Global resource consumption and security Flashcards
Define absolute poverty
Is the lack of money for basic needs: food, shelter and clothing.
Define relative poverty
Is when people have inadequate financial resources and thus fall below the prevailing standards of living in a particular society.
Define income poverty
Is when family income is below the nationally established poverty line (threshold).
What is poverty and how is it generally assessed?
Poverty is a broad, multifaceted concept that includes economic, social, political, and cultural elements. It is generally assessed on a family level, not an individual level. Poverty can be categorized as absolute poverty, which focuses solely on the economic component, or relative poverty, which incorporates social, political, and cultural elements.
How does the income poverty threshold differ between countries?
The income poverty threshold is significantly higher in High-Income Countries (HICs) than in Low-Income Countries (LICs) due to the higher cost of living in HICs. To account for these differences, the World Bank sets a global poverty line based on purchasing power parity (PPP).
What is the World Bank’s global poverty line and how has it changed?
The World Bank’s global poverty line is used to define extreme poverty. In 2008, it was set at US$1.25 per day. In 2015, it was raised to US$1.90 per day. Anyone living below this line is considered to be in extreme poverty.
Describe the distribution of extreme poverty in 2000-2007.
Most High-Income Countries (HICs) had a very low percentage (under 2%) of their population living in extreme poverty. In contrast, much of Africa had very high proportions, with most of East Africa having 61-80% of their population living in extreme poverty.
What progress has been made in global poverty reduction?
Significant progress has been made through the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The proportion of people living in extreme poverty halved between 1990 and 2010. However, over 80% of the global population still lives in countries where the income gap is widening.
What were the key achievements of the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) regarding poverty reduction between 1990 and 2015?
- The proportion of people in LICs living in extreme poverty fell from nearly 50% to 14%, exceeding the target.
- The actual number of people in extreme poverty fell from 1.9 billion to 836 million.
- The number of people with access to over US$4 per day increased from 18% to 50%, indicating the growth of a new ‘global middle class’.
What is the main goal of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) regarding poverty?
Goal 1 of the SDGs aims to “End poverty in all its forms everywhere” by 2030. This goal includes several targets such as eradicating extreme poverty, halving the number of people living in poverty, and implementing social protection systems.
What were some key poverty statistics when the SDGs took over from the MDGs in 2016?
- 836 million people were still living in extreme poverty
- One in five people in LICs lived on less than US$1.25 a day
- Sub-Saharan Africa and southern Asia were at highest risk
- Around 10% of the world’s families were living on less than US$1.90 a day
- 18,000 children died every day from poverty-related causes
What are the main characteristics of the global middle class?
The global middle class typically consists of non-manual workers, middle management, and small business owners. They earn more than the working class but less than the upper middle and upper classes. A key characteristic is having approximately 33% of their income as discretionary, available for consumer goods or improving health care and education opportunities.
How does the growth of the middle class vary globally, and what factors contribute to this growth in emerging economies?
Growth is uneven globally. Emerging economies, especially in Asia, are witnessing an explosion of the middle class, while North America has seen a contraction. Growth in emerging economies is largely due to:
- Cheap labor producing cheap goods
- Decreased reliance on subsistence agriculture
- Rapid urbanization and industrialization
- These factors lead to rapid productivity increases when benefiting from international trade.
How does the middle class contribute to economic and social change?
The middle class is considered critical for economic and social development:
- It can drive growth by increasing consumption and domestic demand for goods
- It tends to be educated, leading to more participation in the political process
- It pushes for inclusive growth and social change
- In countries like South Korea, a large middle class (over 50% of the population) allowed a shift from export-driven growth to domestic consumption
Define resource/natural resources/natural capital
Anything that the Earth provides that is useful to humans (e.g. fossil fuels or plants).
Define non-renewable
The natural resources that humans are using at a rate that exceeds their replacement (e.g. fossil fuels).
Define renewable
The natural resources that humans are using at a rate that allows for their replacement (e.g. plants and animals).
Define ecological footprint
The area of land and water required to support a given human population at a particular standard of living. It takes into account the area of land and water required to provide all the resources needed by the population, and assimilate all waste.
Define biocapacity
The biological capacity of an area/region/country to generate the resources and absorb the waste of a given population.
What is resource consumption?
Resource consumption generally refers to the use of non-renewable resources such as fossil fuels, metal ores, and stone. It may also include renewable resources like water, soil, and biomass, which can become non-renewable if poorly managed. Resource consumption can be measured for individual resources or groups of resources, but a more comprehensive measure is the ecological footprint.
What is the ecological footprint (EF) and what does it measure?
The ecological footprint is a model used to estimate the demands that a human population places on the environment. It can be measured at any scale, from global to individual. The EF considers two aspects:
- Biocapacity: the Earth’s bioproductive land and sea, including forests, cropland, pastures, and fisheries.
- Demand: the amount of bioproductive land needed to provide resources, space for infrastructure, and absorb waste.
What was the global ecological footprint in 2010 according to WWF’s Living Planet Report 2014?
In 2010, the global ecological footprint was 18.1 billion global hectares (gha), which translates to 2.6 gha per person. However, the Earth’s biocapacity was only 1.7 gha per person, resulting in a shortfall of 0.9 gha per person.
What are the main aspects of the ecological footprint?
The main aspects of the ecological footprint include:
- Energy
- Travel
- Goods
- Settlements and infrastructure
- Food and fibre
- Forests
- Seafood
How do energy, travel, and goods impact the ecological footprint?
- Energy impact: Source of electricity generation, emissions controls, energy-efficient devices, and energy-saving measures.
- Travel impact: Public vs. private transport, fuel type, emissions controls, and air travel.
- Goods impact: Number of gadgets, built-in obsolescence, frequency of device replacement.
- Lower EF: Renewable energy, limited car ownership, alternative fuels, strict emissions policies, energy-efficient products, recycled goods.
- Higher EF: Fossil fuels, high car ownership, petrol vehicles, limited emissions policies, excessive air travel, non-energy-efficient products.
How do settlements and infrastructure affect the ecological footprint?
Settlements and infrastructure impact the ecological footprint by:
- Reducing space for crops, pasture, and forests
- Limiting the natural environment’s ability to deal with waste products
- Negatively impacting natural ecosystems and biodiversity
- High-density living (e.g., high-rise apartments or extended families in one house) generally has a lower ecological footprint compared to low-density living (e.g., single-family detached houses).
How does food and fibre production impact the ecological footprint?
Food and fibre production affects the ecological footprint through:
- Use of cropland and pastures for food and non-food items (e.g., biofuels, textiles, pharmaceuticals)
- Dietary choices (plant-based vs. meat-based diets)
Calorie intake
- Food miles (locally grown vs. imported produce)
- Lower EF: Plant-based protein, low calorie intake, locally grown produce
- Higher EF: Meat- and dairy-based diet, high calorie intake, imported food
How do forests contribute to the ecological footprint?
Forests impact the ecological footprint by:
- Providing timber and paper
- Sequestering carbon dioxide, which slows global climate change
- Affecting the EF through deforestation or reforestation rates
- Influencing the EF based on paper and timber usage rates
- Countries with high deforestation rates tend to have an increased EF, while those engaged in reforestation can decrease their EF.
What is the role of seafood in the ecological footprint?
Seafood contributes to the ecological footprint through:
- Wild catches from seas and fresh water (many facing serious problems)
- Farmed fish production
There is ongoing debate about the relative benefits of wild catch versus farmed fish in terms of their impact on the ecological footprint.
What are the different types of footprints within the overall ecological footprint?
The main types of footprints within the overall ecological footprint are:
- Carbon footprint: Total amount of greenhouse gas emissions caused by an individual, city, event, flight, or country
- Water footprint: Amount of water in your EF, including direct and indirect water use
- Food footprint: Measure of how food intake impacts the EF, considering land use for food production, carbon emissions from food production, and sea area needed for fishing
What is the carbon footprint and how does it vary globally?
The carbon footprint is the total greenhouse gas emissions caused by an entity. In specific contexts, the United States produces approximately 15.5 metric tons of CO2 per capita annually, compared to India’s 1.9 metric tons. China, as the world’s largest emitter, produces around 7.1 metric tons per capita. The carbon footprint varies dramatically between High-Income Countries (HICs) like the United States and Low-Income Countries (LICs) like Bangladesh, reflecting differences in industrial development, energy infrastructure, and consumption patterns.
How does the water footprint differ between countries?
The water footprint varies significantly globally. For instance, the United States has an average water footprint of 2,842 cubic meters per person annually, while India’s is 1,089 cubic meters. A specific case study is California, where agriculture consumes approximately 80% of the state’s water resources. In contrast, countries like Israel have developed advanced water-efficient agricultural technologies, reducing their water footprint through drip irrigation and water recycling techniques.
What is the water footprint?
The water footprint represents the amount of water in your ecological footprint. This includes both direct water use, such as for drinking and washing, and indirect water use, such as the water required to produce food and other goods you consume.
What is the food footprint?
The food footprint measures how food intake impacts the ecological footprint. It takes into account the land use for food production, carbon emissions from food production, and the sea area needed for fishing. The food and fibre component has more than doubled in 52 years, largely due to population growth and shifts towards meat- and dairy-based diets.
How has the carbon component of the ecological footprint changed over time?
The carbon component of the ecological footprint has shown the most dramatic increase, quadrupling over a 52-year period. It now takes up the largest proportion of the overall ecological footprint. This significant increase is due to various factors related to energy production, transport, manufacturing, agriculture, and deforestation.
What trends are observed in the food and fibre component of the ecological footprint?
The food and fibre component of the ecological footprint has shown a significant increase, more than doubling over a 52-year period. This increase is attributed to global population growth and changing dietary patterns, particularly the shift towards more meat- and dairy-based diets in many parts of the world.
How has the forest component of the ecological footprint changed?
The forest component of the ecological footprint shows the lowest percentage increase, at approximately 50% over the observed period. This relatively lower increase is likely due to reforestation programs in many High-Income Countries (HICs), which help to counteract increases in paper and timber product consumption.
What trends are seen in the fishing grounds component of the ecological footprint?
The ecological footprint of fishing grounds has increased by over 100%. This substantial increase is due to changing diets, population growth, and increased demand for fish. Additionally, the rise of fish farming, seen as a way to improve protein intake in Middle-Income Countries (MICs) such as the Philippines and India, has contributed to this trend.
What does the built-up land component of the ecological footprint include?
The built-up land component of the ecological footprint includes actual buildings as well as infrastructure such as communication networks and power-generation plants. This component represents the direct land use for human settlements and supporting structures.
How does the food footprint vary between developed and developing countries, and what specific examples illustrate this?
The food footprint varies significantly between developed and developing countries. For instance, the average American has a food footprint of about 1.1 global hectares, while in India it’s around 0.4 global hectares. A specific case study is Brazil, where the expansion of soybean cultivation for global markets has led to deforestation in the Amazon, increasing the country’s food footprint. In contrast, countries like the Netherlands have developed innovative vertical farming techniques, reducing land use and transportation emissions, thus lowering their food footprint despite high population density.
How has the carbon component of the ecological footprint changed over time, and what specific regions show the most dramatic changes?
The carbon component of the ecological footprint has quadrupled over a 52-year period. China exemplifies this trend, with its carbon footprint increasing by about 400% between 1990 and 2016 due to rapid industrialization. In contrast, the United Kingdom has reduced its carbon footprint by about 40% since 1990, largely due to a shift from coal to natural gas and renewable energy sources. The city of Shenzhen in China presents an interesting case study, having transitioned its entire public bus fleet to electric vehicles, significantly reducing its local carbon footprint.
What trends are observed in the food and fibre component of the ecological footprint, and how do these manifest in specific countries?
The food and fibre component has more than doubled over 52 years. In the United States, the average meat consumption is about 124 kg per person annually, contributing significantly to its food footprint. Conversely, India, with its largely vegetarian population, has a much lower meat-related footprint at about 4 kg per person. Brazil presents a unique case, where the expansion of cattle ranching in the Amazon rainforest has led to significant deforestation, increasing both the country’s carbon and food footprints simultaneously.
How has the forest component of the ecological footprint changed, and what specific countries demonstrate contrasting trends?
The forest component shows the lowest increase at approximately 50%. Costa Rica provides a positive example, increasing its forest cover from 21% to 52% between 1987 and 2013 through successful reforestation programs. In contrast, Indonesia lost about 15.8 million hectares of forest between 2000 and 2012, primarily due to palm oil plantation expansion. Finland presents an interesting case study, maintaining 75% forest cover while supporting a significant forestry industry through sustainable management practices.
What trends are seen in the fishing grounds component of the ecological footprint, and how do these manifest in specific regions?
The fishing grounds component has increased by over 100%. Japan, with its high seafood consumption (about 46 kg per capita annually), has a significant fishing footprint. In contrast, landlocked countries like Ethiopia have much lower fishing footprints. The South China Sea presents a complex case study, where overfishing and territorial disputes have led to depleted fish stocks, affecting the ecological footprints of multiple Southeast Asian countries. Meanwhile, Norway has developed one of the world’s most sustainable fishing industries through strict quota systems and advanced aquaculture techniques.
How does the built-up land component of the ecological footprint vary across different urban areas globally?
The built-up land component includes buildings and infrastructure. Hong Kong, with its dense urban development, has a high built-up land footprint relative to its size, with 25% of its land developed. In contrast, Brasília, the planned capital of Brazil, was designed with large green spaces, resulting in a lower built-up land footprint. Singapore presents an innovative case study, implementing vertical gardens and green roofs to offset its built-up land footprint, with a goal to make 80% of its buildings green-certified by 2030.
What is Peru’s ecological footprint and biocapacity as of 2013?
Peru’s ecological footprint in 2013 was 2.3 gha/person, with a biocapacity of 3.9 gha/person. This resulted in an ecological surplus of 1.6 gha/person. However, Peru’s biocapacity has been steadily declining since 1961, indicating potential unsustainable practices and environmental damage.
What are the key demographic facts about Peru?
Peru’s demographic facts include:
- Crude Birth Rate: 18 births/1000 people
- Crude Death Rate: 6 deaths/1000 people
- Population growth rate: 1.2%
- Population doubling time: 58 years
- Urban population: 78.6% with 1.7% urbanization rate
- Population without access to clean water: 13.3%
- Population without access to sanitation: 23.8%
- Population below poverty line: 25.8%
What natural resources contribute to Peru’s ecological capacity?
Peru has abundant natural resources, including:
- Minerals: copper, silver, gold, iron ore, coal, phosphate, potash
- Energy sources: petroleum, natural gas, hydro-power
- Biological resources: timber, fish
- Natural vegetation: tropical rainforest providing ample water supply