Gender and Communication Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Theory of Otto Jesperson

A

-1922 - Stated that women:

  • Talk more than men
  • Link sentences with “and” because they’re more emotional than grammatical
  • Use many intensifiers such as “so”
  • Use adverbs too much and tend towards hyperbole
  • Use half-finished sentences as they speak without thinking more than men
  • Have a smaller vocabulary than men
  • Prefer indirect expressions
  • “Shrink from coarse expressions”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Criticisms of Otto Jesperson

A
  • Didn’t conduct any studies
  • Based his work largely on fiction and literature
  • Quoted others who didn’t do any studies either
  • Falls under Deficit Theory – claims “male” language is the norm and “female” language is different and therefore deficient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gender Theory of Robin Lackoff

A

-1975 - Stated that women:

  • Use hedges such as “sort of” and “kind of”
  • Are excessively polite
  • Speak in a tone equal to the use of italics
  • Use empty adjectives
  • Use direct quotation more so than men
  • Have a special lexicon, eg. use more words for things like colours
  • Turn declarative statements into questions by raising the pitch of their voices at the end of a sentence
  • Use hypercorrect grammar
  • Use “wh-“ imperatives such as “why” and “who”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Robin Lackoff’s Types of Prestige

A
  • Overt Prestige: striving for something that is recognised by society in an open way
  • Covert Prestige: striving for recognition and credit from a more closed and subtle group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Criticisms of Robin Lackoff’s Gender Theory

A
  • Dated socialised concepts (1975)
  • Observation with no real evidence (similar to Jesperson)
  • Still emphasises “male” language as “normative”
  • However, her view is that of a descriptivist (describes language patterns / evolutions / history) – is not setting rules but mainly explaining observations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Zimmerman and West

A
  • 1975
  • Interruptions in mixed-sex conversations are evenly distributed among the participants
  • 96% of interruptions are from men and only 4% from women in mixed-sex conversations.
  • These statistics were evidenced using only 31 segments of conversation and a lot of them were between intimate mixed-sex partners
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fishman

A
  • 1990
  • The amount of time a man will speak in mixed-sex conversations is twice as long as the average time a woman does
  • Women often have to do the “shit work” (moving along the conversation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Theory of Keith and Shuttleworth (Women)

A

-2000

  • Talk more than men and talk too much
  • Are more polite
  • Are indecisive
  • Nag and gossip
  • Ask more questions
  • Support each other (more cooperative)
  • More likely to use “we” than “I”
  • Use more adjectives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Theory of Keith and Shuttleworth (Men)

A

-2000

  • Swear more
  • Don’t talk about emotions
  • Talk about sport more
  • Talk about women and machines in the same way
  • Insult each other frequently
  • Are competitive in conversation
  • Dominate mixed conversation
  • Use more imperatives
  • Interrupt more
  • Speak with authority even if they don’t have any
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  • 1990
  • The amount of time a man will speak in mixed-sex conversations is twice as long as the average time a woman does
  • Women often have to do the “shit work” (moving along the conversation)
A

Fishman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  • 1975
  • Interruptions in mixed-sex conversations are evenly distributed among the participants
  • 96% of interruptions are from men and only 4% from women in mixed-sex conversations.
  • These statistics were evidenced using only 31 segments of conversation and a lot of them were between intimate mixed-sex partners
A

Zimmerman and West

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  • Dated socialised concepts (1975)
  • Observation with no real evidence (similar to Jesperson)
  • Still emphasises “male” language as “normative”
  • However, her view is that of a descriptivist (describes language patterns / evolutions / history) – is not setting rules but mainly explaining observations
A

Criticisms of Robin Lackoff’s Gender Theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

-1975 - Stated that women:

  • Use hedges such as “sort of” and “kind of”
  • Are excessively polite
  • Speak in a tone equal to the use of italics
  • Use empty adjectives
  • Use direct quotation more so than men
  • Have a special lexicon, eg. use more words for things like colours
  • Turn declarative statements into questions by raising the pitch of their voices at the end of a sentence
  • Use hypercorrect grammar
  • Use “wh-“ imperatives such as “why” and “who”
A

Gender Theory of Robin Lackoff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

-1922 - Stated that women:

  • Talk more than men
  • Link sentences with “and” because they’re more emotional than grammatical
  • Use many intensifiers such as “so”
  • Use adverbs too much and tend towards hyperbole
  • Use half-finished sentences as they speak without thinking more than men
  • Have a smaller vocabulary than men
  • Prefer indirect expressions
  • “Shrink from coarse expressions”
A

Theory of Otto Jesperson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Julia Stanley - 1973

A
  • There are around 200 terms for sexually promiscuous females and only 20 for males
  • There are more words in the English language relating to male roles than female roles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Julia Stanley - 1977

A

Marked female forms create negative semantics because the modification makes the term sound unequal or different (represents the female as an “other”)

17
Q

Marked expressions

A
  • The act of marking suggests deviation or difference from the norm, which is the unmarked term
  • Lexical terms that denote females are more often marked to differentiate them from those that denote males
18
Q

Generic masculine

A

When male pronouns are used to refer to both genders (eg. “zeitgeist”)

19
Q

Sarah Mills - 1995 - Semantic derogation

A

Some paired words have connotations that are unequal or strongly negative for the female lexene (eg. “bachelor” and “spinster”)

20
Q

Margaret Talbot - 1992 -“Synthetic Sisterhood”

A

In trying to create empowerment for a female reader, the media can also unintentionally reinforce negative female stereotypes

21
Q

Perjoration

A

Semantic deterioration - connotations become negative over time

22
Q
  • There are around 200 terms for sexually promiscuous females and only 20 for males
  • There are more words in the English language relating to male roles than female roles
A

Julia Stanley - 1973

23
Q

Marked female forms create negative semantics because the modification makes the term sound unequal or different (represents the female as an “other”)

A

Julia Stanley - 1977

24
Q
  • The act of marking suggests deviation or difference from the norm, which is the unmarked term
  • Lexical terms that denote females are more often marked to differentiate them from those that denote males
A

Marked expressions

25
Q

When male pronouns are used to refer to both genders (eg. “zeitgeist”)

A

Generic masculine

26
Q

Some paired words have connotations that are unequal or strongly negative for the female lexene (eg. “bachelor” and “spinster”)

A

Sarah Mills - 1995 - Semantic derogation

27
Q

In trying to create empowerment for a female reader, the media can also unintentionally reinforce negative female stereotypes

A

Margaret Talbot - 1992 -“Synthetic Sisterhood”

28
Q

Semantic deterioration - connotations become negative over time

A

Perjoration