Experimental Design Flashcards
Experimental design is perhaps the single most important topic in MCAT P/S. Use this deck to master types of variables, reliability and validity, relevant statistical concepts, and more.
In an experiment, which variable is manipulated by researchers?
independent variable
The independent variable is the variable that is controlled or changed by the experimenters. The goal is to assess whether these manipulations impact the dependent variable.
In the graphed results of a typical experimental study, which variable is on the y-axis?
dependent variable
The dependent variable is the variable that changes in response to the independent variable. This variable is usually plotted on the y-axis, which helps visualize the magnitude of the changes.
In an experiment, which variable is measured?
dependent variable
The dependent variable is the variable that is measured by the experimenters. The goal is to assess how differences in the dependent variable correspond to the intentional changes made by the researchers to the independent variable.
In the graphed results of a typical experimental study, which variable is on the x-axis?
independent variable
The independent variable is the variable that is manipulated by the experimenters. Since this variable is typically varied in consistent increments, it makes sense to plot it on the x-axis.
A researcher in Singapore is studying the impact of PTSD on burnout rate in police officers. If these study results were graphed, what would be on the y-axis?
Burnout rate
Here, burnout rate is being measured, making it the dependent variable. The dependent variable is typically plotted on the y-axis.
A researcher in Singapore is studying the impact of PTSD on burnout rate in police officers. If these study results were graphed, what would be on the x-axis?
PTSD status
Here, PTSD status is something that the experimenters believe may influence the dependent variable (burnout rate). Therefore, PTSD status is the independent variable, which is typically plotted on the x-axis.
True or false.
Experiments can have only one independent and one dependent variable.
False
Experiments, including on the MCAT, can have multiple independent and/or multiple dependent variables. This is usually clear from the results, which (if in graph form, for example) might show multiple bars at each data point or have multiple x- or y-axes.
In an experiment, which type of variable can explain the relationship between the independent and dependent variables?
mediating variable
As its name implies, a mediating variable essentially “goes between” two other variables to explain their relationship. For instance, imagine that an increase in variable A leads to an increase in variable C (put symbolically, A → C). If this is found to be true because an increase in A leads to an increase in B (A → B), which then leads to an increase in C (A → B → C), then variable B is a mediating variable.
In an experiment, which type of variable can explain variations in the strength of the relationship between the independent and dependent variables?
moderating variable
This concept can be tricky! Just imagine that an increase in an independent variable corresponds to an increase in a dependent variable. Under certain circumstances, it might correspond to a large increase, but under others, it might only produce a small increase. These circumstances, which “moderate” the strength of the relationship, are moderating variables.
What is socioeconomic status (SES) called when it impacts both the independent and dependent variables in a study, even if it is not the focus of the study?
confounding variable
This relationship can cause researchers to erroneously believe that the independent and dependent variables are related, when in fact their results are due to the presence of the confounding variable.
True or false.
If a researcher is studying the impact of the provision of medical information on patient adherence to doctor advice, and gender is found to play a role, gender must be a confounding variable.
False
It’s easy to assume that just because gender isn’t being studied (that is, it isn’t the independent or dependent variable), that it must be a confounding variable! However, that is not accurate; it could be a mediating or moderating variable instead.
A study is designed to assess the impact of dog ownership on stress. One post-bac student believes this study is flawed because it does not also assess the impact of cat ownership. Is the student correct?
no
This question relates to study scope. A study design does not need to include the assessment of every possible factor, including those outside its scope! Here, the study aims only to assess dog ownership; adding another independent variable of cat ownership would fall outside this scope.
Imagine that across the country, flights tend to be delayed more on Mondays than on any other day. However, in the southwest U.S., flights are delayed far more often on Mondays, while in the eastern U.S., flights are only delayed slightly more often. Here, region of the country is what kind of variable?
A moderating variable
In this example, the region of the country “moderates” (or affects the strength of) the existing relationship between the day of the week and the likelihood of flight delays.
In a study of the influence of poverty on alcoholism, poverty is found to be associated with stress, which in turn is associated with increased rates of alcoholism. Here, what kind of variable is stress?
mediating variable
Here, stress explains the relationship between poverty and alcoholism, making it a mediating variable.
A Ph.D. student develops an experiment in which she measures the impact of eating breakfast on both cortisol levels and subject-reported alertness. In this study, whether a subject ate breakfast is what kind of variable?
independent variable
Since the Ph.D. student is evaluating the effects of eating breakfast, breakfast-eating status is the independent variable. It is likely that certain subjects are told to eat breakfast and other subjects to skip it.
A Ph.D. student develops an experiment in which she measures the impact of eating breakfast on both cortisol levels and subject-reported alertness. In this study, how many dependent variables are present?
two
Here, both cortisol levels and subject-reported alertness are being measured by the researcher in response to changes in the independent variable. Therefore, both are dependent variables.
True or false.
Age is a common confounding variable.
True
As age has extremely widespread effects, it often correlates with independent and dependent variables even when it is not being studied itself. Therefore, it is a classic confounding variable, and studies often use age-controlled/same-age subjects to control for it.
What is the term for causality in which variable A impacts variable B, but variable B has no effect on variable A?
unidirectional causation
This is common across the board in scientific research, to the extent that we usually assume relationships to be unidirectional unless indicated otherwise.
What is the term for causality in which two variables each impact the other?
reciprocal causation
While less common than unidirectional causation, this certainly still exists. For example, if researchers are evaluating the impact of depression on alcoholism, they may need to consider that alcoholism may also worsen some of the symptoms of depression.
What is the term for the group that is compared to the experimental group in nearly all scientific experiments?
control group
Virtually all well-designed studies include at least one control group, which is a group included for the purpose of comparison to the experimental group(s). Control groups allow the researchers to minimize the impact of confounding variables.
A control group that is expected to exhibit no change (in other words, that represents no effect) is what kind of control?
negative control
For example, a negative control group may simply not be treated with anything, while the experimental group receives the experimental treatment.
A control group that is expected to display a result based on existing understanding about the results in that group is what kind of control?
positive control
For example, if experimenters are testing whether a new treatment decreases levels of an enzyme, they may compare it with a control treatment that is already known to decrease levels of that enzyme.
Fill in the blank.
In human studies, researchers often go to great lengths to ensure that the negative control group believes that they may be receiving the experimental treatment. This best relates to the ________ effect.
placebo
The placebo effect refers to the impact of simply believing that one is receiving a treatment. As such, the negative control group is typically given a placebo treatment (such as a sugar pill) rather than being given nothing.
What does the epidemiologist ensure by carefully writing the Methods section of his paper so other researchers can understand and repeat his experiment?
replicability
It is crucial that experiments be replicable, meaning that other scientists can repeat the experimental method and steps and see if they get the same results.
What term describes an experiment that can be repeated and yields the same results?
reliable
Reliability can apply to the same researchers repeating their experiment on the same subjects, to the same researchers repeating the experiment on different subjects, or to entirely different researchers attempting to repeat the experiment.
Fill in the blank.
A team of scientists in Stockholm are able to repeat an experiment originally conducted by a team in Atlanta. However, the results are dramatically different. This experiment was ________, but not ________.
replicable, reliable
Since the experiment could be repeated at all, it was replicable. However, since its results were found to be inconsistent, it was not reliable.
Define:
validity
In the context of research, validity is the extent to which a study truly measures what it intends to measure and has results that are applicable outside the exact circumstances of the study.
Put simply, validity can be thought of as the extent to which a study’s results are genuine and generalizable.
Which type of validity refers to the soundness of a study with regard to being able to support claims of causality?
internal validity
If a study is internally valid, that means that if a causal claim is determined (as in, “thing A causes thing B”), that causal claim is likely to be accurate/sound.
In a research study, the best way to improve internal validity is to do what?
Control for confounding variables and rule out sources of bias.
Since internal validity refers to the ability to draw accurate causal conclusions from a study, it is important to reduce or eliminate the impact of confounding variables or bias, both of which can lead to inaccurate interpretations of causality.
Which type of validity can be thought of as the extent to which a study’s results are generalizable?
external validity
Unlike internal validity (which deals with the soundness of causal conclusions), external validity refers to the extent to which a study’s results can be generalized to contexts outside the specific circumstances of the study.
What are three subtypes of test validity in research, which refers to the extent to which a test or experiment measures what it intends to measure?
- criterion
- construct
- content validity
As one might predict from its definition, test validity is very broad. As such, it is sometimes divided into these three slightly more specific subtypes.
Which of the following is not typically considered to be part of test validity?
- Construct validity
- External validity
- Criterion validity
External validity is not part of test validity. Rather, external validity measures something separate (the generalizability of the study).
However, both construct validity and criterion validity are types of test validity.
Define:
criterion validity
It refers to the extent to which the results of a given test correspond to those of another well-respected, established, and/or relevant measure.
For instance, imagine that job applicants to a large tech firm are typically given a six-hour exam. If the leaders of that firm decide they want to replace it with a 30-minute exam, they will likely first confirm that the results on the shorter exam correspond with the criterion of the longer test.
Define:
construct validity
It refers to whether a given test accurately evaluates the construct it was developed to evaluate.
In this context, a “construct” is a variable that is being assessed but cannot be directly measured or observed. For example, a test may measure the construct of stress, but to do so, the experimenters must evaluate proxies of stress such as heart rate or cortisol levels.
Define:
content validity
It refers to how well a given test actually evaluates the full scope of what it was designed to test.
As such, a test with low content validity might test only a tiny part of the larger phenomenon it was developed to evaluate.
What is the difference between content and construct validity?
- Content validity evaluates whether a test covers the full scope of a construct.
- Construct validity determines if the test measures the correct construct.
Define:
predictive validity
It refers to the extent to which the results of a given test correspond to results on some future measure.
For instance, if high MCAT scores typically correlate with low medical school dropout rates, then MCAT score has high predictive validity with regard to dropout rate.
What is the difference between criterion and predictive validity?
- Criterion validity assesses how well a test correlates with an established measure.
- Predictive validity evaluates how well a test predicts future outcomes.
True or false.
An experiment that produces very different results each time it is repeated has low external validity.
False
Whether an experiment produces the same results over multiple identical administrations is reliability, not external validity. External validity refers to the extent to which a study’s findings can be generalized to different situations.
Fill in the blank.
The final exam in Professor Jones’ chemistry class is meant to test information from the entire semester, but Professor Jones is in a weird mood and includes only questions about stoichiometry. This final exam has low ________ validity.
content
Professor Jones’ final exam fails to test the entire scope of content covered by the class; therefore, it exhibits low content validity.