Gen Paeds, ED Flashcards
Crying/Colic - bg
- Background
a. Crying is normal physiological behaviour in young infants
b. Crying starts at 2 weeks of age – peaks at 2 months of age – resolves at 4-5 months
i. 6 - 8 weeks age = baby cries on average 2 - 3 per 24 hours
c. Excessive crying is defined as crying >3 hours/day for >3 days/week (Wessel’s criteria) termed colic (outdated)
i. Excessive crying of unknown cause
ii. Infants <3 months
d. Infants with colic are well and thriving
e. There is usually no identifiable medical problem
f. Associated adverse outcomes
i. Increased risk of PND
ii. Early weaning
iii. Multiple formula changes
iv. Antireflux problems and OTC medication
v. Shaken baby syndrome - Infant sleep
a. Average sleep requirements
i. At birth: 16 hours
ii. At 2 - 3 months: 15 hours
iii. A 6 week-old baby generally becomes tired after being awake for 1.5 hours
iv. A 3 month-old baby generally becomes tired after being awake for 2 hours
b. “Usual” sleep pattersn
i. First week home = sleep feed sleep feed
ii. More night sleep from 3 weeks
iii. Consolidation by 12 weeks – ‘sleeping through’ ie block of sleep lasting 8 hours median age 3 months
iv. Normal to feed overnight until 6 months of age
c. Infants sleep cycle
i. 20-40 minute sleep cycle (vs. 90 minutes in adults)
ii. How you fall asleep is how you want to go back to sleep – sleep association eg. feeding, rocked, dummy
iii. Babies have more REM sleep (cf. adults) – sleep is more restless
d. Infant sleep problems
i. Night waking, difficulty sleeping, or both – affect 30-45%
ii. Associated outcomes - Double-triple risk of PND
- Poorer maternal physical functioning
- Costly to treat
Crying/Colic - sx
- Clinical manifestations
a. Crying develops in the early weeks of life and peaks around 6-8 weeks of age
b. Usually worse in late afternoon or evening but may occur at any time
c. May last several hours
d. Infant may draw up legs as if in pain, but NO evidence that colic is attributable to an intestinal problem or wind
e. Usually improves by 3 - 4 months of age - The tired baby
a. Tired signs = jerky movements, frowning, grizzling, crying
i. Often misread as boredom, hunger
b. Rough guide
i. Infants aged 5-6 weeks after 1.5 hours
ii. Infants aged 12 weeks after 2 hours
c. Older babies = clumsiness, clinginess, grizzling, crying, demands for constant attention, boredom with toys, fussiness with food
d. Managing tired baby
i. Into cot awake
ii. Pat/stroke until quiet but NOT asleep
iii. Re-settle at 2 minute intervals in young baby <6 months
iv. Consider wrapping +/- dummy - Red flags
a. Sudden onset of irritability and crying should not be diagnosed as colic; a specific cause is usually present
b. The maternal and family psychosocial state must be taken into account
i. Maternal post-natal depression may be a factor in presentation
ii. Note that excessive crying is the most proximal risk factor for Shaken Baby Syndrome
c. Suspect cow milk / soy protein allergy if
i. Vomiting / blood or mucus in diarrhoea / poor weight gain / family history in first degree relative / signs of atopy (eczema / wheezing) / significant feeding problems (especially worsening with time)
ii. Gastro-oesophageal reflux is diagnosed
iii. Lactose malabsorption is diagnosed in formula-fed babies
Crying/colic - aetiology
- Aetiology
a. Non-organic causes (90%)
i. Overtired = suspect if the infant’s total sleep duration per 24 hours falls more than an hour short of the “average” for their age
ii. Hungry = this is more likely if a mother reports her baby has frequent feeds (ie < 3 hourly), poor weight gain and inadequate milk supply
iii. ‘Difficult’ temperament
iv. Delay in neuromaturation - Infants vary in maturation of self-regulation and self-soothing
- Infants respond differently to
a. Internal factors eg. gut spasm
b. External factors eg. loud noises
v. Sub-optimal parent-infant relationship
b. Organic causes (10%)
i. Allergy – cow’s milk protein, soy protein
ii. GIT problem – GOR, bowel spasm
iii. Lactose intolerance
iv. Neurological – early sign of CP - Acute causes of crying
a. Urinary tract infection
b. Otitis media
c. Raised intracranial pressure
d. Hair tourniquet of fingers / toes
e. Corneal foreign body / abrasion
f. Incarcerated inguinal hernia
Organic causes of crying/colic - CMPA/soy
a. Food allergy
i. Immediate onset (<2 hours) – vomiting, diarrhoea, rash
ii. Delayed onset (up to 72 hours) – vomiting, diarrhoea
iii. Atopic disease in 50% at presentation
iv. Cause of reflux and oesophagitis
b. Cow’s milk protein/ soy protein allergy
i. Both can be found in human breast milk - goat milk protein is as allergenic as cow milk protein
ii. Usually a manifestation of delayed (non-IgE mediated) reactions
iii. Clinical manifestations
1. Usually colicky crying and 1 or more of
a. Blood or mucous in bowel actions
b. Poor weight gain
c. Eczema
d. Vomiting
e. Family history of 1st degree relative with food allergy
2. Other manifestations
a. Signs of atopy (eczema/wheezing)
b. Significant feeding problems
iv. Management
1. Formula fed
a. Extensively hydrolysed (eg. Apatmil, Pepti Junior, Alfare, Allerpro) - needs consultation with allergist/immunologist/paediatrician/gastroenterologist
b. Amino acid based (eg. Neocate, Elecare)
c. Add golden syrup or vanilla
2. Breast fed
a. Eliminate all cow’s milk product
b. Calcium supplement for mother
3. Trial 2 weeks – if after 2 weeks of extensively hydrolysed then 2 weeks of amino acid formula they do not respond; can cease trial
Organic causes crying/colic - reflux
i. Key points
1. No causal relationship between GORD and infant crying and irritability has been demonstrated
2. “Silent reflux” (reflux without vomiting) is an unlikely cause of infant crying
3. The duration of daily crying is unlikely to reflect the severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux
4. GORD may be secondary to cow milk / soy protein intolerance
ii. Clinical manifestations
1. Vomiting >5x per day
2. Feeding difficulty
iii. Management
1. Ranitidine and omeprazole have not been shown to be effective in reducing crying
2. Anti-reflux medication to manage persistent infant irritability is not recommended
3. Side effects
a. Increased risk of pneumonia
b. Gastroenteritis
c. Later fractures – dose response
d. Allergy
Organic causes crying/colic - lactose intolerance/overload
i. Not true allergy
ii. Primary lactose intolerance is extremely rare
iii. Clinical manifestations
1. Frothy, watery diarrhoea
2. Perianal excoriation
iv. Cause
1. Breastfed – frequent feeding, frequently changing sides
2. Formula fed – mucosal injury of the GIT secondary to cow milk/ soy protein allergy
v. Diagnosis
1. Faecal reducing substances ≥0.5% and pH < 5.0
2. Confirmed by clinical response to lactose-free formula
3. Lactose hydrogen breath test if available
vi. Management
1. Breastfed = commonly functional lactose overload (high lactose content in foremilk)
a. Empty entire breast – avoid frequently switching sides
b. Feed less frequently (>3 hours)
c. Lactase treated milk (no evidence Cochrane)
d. Lactase tablets (4-12 drops)
2. Formula fed = consider change to lactose free or extensively hydrolysed
Colic/crying - ix/rx
- Investigations - typical hx and ex requires no ix
a. Stool reducing substances and pH (if indicated)
b. Acute crying
i. Urine microscopy and culture
ii. Fluorescein staining of eyes (if history suggestive)
Management
- Exclude medical cause
- Parental education and reassurance (see RCH guideline for more details)
- Assess parental emotional state and mother-baby relationship, assess for PND
Medication is not indicated, this includes:
Anti-reflux medications — ineffective in reducing crying compared with placebo
Anticholinergic medications — due to risk of serious adverse events eg apnoeas, seizures
Colic mixtures (eg gripe water) – no proven benefit
Simethicone (eg Infacol Wind Drops/Degas Infant Drops) - no effect on crying compared with placebo
There is limited evidence to support probiotic use
Only in exclusively breastfed infants under 3 months, the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM17938 (BioGaiaTM) has been shown to be effective with excessive crying (colic)
To be given as 5 drops per day orally to the infant for 21 days only
It should not be given to formula-fed infants
The probiotic has not been shown to be effective in both breastfed and formula-fed infants in Victoria, Australia
Probiotic effects are strain-specific; Lactobacillus reuteri DSM17938 is the only probiotic strain with some evidence of efficacy in exclusively breastfed infants with excessive crying (colic)
Formula changes are usually not helpful unless there is proven cow milk allergy. Weaning from breast milk has no benefit
Spinal manipulation is not indicated and has associated risks
Tantrums - general
- Key points
a. Defined as out of control behavior involving – screaming, stomping, hitting, head banging, falling down, or other displays of frustration
b. Can include vomiting, aggression, biting
c. Trigger = frustration, anger, inability to cope with situation - Epidemiology
a. 18 months to 4 years
b. Peak 2-3 years (50-80% children have regular tantrums)
c. Lasting 2-5minutes - Aetiology
a. Normal for childhood developmental stage
b. Must consider – NAI, domestic violence, hearing loss/language delay, behavioural/developmental disorders (Autism), psychiatric conditions, underlying neurological conditions (TBI, Prader Willi) - Strategies to prevent
a. Consistency – toddlers difficulty adapting to different environments, routine/schedules as well as consistent rules/enforcement
b. Warnings – to familiarize child with rules
c. Expectations – set reasonable ones for child
d. Positive reinforcement – for desired behaviors, child feels satisfied and appreciated
e. Avoid known problems – avoid taking child out when hungry/sleepy - Management
a. Stay cool – the more attention, the more likely it will be repeated
b. Ignoring – withdraw all attention, consistent amongst care givers. Intervene if others at risk
c. Distraction – known precipitants
d. Time outs – only if other methods have failed. Ensure consistent place/room, 1min for each year age.
e. Verbal reprimand – if child is old enough, discuss what happened and better ways to handle
f. Punishment – NOT recommended, can increase frequency tantrums and reinforce aggression
Poor growth - bg
- Background
a. FTT = poor growth
b. Nutrition is the main driver for a child’s growth - Aetiology
- inadequate intake
- inadequate absorption (coeliac, liver, CF, diarrhoea, CMPA)
- excessive caloric utilisation (chronic illness, UTI, CF, CHD, DM, hyperT)
- psychosocial (low SES, PND, etc)
- other (genetic/syndromic, IEM, endo) - Growth charts
a. Growth charts
i. WHO <2 years
ii. CDC > 2 years
iii. Condition specific – Turner, Down syndrome, Williams
b. Serial measurements are needed to assess a child’s growth
i. Many healthy children grow on centile lines at the top or bottom of the growth chart and many healthy children have small “dips” above or below a particular centile line or growth curve
ii. Birth weight is not necessarily representative of the genetic potential for future growth
c. Correct for prematurity (<37 weeks) until 24 months of age
d. Length and head circumference should also be plotted on growth charts and it is important to take these into account in the overall assessment of a child with poor growth
Expected growth
- 1st 3mo: 150-200g/week
- 3-6mo: 100-150g/week
- 6-12mo: 70-90g/week
Poor growth - assessment/hx/ex/ix
a. History
i. Infants
1. Breastfeeding
a. Breast feeding difficulties, timing of feeds and the presence or absence of vomiting.
b. Is the infant “settled” with breast feeds?
c. Mother’s perception of breast milk supply/difficulties.
d. Previous experience of breast feeding.
2. Formula feeding
a. Volumes, changes to formula, dilutions (check scoops to volume of water), vomiting, or diarrhoea
3. Timing of the introduction of solids and the types of foods offered.
a. The parent infant interaction during feeding eg. Force feeding.
b. Are mealtimes pleasant or unpleasant?
c. Does the infant accept solids readily?
ii. Toddlers
1. Mealtime battles, coercive feeding, food refusal
2. Milk volume over 24 hrs
3. Assess parental attitude towards foods and mess
iii. Other
1. Antenatal complications and maternal health
2. Birth weight, length and head circumference
3. Significant intercurrent illnesses coinciding with onset of poor growth
4. Vomiting and diarrhoea
5. Developmental delay, regression or syndromal causes of poor growth
6. Mid-parental height and the family history of childhood weight gain
7. Social
a. Lack of financial resources for food requirements
b. Lack of suitable housing
c. Lack of family/community supports
d. Refugee or recent immigrant background
e. Parental mental health problems
f. Community Services History
g. Failure to attend hospital or community services appointments.
h. Previous history of child protection involvement
b. Examination
i. Does the child appear sick, scrawny, irritable or lethargic?
1. Evidence of loss of muscle bulk and subcutaneous fat stores; especially upper arm, buttocks and thighs
2. Conduct a thorough examination with particular attention to potential underlying diagnoses
3. Look for signs of child abuse and neglect
ii. Observe the child-parent interaction and communication (cues from infant)
iii. In younger infants, consider observing a feed
c. Investigations
i. No investigations are necessary at first
ii. First line investigations
1. FBE, ESR, UEC, LFT
2. Iron studies
3. Calcium, phosphate
4. Thyroid function
5. Blood glucose
6. Urine for microscopy and culture
7. Coeliac screen if on solid feeds containing gluten
8. Stool microscopy and culture
9. Stool for fat globules and fatty acid crystals
SIDS - bg
- Definition
a. = sudden infant death syndrome
b. Sudden unexpected death in sleep
c. 1 month to 12 months
d. No cause on post mortem
e. Examination of death at scene not suspicious - Epidemiology
a. 1.3/1000 live births (Australian), 7.5/1000 indigenous
b. Normal age 2-5 months (95% < 7 months)
c. Accounts for 45% of infant deaths 1 month – 1 year (post-neonatal mortality)
d. Winter peaks (viral infections)
e. Saturday peaks (parental drug use, co-sleeping)
f. Brainstem abnormality in cardiorespiratory control = asphyxia
SIDS - RFs
Biggest RF:
- young maternal age (<20)
- maternal smoking
- late/no prenatal care
- preterm birth and LBW
- prone sleeping
- sleeping on soft surface
- bed sharing
- overheating
NOT a RF:
- neonatal vital signs
- apnoea of prematurity
- recent URTI or immunisation
Risk reduction (uptodate):
- breast feeding
- room sharing
- pacifier use
- fan use
- immunisations
SIDS - causes, rx
- Causes
a. 85-90% SIDS
b. Cause more likely if atypical age (<1/12 or >6/12)
c. Infection (7%)
d. Cardiovascular disease (2.7%)
e. Child abuse (2.6%)
f. Metabolic/genetic disorders - Management
a. Prevent risk factors
b. Baby on back from birth
c. Face and head uncovered
d. Smoke free environment
e. Safe sleeping environment, minimal sleep overs
f. Sleep baby in own safe sleeping place in same room as adult carer for first 6-12months
g. Breastfeed baby if possible
i. Consider carer training in CPR
Home cardiorespiratory monitoring is NOT recommended (uptodate)
- no benefit
- poor correlation with hospital monitoring (pulse ox etc)
- can be falsely reassuring for parents
- equally can cause more anxiety with false alarms
- apnoea not thought to be the initiating event for SIDS
- infants have died whilst on home CR monitoring
Microcephaly - bg
- Key points
a. OFC = occipitofrontal circumference (OFC): Standardised charts for age, sex and gestation - Definitions
a. Variable definitions
b. Generally accepted as >3SD below mean for age and sex (some define as >2SD below)
c. Further defined
i. Borderline microcephaly – between 2-3 SD below mean
ii. Moderate microcephaly – between 3-5 SD below mean
iii. Severe microcephaly - >=5 SD below mean - Pathogenesis
a. Lack of brain development or abnormal brain development related to a developmental insult during the time-specific period of induction and major cellular migration; thought to result from a reduction in the number of neurons generated during neurogenesis
i. Forebrain most affected – holoprosencephaly
b. Injury or insult to a previously normal brain; reduction in the number of dendritic processes and synaptic connections
Microcephaly - aetiology, classification
- Classification
a. Time of onset
i. Congenital microcephaly = present at birth or by 36 weeks gestation
ii. Postnatal microcephaly = failure of normal growth
b. Aetiology
i. Primary = no associated malformations and follow a Mendelian pattern of inheritance or are associated with specific genetic syndrome
ii. Secondary (non-genetic)
c. Relation to growth parameters
i. Symmetric = proportionate
ii. Asymmetric = disproportionate - Aetiology
a. Primary
i. Genetic = isolated microcephaly (true microcephaly, microcephaly vera)
ii. Syndromal (T21, T18, cri-du-chat)
b. Secondary
i. Environmental - Congenital infections = CMV, rubella, toxoplasmosis
- Meningitis
- Drug or toxin exposure
- Other perinatal insult – hypoglycaemia, hypothyroidism, hypopit, hypoadrenalism
- Anoxia/ischaemia
ii. Neuroanatomic = NTD, holoprosencephaly, lissencephaly, polymicrogyria
iii. Metabolic = maternal diabetes, PKU, untreated maternal PKU methylmalonic aciduria, citrullinaemia, neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Microcephaly - approach, ix
- Approach
a. History
i. Prenatal history – maternal medical problems (diabetes, epilepsy, PKU, medications etc)
ii. Birth history
iii. Weight, length, OFC at birth
iv. OFC trajectory
v. History of seizures, developmental history
vi. Family history consanguinity
b. Physical examination
i. Dysmorphology
ii. OFC, weight + height
iii. Head shape - Anterior fontanelle – closes between 10 and 24 months
- Eyes – intrauterine infections (chorioretinitis, cataract), metabolic disease (cataract)
- Oropharynx – single maxillary incisor (holoprosencephaly)
- Skin
- Abdomen – hepatosplenomegaly
- Neurological – at risk for CP developmental
- Investigations
a. Genetic testing
b. Evaluate for TORCH
c. Evaluate for metabolic or storage disorder
d. Neuroimaging
i. MRI = identify structural abnormalities such as lissencephaly, pachygyria, and polymicrogyria
ii. CT = calcification
Macrocephaly - general
- Key points
a. Can be caused by increase in size of ANY components of cranium – brain, CSF, blood or bone
b. Most common causes vary with age of onset - Definition
a. Macrocephaly = OFC >2 SD above mean for age, sex, gestation
b. Megalencephaly = enlargement of brain parenchyma - Aetiology
- increased brain (anatomic, metabolic)
- increased CSF (hydrocephalus)
- increased blood (intracranial haemorrhage)
- increased bone (thalassaemia, bone dysplasias)
- increased ICP (idiopathic, infective, inflammation, metabolic, mass lesion)
Early infantile (birth to 6 months) Hydrocephalus Subdural effusion Normal variant (often familial) Late infantile (6 months to 2 years) Hydrocephalus Dandy-Walker syndrome Subdural effusion Increased ICP Primary skeletal cranial dysplasias Megalencephaly Achondroplasia Primary megalencephaly Early to late childhood (older than 2 years of age) Hydrocephalus Megalencephaly Pseudotumour cerebri Normal variant
Craniosynostosis - bg
- Key points
a. Premature closing of cranial sutures
b. Incidence 1/2000
c. Craniosynostosis can involve single sutures (85%) or multiple sutures (15% - more likely to be assoc with syndrome/genetic defect)
d. Delayed closure = rickets, hypothyroidism, malnutrition, osteogenesis imperfecta, hydrocephalus, chromosomal anomaly - Classification
a. Primary = due to abnormal skull development; premature closure of one or more sutures
b. Secondary = failure of brain growth
i. This leads to restricted growth perpendicular direction to the affected suture
ii. Compensatory skull growth occurs parallel to suture - Aetiology
a. Idiopathic
b. Genetic syndrome = 10-20%
i. Crouzon/ Apert/ Carpenter/ Chotzen/ Pfeiffer/ mutations of fibroblast growth factor receptor - Normal development
a. Cranial bones develop by 5th month of gestation
b. Normal fontanelle closure
i. Posterior – 2 months
ii. Anterior lateral – 3 months
iii. Posterior lateral – 1 year
iv. Anterior – 2 years
c. Normal suture closure
i. Metopic – 2 months
ii. Sagittal – 22 months
iii. Coronal – 24 moths
d. In the first 2 years of life
i. Brain volume quadruples
ii. Brain size reaches 75% of the adult brain
Craniosynostosis - sx, rx, cx
- Clinical manifestations
a. Prominent bony ridge
b. Fusion of the suture may be seen in XRs/ CT
i. Plain films helpful for accurate measurements
ii. CT usually required to assess underlying brain/ surgical panning - Sutures + deformity
a. Metopic = middle forehead
i. Trigonocephaly = triangular/pointed forehead
b. Sagittal = Centre (most common)
i. Scaphocephaly = long and narrow head
c. Lambdoid = like lambda = back
i. Posterior plagiocephaly = unilateral fusion
d. Coronal = ear to ear
i. Brachycephaly = bilateral fusion = flat and tall forehead / short and wide head
ii. Anterior plagiocephaly = unilateral fusion = affect side flat, other side bulges out - Management
a. Surgical correction = usually aim 8-12 months
i. If one suture involved only , this is purely for cosmetic purposes
ii. If > 1 suture involved, surgery required to avoid hydrocephalus/ raised ICP - Complications
a. Raised ICP = uncommon, especially if only one affected
b. Inhibition of brain growth
c. Impaired; cognition, growth, development, poor feeding, poor weight gain, vision, hearing, speech
i. Even in single suture craniosynostosis
Scaphocephaly - general
Sagittal suture closes prematurely
- Long thin head
- Point on top of head
- Prominent occiput and broad forehead
- Most common
- Sporadic
- M>F
- Does not produce raised ICP or hydrocephalus
- Can occur with obstructed labour
Brachycephaly - general
Coronal suture closes prematurely bilaterally
• Both sides forehead flattened
- Apert/ Crouzon disease
- F>M
Frontal/anterior plagiocephaly - general
Premature fusion of coronal and sphenofrontal suture (unilateral)
- Affected side flattened forehead
- Elevation of ipsilateral orbit, eyebrow and ear
- Contralateral side prominent forehead
• F>M
Occipital/posterior plagiocephaly - general
Most often positional
Can be caused by fusion lambdoid suture
- Occipital flattening, bulging of contralateral forehead
- Ipsilateral ear is inferior
• Positional occipital flattening can mimic posterior plagiocephaly
Trigonocephaly - general
Premature fusion of metopic suture
- Ridge down forehead, pointed forehead
- Hypotelorism
- Rare
- Assoc w 19p
- Increased risk of developmental abnormalities of brain
Turricephaly - general
Premature fusion of coronal + sphenofrontal + frontal ethmoidal sutures
• Cone shaped head
Kleeblattschadel deformity
• Cloverleaf shaped head – prominent temporal bones
Syndromes a/w abnormal head shape
- Most AD
- Mutations of FGFR gene
- FGFR1 mutation (chromosome 8) = Pfeiffer syndrome
- FGFR2 = Apert syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Crouzon syndrome
- Crouzon syndrome
b. FGFR2 mutation
d. Clinical manifestations
i. Skeletal - Skull deformity (brachycephaly – bilateral coronal suture fusion, tall forehead)
- Midface hypoplasia (prominent nose & forehead, maxillary hypoplasia) + OSA
- Mild hypotelorism, proptosis
- NORMAL hands and feet
ii. Neuro - Hydrocephalus
- Visual problems (optic atrophy, proptosis)
- Apert syndrome
b. FGFR2 mutation
c. Clinical manifestations
i. Skeletal - Irregular craniosynostosis (brachycephaly, plagiocephaly - coronal)
- Premature fusion of coronal, sagittal, lambdoid sutures
- Midface hypoplasia + OSA
- Exophthalmos but less severe than Crouzon
- Symmetrical syndactyly (fusion of 2nd/3rd/4th digits – single nail 2nd-4th digits)
ii. Neuro - Hydrocephalus
- Intellectual disability
- Pfeiffer syndrome
b. Rarely FGFR1
c. Clinical manifestations
i. Skeletal - Skull deformity (scaphocephaly + brachiocephaly)
- Midface hypoplasia (flat face, shallow orbits)
- Hypertelorism, prominent eyes, mild exophthalmos, small nose
- Partial syndactyly – webbing fingers/toes
- Deviated broad and short thumb/big toe
- Carpenter syndrome
a. AR, rare
b. Skull deformity (cloverleaf- turricephaly – coronal + other suture fusion)
c. Prominent metopic ridge
d. Narrow maxilla with broad depressed nasal bridge
e. Polydactyly and syndactyly of hands and feet
f. Intellectual disability common
Positional head deformity
Soft shape of infant skull changes shape due to outside forces (in utero, sleep position)
Sutures in tact
Forehead protrudes on SAME side as posterior flattening
Ear anterior displaced on affected side
Rx
- physical therapy
- helmet
- ref to PT
Breath holding - general (except classification)
- Key points
a. NOT a cause of death, epilepsy, intellectual disability or cerebral damage; EEG unnecessary
b. Family history common
c. Caused by bradycardia/ asystole (VERY brief) - Clinical manifestation
a. Occur in children 6 months to 6 years
b. 80-90% have first episode by 18 months of age
c. Always has a precipitant – trauma, emotional fright, anger, frustration
d. Cyanotic more common; pale less common - Investigations
a. No diagnostic test
b. Consider other causes of syncope – ECG
c. FBE + Fe studies - Treatment
a. Fe supplementation
i. Indications - Anaemic
- Iron deficient
ii. Complete response in 30-50% of children
Iron deficiency anemia is more prevalent in children with breath-holding spells compared with controls and appears to contribute to the occurrence of breath-holding spells and the underlying dysautonomia.
- Prognosis
a. Excellent prognosis
Breath holding - classification
Pallid
• Trigger – minor injury (often to the head or upper body), upset, tantrum
• Often can be delayed 30s after trigger
• Open mouth as if to cry but no sound, faint/collapse, appear pale, diaphoretic, often followed by increased tone/loss continence/clonus.
• <60s, some confusion afterwards
• Sometimes followed by seizure (rare)
• Caused by cardiac bradycardia
Blue
• Trigger – pain, frustration, reprimand
• Scream, apnea, colour change red/blue, floppy/unconscious, rapid recovery
• Sometimes followed by seizure (rare)
• 15-25% children have multiple episodes daily
Milestones (GFSL) - 6 weeks
Raise head
Tight fist, fix and follow to midline
Smiles
Alert to sounds
Milestones (GFSL) - 2 months
Lift chest
Hands together, fix and follow past midline, Opens fist
Social smile
Smiles to coos
Milestones (GFSL) - 4 months
Rolls prone to supine
Supports on elbows + wrists prone
Minimal head lag
Reaches midline
Hands unfisted
Grasps object
Excited by environment
Works for food and toys
Squeals
Orients to voice
Milestones (GFSL) - 6 months
Sits unsupported
Rolls supine to prone
Transfers – crossing midline
Raking
Reaches for object
Feeds self
Holds bottle
Begins to recognize strangers
Babbles
Milestones (GFSL) - 9 months
Crawls/stands/cruises
Comes to sit from lying
Crude pincer
Object permanence
Waves
Peek a boo
Mama/dada
Milestones (GFSL) - 12 months
Walks alone
Stands alone
Refined pincer
Bangs objects together
Imitates eg. clapping
Mama/dada
Words
Jargoning (polysyllabic)
1 command
Milestones (GFSL) - 15 months
Walks backwards
Runs
Scribble
2 blocks
Spoon
Indicates wants
Milestones (GFSL) - 18 months
Walks well
Runs, kicks
Throws – 2 hands
Walks up stairs with hand held
Handedness
Scribble
2 blocks
Copies task
Pretend play
5-20 words
2 word sentences
Points to pictures and body parts
Milestones (GFSL) - 2 years
Rides on toy without pedals
Line
6 blocks
Pages, doors, undress
Parallel play
50-200 words
Pronouns
2/4 clear
2 commands
Milestones (GFSL) - 3 years
Broad jump
Pedals
Alternating steps
Circle
Dressing
Draws person with head + body part
Group play
Knows name, age and gender
1000 words
Grammar
3/4 clear
Milestones (GFSL) - 4 years
One foot
Hop
Stairs without support
Square
Cross
Person – 3 parts
1500 words Full name Colours Songs 4/4 clear
Milestones (GFSL) - 5 years
Skips
Heel to toe
Leaps
Triangle
Shoe laces
Spreads with knife
Object permanence - ages
- 8-12 months: a child will be able to uncover an object he sees being hidden
- 12-18 months: child will be able to uncover an object even if he doesn’t see it being hidden
Newborn reflexes - Moro
- The examiner holds the infant supine in his or her arms, then drops the infant’s head slightly but suddenly - this leads to the infant extending and abducting the arms, with the palms open, and sometimes crying
- Alternatively, the examiner may lift the infant’s head off the bed by 1 to 2 inches and allow it to gently drop back; this maneuver elicits a similar response
Appears: 34 to 36 weeks PCA
Disappears: 5 to 6 months
Newborn reflexes - asymmetric tonic neck reflex
- With the infant relaxed and lying supine, the examiner rotates the head to one side
- The infant extends the leg or arm on the side towards which the head has been turned, while flexing the arm on the contralateral side (fencing posture)
Appears: 38 to 40 weeks PCA
Disappears: 2 to 3 months
Newborn reflexes - trunk incurvation/Galant
- With the infant in a prone position, the examiner strokes or taps along the side of the spine
- The infant twitches his or her hips toward the side of the stimulus
Appears: 38 to 40 weeks PCA
Disappears: 1 to 2 months
Newborn reflexes - palmar grasp
- The examiner places a finger in the infant’s open palm
- The infant closes his or her hand around the finger, tightens the grip if the examiner attempts to withdraw the finger.
Appears: 38 to 40 weeks PCA
Disappears: 5 to 6 months
Plantar grasp is the same but remains until 9-10 months
Newborn reflexes - rooting
- The examiner strokes the infant’s cheek
- The infant turns the head toward the side that is stroked, and makes sucking motions
Appears: 38 to 40 weeks PCA
Disappears: 2 to 3 months
Newborn reflexes - parachute
- The infant is held upright, back to the examiner
- The body is rotated quickly forward (as if falling). The infant reflexively extends the upper extremities towards the ground as if to break a fall.
Appears: 8 to 9 months of age
Persists throughout life
Motor milestones (G+F) - red flags
Gross Motor • Reduced movement on one side • Poor head control at 4 months • Primitive reflexes at 6 months • Not sitting at 9 months • Not weight bearing at 10 months • Unable to walk independently 18months • Toe walking at 2 years • Clumsiness at 3 years • Gross motor is least predictive of a cognitive problem
Fine Motor • Intention tremor • Fisting at 4 months • Early handedness before 18 months • Not reaching at 6 months • Not transferring at 9 months • No pincer grip at 12 months • No stacking at 15 months • No feeding self at 18 months • No drawing a person at 3 years
Milestones - screening
- The following motor skills should be observed in the young child at the specified visit
- These skills are typically acquired at earlier ages, and their absence at these ages signifies delay
- Loss of previously attained motor skills should also raise concern
Common causes of delay: CP, ID, ASD
9 MONTHS
- Rolls to both sides
- Sits well without support
- Demonstrates motor symmetry without established handedness
- Grasps and transfers objects from hand to hand
18 MONTHS
- Sits, stands, and walks independently
- Grasps and manipulates small objects
30 MONTHS
- Evaluate for subtle gross motor, fine motor, speech, and oral motor impairments
- Evaluate for loss of previously attained gross or fine motor skills
4 YEARS
- Evaluate coordination, fine motor, handwriting, gross motor, communication, and feeding abilities
- Address any preschool or child care staff concerns about motor development
- Evaluate for loss of previously attained gross or fine motor skills
Psychological development - general
• Bonding – occurs soon after birth and reflects feelings of parents towards newborn = UNIDIRECITONAL
• Attachment – reciprocal feelings between parents and infant develop over first year = BIDIRECTIONAL
o Functional attachment crucial for optimal development
o Parents who respond immediately to crying/fuss show less crying at end of 12 months
• Stanger anxiety – develops 9-18months of age reflects insecurity on separation from care giver.
o Rapid swings from stubborn independence to clinging dependence
• Toddler (2-3 years)– autonomy that allows separation, rapid development of skills in all areas, limit setting essential to balance child’s emerging independence.
• Preschool (4-5years)– readiness for preschool when child autonomous and can separate for hours at a time.
o Preschool assists socialization, language, problem solving skills.
• Adolescence (10-25years) – Early (focus on self/physical changes, and peers), middle (independence, psychosocial development, relationships), late (formal operational thinking)
Piaget’s cognitive developmental theroy:
0-2
- Sensorimotor
- Establishment of mental representation
- Understanding of the world is based on senses and motor skills
2-6
- Preoperational thought
- Symbols, words and numbers
- Egocentric (only own perspective seen)
7- early adolescence
- Concrete operational thought
- Logical operations start
Adolescence and beyond
- Formal operational thought
- Abstract thinking, hypotheticals
Developmental delay - primary care screening tools
- Surveillance = information = Use of developmental milestones
- Screening = formal screening test (standardized)
a. Sensitivity/specificity = 70-80%
b. 20-30% false negatives
c. Cognitive screening best correlates with receptive language in younger children
d. Abnormality = referral for full assessment - Tests used in primary care
a. ASQ2: screen development from 1-66 months; 15 minutes, assesses cognition, motor, self-help and language (does NOT include social emotional factors)
b. Infant-Toddler Checklist for language and communications: 6-24 months, used to screen children during this period
c. Brigance Early Childhood Screens: screens 0-7 year old - Narrow band instruments look specifically for ADHD/ autism
a. Conners 3rd edition ADHD index
b. Modified checklist for autism in toddlers
c. Vanderbilt ADHD diagnostic parent and teacher rating scale
Development/IQ assessments - overview
Alphabetical for order of age appropriateness:
- Bailey 1mo-3.5yr (gold standard)
- Griffiths 0-8yrs (better for older children than Bailey)
- McCarthy 2.5-8.5yrs
- Peabody picture test 2.5-4yrs
- WIPPSI (Weschler preschool and primary scale) 2.5-7yrs
- WISC 5-18yrs (Weschler), generates an IQ
Development Screening:
- ASQ (ages/stages) 0-4yrs
- Denver II 0-6, good for language delay
- PEDS (parental) 0-8
IQ Screening
- 0-2: Griffiths
- 1-3: Bailey
- 2-8 McCarthy
- > 2.5 Peabody
- 3-7 WIPPSI
- 6-16 WISC
Developmental delay - bg
- Key points
a. 10- 15% of children may have some form of developmental delay or disability
b. 20-30% of children have developmental delay of at least mild-moderate severity that remain undiagnosed unless specific assessment taken – usually diagnosed at school
c. Most have no identifiable cause such as a syndrome or physical abnormality
d. Age at presentation
i. Motor and speech problems present earlier
ii. Problems affecting receptive language, socialization and cognition present later - Definitions
a. A child younger than 5 (>5 use IQ)
b. On standardized testing, functional level >2SD below the mean in gross motor, fine motor, language, cognition, psychosocial development
c. Developmental delay = one domain affected
d. Global developmental delay = two or more domains affected
i. Eg. motor + language, language + social
ii. Includes children with intellectual disability - Prevalence
a. All developmental disabilities – up to 10%
i. Language concerns most common (12%), then GDD (1-3%), then ASD (<1%)
b. GDD – 10%
i. Similar to intellectual disability
Developmental delay - assessment
- Assessment
a. History
i. Prenatal - Genetic (T21, Fr X)
- Toxin (FAS)
- Infection (TORCHS)
ii. Perinatal - Neurological insult (prematurity, HIE)
iii. Postnatal - ABI (infection, trauma)
- Psychosocial stress (neglect) – COMMON
b. Physical examination
i. Dysmorphology
ii. Growth
iii. Neurocutaneous signs
iv. Neurological examination
c. Developmental assessment
i. Surveillance
ii. Screening tools – physician or parent initiated
iii. Formal multidisciplinary assessment
d. Syndrome or phenotype
e. Formulation and differential diagnosis - Clinical approach
a. Elicit parental concerns
b. Targeted history and physical helps to predict the risk of delay
c. High risk
i. Developmental delay
ii. Dysmorphism
iii. Chromosomal abnormality
iv. Hearing, visual, abnormal neurology exam
d. Moderate risk
i. VLWB
ii. Severe pre or perinatal insult
iii. Low SES, poor support
iv. Family adversity, mental health, authoritative style - Medical evaluation
a. Try to catch developmental delay early and coordinate access to benefits/ services and further referrals
b. Aetiological yield proportional to severity of delay and selection of population (45-80%)
c. Work up done in rational and stepwise manner ? Guided by clinical acumen
d. Specific diagnosis may help in explanation, management, prognosis, recurrence
e. Advances in genetic testing and neuroimaging
Developmental delay - ix
- Importance of investigations
a. Explanation and validation
b. Management
i. Parent support groups, advocacy for services, specific therapy
c. Prognosis
d. Recurrence risk – genetic counselling
e. Associated conditions – seizures, CP, vision/hearing deficits, behavioural problems
f. Stop further investigations - Investigations
a. Genetics
i. Molecular karyotype
1. Picks up microdeletion and microduplications
2. ‘Copy number variant’
3. Yield = 10-15% of children who were previously undiagnosed
ii. Exome sequencing (next generation sequencing)
1. Parts of the genome of interested are fully sequenced (rather than looking at deletions or duplications)
iii. Fragile X screening
1. 5% prevalence in GDD
2. Syndrome 1-6/1000 males, half as prevalent in females
a. Females – learning difficulties and anxiety
3. Unstable triplet repeat of FMR1 on X chromosome (symptoms if >200)
4. Boys; girls if suggestive family history
b. MRI
i. Imaging of choice
ii. Consider for certain reasons = abnormal head size, focal seizures, abnormal neuro exam
iii. 13% pickup if no additional features
iv. 25% if additional features
v. Most common findings – HIE, malformations, toxic/metabolic/ non-specific
c. Metabolics
i. Low pick up in GDD (1%) unless target use
ii. Suggestive features
1. Regression
2. Family history
3. Hypotonia
4. Vomiting/ diarrhoea
5. Decompensating during acute illness
iii. Amino acids (plasma), organic acids (urine)
iv. Other = pH, glucose, lactate, pyruvate
d. Other bloods
i. Thyroid function
ii. Iron studies
iii. CK
iv. Lead level – important in children with Pica
v. Vitamin B12
vi. Vitamin D – restricted indications
e. Electrical
i. 4.4% of GDD but provided aetiology only in 0.4%
ii. Careful history important
iii. Acquired epileptiform aphasias
1. Rare but potentially treatable
2. Eg. Landua Kleffner syndrome
Developmental delay - rx
- Management
a. Early intervention is important
b. Intervention targeted to symptoms
i. Eg. Speech therapy, OT, psychology
c. HOWEVER services are thin on the ground
d. Paediatricians have an important role in advocacy and follow-up
e. Services
i. Refer to Early Childhood Intervention Services
1. 0 to 6 years
2. Delays in 2 or more areas of development
3. Long waiting list
ii. Transition to NDIS
iii. Community Health Center referral
1. Children with only language delays
2. Wait times generally much shorter
iv. Private therapy
1. Can be expensive
2. Funding
a. Autism or Best Start Funding (including CP, T21 etc) or NDIS
b. Medicare – GP Team Care Plan, Mental Health Plan
c. Private insurance
d. Carer’s allowance
v. Kindergarten/ Childcare can be very helpful
1. Opportunities to socialize
2. Learn routines, cooperation, sharing
3. Kindergarten inclusion support services/ Preschool field officer (DHS)
f. Transitions
i. Support transition into prep
1. Visit school
2. Meet principal
3. Transition programs
ii. Support within school
1. Individual learning plans
2. Extra funding – program for students with disabilities
- Role of paediatrician
a. Important role as part of MDT
b. Recognize the DD
c. Hear parents’ concerns
d. Rule out medical causes
e. Advocate for and coordinate services
f. Monitor development and well-being over time
Intellectual disability - bg, aetiology
- Definition
a. Affects up to 2.5% of children
b. Significantly sub average general intellectual functioning = 2SD below mean intelligence quotient that exists concurrently with
i. Deficits in adaptive behavior
ii. Manifests during developmental period
c. FSIQ (full scale intelligence quotient) <70 = intellectual disability
d. FSIQ (full scale intelligence quotient) 71 = NO intellectual disability
e. Classification
i. Mild = 50-55 to 70 – physical and neurological examination usually normal
ii. Moderate = 35-50 – often have dysmorphic appearance, a recognized syndrome or other known aetiology for ID
f. DSM definition of mental retardation = significantly sub-average intellectual function accompanied by limited adaptive function, with onset <18 years
g. A child with intellectual impairment may have other associated
i. Developmental delays
ii. Behavior problems
iii. Health difficulties - Cause
a. Prenatal
i. Chromosomal = trisomy 21, fragile X syndrome, velocardiofacial syndrome (22q11- deletion)
ii. Genetic = tuberous sclerosis, metabolic disorders
iii. Major structural abnormalities of brain
iv. Syndromes = Williams, Prader-Willi, Rett
v. Infections = CMV
vi. Drugs = alcohol
vii. Low birth weight increases risk – the lower the birth weight the greater the risk
viii. Always do a CK and TFT
b. Perinatal
i. Infections
ii. Trauma
iii. Metabolic abnormalities
c. Postnatal
i. Head injury
ii. Meningitis or encephalitis
iii. Poisons
d. Evolving phenotype over time
i. Rett syndrome
ii. Prada Willi – detected earlier due to microarray
iii. Angelman – detected earlier due to microarray
iv. Velocardiofacial syndrome
v. Williams syndrome
vi. Noonan syndrome
vii. Fragile X syndrome
Intellectual disability - presentation
- History
a. Detailed birth and prenatal history – drugs, alcohol
b. Hereditary and family history
c. Three generation pedigree - Examination
a. Informal
i. Appearance
ii. Behavior – eye contact, social engagement, attention, activity level, anxiety
iii. Play – symbolic, imaginative, repetitive
iv. Movement – skills, symmetry, quality
b. Formal
i. Developmental assessment – strengths + weaknesses
ii. Minor physical anomalies
iii. Vision + hearing
iv. Physical + CNS examinations - Minor physical anomalies – eg. simian crease, low-set ears
- Disturbance of growth – microcephaly, macrocephaly, extremes of stature or weight
- Abnormal skin lesions – multiple depigmented or pigmented naevi
- Malformations or abnormal findings in several organ symptoms
- Behavior characteristics of specific disorders ie. behavioral phenotype
v. Growth – plot centiles
c. Other
i. Video monitoring of posture and gait or behavioural characteristics
ii. Serial evaluations over several years - Differential diagnosis
a. The differential diagnosis of intellectual impairment includes children:
i. Who have been severely deprived or abused
ii. With a progressive neurodegenerative disorder or unrecognized epilepsy
iii. With severe sensory or specific developmental disorders
iv. Where the child’s apparent lack of skills is due to cultural differences, mental health disorders, ill health or refusal to participate
v. Infants with severe movement difficulties
Intellectual disability - investigations
a. Genetics
i. Imprinting – Prader Willi an Angelman syndrome
ii. Trinucleotide repeat expansion – Fragile X
iii. Rearrangement of sub-telomeres’ regions recently implicated
b. Consider
i. Chromosome = fragile X, William and Prader-Willi syndromes using DNA probes and FISH for 22q11 deletion
ii. MRI brain
iii. Creatinine phosphokinase in boys (neuromuscular disorder)
c. Metabolic
i. Indications = change with fever, neonatal hypotonia, progressive coarsening of features, loss of skills, recurrent coma, early morning cognitive deficits following fasting
ii. Extremely low yield for unselected metabolic screening
iii. Includes
1. Acid base
2. Plasma amino acids
3. Urinary organic and amino acids
4. Lactate-blood CSF
5. Cholesterol
6. Lysosomal enzyme analysis
7. Plasma and urine carnitine analysis
8. Plasma VLCFA
d. Other
i. TFTs
ii. Mucopolysaccharide screen
iii. Ix for congenital infection = ophthalmological and aetiological examination, maternal/ infant serology and viral culture (CMV)
e. Neuro-imaging
i. Indications
1. Microcephaly
2. Macrocephaly
3. Neurological signs – spasticity, ataxia, dystonia, seizures, loss of psychomotor skills, abnormal reflexes, abnormal cranial contour
ii. Options
1. CT = for cranial synostosis or where intracranial calcification is likely (TS, intrauterine infection) (avoided if possible <2 years due to risk of malignancy)
2. MRI study of choice
3. PET scanning
4. May help date onset of problem – prenatal, perinatal, postnatal
f. Environmental factors
i. Lead and methyl-mercury poisoning
ii. Alcohol
iii. Thalidomide
iv. Valproic acid
v. Polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins, pesticides and tobacco smoke may be potential neurotoxins
Intellectual disability - concomitant problems, rx
- Concomitant medical problems
a. Epilepsy 14-45% higher in smore severe ID
b. Combination of ID and epilepsy is a strong predictor of psychiatric and behavioural problems
c. Hypothyroidism is common in Down syndrome
d. Many cancers occur with higher frequency
e. Visual problems 10x more common cataract and keratoconus also common
f. Hearing problems 40x more common
g. Psychiatric disorders very common – pica, self-injurious behaviours, stereotypies and ADHD symptoms - Management
a. Support and info for parents
b. Referral to and liaison with other practitioners, early intervention, family support and educational services
c. Child advocacy
d. Regular assessment of hearing and vision
e. Investigation for associated anomalies (eg. cardiac and thyroid status with trisomy 21)
f. Treatment of associated disorders (eg. epilepsy)
g. Monitoring of development
Language - summary of milestones/development and red flags
- 2 year: 100 words, starting to put words together
Development of Expressive Vocabulary • 12 months = 2 words + mummy and daddy • 2 years = 300 words • 3 years = 1000 words • 4 years = 2000 words • 5 years = 6000+ words • 17 years 36000 to 136000 words
Reasons for Concern (RCH handbook)
6 months
No response to sound, not cooing, laughing or babbling
12 months
Not localising to sound or babbling
No babbling or babbling contains a low proportion of consonant vowel babble (eg. baba)
Does not understand simple words (eg. no and bye), recognize names of common objects, or respond to simple requests (eg. clap hands) with an action
Does not respond reliably to name by turning head
18 months
No meaningful words except mum dad
Does not understand and hand over objects on request
2 years
Expressive vocab <50 words and no word combinations
Cannot find 2-3 objects on request
3 years
Speech is not understood within the family
Not using simple grammatical structures eg. tense markers
Does not understand concepts such as colour and size
4 years
Speech is not understood outside the family
Not using complex sentences (4-6 words)
Not able to construct simple stories
5 years
Speech is not intelligible
Does not understand abstract words and ideas
Cannot reconstruct a story from a book
How much dose a stranger understand? 1/age i.e. 1/2 at age 2, all at age 4.
Speech v Language disorder
• Speech disorder
o Articulation disorders = characterised by substitutions, omissions, additions or distortions of speech that interfere with intelligibility
o Fluency disorders (stuttering) = interruption of flow of speaking
o Voice disorders = pertain to abnormal production of vocal quality, pitch, loudness, resonance and/or duration
• Language disorder
o Impaired comprehension and/or use of spoken, written and/or other symbol systems
o May involve the form (grammar, syntax, morphology), content (vocabulary) and/or function (pragmatic use) of language
Language delay - bg, definitions
- Language
a. Socially shared code
b. Best correlates with cognitive ability, receptive»expressive
c. Aspects of language
i. Form = syntax, morphology, phonology
ii. Content = semantics
iii. Use = pragmatics; social use of language classically
d. Classification
i. Receptive skills/language = ability to understand spoken language
ii. Expressive skills/language = language production
iii. Pragmatic skills/language = social use of language
e. Speech = the sound of the spoken language
i. Can have a speech problem without a language problem
ii. Basically a motor impairment eg. stuttering, lisp - Speech and language delay
a. Most common developmental delay
b. 25% of one year olds have delayed speech
c. 20% of two year olds have delayed speech
i. Some of these are ‘late talkers’ who have typical language development but slower than others
d. 5-8% of five year olds have a speech and language disorder - “Late talkers”
a. Early language delay (2-3 years)
b. Delayed language acquisition compared with apparent typical development in other areas
i. Primarily expressive delay
ii. Completely normal in non-verbal language – good receptive language, desire to communicate
c. By 24 months late talkers have approximately 20 words in their expressive vocabulary
i. Typically developing peers have approximately 200 words
ii. Diagnostic criteria = <50 words in expressive vocab and/or demonstrate no word in combinations (ie. no 2 word utterances) - Delay vs disorder
a. Delay = development proceeds in a typical way but slower than expected
i. There is an implication that catch up is possible/ expected
b. Disorder = development is not proceeding in a typical or expected way
Language delay - aetiology
- Aetiology
a. Primary/secondary
b. Expressive, receptive, mixed
c. Word sounds (phonology), modification, grammar, vocab, meanings, pragmatics - Causes of language delay
a. Developmental language delay
i. Isolated expressive delay
ii. Mixed expressive receptive
iii. Oral motor problems
iv. Receptive worse than expressive (unusual and more difficult to diagnose) – genetic eg. Williams, ASD
v. Dyspraxia (difficulty with the patterns of movement required to produce words)
vi. Family history in 33%
b. Global developmental delay
c. Autism spectrum disorder
d. Hearing loss
e. Other
i. Neurological/epilepsy
ii. Behavioural (elective mutism)
iii. Environmental deprivation
Language delay - assessment
- Factors raising concern about speech and language
a. Parental concern regarding speech and language development
b. History of hearing loss
c. Delay in both receptive and expressive language skills
d. Concern about other aspects of development and lack of developmental progress
e. Autistic features
f. Parental report of regression of babbling or language
g. Family history of speech and language problems - Assessment
a. Language
i. Current language
ii. Development of language
iii. Understanding of language (? Context)
iv. Regression
v. Echolalia vs spontaneous speech
vi. Communicative intent
vii. Non-verbal communication
1. Protoimperative = pointing at what a child wants
2. Protodeclarative = pointing with shared interest
3. Shared attention = shared focus of 2 people on an object
viii. Oro motor function
b. Other features on history
i. Features of a more generalised problem
1. GM and FM delay
2. Social
3. Self help
ii. Features of autism – usually present well before second birthday
1. Abnormal play
2. Obsessions, repetitive interest or behaviour
3. Motor mannerisms
4. Sensory processing difficulties eg. fussy eating
- LACK OF
a. Pretend play
b. Pointing out objects to another person
c. Social interest
d. Joint attention
e. Social play
f. Response to name when called
g. Language development is delayed or disordered, there may be unusual social use of language
h. Language regression may be seen
iii. Family history
1. Language delay/disorder
2. Stutter
3. Autism/Asperger’s
4. Epilepsy
5. Learning difficulties
iv. Social context
Language delay - ix
- Investigations
a. Audiology
b. Only if features of wider developmental concerns
i. Molecular karyotype, fragile X, TFT, CK
ii. Cognitive assessment
iii. EEG
iv. MRI - Tools for language assessment
a. Parent report instruments
i. Parents are very accurate in reporting on current and emerging behaviours as opposed to giving retrospective accounts of developmental milestones
ii. Accuracy is greater with a checklist format rather than a free-response or diary method
iii. Receptive language hard to assess on parental report
iv. For bilingual families you want information in best language
v. Examples - MacArthur Bates Communicative Behaviour Scales (CSBS) – Infant/Toddler Checklist
- Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)
- Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Scale (REEL-3)
- Brigance Infant Toddler Screen (BITS)
- Ward Infant Language Screen
b. Screening Assessments
i. Renfrew Action Picture Test - Short, easily administered and scored screening tool for expressive language and semantic skills
- Does NOT provide information about
a. Receptive language
b. Pragmatics
ii. The Bus Story Narrative Test
iii. Word Find Vocabulary Test
c. Standardized Language Assessment – referral to a speech pathologist if required
i. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF4) - Time = 30-60 minutes
- Initial diagnosis of the language disorder
a. Core, receptive and expressive language index standard scores
b. Normative mean - Determines nature of the language disorder and individual language strengths and weaknesses
a. Language Structure, Language Content, Language Memory, and Working Memory Index Scores
ii. Preschool Language Scale (PLS-4)
iii. Test of Language Development (TOLD)
iv. Test of Adolescent Language (TOAL)
Language delay - rx, prognosis
- Prognosis
a. Early language delay is a powerful predictor of later language/learning problems
b. Early LD associated with
i. Poorer literacy, learning and education outcomes
ii. Effects classroom performance and school achievement (poorer grades)
iii. Difficulties in social use of language
iv. Impaired peer interactions and peer acceptance
v. Social, emotional and behavioural problems
vi. Mental health morbidity
c. Children with isolated expressive language impairment tend to have positive outcomes
d. Children with mixed or receptive language impairments, and those with social communication difficulties, are at higher risk
e. Preschool children with persistent speech and language impairment tend to have
i. Learning and social difficulties when starting formal schooling
ii. Increased risk for later literacy and numeracy problems
iii. Increased rate of emotional and behavioural disorders - Management
a. Key principles
i. Assess other areas of the child’s development
ii. Refer to an audiologist to exclude hearing loss
iii. Refer to a speech pathologist as early as possible
iv. In cases where regression in language is suspected, refer to paediatrician
b. Overview
i. Involvement of family and services – childcare, kinder, school
ii. Appropriate referrals - Speech
- Other allied health
iii. Financial support/ funding access (carers allowance, medicare plans, funding for school, NDIS) - Treatment
a. Appear to result in more favourable outcome especially if diagnosed by 5 years
b. Indirect treatment can be just effective as direct treatment
c. Referred children may experience lowered parent/teacher expectation and increased family anxiety
Semantic pragmatic disorders
a. Individuals with semantic pragmatic disorder have particular trouble understanding the meaning of what others are saying, and they are challenged in using language appropriately to get their needs met and interact with others
b. Pragmatics are able to correlate sounds with meaning
c. Consequences
i. Delayed language
ii. Word search pauses, jargon, category errors, sentence structure errors, pronoun/noun abnormalities
iii. Specific difficulty with understanding
iv. Difficult understanding stories, body language, context, jokes/satire
Uptodate: Pragmatic language refers to the skills needed to select the right words for the situation, so as to have the intended impact upon the listener. Pragmatic language skills include conventions such as taking turns in a conversation and maintaining some eye contact; contingency and topic maintenance (keeping the conversation on the same topic); adjusting the complexity of the language to suit the needs of the listener (eg, simplifying language for a younger audience; explaining terms that might not be familiar to the listener), and using nonverbal strategies such as changes in intonation, changes in facial expression, or gestures to modify the meaning of words or to convey emotion.
Speech impairment - articulation disorders
a. Characterised by substitutions, omissions, additions or distortions of speech that interfere with intelligibility
b. Includes:
i. Hearing impairment
ii. Neurological impairment
iii. Apraxias/dyspraxia
iv. Structural disorders
c. Dyspraxia
i. Verbal dyspraxia is when the child cannot voluntarily coordinate their muscles to produce the right speech sounds or words
ii. May be the result of a brain injury
iii. Features
1. Perseveration - get stuck on one word or sound and say it over and over when trying to say something different
2. Difficulty sustaining normal intonation patterns
3. Very limited vocab
4. Speak slowly, lots of pauses, make searching movements with their lips and tongue.
d. Phonological delay
i. People with phonological delay can make a sound correctly but use it in the wrong position in a word or say the wrong word - for example using a d sound instead of a g sound when saying go
ii. These children are typically very difficult to understand
iii. Usually not the result of a brain injury
iv. This child can pronounce words
Speech impairment - fluency disorders
- Fluency disorders (stuttering)
a. Interruption of flow of speaking
b. Developmental stuttering begins between the ages of 2 and 5 years
c. More common in males
d. High familial incidence
Stuttering
- affects fluency of speech
- strong genetic link (50-75% have affected relative)
- onset NOT a/w anxiety, stress, personality
- features: repeated speech movements, fixed postures which include stretching out a word (prolongation) or not being able to produce any sounds (blocks), superfluous behaviours such as visible tension in the head/neck
- 12% of children stutter at some point by 4 years of age, most recover eventually
- wait up to 12 months before starting treatment (unless distress, parental concern, impacting communication), refer to speech path for LIDCOMBE PROGRAM (best evidence)
- parents should be advised to converse normally with the child and not draw attention to stutter
Speech impairment - voice disorders
a. Pertain to abnormal production of vocal quality, pitch, loudness, resonance and/or duration
b. Voice disorders = ulcers, nodules, vocal polyps, cancer, endocrine changes etc
c. Resonance disorders = hypernasality + hyponasality
i. Velopharyngeal insufficiency = absence of normal closure between soft palate (velum) and pharyngeal wall, allowing air to escape into nasal quality
d. Dysphonia
i. Impairment in the ability to produce voice sounds using the vocal organs
ii. It is distinct from dysarthria which means disorders of speech, that is, an impairment in the ability to produce spoken words
iii. The dysphonic voice can be hoarse or excessively breathy, harsh, or rough, but some kind of phonation is still possible
iv. Can be pathological i.e. Vocal nodules or functional - conversion disorder, phonological delay
Learning difficulties - bg
- Key points
a. Complex group of conditions
b. Have NORMAL IQ – have another reason apart from intellect that learning is difficult
c. Often present with behavioural difficulties
d. Fits the ‘chronic disease model’ – there is no cure
e. Defined by educational criteria, but contribution of health, developmental, behavioural and environmental factors
f. Requires multidisciplinary assessment - Epidemiology
a. Learning difficulties represent outcome of constitutional and environmental factors – prevalence 15-20%
b. Learning disabilities/disorders thought to be neurological in nature – prevalence of 3-5%
c. Search for neurobiological/physiological correlates disappointing - Definition
a. Multiple definitions
i. Refers to a gap between ability and achievement
ii. Refers to discrepancy between verbal and performance scores on cognitive testing
b. Not a discrete categorical entity, but on several continuums, and varies by type and severity
DSM criteria
- A: difficulties learning and using academic skills in reading, written expression, and maths despite adequate tuition
- B: academic skills substantially and quantifiably below age expectation, interfering with academic performance
- C: learning difficulties manifest in school years, may not be fully manifest until demands exceed limited capabilities
- D: learning difficulties NOT better accounted for by ID, decreased visual/auditory acuity, mental/neurological pathology, ESL, inadequate education instruction
- specifiers: impairments in reading, written, expression, maths
- Patterns
a. Reading difficulties = 80%
b. Usually associated with spelling and writing difficulties
c. Isolated maths or writing difficulties less common
Dyslexia - general/brief
a. Specific learning disability
b. Characterised by difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and poor spelling and decoding abilities
c. These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the phonological component of language that is often unexpected in relation to other cognitive abilities and the provision of adequate classroom instruction
Learning difficulties - comorbidities, correlations
- Known correlations
a. Poor phonological awareness
b. Speech and language delay
c. Working memory impairment
d. Poor self-regulation
e. Behaviour disorders eg. ADHD - Comorbidities
a. Developmental language disorder (specific language impairment) 55-75%
b. ADHD – other externalizing BPs 10-50%
c. ASD 5-10%
d. Motor delay 50%
e. Emotional disorders
f. Family dysfunction
g. Medical conditions eg. Epilepsy, VLBW
Readiness for learning/school (5 years) - components
a. Reading = phonological awareness, beginning knowledge of alphabet, auditory memory – plus literacy experiences
i. If a child regularly read to at 6 months onwards – they will learn quicker and better
b. Writing = motor skill, perceptual organisation
c. Maths = one to one correspondence (understand numbers represent objects), ie conceptualise quantity through numbers
d. Behavioural = attention control, integration of auditory and visual input, emotional security, self confidence
e. Experienced preschool teacher is best predictor of ‘school readiness’
Learning difficulties - assessment
a. Key features
i. Child specific
ii. Measure strengths and weaknesses
iii. Individual specific management plan
iv. Implies flexible responsive school environment
b. Require
i. Multiple sources of information
ii. Elaboration of history
iii. Physical and neurological examination
iv. Neurodevelopmental assessment
v. Referral for more detailed assessments as appropriate
c. Steps of assessment
i. History
ii. Information from school questionnaire, class reports, previous assessments
iii. Examination – important for reassurance
iv. Child behaviour checklist, parents and teacher
v. Neurodevelopmental assessment
- assess: neuromaturation, gross motor, fine motor, visual motor, temporal-sequential, language (with help of questionnaire), attention and behaviour
d. Environmental factors (poverty, low SES, cultural, language)
e. Constitutional factors (genetics, health, development, gender)
Learning difficulties - management
a. Key steps
i. Exclude medical conditions
ii. Interpret biomedical findings
iii. Assessment of developmental status
iv. Match environment to child
v. Coordination and follow-up
vi. Advocacy
b. Plan
i. Acute description leads logically to management
ii. Paediatric role – interpret developmental findings so that appropriate educational strategies can be planned
iii. Refer for cognitive, speech pathology, special education assessment as required
iv. Report to be understood by parents and teachers
Cerebral palsy - bg
- Definition
a. Persistent, but not unchanging, disorder of movement and posture causing activity limitation, due to a defect or lesion of the developing brain; non-progressive
- It is accepted that children up to five years, who acquire permanent motor impairment due to non-progressive neurological insults, have cerebral palsy. There are many causes, a wide range of manifestations of the motor disorder and various associated problems.
- Cerebral palsy is not a single disorder but a group of disorders with diverse implications for children and their families.
b. The motor disorders of cerebral palsy are accompanied by disturbances in sensation, perception, cognition, communication, and behaviour, by epilepsy and by secondary musculoskeletal problems
c. NOT a single entity but a term used for a diverse group of disorders, which may relate to events in the prenatal, perinatal or postnatal period
d. Refers to a group of conditions of variable severity with certain developmental features in common
e. ALWAYS describe aetiology
f. No definitive cure - Epidemiology
a. 2/1000 live births – prevalence stable
b. A child with CP born every 15 hours – 1/500 live babies
c. Increase in prevalence in the 1980s and 1990s – due to survival of preterm infants + vigorous resuscitation
i. Prevalence of CP in premature infants is now declining
d. 60% of children with CP walk without aids
e. 15% are GMFCSV - Risk factors
a. Pre-term delivery = 30-80 fold increase
b. IUGR = 10-30 fold increase
c. Multiple pregnancy = 2 fold increase
d. IVF = 4 fold increase
iii. NOTE: HIE - Only 1/4 neonates with neonatal encephalopathy have CP - Aetiology
a. Unknown
b. Prenatal
i. Prenatal hypoxia <10%
c. Postnatal
i. Postnatal illness 5-10%
ii. Occurs 28 days to 2 years
iii. Infection (50%)
iv. TBI
v. Stroke
Cerebral palsy - prevention, differentials
- Prevention
a. Antenatal
i. Measures to reduce likelihood of preterm birth
ii. Magnesium sulphate = reduce incidence and severity of CP without affecting mortality
iii. Delayed cord clamping = may reduce risk of IVH in preterm infants
b. Postnatal
i. Supportive measures - Adequate ventilation
- Sufficient cerebral perfusion
- Maintaining normal metabolic status
- Controlling seizures
- Treating underlying cause for encephalopathy
ii. Therapeutic hypothermia - Differential diagnosis
a. Neurological – hereditary neurodegenerative diseases (SMA), Rett syndrome, tethered spinal cord, myopathy/dystrophy, ataxic disorders (E.g. Neiman-Pick disease)
b. Metabolic – glutaric aciduria type 1 (dystonia/choreoathetosis), urea cycle disorders (diplegia/quadriplegia)
c. Endocrine – thyroid dysfunction
d. Malignancy – intracranial/spinal neoplasm
Cerebral palsy - red flags for alternate cause
a. Normal MRI or isolated imaging findings
b. Significant symptoms with unremarkable perinatal history
c. Think again if unremarkable perinatal history
d. Regression NOT consistent with CP
e. Isolated hypotonia or chorea
f. Rigidity
g. Paraplegia – think of hereditary spastic paraparesis
h. Fluctuating symptoms – worse over the course of the day, symptoms worsening over time, progression
i. Family history – restless legs, mood disorder
j. Atypical phenotype
i. ADCY5 – progressive early onset chorea
ii. GNA01 – severe epilepsy, dyskinesia
iii. Dopamine responsive syndromes
iv. Benign chorea of childhood
k. Genetics
i. 1/3 of children have a genetic abnormality (compared with 2-3% in general population)
ii. Cerebral, cardiac, urinary anomalies and facial clefts common
iii. Increased risk in consanguineous families
iv. Cryptogenic CP – 48% found to have copy number variance of clinical significance; clinically distinct group, dysmorphic features more likely, non-motor comorbidity more likely
Cerebral palsy - general presentation
- Spectrum
a. Children with cerebral palsy are an extremely heterogenous group and the degree of handicap experienced varies enormously
b. Approximately 30% are hemiplegic, 25% diplegic and 45% have quadriparesis
c. Some children have an isolated motor disorder - Clinical presentation
a. Neurobehavioral signs
i. Excessive docility
ii. Irritability
iii. Poor feeding in neonatal period
iv. Irritably, poor sleep, frequent vomiting
v. Difficult to handle and cuddle
b. Developmental reflexes
i. Most reflexes related to posture (tonic labyrinthine, tonic neck, Gallant) disappear between 3-6 months of age
ii. Infants with CP – delay in disappearance or exaggeration of a developmental reflex
iii. Obligatory developmental reflex (persists as long as stimulus applied) abnormal at any age
c. Motor tone + posture
i. Tone may be normal, increased or decreased
ii. Persistent or asymmetric fisting abnormal
iii. Abnormal oromotor pattern including tongue retraction and thrust, tonic bite, oral hypersensitivity, grimacing
iv. Poor head control
d. Motor milestones
i. Common delayed milestones
1. Not sitting by 8 months
2. Not walking by 18 months
3. Early asymmetry of hand function <1 year
e. Associated problems
i. Feeding difficulty
Cerebral palsy - classification
a. Type of motor disorder = spasticity, dyskinesia (dystonia, athetosis), ataxia
b. Distribution = hemiplegia (35%), diplegia (30%), quadriplegia (35%)
i. Monoplegia = one limb, usually LL
ii. Hemiplegia = unilateral impairment R>L or L>R (usually UL > LL)
iii. Diplegia = impairment of all four limbs, LL>UL
iv. Triplegia = unilateral UL, asymmetric LL
v. Quadriplegia = all four limbs
c. Severity of motor dysfunction
i. Gross Motor Function Classification System
1. Reliable for children with CP <18years – descriptors vary 6-12 and 12-18 years
2. Predictive 1 (mild) to 5 (severe)
3. 60% of children walk without aids
4. Level 1 – walks without restriction, limitations in more advanced gross motor skills
5. Level 2 – walks without devices, limitations walking outdoors and in community
6. Level 3 – walks with mobility device, limitations walking outdoors and community (sit and can get in and out of frame, crutches, walker)
7. Level 4 – self mobility with devices, limitations walking outdoors and community (cannot move in/out of frame, difficult sitting, wheelchair)
8. Level 5 – self mobility severely limited even with use of supporting technology (head and trunk postures absent, dependent on wheelchair)
ii. Functional Mobility score
iii. Manual Ability Classification Scale (MACS) = fine motor
iv. Communication Function Classification System (CFCS)
Cerebral palsy - motor subtypes
a. Spastic
i. Injury to UMN of pyramidal tracts or motor cortices
ii. Signs of spastic CP
1. Increased tone
2. Signs of UMN syndrome
3. Brisk deep tendon reflexes
4. Extensor plantar response
5. Clonus
iii. Subtypes
1. Spastic diplegia
2. Spastic hemiplegia
3. Spastic quadriplegia
b. Dyskinetic
i. Basal ganglia lesions which result in involuntary, uncontrolled, recurring movement
ii. Classification
1. Choreoathetosis
a. Chorea = rapid, irregular, unpredictable contractions of individual muscles or small muscle groups that involve the face, bulbar muscles, proximal extremities, and fingers and toes
b. Athetosis = slow, smooth, writhing movements that involve distal muscles
2. Dystonia = involuntary sustained contractions resulting in patterned, twisting movements of the trunk/limbs that may be slow or rapid (hypokinesia and hypotonia)
c. Ataxic
i. Due to cerebellar injury
ii. Loss of muscle coordination with impaired force, rhythm and accuracy
iii. Commonly gait and trunk ataxia, poor balance, past pointing, intention tremor, nystagmus, hypotonia
Cerebral palsy - spastic diplegia
13-25%
Aetiology: PVL
Affects: Preterm infants
Infants and young children
• First few months: hypotonia of the lower limbs with delayed functional maturation
• By 6 months: spasticity involving ankle plantar flexors and hip adductors
• Crawling may be combat style
Children >5 years old • Contractures of affected muscles • LL > UL • Flexion, adduction + IR of hips with contractures of hip flexors + hamstrings • Flexion at elbows + knees • Reduced LL strength + muscle bulk
Cerebral palsy - spastic hemiplegia
21-40%
Aetiology: Neonatal stroke, Prenatal circulatory disturbances, Brain maldevelopment
Affects: Term infants with normal BW
Infants/young children
• Motor asymmetry
• Hand dominance <12 months + unable to use both hands in midline
• Unilateral
• Protective reactions (appear at 5-8 months) asymmetric
• Initial low tone + movement on affected side followed by increased tone + reflexes
• Typical posture appears by age two years in most cases
Older children >5yrs
• One side of the body is affected
• Arm > Leg
• UMN posture
• Arm = adducted at the shoulder and flexed at elbow, forearm pronated and wrist + fingers flexed with hands closed
• Leg = hip flexed and adducted, knee and ankle flexed; the foot may remain in the equinovarus or calcaneovalgus position
• Most children also have sensory deficits
• Postural abnormalities more apparent during running/walking
• Independent walking usually occurs at the appropriate age or is only slightly delayed
Cerebral palsy - spastic quadriplegia
20-43%
Aetiology: Congenital infection, Cerebral dysgenesis, Perinatal or postnatal evets
Affects: SGA, late preterms
Infants/young children • Moderate or severe psychomotor delay • Poor head control • Spasticity from 2-3 months • Scissoring of legs – adduction • 9-10 months – unable to flex legs and poor truncal tone
Older children >5yrs
• All limbs are affected
• UL > than or equal to LL
• Children often are severely handicapped
• Feeding difficulties, chronic respiratory insufficiency, and seizure disorder are common
Cerebral palsy - ataxic subtype
4-13%
Aetiology: Early prenatal event, Frequently unknown, Genetic
Affects: Term infants
Infants/young children:
• Hypotonia and incoordination
• Motor milestones and language skills typically are delayed
Children older >5yrs • Ataxic movements • Widespread disorder of motor function • Ataxia usually improves with time • Speech typically is slow, jerky, and explosive
Cerebral palsy - dyskinetic subtypes (general)
12-14%
Aetiology: Severe perinatal asphyxia, Kernicterus - choreoathetotic CP
Affects: Term infants
Infants/ <2 years • Reduced spontaneous movement • Hypotonia at rest, variable tone with movement or emotion • Oromotor incoordination • Persistence of primitive reflexes • Involuntary grimacing • Drooling • Delayed psychomotor development • Head can be persistently turned
Age 2-3
• Involuntary movements
• Extension patterns in the supine position + flexion with shoulder retraction in prone position
• Head usually is persistently turned to one side
Age >5yrs
• Involuntary movements
• Contractures later in life (not common)
• Variable degree of dysarthria + ID
Choreoathetotic CP
Dyskinetic subtype, 12-14% (including dystonic), d/t severe perinatal asphyxia, kernicterus
- Chorea + anthesis - induced or accentuated by emotion or change in posture
- Athetosis is most apparent during reaching
- Stress, excitement, or fever may exacerbate chorea
- Primitive reflexes retained
- Oropharyngeal difficulties occur commonly
Dystonic CP
Dyskinetic subtype, 12-14% (including choreoathetotic), d/t severe perinatal asphyxia, kernicterus
- Repetitive, patterned, twisting, and sustained movements of the trunk and limbs that may be either slow or rapid
- Pyramidal signs and anarthria may occur
- “Tension” = sudden involuntary ↑ tone affecting both flexor and extensor muscles, during attempted movement or emotion
- Tendon reflexes = normal or may be difficult to elicit
- Clonus + extensor plantar response absent
Cerebral palsy - assessment and ix
- History
a. Family history, pregnancy history, maternal disease (eg. thyroid), maternal infection
b. Drug ingestion, alcohol
c. Gestational age
d. Birth history, APGAR, neonatal encephalopathy, duration of NICU/ SCN stay
i. Identify high risk groups – premature, IUGR, neonatal encephalopathy
ii. Only 25% of children with neonatal encephalopathy
e. Concerning features – poor feeding, poor bulbar function, irritability, seizures, fisting, bilateral signs, delay in motor milestones, poor head growth
f. Developmental history
g. Age at diagnosis – severe CP can be diagnosed early (<12 months) - Examination
a. General tone – trunk vs limbs
b. Abnormal tone - hypertonia, hypotonia
c. Asymmetric tone
d. Head control, eye movements
e. Quality of movements, movement disorder – note dystonia can present late
f. Primitive reflexes
g. Reduced selective motor control
h. Hypertonic reflexes
i. Persistence of primitive reflexes
j. General Movement Assessment (GMA) – quality of spontaneous movements; absent/abnormal increases risk of CP – higher ‘hit rate’ if combined with MRI - Investigations
a. Genetic tests - Karyotype / microarray
i. GATM gene sequencing – AGAT deficiency
ii. SLC6A8 gene sequencing – creatinine transporter deficiency
iii. WBC enzyme testing – Krabbe
iv. Arylsulfatase – MLD
b. TSH (hypothyroid)
c. Metabolic screen
i. Blood = acyl carnitine profile, carnitine, amino acids, cholesterol, copper, caeruloplasmin
ii. CSF = amino acids, glucose (GLUT-1), pyruvate/lactate (PDHD), biogenic amines (Segawa, DTDS, AADC)
d. +/- EEG if indicated
e. MRI brain = abnormal in about 85% of patients with CP
i. Abnormalities of white matter most common – 45%
ii. Grey matter injury associated with perinatal compromise
iii. Not done before 2 years of age
iv. White matter lesions more common in ambulant children
v. Basal ganglia more common in more severe GMFCS
vi. Timing
1. Brain malformations 12-20weeks
2. Periventricular white matter injury 26-34weeks
3. Cortical and subcortical gliosis 36-44weeks
- Comorbid conditions
a. 25-80% of all individuals with CP had additional impairments
b. Impact on function, QOL and longevity
i. ID 30-65%
ii. Epilepsy 30-50%
iii. Speech and language deficit 40%
iv. Visual impairment 40%
v. Hearing impairment 5-15%
Cerebral palsy - MSK complications
- Complications of spasticity
a. Hip displacement
b. Scoliosis
c. Contractures + deformity - Hip
a. Surveillance
i. ALL children with CP require surveillance - Hip displacement common
- GMFCSV dysfunction – almost 100% rate of hip dysplasia
ii. Initial radiology between 12-24 month
iii. Frequency based on GMFCSV, radiology, clinical findings
b. Referral
i. Migration percentage > 30%, Pain, Other orthopaedic problem
c. Management
i. Non-operative, Botox + bracing, Weight bearing assists with hip development
iv. Surgical - Salvage surgery
- Preventative surgery – adductor muscle release, aims to halt progression
- Bony surgery – VDRO
a. Femoral osteotomy +/- acetabular reconstruction
c. Maintains stable, enlocated hips in the long-term with minimal risk of recurrence - Scoliosis
a. Source of pain
b. Pressure areas
c. Respiratory compromise – surgery prevents decline in restrictive lung disease but does not regain function
d. Management
i. Bracing
ii. Botox
iii. Bipolar surgery – can be done prior to hip development
iv. Spinal rodding - Osteoporosis
a. Non-weight bearing
b. Monitoring should start at 3 years and choose as indicated
Cerebral palsy - cx: movement disorders - types
a. Dystonia
i. Sustained or intermittent contractions causing twisting and repetitive movement or abnormal posture
ii. Predictable, repeated, superimposed over or part of voluntary movement
iii. Often triggered by purposeful movement
b. Athetosis
i. Slow, continuous, involuntary writhing movement that prevents maintenance of a stable posture
ii. Continuous, smooth, repeated but not sustained
c. Stereotypies
i. Repetitive, simple movements that can be voluntarily suppressed
d. Tremor
i. A rhythmic back and forth or oscillating involuntary movement about a joint axis
e. Myoclonus
i. Sequence of repeated, often non-rhythmic, brief, shock like jerks due to sudden involuntary contraction or relaxation of one or more muscles
f. Chorea
i. Ongoing and random appearing sequence of one or more discrete involuntary movements or movement fragments
ii. Random due to variations in timing, duration, direction and anatomic location
g. Tics
i. Repeated, individually recognizable movements or movement fragments that are almost always briefly suppressible
ii. Associated with an awareness of an urge to perform the movement
h. Hyperkinesis/ dyskinesia
i. Any unwanted or excessive movements seen in children with neurologic disorders
ii. Usually associated with injury to BG, cerebral cortex, cerebellar or other motor pathways
i. Spasticity
i. Isokinetic movement disorder characterised by velocity dependent increased resistance to passive muscle tone
ii. Felt not seen
Cerebral palsy - cx: movement disorders, treatment
a. Pharmacological
i. Oral
1. GABA-active medications = baclofen, diazepam
a. AE = sedation, weakness, constipation, nausea, headache, low mood, risk of withdrawal and gradually stop
2. Anti-epileptics = gabapentin, Keppra, topiramate
3. Anti-cholinergic = tetrabenazine, reserpine
4. DOPA-active drugs = levodopa, bromocriptine, pergolide
5. DOPA-antagonist depletors = chlorpromazine
6. Alpha agonists = clonidine, tizanidine
ii. Intrathecal baclofen
1. If severe
2. Improves endurance associated with spasticity (beware withdrawal due to mechanical failures)
b. Non-pharmacological
i. Physiotherapy
ii. Splinting/castings
iii. Orthoses (E.g. AFOs)
iv. Walking aids – brace, crutches, canes, walkers, wheelchairs
c. Surgical
i. Botulinum A toxin for localised spasticity
ii. Selective dorsal rhizotomy – severe spastic diplegia
Cerebral palsy - GI cx summary
Poor dentition Poor salivary control Dysphagia and GORD Incontinence and constipation Feeding and nutrition problems
Cerebral palsy - GI cx: poor salivary control
a. Highly associated with ID and epilepsy
b. Prevalence 40%
c. Consequences
i. Respiratory
ii. Aspiration
iii. Sleep disturbance
iv. Skin excoriation
v. Social
d. Contributors
i. Poor dental health
ii. Upper airway issues
iii. Intranasal congestion
iv. Pain
v. Poor control
e. Treatment
i. Referral
1. Dental review
2. Speech therapy
ii. Non-pharm
1. Tone management
2. Positioning
3. Behaviour management
iii. Pharmacological
1. Intranasal steroids – nasal congestion
2. Anticholinergics – benzhexol, glycopyrrolate
3. Anti-muscarinic – scopolamine, hysocine, probantheline
4. Alpha adrenergic agonists – clonidine
5. TCA – amitriptyline
6. All oral medications have side effects – agitation, anxiety, hallucinations, low mood, reduced heat tolerance, poor sleep, constipation, urinary retention, seizures, THICK SALIVA
iv. Surgical
1. Botox injection
a. Effective – reduction in dribble for up to 12 months
b. Complications
i. Problems with swallowing
ii. Changes in saliva consistency
2. Excision of salivary glands
3. Ligation of salivary ducts
4. Relocation of ducts
Cerebral palsy - GI cx: dysphagia and GORD
a. Aetiology
i. Oropharyngeal dysphasia
ii. Bulbar dysfunction
iii. Dystonic/dyskinetic oral and tongue movements
b. Consequences
i. Choking + vomiting
ii. Underweight
iii. Increased feeding time, feeding distress + carer burden
c. Treatment
i. GORD
1. Non-pharmacological
a. Positioning
b. Thickened feeds
2. Surgical
a. PEG/GJ feeds – continuous
b. +/- fundoplication
3. Medications
a. Ranitidine
b. Omeprazole + esomeprazole
c. Eradication of H pylori
Cerebral palsy - cx: urological
- Continence
- Neurogenic bladder
a. Oxybutinin
b. Monitoring renal tract/function - Undescended testes
Cerebral palsy - cx: respiratory
- Contributors to poor respiratory function
a. Restrictive lung disease – scoliosis
b. Neuromuscular weakness
c. Aspiration – poor saliva control, GORD
d. Recurrent infections
e. OSA
f. Poor sleep - Investigations
a. Studies to assess aspiration/ swallow - videofluoroscopy
b. CAB when well
c. Overnight oximetry
d. Sleep study - Treatment
a. Pharmacological – poor sleep
i. Melatonin, trimeprazine, chloral hydrate, SSRI, amitriptyline
b. Aspiration
i. PPI
ii. PEG/fundo
c. Neuromuscular weakness/ restrictive lung disease/ OSA
i. Supplemental oxygen
ii. NP airway, CPAP, BiPAP
d. General
i. Physiotherapy
ii. N saline NEB
iii. Positioning
iv. Saliva control
v. Tone management
vi. Treatment of intercurrent infections
vii. Surgical – OSA - Tonsillectomy
- Adenoidectomy
- Tongue reduction
- Jaw distraction
Cerebral palsy - cx: neurological
a. Epilepsy
i. Similar to epilepsy – valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenytoin
ii. Diplegia 20%, hemiplegia 50%, quadriplegia 75%
b. Intellectual disability
i. Occur in 50% of individuals with CP
ii. Children benefit from cognitive assessment particularly at school entry
iii. Perceptual problems may also be identified
c. Specific learning disability
d. Perceptual problems
- Hearing
a. Hearing deficit = moderate degree found in 7% of children
b. All children require hearing assessment - Visual impairment
a. Visual problems = found in 45% of children with CP - Communication
a. Receptive or expressive language delays
b. Dysarthria
c. May require communication aid such as electronic device
d. Communication Function Classification System rates a child’s every day communication performance
Cerebral palsy - mortality
• Peak in mortality in childhood and adolescence
• Mortality highest in children <15 years of age compared with age matched peers
• Mortality by age group
o Mortality twice population rate at 35 years
o 3% by 5 years, 6% by 10 years, 11% by 20 years
o Median age at death 45-55 years
• Predictors of mortality
o Include = no independent ambulation, severe intellectual impairment, epilepsy, deafness (associated with CMV, kernicterus and long NICU stay), term birth, dyskinesia, quadriplegia, comorbid additive impact on mortality (epilepsy, deafness, severe ID, lack of speech)
o Respiratory causes most common cause of direct death
o Strongest predictor of mortality is no independent ambulation (individuals with severe motor impairment had >30x the risk of mortality)
o Term birth is a risk factor – likely associated more severe motor impairment (likely marker for severe HIE)
• Discovered dead during sleep (DDDS)
o Average age 17 years
o Majority PEG fed – marker of poor bulbar function
Salter Harris fracture classification
Although there are more recent and more complex classifications, the Salter-Harris classification is the most widely used and clinically useful approach to classifying and describing physeal injuries in children. About 90% of children with physeal injuries can be classified using the five Salter-Harris classifications from plain x-rays.
S (“Straight across”) – Type I (low risk for growth plate injury), Transverse fracture through the growth plate. Healing is rapid for type I fractures, within 2-3 weeks of injury and problems are rare especially in sites such as the distal radius.
A (“Above”) – Type II, fracture through the physis and the metaphysis (most common type, 75%), Transverse fracture through the growth plate and an oblique or vertical fracture through the metaphysis. Usually easy to reduce.
L (“Lower” or “BeLow”) – Type III, fracture through the physis and the epiphysis, Transverse fracture through the growth plate and a vertical fracture through the epiphysis. Displaced injuries may result in a physeal bar, leading to growth disturbance and joint incongruity, leading to arthritis. Most displaced type III injuries require open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).
T (“Two” or “Through”) – Type IV, fracture through the physis and both the metaphysis and the epiphysis (high risk for growth plate injury), Vertical fracture through all three components, metaphysis, physis and epiphysis. Most displaced type IV injuries require ORIF and long-term follow-up to detect growth disturbance.
E (“End”) or ER (“ERasure of the growth plate”) “cRush” – Type V (high risk for growth plate injury), Compression fracture or crushing of the growth plate. These injuries are almost always diagnosed retrospectively, when a growth arrest has occurred.
Refer to ortho: type III and IV, open #, neurovascular compromise
Shoulder dislocations - general
- Types of shoulder dislocation
a. Anterior = 95%
b. Posterior = 5% electric shock or seizure
c. Inferior = <1% - Complications
a. Bankart lesion = injury of anterior glenoid labrum
b. Hill-sachs lesion = cortical depression in posterolateral head of humerus
c. Rotator cuff tear
d. Axillary nerve injury
i. Course
1. Runs inferiorly to the humeral head and wraps around the surgical neck of the humerus
ii. Muscles innervated
1. Deltoid
2. Teres minor
iii. Motor function
1. Abduction of arm at shoulder beyond first 15 degrees
iv. Sensory
1. Skin over shoulder (miliary badge distribution)
Clavicle fractures - general
Location: middle third/midshaft 80%, lateral third 15%, proximal third 5% and a/w dislocation.
• Careful neurological examination should be performed to define potential (but rare) associated brachial plexus injury.
• Vascular assessment of the arm should also be performed as the subclavian artery runs closely opposed to the clavicle in the middle third.
MANAGEMENT
Middle third
• Broad arm sling to support limb for 2 weeks or until comfortable. No evidence to support Figure of 8 bandage or brace
• If age >12 years and shortened >2 cm refer to orthopaedics for opinion
• If <11 years and undisplaced, follow-up by a GP or fracture clinic is usually not required. Repeat x-rays are usually not required
• If displaced or ≥11 years, follow up with GP or fracture clinic in 1 week
Lateral third
• Broad arm sling to support limb for 2 weeks or until comfortable. No evidence to support Figure of 8 bandage or brace
• If displaced, refer to the nearest orthopaedic service on call
• Fracture clinic in 5-7 days with x-ray
Medial third
• If displaced, urgent referral to the nearest orthopaedic on call service
• Follow up to be arranged by orthopaedic service
Proximal humerus fractures - general
- Most proximal humeral fractures do not require reduction as remodeling is extremely effective in the proximal humerus
- The usual treatment for this fracture is immobilisation of the shoulder in a sling, body swathe or shoulder immobilizer
- Patients should be seen in the fracture clinic or by an interested GP within 7 days for follow-up with x-rays to assess further displacement
Background
- Proximal humeral fractures represent <5% of all paediatric fractures
- FOOSH
- not commonly a/w NAI
• Infantile proximal injuries are usually transphyseal separation incurred during the birth process
o May not be seen on x-ray as the proximal humeral epiphysis appears at about six months of age.
o Ultrasound may be needed in this setting.
Management
• The proximal physis contributes 80% of the length of the humerus
• Due to the enormous remodeling potential, most of these injuries do not require reduction
• There is no role for attempted reduction in the ED.
• The older child with greater deformity may be treated with closed reduction. This is controversial and there are no agreed figures to guide closed operative reduction.
• Approximate indications are:
o 5-12 years - accept 60 degree angulation and 50% displacement
o >12 years - accept 30 degrees angulation and 30% displacement
• Isolated greater tuberosity fractures with displacement in the adolescent are an exception group in which surgical reduction and fixation is usually required.
Humeral shaft fractures - general
Background
• Uncommon – account for 2-5% of all fractures in children
• Transverse and short oblique fractures are generally as a result from direct trauma, whereas spiral fractures are caused by indirect twisting, as with a fall
• Pathological fractures through a humeral simple bone cyst are relatively common after minimal trauma in children over 7 years old
• Humeral shaft fractures are the second most common birth fracture
• Spiral fractures of the humerus in toddler age and younger are strongly linked with non-accidental injury
o Careful history and examination are required to determine the child at risk.
Management
• Reduction is seldom required for humeral shaft fractures
• Fractures will usually “hang out” (i.e. under influence of gravity) to good alignment and apposition using a collar and cuff
• Mid-shaft humeral fractures should be followed up in fracture clinic at 1 week
Supracondylar elbow fractures - general
Identifying fracture
• The Gartland type classification is based on the lateral x-ray, identifying where the capitellum sits in relation to a line drawn down the anterior aspect of the humerus - the anterior humeral line.
• In a normal elbow, a line drawn on a lateral view along the anterior surface of the humerus should pass through the middle third of the capitellum
• If it passes through the anterior third of the capitellum or misses the capitellum completely, the fracture is displaced posteriorly.
Complications
• Gartland type III injuries have the highest risk of neurovascular injury -> Volkmann’s ischaemia
o Compartment syndrome followed by the development of Volkmann’s ischaemic contracture
Supracondylar fractures are initially divided into two types, depending on the direction of displacement of the distal fragment:
- Flexion-type (rare) - distal fragment is displaced anteriorly
- Extension-type (98%) - distal fragment is displaced posteriorly
Type 1 (undisplaced)
- ED management
• Immobilisation in an above-elbow backslab in 90 degrees elbow flexion with sling for 3 weeks. The backslab and sling should be worn under clothing (e.g. loose fitting shirt) and not through the sleeve
• TIP: Avoid putting on a short, flimsy backslab. The backslab should extend as high above the elbow as possible (i.e. close to the axilla) and down to the metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP) joints.
- follow up
• Undisplaced fractures can be followed up with the GP in 3 weeks
• Repeat x-ray is not required.
Type 2 (Angulated fracture with intact posterior cortex)
- ED management
• Refer to the nearest orthopaedic on call service for advice
• A gentle reduction can be achieved by an anterior push on the distal fragment as the elbow is flexed to 90 degrees
• Note the exception is type II injuries with coronal plane deformity. These must always be managed by orthopaedics.
- follow up
• Observation overnight
• Fracture clinic within 7 days post-injury with x-ray of distal humerus in backslab
Type 3 (Displaced distal fragment posteriorly, no cortical contact)
- ED management
• Refer to the nearest orthopaedic on call service
• Requires urgent reduction and percutaneous pin fixation
- follow up
• To be organised by orthopaedic service
Indications for prompt consultation (ortho) include:
- Associated absence of pulse or ischaemia
- Open or impending open fracture (large anterior bruise)
- Associated nerve injuries
- Gartland type II & III fractures
- Associated same arm forearm or wrist injury
- Flexion supracondylar fractures
- Unable to achieve or maintain reduction (including if ED is not experienced in fracture reduction, splinting or casting)
Forearm fracture dislocations - general
Monteggia fracture-dislocation = dislocation radial head + fracture of ulna
Galeazzi fracture-dislocation = dislocation of distal radioulnar joint + fracture of radial shaft
Both require urgent referral to orthopedics
Distal radial fractures - general
0-5 years = <20 deg angulation
5-10 years = <15 deg angulation
10-15 years = <10 deg angulation
Salter Harris 1
- cx: Rarely associated with growth disturbance
- ED management
Undisplaced: Below-elbow plaster backslab or removable splint for 4 weeks
Displaced: Closed reduction and below-elbow plaster backslab for 4 weeks
Reduction is not advisable after ≥5 days of initial injury Undisplaced and displaced:
- follow up: Fracture clinic within 5 days of immobilisation
SH2
- as above
SH3
- cx: Medium risk of growth disturbance
- ED management
Refer to orthopaedics - usually requires open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)
- f/up: Fracture clinic as per post-operative orders
SH4
- high risk of growth disturbance
- as for SH3
SH5
- high risk of growth disturbance
- rarely seen/diagnosed acutely, usually dx retrospectively
- f/up: fracture clinic as per post op orders