Formation Flashcards

1
Q

Conceptual model of the primary dimensions that underlie individual differences in personality:

extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience

A

Big Five theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Degree to which an individual tends to seek out social contacts.

A

Extraversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Degree to which one’s values, attitudes, and outlooks emphasize, and facilitate establishing and maintaining, connections to others.

A

Relationality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dispositional tendency to seek out others

A

Need for affiliation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dispositional tendency to seek warm, positive relationships with others

A

Need for intimacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Dispositional tendency to seek control over others.

A

Need for power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Theory of group formation and development
proposed by William Schutz that emphasizes compatibility among three basic social motives: inclusion, control, and affection.

A

Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation (FIRO)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Feeling of apprehension and embarrassment experienced when anticipating or actually interacting with other people.

A

Social anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

One’s characteristic approach to relationships with other people:

secure, preoccupied, fearful, and dismissing

A

Attachment style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluating the accuracy of personal beliefs and attitudes by comparing oneself to others

A

Social comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Comparing oneself to others who are performing less effectively relative to
oneself.

A

Downward social comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Comparing oneself to others who are performing more effectively relative to
oneself.

A

Upward social comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Theory proposed by Abraham Tesser which assumes that individuals maintain and enhance self-esteem by associating with high-achieving individuals who excel in areas that
are not relevant to their own sense of self-esteem and avoiding association with high-achieving individuals who excel in areas that are important to their sense of self-esteem.

A

Self-evaluation maintenance (SEM) model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A sense of belonging, emotional support,
advice, guidance, tangible assistance, and spiritual perspective given to others when they experience stress, daily hassles, and more significant life crises.

A

Social support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dispositional tendency to compare oneself to others.

A

Social comparison orientation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups (5)

A

Belonging
Emotional support
Informational support
Instrumental support
Spiritual support

17
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups

Inclusion in a group

A

Belonging

18
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups

Expressing caring and concern for one another

A

Emotional support

19
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups

Providing advice and guidance

A

Informational support

20
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups

Providing tangible resources

A

Instrumental support

21
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups

Addressing issues of meaning and purpose

A

Spiritual support

22
Q

Feelings of desperation, boredom, self deprecation, and depression experienced when individuals feel their personal relationships are too few or too
unsatisfying

A

Loneliness

23
Q

Tendency for individuals to form interpersonal relations with those who are close by.

A

Proximity principle

24
Q

Tendency for groups to expand as members form dyadic associations with someone
who is not in the group and thereby draw the nonmember into the group.

A

Elaboration principle

25
Q

Tendency to affiliate with or be attracted to similar others; this tendency causes groups and other interpersonal aggregates to be composed of individuals who are similar to one another rather than dissimilar.

A

Similarity principle

26
Q

Tendency for group members to display
certain affinities, such as similarities in demographic background, attitudes, values, or so on; the overall degree of similarity of individuals within the same group.

A

Homophily

27
Q

Tendency for group members to like people who are dissimilar to them in ways that complement their personal qualities.

A

Complementarity principle

28
Q

As described by William Schutz, compatibility between group members based on their similar needs for inclusion, control, and affection.

A

Interchange compatibility

29
Q

Tendency for liking to be met with liking in return; if A likes B then B will tend to like A.

A

Reciprocity principle

30
Q

Tendency to prefer relationships and group memberships that provide the maximum
number of valued rewards and incur the fewest number of possible costs.

A

Minimax principle

31
Q

In John Thibaut and Harold Kelley’s social exchange theory, the standard by which individuals evaluate the quality of other groups that they may join.

A

Comparison level for alternatives (CLalt)