation- positive income effect
High growth, low inflation years since 1990s- signs of global8siation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Impact of globalisation on inflation - con

A

Occassional peaks cost push inflation due to increasing demand for oil and comities- as seen with ukraine, oil gas and food increased- interdependent market s marke more likely

Overall impact lower prices adv but more vulnerable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Globalisation conc

A

Overall largely beneficial- growth econ, lower inflation, icnrease jobs
Buut are more vulnerable to supply side shcooks- ukraine and credit crunch- check sneeded
And bop andequity worsen- due to structural econ change, move manufacturing overseas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Absolute adv

A

Comp adv
Uncontested superiority of a country or business to produce a particular good better
Exists were a country using a given resource input is able to produce mroe than other countries with the same input
Country with absolute adv is more technically efficient
Eg well educated workforce- uk legal financial seervcies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Adam smith on absolute adv

A

Used principle to promote the beneifts of international trade- arguing taht countries should specialise in the production of those gs technically more efficient, exports their supluses and imports thsoe gs in which other countries have an absolute advantage- world output increases
It is possibel for a country to have an absolute adv to be more technically efifcent in the production of most gs- eg between developed and less developed cuntries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Comparative adv

A

A country can produce a gs with a lower opp cost than other countries
Has to give up less to produce the gs
May still benefit the countries to specialise in the production of particular gs even i fdont have absolute adv and tehn trade internationally- exporst surplus of gs in which specialise and import dont
Countries should specialise in the production of gs in which they have comparatie adv
Countries may partially specilaise (produce multiple gs at diff levels- more realistic ie uk ewith food- mostly export but import some too
R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Whose tyheory was comparative advantage

A

Ricardo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Benefits of comparative advantage

A

Global resources can be used more efficiciently when countries speiclise in producing these gs in which they have a comparative advantage- efficiencies obtained by imports from countriess where opp cost lower
Global specialisation international trade should increase both allocative and productive effciiency
Competition to dynamic efficiency- greater innovation, hiigher quality and technology transfer
Consumers benefit lower prices, greater cchoice
Withot trade some fines may not be able to fuly exploit econ of scale- minimsie av costs
No trade- countries self sufficient and benefits lost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Benefits of free trade

A

International specialisation leads to increasing output of gs- promoting econ growth and increasing living standards- comp adv
Greater variety gs- more choice for consumers- exotic fruits
Ecinomic growth0 exports to foriegn markets increase soutput more jobs and higher income- exports net inkection, positive multiplier
Home firms exposed to more comp- lower prices, greater market orientation , technical efficiency, innoation
Technology transfer- spread pf omporved technologyu
Home firms may find cheapoer input savings aborad- improt raw materials, compoet parts
Income effect of cheaper imports for consuemrs- eg cheaper food, clothing electrical goods- spend mroe entertainment or lsiere domestically
As countries trade more and become mro einterdependent to avoid war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Disadv free trade

A

Job losses- esp labour inntensive manufactures indisteis in developed countru- against biden semi conductor, trump steel and solar panels
Greater international interpdependence- countries can become dependent ie food fuel- make bvulberable in war or cnoflict- russian gas
Interntional specialisation can also make vulnerable should demand or price for priduct fall- if specicalise one thing- kenya tea and coffe, agricultural when crop failure
Free trade not always level playing field esp with exploitation or dumping (prodcue a lot excess sell at cheap price- eu accused japan dumping cheaper printers on euprean markey, china steel throgh not enviornmental way
High exchange rate may also disadv higher effcicent production
Increased co2 emissons from transportation
Exploitation of labour in countries where not monitored as closely
Diff ruglate wto- self interest ect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Consumer surplus

A

Lower price than willing to pay so demand is higheer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Producer surplus

A

Higehr price than wiling to pay for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

In an open econ impact on consumer and producer suprlus

A

Welfare tranfer from producer to consumer- b welfare gain for consumers without domestic
Gain consumer grester producer
Sturctural econ change, ie mroe to work as deliery drivers
Fall in price- prdocuer surplus for domestic lower
Consumers win and domestic producer lose
Net welfare gain c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Main areas globalisation seen

A

Natural boundries of gs
Greater movement labour between countries- eu free movement, or via visas- barriers to entry legal barriers through visas
Greater movement of capital (finance to purchase cautal) betwene country- rmeoval exchange controls mean more finance can be spread- ie uk pension firm can buy shares chinese company
Greater sharing of technology and intellect- ie patents, although s asian dyson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Causes globalisation

A

More trade gs
Trade liberalisation and greadual removal of barriers to trade
Increased number multinationals companies
Increased foriegn ownership of firms
Eilimination of exchange controls
Innovation in info and communication technology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Causes of globalisation- more trade gs - examples

A

Tourism- eastern bloc
Financial services- derviatives, shares in domestic stock market
Entertainment services- online
Education international uni
Telecomms lots natural monopoluy now internat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Causes of globalisation- trade liberalisation and gradual removal of bariers to trade
Dismantaling tarrifs on iimports Quotas-limits q of imports Complex customs procedure- eu none- tmelyu Comm technology systems- us diff catalytic convrtgor
26
Causes globalisation- increased no multinat
Vompanies with oepration in more than one coutry Eg macdonalds, toyota, alphabet
27
Causes globalisation- increased foriegn ownership of firm
Firm expands by takeover or merger Bmw mini, Jl tartar over landrover Mars over hotel chocolate
28
Causes of globalisation- elimination exchnage ocntrol
Increased fnancal capital spread Fund investment- ie nissan battery plant in somerset
29
Causes of globalisation- innovation in information and comm tech
Easier to communicate internationally Zoom, emails ect
30
Effects of globalisation- prices
Decrease prices- specilisation, greater comp, move to low cost countries- clothes india andpakistan But in some gs where supplu not perfectly elastic high anounts waste Real econ growth in china and other econ has increased demand for commodities such as oil, ematlas ect
31
Effects of globalisation - consumer choice
Wider variety- exotic furit, hliday destinations But homogenisation of many gs- macodnalds- reduces cultural diversity
32
Effects of globalisation- income
Raises world gdp and av income per capita esp higher skilled pwrkers-it finance law Specialisationa nd trade more productive Relatively closed econ, not embrace globalisation- cuba and nk seen growth rates fall But Low skilled workers may lose jobs- structural unemp New firms in service sector often fraggmented less unionised and lower rpaid Lower wages in agricuture due to ledcs
33
Effects of globalisation- employment and unemp
Increase world gdp and increase level s of emp But accelerated shock may create structural econ loss- labour intensive makret may move where cheaper, less developed ecn larger transfer of worker from rural to urban areas- increase real income higher material living standardss
34
Income distribution - effects globalisatio n
Anti globablisation argue that increase inequality Real income risen yet fallen in many other parts war (sudan), climate change, lack education (esp war Uk rise income inequality- unklilled labour,s turctural econ change, higher paid in skilled Technological innovation disproportionaly enefit skilled worker
35
Multinationals/transnationals
Firms with physical operations in more than one country ie macdonalds google When set up in another country (fdi)- build plants/factory, open retail outlet, purchase majority shareholder- mondelex international/kraft over cadbury
36
Vertical integration
Diff stages of production process taking place in diff countries Bp oil rig refinery petrol station
37
Horizontally initegrated
Perform the same basic oeprations in each of the country in whcih they operate Ie tesco- stores uk ireland eyripe May specialise in capital goods industry and may not be h ousehold name siemnas
38
Reasons for multinat status
Locations close to target markets- avoid transport costs, greater market orientation Locate close to sources of raw materials /corperations- eg oil mining Take advantage of low cost production facilities or geographical characteristics- flat land Take advantage of cheap labour- dyson malaysia Take advantage of skilled labour- pharma near uni cambridge, recruit from uni Low corporation tax in host country- increase retained profit- ireland alogabet Expanding markets/prodction may lead to econ of scale, decreasing ac, decrease unit cost, decrease prices, increase profit margins Longer term survival of company due to spread of markets- spreading risk may maintain when recession in one country By setting up prodcution in target market, transport costs, import tarffis and quotas may be avoided- nissan in uk avoid eu external tarrif
39
Benefits multinat
Many gov forom developed and less d wish multinat as provide employment Expirts increase injection positive multiplier Technology transfer- multinat introduce new ideas Train and educate local worjers- nissan ne greater standard of life than fordm engineers trained up to meet requirements, boost overall rpductivity Direct inward investment from multinat- nissan battery plant sunderland for new electric model gov contribute
40
Problems multinat
Regulatory capture Lack social responsibility Job displacement Trojan horse effect Tax avoidance
41
Regulatroy capture- multinsat
Multinat may pressure gov to legilsate in their favor Mondeliex internat campaign against sugar tax and more labelling
42
Lack social responsibility- multinat
Double standards May be indirectly subcontractorsor directly Primark- exploitation of labour Pollute enviroemnt- bp shell, oil spill in gulf of mexico Tax avoidance via transfer polucy- anaxon
43
Job displacement- multinat
Some multinat have no loyalty to host country and may close operations very rapidly when econ climate changes Hoover dijon fr to glasgow Uk offer large grants and financial incentive to entice fdi yet some opp cost- not spent on domestic firm
44
trojan horse effect- multinat
Over reliance on multinat by a host country displace or crowd out domestic market Leave host econ vulenerable if multinat switch countries- ie chepaer labour
45
Tax avoidance- multinat
Through transfer price agreenents Buy and sell between nat office- ie london opp more profitable and dublin office sells it Unethical as using country public goods yet not contributing Min coroporation tax (2021) 15% g20
46
Capital flows- bop lt
When multinat bring finance from their country of origin and invest in greenfield sit ein host country ie nissan factory ne, net injections multiplier Direct investment recorded in financial account of bop Once operation starts make profit, post tax profits may be reptairated to country of origin/offshore and recorded as an outflow/invisable import in current account bop Eu now rules of origin limits opp to evade tax and compenent parts sold to a tranfer company and sold tax free ie vw 1970 sbraxil Current account largely benefit multinat direct investment Uk net investment aborad with inward investment being higher outward investment- gnp via net property income from abroad- pisitive impact But reversed in recent years
47
Hot money flows on bop
Removal of foreign exchange controls by most developed econ and improve in info tecnology means huge sums of money can be moved between firm centres Multinat and foriegn may have large cashflow suplus at avrious times over the year Money can vbe invested in moving moneymarkets around world within 24 hours Move these cash suplus where can achieve highest rate of return in interest rates and excess rates- hot money flows seculation Rapid extremely volatile, may destablis eindustyr Britain exit erm in 1992 can be attributed to massive hot money flows out of uk as speculators sould pind sterling believing to be devalued
48
Organic growth
Icnrease operations and sale rev to increase net assets of business
49
Inorganic growth
Ie takeover and merger May be cheaper to take over when share prices low and weak change rate Quicker Existing customer base Vertical and horizontal already
50
Conglomerate integration
Take over unrelated business Ie sony- emi music records but electrical equipment
51
Main objectives/benefit of ffirms expansing
If firms ethical in way operate and look after interests of all stakeholders positive immage, boost slaes, increasel likely survival But free market friedman- main objective of private sector business should be to max profit of shareholders If fiems seek to min costs and max sales more efficient allocation of resources, increase innovation, decrease prices- max welfare gain society in lt Not the job of businesses to look after intersts of society and social responsiblities distract from primary role- could lead to waster of resources Free makret role of gov to put laws in place to prevent market failure to avoid exploitation of factors of production Uet even most effective regulatiures to do not protect stakeholders efforts - ie after thiadamide incident more rigerous testing Environmental protection may not be major concern
52
Methods of protectionism
Tarrif Qupta Subsidies to domestic prdocuers that export Complex admin procedures imports Complex or non uniform systems Trade embargo Boluntary export agreement
53
Tariff
Tax on imported goods Import duty, Deliberate attempt to discriminate inmports and protect home industry Can also increase gov revenue to fund public spending Increase price so switch domestic producer Yet domestic consumer lose out by paying higher price- as domestic producer also sell at higher price
54
Quotas
Physical limit on q oof good imported Physical control Limit of imports increase share of market available for domestic producers Increase price of product domestic consumer lose out But lead to gains to domestic importers as those who still import win reduced q allow higher price As buy at world supplu, sell at higher, greater profit
55
Subsidies domestic producer
Money lagrley wasted due to oppcist Although incnrease welfare producer, increase can benefit welfare gain See diagram
56
complex admin proceedures imports
Unecessarlily lagre delays as customs posts Esp posty brexit Increases costs as seen us and canada border Problem perishable goods ie fish
57
Complex/higher or non uniform standards
Cars in use diff catalytic converter Uk 3 point plug
58
Nationalistic purchasing policies by gov
Ie nhs purchase drugs even though if cheaper abroad could be imported
59
Trade embargo
Econ sanctions Ban on imports Russian oil gas Illegal drugs weapons
60
Voluntary exporting agreement
Uk with japan that they should not take uuyp more than 10% car manufacturing market in uk
61
Arguments for protectionism
All countries protect domestic industriesto some extent ie agricultire Proetction of infant industries Protection of sunset industries Strategic trade theory Proetction against dumping Protection of empoyent against cheap labour
62
Protectionism for infant industries
Developing country Poretct infant idnsurteis from established rivals in advanced econ to take adv of econ of scale ie technological managerial financial econ of scale Japan did so post ww2 with infant car industies Even devekiped econ such as uk subsidise infant indsurteis such as biotechnology idnsurty- tax breaks for science parks, rand d Wto support this for developing countries- but when stop?
63
Protectionism for sunset industries
Developed econ Minimise impact of structural econ cange- buys time to adjust , as can lead to deinstrialisation mass unemp regional decline and econ imbalance Argument for multifibre agreement protect eu from cheap textiles from asia- yet wto pressure to withdraw more quickly as most developed econ have welfare state and ecuation system to help structural unemp to accept sturctural econ change
64
Strategic trade theroyr
Krugmen Gov can create comp adv by nurturing strategically selected industry or econ security- justify protecting industries while company developing Skills gained in developing it sector or energy sector may spill over (positive externalities) to help ptehr sectors Protectionism can prevent explloitation by fair business practises Protect strategically improtant industrie-s shipbuilding defecne Proetct culurally important industries=- fr film industry, idnependent book shops
65
Protectionism against dumping
When a country produces too much of a good for domestic consumption so sold below cost price on foriegn markets Eu common agriculture policy pricing following overpricinbg of agricultural produing in eu 1980 and 70s- dumped on less developed econ China dump cheap steel eu
66
Protection of employment against cheap labour
Mass strctural unemp in developed econ by exploitation cheap leab on less developed econ where human rights abused Seen esp where minimal unions workers rights, sweat shops- yet better than subsistence farming
67
Against protectionism
Welfare losses Retaliation Props up inefficient and omnopoly prodcuers Protection redistributes income in favour of producer Counter to protection for employment against cheap labour
68
No protectionism- welfare losses
Occur due to econ ineff as countries are not specialising in porducing these gs- lowest op cost Domestic consumer pay higher prices Eu proetctionism for food process- ground coffe or cocoa powder face much higher tax than raw onese Estimated that w trump av household lost 1300 dollar per yearr= ig protectionism
69
Retailiation from protectionism
Countries who feel that their domestic industries will be harmed by protectionism are likely to retaliate Decrease world trade to detriment of all- country around world pay higher price- dynamic benefits of free trade and greater comp are lost Ie current trade war china and us- increased 0.5% against us
70
Protectionism props up inefficient and monoply producers
Do not face efficient or effectove cpm[ Many italian and fr textile firms delayed trying to compete with cheaper textile imports- went as luxury Less efficient allocation of resources
71
Protectionism redistrubutes income in favour of producer
If one country stops with free trade protectionism Increasing prices Sugger increased unemp
72
Counter to portectionism for employment against cheap labour
Structural unemp in developed econ helped by werlfare payments and acess to education and retraining Poorer working in less developed econ still better off than subsistence farming Yet also vital consumers put pressure on multinat to prevent exploitation Gov can also put pressure on less developed econ to put laws in place to protect human rights in return for trade deals
73
Terms of trade
Measrying the rate of exchange of one product for another when two countries trade Index= 100 x av index export prices/av import price index Ricardo theory of comparative advantage explains that if country specilaise in production of gs in which have comparative adv- all countries mover own ppf and gain from trade
74
Signif of changes in terms of trade
Increase terms of trade- import cheaper food, increase standard of living Weak exchange rate, icnrease imports, decrease terms of trade- makes imports more expensive
75
Explanation terms of trade
If a country can buy more imports with a given q of exports, terms of trade imporve Consumer price boom, terms of trade increases increasing export further Deterioration terms of trade- exports cheaper, imports more expansive Factors affected- exchannge rate, elasticity for demand for export
76
What happens when pattern of trade changes
More internat trade- structural econ change, areas that lose comparative adv regional decline and market shifts where competition increased- but occupational, geographical imobility fo lab factors of prduction Internat trade benefits consumers when can obtain more cheaper products and have highreal income May benefit producer who can expanc into export market or take advantage of of cheaper imports But may lose jobs structural econ change
77
Import penetration
Extent to which imports have met needs of market as % of total shares
78
How to surive internat comp
Price Product- design, durability, appearance, innovation, after sales service, reliability Promotion- brand image, ads Place- availbality distribution Jlr-high value added Bae innovative
79
Wto
Main objective is to reduce tariffs and other barriers to trade whilst also eliminating discrimination in trade Forum for multinat trade negotiations between its 164 member countries to contribute incnreasing libing standards Most favored nation pricniple applies when one country member that offers a reduction in tarrfis to another country must ofer the same reduction to all other members
80
Wto aims
Create a level playing field - firms compete on equal terms for bysiness No firm will be protected by tarrifs quotas anti comp practtises cartels or tacit agreements
81
Problems with wto
Countries jpin wto must consider effect of decreasing quotas and tarifs on bop and domestic econ as lead to sturctural eocn change Special circumstances- econ crisis, protection infant industry- may be exception Anti comp pactises in diff countries may discourage importers- despite removal tarrifs and quotas A country in wto may prefer not to offer a tarif reduction to another country as would have to offer the same reduction to all other measures May have to apply dif measures to remove proetctionism- with uraguay tooik 4 years in 90s to negotiate
82
Doha rouind of negotiations to begin nine 2001
Uet to reach a satisfcatory conclusion Iam to help develiping counrteis expandtheir trade through develiped countries ipen market to exports from developed countries Developing countreis not expected to liberate their markets to same extent Eu declared eliminating agricultural export subsidies
83
Who opposes wto
Some developing countries Envrionmental groups Antiglobalisation pg Tu in developed econ
84
Why opp to wto
Developing countreis and environmentalists concerned about wto ruling failed to protect dolphins from fishing nets or envrionmental exploitation for develiping countries to multinat such as shell Labour unions threat globalisation and structural econ change, exploitation of child and female labour
85
But why sholdnt oppose wto
Not trading with developing countries confides many poorest countries to remain poor Countries ngo and media can out pressure on retailers and multinat to ensure good conditions along supply chain
86
Wealth- wto opposition
All countries can benefit from speiclaition and free trade Inequlity on gini cooeficient drceasing as living standards increaein china and india But tirckle down doenst happen increasing inequality in developed en Esp not african countrieis sucha s congo Judicial failure/corruption- contracts not upheld, no one rent land properly, intellectual rpoerty copied, exploiation of workers- rulee of law nt enforced War- spnedt on weapons not pubilic goods, destorus productive capacity
87
Trade agreements
Can involve two ountries reducing tarrifs on each others goods or perhaps reducing bureacracy by simplifying import/export procedures
88
Trade liberalisation
Might inivolve creating free trade areas Creates larger amrket, greater access to raw materials, more comp Should lead to lower unit costs as firms are able to gain econ of sclae
89
Examples of regional trade agreements
Eu Usmca- us mexico canada
90
Free trade area
Members eliminate trade barriers between themselves but each country cant operate their own barriers against non members
91
Customs union
Members eliminate trade barriers between themselves and establish uniform barriers against non members and common external tarrif
92
Common market
A customs union ytat also provides for rthe free movement of labour and capital across own borders Eg european single market
93
Econ union
Free movement of goods, money and workers Integrate monetary and fiscal policies (not necessarily shared currency- that is monetary union)
94
Trade creation
Shift in domestic econ spending from a higher cost domestic sourec to a lower cost partiner source within customs union As a result no tarrifs in intra uiinon trade Ie uk families get insurance from chepaer fr rather than uk sources
95
Impact of trade creation
Increase consumer suprlys Income effect- frees up inocme for othe rg&s- esp if domestic Firms may benefit cheaper raw amterials compenent parts within customs union- ie western european car manufacturer can get tcheaper galss or rubber tyres from within Trade creation should stimilate an increased intra eu trade within cutsoms union and efficient utilisation of scare resources Gains in producer and consuemr welfare
96
Diagram trade creation
Like qupota one with lower for eu than world suppluy Abcd producer gain B+d net welfare gain
97
Trade diversion
Shift in domestic consumer spending from low cost world source to eu partner source higher cost Tarrifs mean importing expensive to Maning more expensive, high cost producer and consumer Welfare loss Trade diversino likely with agirculture and processed foods
98
Diagram trade diversion
Tarrifs A+b welfare loss C= rev tarrif to eu
99
Objectives of eu
Promote free trade- consumers and frirms should purchase from most efficient supplier within eu Specialisation increases output to higher incomes and rising living standards Firms expand by selling to larger markets taking advantage of of econ of scale Greater comp between firms within eu- low prices ect Free trade should enhance allocative and productive efficiency
100
European single market
Common market Free movement of factors of production- largely capital and labour As wel as eliminating barriers to trade such as tariffs and quoteas Removal all border controls Goods produced witin have same technical standards- min health and safety environmental standards but less standardisation with services market
101
Structure of eu
Bodies inc creating european policy Council of ministors- made yp of heads of states or their reps- unanimous decision makiing European parliament composed elected members like hol- rubber stamp and ammend Eu commisoners are appt bu the gov of member countires- propose policy and are responsible with carrying out once ratified by council of ministers and eu parliament
102
Eu competition commissoner
Rresponsible for creating a level plaing field on which the effiicent workings of single market depends Objective to encourage competition- make buisness behavoir as close to perfect comp as possibel
103
What does eu comp commissioner look into
Collusive aggeements between suposedly independent competition organisations Power exeryted by firms with degree monopoly power Distortions of market resulting from gov subsisies legal restrictionas and purchasing policies
104
Powers of eu competition commissioner
Investigate compliants Initiate complaints Search and size documents and records Produce a reaosned decision on its findings which can be carried out by nat gov or commisisoner itself Impose a fine of up to 10% annual business turnover
105
Examples of powers eu comp comisoner
Coca cola premises in ger austria and denamrj- ability to demoniat position by making retailers stock full range of coca cola- full line forcing and offers loyalty ddiscounsts that rwuire distributers to seell less competitor products Interbrew/inbev- producer stella artois- dominant belgian beer brew raided of allegations of practises that excluded competing beers from bars Ba fined 6.8 million euros for operating loyalty shceme that discourage travle agents from rival airlines ickets Fr gov chalenged over subsidies to bank credit lyonnaise Apple fined $14bn nfor sweetheart tax deal with irish gov which eu comcluded resulted in state subsidy
106
Limitations or problems with eu comp commisoer
V slow investigating and coming to conclusions V diff comm to enforce deciisons on nat gov- serveral countries have notorious record for ignoring eu rulings Eu comp comm tries to control retrains on trade by businesses while many gov want to lok after some rtad indisutries to proetct jobs and promote nat pride and own political dutrie Trade off- country emp and efffective comp In theory eu single market and single currency should lead to smae price of goods across eu yet vat fidd- challenging price harmonisation If firms are operating business agreements or joint ventures dont consider harm to consumer can notify eu comp comm- asking exemption from ruling but problem idf later challenge
107
Benefits brexit
Free to negotiate trade delas No longer transfer funds to eu to subsidise farmers Gained fishing righst No longer eu emp legislatin Fiinancial services sector Own targets green poer generatiuon Free movement lab Free subsisdies
108
Benefit brexit- free to negotiate trade deals
Since leaving eu singed trade deals 71 countries and 1 eu But majority simply rollover deals copying terms of when in eu Despite free trade deal eu, signif more barrierst o trade than when uk memebr of eu and single market- complex customes forms, uk financial firms lost their ‘passport’ to trade acorss eu without restirctions
109
Benefit brexit - no longer transfer funss to eu tyo sibsidise farmers
Treaty savung up 8bn - uk recived 3.5bn for farmers Food oculd become cheaper in uk but famrers lose subsideis Under wto rules cuountries may reduce import barriers as long as dont beneift some over others- Yet stilll aas eu does too highe comon external tarrif on agriculture- leading to trade diversion
110
Brexit benefits gained fishing rights
May be better able to protect fishinhg sites as icelnend did so outside ey Exluding eu fisherman from waters protects fishing righst
111
Brexit benefits- no longer emp legislation
Uk could scrap working time directive (no more 48h per week unless volunteer Abandon agency workers directive which gives temp workers swme rights enjoyed by permenant staff Free to remove rules on health ssafety maternity and paternity levae
112
Benefits brexit financial services sector
Free from obligation to abide by ever changing eu rules 2022 gov pans of edinburgh reforms further deregulation- scrap cap abankers nss, lure back more hedge funds
113
Benefits brexit= own targets green power generated
Could mean cheaper power but could undermine eu and global initiatives to reduce co2 emissions
114
Benefits brexit- no free movement labour
fewer migrants form eu Reduce pressure on public services esp se But led to labour shortage and minimal labour displacement at time
115
Costs brexit
Single market Customes Decrease exports Financial services Decrease gdp Research projects science
116
Single market- costs brexit
Not frictionless trade and freedom of movement of factors of production
117
Costs brexit- customs
Uk exports customes frmms- red tape- increase cost Delays discourage some su costoms buy british goods- uk farmers producing shellfish and salmon perishable goods Whilst nissan and toyota agree remain- honda closed operations in eu, bmw no loonger pfouce electric mini in uk
118
Costs brexit- exports
Down 14% in 2021
119
Financial services cost of brexit
Lost direct access eu and passport rights which allowed major global banks to serve acorss eu from britain Around 7,000 financial service staffa nd apporx 1.3trn on assets lost to eu
120
Cost brexit- gdp
4% fall 40bn lossu k gov tax rev
121
Cost brexit- exclusive research projects
Ie science Ie horizzon european innovation programme and galieo project Lead to brain drain and potentially damage uk econ in lt due to lack innobveation But uk gov announce extra 15bj of dunss for uk based science projects
122
Discuss econ arguments for and against trade protection
Intro- define protectionsism, example tarrif quota Benefits free trade- loss of tarrif Krugman strategic trade theory Retaliation Exploitation of lab Loa- limited protection with strategic tade thoery
123
Discuss econ arguments for and against trade protectionsim- benefits free trade
Net welfare gain free trade- diagram- choice market, gainning export marets ect Net welfare loss result import tarrif or quota
124
Discuss econ arguments for and against trade protectionsim- krugman strategic trade theory
Protectionsim justified as gov create comparative advantage than nurturoing strategicc selected industry Proetct infant and sunset industries Protect against dumping, strategic or culturally impoportant industry
125
Discuss econ arguments for and against trade protectionsim- krugman strategic trade theory- con
Wto temporary protection of infant (china) and sunset (multifibre agreement) provided gradually lifetd as industry more comp or econ developed more comp industry to replace those in structural decline Proetct against dumping justfied providing can be proved- but diff Portect strategic or culturallyy important eval case by case
126
Discuss econ arguments for and against trade protectionsim- retaliation
Trade war-china and us, us and eu 1930s proetct deppen depression Supply side policies target welfare policies may he;p to develop and econ adapt more effectively to structural eocn change rtahe rthan resorting to proetctionism Eductaiona nd training by encourage occupational mobility and regiuonal policu with geographic immobility Flexibility programme denmark v effective and copied
127
Discuss econ arguments for and against trade protectionsim retaliation no
Many ledcs cannot affort welfare and limited education provision infrastructure not position to compete with mroe comp econ Protection measures with strategic trade theory may be jsutrifed
128
Discuss econ arguments for and against trade protectionsim- exploitation
Ie multinat sweatshops in developed countries Yet cont freee trade but ngos and media highlight human and property rights- thus consumers do not have assymetircis info Put pressure on retailiers and multiat to ensure integrity of suppyl change Important to reach and enforce international agreements on proetction of property rights and human rights International greements on tax avoidance reduce increasing global ineuality associated free trade Nike accuseed exploitation but improved
129
Factors to imporve internat comp
Supply side policies Well educated, higly skiled workforce Infrasturcture Investment r and d Comp markets Low tax Deregulate Low stable inflation Stale exhcnage rates
130
Mneumonic for benefits free trade
Svectciie