Furcation Flashcards
furcation distance: Max Molars
Mesial- 3.6mm
facial- 4.2mm
distal- 4.8mm
furcation distance: mand 1st molar
buccal- 2.4
lingual- 2.5
root concavitites: max molars
94% MB
31% DB
17% P
root concavitites: mand molar
100% M
99% D
position of interdental bone suggestive of
furcation involvement
anatomical factor associated with furcation invasions
- cervical enamel projections (common)
- Furcation entrance width
- bifurcation ridges
- furcation and root concavities
- accessory pulp canals
- enamel pearls
- furcation restorations
furcation arrows
- limited usefulness as a diagnostic marker of furcation invasion
- difficult in interpreting
- 40% sensitivity
- subjective observation
diagnosis of furcations
- nabors probe
- generally overestimated when compared to surgical presentation
- absence of furcation arrow does not rule out furcation invasion
enamel pearls/projections prevent
connective tissue attachment, possibly predisposing that area to attachment loss
incidence of enamel pearls range from
1.1-9.7% (mean 2.69%)
predilection for max 3rd and 2nd molars
treatment for enamel pearl
odontoplasty
Grades for enamel pearl
1: is incipient
2: approaches but does not enter furcation
3: enters the furcation
accessory pulp canals, repoted incidence range from
- 4 to 76% in max molars
29. 4 to 63% in mand molars
teeth initially diagnosed with furcation that were lost in 15 years
19 to 57%
teeth without furcation that were lost in 15 years
5 to 10%