Fracture Management and Fracture Assessment Score (Betance 4) Flashcards
Fracture healing = race between ____ _____ and _____ failure
fracture healing; implant (failure)
State the aims of fracture repair:
- Encourage _____
- Restore ____ to bone and to surrounding ____ ____
- Obtain a ______ acceptable result
- Early return to _____
- Encourage (healing)
- Restore (function) to bone and to surrounding (soft tissue)
- Obtain a (cosmetically) acceptable result
- Early return to (function)
State the term based on the definition:
A method of assessing the clinical situation, not only the fractured bone, as an aid to implant selection. Must assess mechanical biological and clinical factors
Fracture assessment score
Describe an example mechanical fracture assessment score of 1-2
Non reducible fragments, multiple limb injury, giant breed (caution!!! bad)
Describe an example mechanical fracture assessment score of 5-6
Reducible fragment from preexisting clinical disease large dog (mid risk)
Describe an example mechanical fracture assessment score of 9-10
Little risk: single limb toy breed compression fracture
_____ bone is associated with low scores such as 0-3 (which is really bad high caution)
Cortical
_____ bone is associated with high scores such as 8-10 (which is really good low caution)
Cancellous
State the associated fracture score in terms of implants:
Lengthening plate or plate ord combination
Type 2 or 3 EF +/- tie in
Interlocking nail
Plate external fixator combination
Low scores 0-3 (bad)
Long TIP
State the associated fracture score in terms of implants:
Bone plate
Type 1 or 2 EF
EF + IM pin
Interlocking nail
IM pin and cerclage wires
Moderate score 4-7
B -one -two TIME
State the associated fracture score in terms of implants:
Type 1 ESF
IM pin and cerclage wires
External Coaptation
High scores 8-10 (best case easy to fix)
M-CITE
Provide a score:
good client compliance
good patient compliance
stoic
comfort level not considered
High score 8-10
Provide a score:
poor client compliance
poor patient compliance
WIMP
High comfort level
Low score 0-3
Compare and contrast and give a fracture assessment score
- Reducible
- Predisposing clinical dz
- large breed
- mid to young adult
- minimal invasive approach
- oblique
- tranverse
versus
- compression injury
- juvenile
- excellent health
- good soft tissue
- calcellous bone
- low velocity injury
- closed
versus
- nonreducible
- multi limb injury
- giant breed
- old age
- poor health
- decreased soft tissue
- high velocity injury (HBC)
- extensive approach
- cortical bone
Moderate 4-7
- Reducible
- Predisposing clinical dz
- large breed
- mid to young adult
- minimal invasive approach
- oblique
- tranverse
High score 8-10
- compression injury
- juvenile
- excellent health
- good soft tissue
- calcellous bone
- low velocity injury
- closed
Low score 0-3 BAD
- nonreducible
- multi limb injury
- giant breed
- old age
- poor health
- decreased soft tissue
- high velocity injury (HBC)
- extensive approach
- cortical bone
Label the fracture score
- Implant must bridge fracture and assume most if not all of the load, delayed healing is possible or likely
- Less stress and or endurance of implant
- Minimum implant stress because bone shares the load and enhanced healing potential
Low score 0-3
-Implant must bridge fracture and assume most if not all of the load, delayed healing is possible or likely
Moderate score
-4-7-Less stress and or endurance of implant
High score
-8-10-Minimum implant stress because bone shares the load and enhanced healing potential