Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Psychology of exercise and health > Exercise interventions for the groups and communities > Flashcards

Exercise interventions for the groups and communities Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
AP® Psychology flashcards Psychology 101 flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

Levels of interventions (Bauman et al 2012)

A
  • individual
  • interpersonal
  • environmental
  • regional or national policy
  • global
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pros and cons of group community approaches

A

Pros:

  • social support
  • can introduce competition
  • wider reach
  • better cost-effectiveness
  • often have a ‘captive audience’

Cons:

  • hard to tailor to individual needs
  • less intensive-tends to have lower individual impact
  • needs to overcome social anxieties
  • have to manage group dynamics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Brownson et al (2010) and McKinlay (1995) levels of intervention

A

Downstream: individual intensive programmes, individual self-directed programmes, small group programmes

midstream- school/wprk site programs, regional community programs

Upstream- national promotion/education campaigns, policy to reduce access and advertising or unhealthy factors, tax,economic incentives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Burke et al (2006) meta-analysis comparing:

a) home based no contact
b) home based with contact
c) standard exercise group

d) true groups exercise

A

Increased social support and/or contact from other participants,researchers and HCPs is associated with greater beneficial effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Harden et al (2015) realist review on multiple groups (men women, older, younger etc, varying health statsus etc and conditions

A

concluded the positive effect of group based PA interventions is pervasive across populations and settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Group interventions (Farrance et al., 2016) adherence to community based group exercise interventions for older people. the factors influencing adherence are:

A

Factors influencing adherence:

percieved benefits
empowering effects
social connectedness
individual behaviour
programme design
instructor behaviour

individual adaptabillity
location
affordability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Methods to ensure people keep coming to your group intervention?

A

Educational content- -increase understanding of the physical and mental benefits

  • be friendly, enthusiastic
  • tailor activities to individuals capabilities
  • give feedback in a supportive manner
  • encourage interaction among group members (e.g. activities in pairs)
  • ensure sessions are on at convenient times, check local transport timetables, encourage car sharing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a community? pt 1

A

can be based on:

geography, culture, social stratification and organisations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a community part 2

A

communities are not homogeneous

people may belong to several communities

the meaning and significance of community varies- it is important to think carefully about how you define it because it will influence how community representatives are identified and how you communicate with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Community interventions-schools

“the primary institution with promoting activity in young people: - Cale and Harris (2006)

4 ideals of school and PA

A
  • Reach- access to almost all children is feasible
  • Children spend about 40% of their waking time in school
  • PE classes-ideal opportunity to educate and provide opportunities for exercise/activity
  • sustained exposure to health message and expertise- adopting an ecological, multi-level approach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dobbins et al. (2013) are school based interventions effective?

A

positive effects on duration of MVPA, TV viewing and v02 max

some evidence showing increases in children engaged in MVPA during school hours

No impact on BP, HR, BMI

small to moderate effects but could be maintained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Future implications and limitations of Dobbins et al. (2013)

A

more positive results with:

  • longer intervention
  • delivered by PE teacher or researcher
  • combination of curricula, printed resources and other components

Limitations

  • inconsistent outcome measures
  • lack of blinding of assessors
  • reliance on self-reported behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lai et al. (2014) school interventions effectiveness?

A
  • 10/13 studies found a sustained effect on PA
  • 1/3 studies reported a sustained impact on fitness
  • 2/2 studies reported improvement in fundamental movement skills
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

associations and limitations of Lai et al. (2014)

A

Associations:

  • studies tended to be based on theoretical models
  • interventions of longer duration’s (>1 year) more likely to be successful

Limitations:

  • adequate retention rates (>30%) only found in 4 studies
  • lack of blinding of assessors
  • reliance on subjective outcome measures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

conclusions and implications of school based interventions?

A

should:

  • compromise of multiple components
  • reach out beyond the school to include parents, communities and healthcare providers
  • last at least a year
  • ensure teachers are trained and feel confident at delivering content
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mcdonald et al., (2018) effectiveness of interventions aiming to impact PA in specific school settings

A

active travel adn active classroom breaks were most successful (67-75% studies has positive results, respectively)

interventions aimed at PE, after school and break time PA were less successful

the most successful interventions were less burdensome _> teachers, parents and children may have been more receptive

17
Q

Sebire et al. (2013) concluded

A

Conclusion: interventions should be fun, satisfying and seek to enhance autonomy, competence and relatedness

18
Q

community interventions-workplace

why is activity important?

A

inactivity leads to back pain, type 2 diabetes and contributes to obesity (all resulting in loss of productivity)

more active workforce likely to be physically and mentally healthier (happier workforce, increased productivity, less cost to society)

19
Q

Community interventions-work place

move to improve (Dishman et al. 2009)
12 week interventions at various sites within an organisation involved the following:

A

utlised individual goal setting- gradual increases in 10 minute bouts of MVPA and step counts

Team goals- 75% of team reaching 150 mins/week MVPA and/ or 10,000 steps each day

Incentives

Senior management endorsement

environmental prompts and education

20
Q

Move to improve Dishman et al. (2009) results:

A

Proportion of intervention groyp meeting PA guidelines increased from 31% to 51%, no change was seen in control

increased perceptions of management support and employee involvement

21
Q

Brockman and Fox (2011)

  • increased parking charges,
  • better changing facilities,
  • bike storage,
  • a subsided bike purchase scheme
  • car sharing
  • free university bus and subsided city bus passes
  • Bristol council reduced availability of non-resident permits

results showed…

A

regularly walking to work 19-30%

cycling to work 7-12%

cark to work 50-33%

22
Q

Workplace challenge 2018 found

A

after 3 months 73% in inactive employees in sport

after 6 months 84% inactive employees reaching 150 mins of exercise each week

after 6 months sickness leave reduced by 0.6 days

19% increase in cycling to work

16% in walking to work

23
Q

Perceptions of employers

walk to work intervention (Audrey and Procter, 2016)

positives and negative?

A

diasdavantages- need to provide changing facilities, employees need to travel for work; safety concerns

resisance- individuals choice, not a business priority

cynicism- lack of interest among employees, might be seen as a cost saving initiatives, not much employers can do anyway

Uncertainity-how best to promote walking? lack of incentives

Benefits- healthier and happier workforce, responsible employer, no lateness due to traffic, frees parking for customers

enablers- offering flexi-time, introducing competition, offering breakfast as an incentive

24
Q

Wider community overall view?

A
  • create an environment that supports healthy behavior
  • population shifts will change norm and might promote further improvements
  • many small individual improvements translate into large populaton effects
25
Q

Community interventions should aim to

A

make use and develop existing assests

enhance community spirit and simultaneously decrease lonliness

empower members of minority/disadvantaged groups -> reduce health inequalities

26
Q

why is wider community interventions harder to enforce?

A

more gatekeepers to get on board

higher initial cost

harder to evaluate

27
Q

Mummery and Brown (2008) aim to increase physical activity in the adult population of rockhampton , Australia

Downstream:
Midstream:
upstream:

A

Downstream: promotion of PA by health professionals- promotion material and training in PA counselling

Midstream: Marketing strategies- maintain the brand “10,000 steps”

  • print,radio, tv campaigns
  • newsletters

upstream: environmental support for physical activity
- repair key footpaths
- erecting 10k step signs
- distributing maps to encourage walking

28
Q

Results of rockhamptom 10k steps?

A

results show large increase in population achieving recommended activity levels from 2001 to 2003

95% were aware of 10k steps at follow-up
18% had used a pedometer in the last 17 months (vs. 6% Mackay population)

27% recieved PA advice from HP (Up from 23%)

conclusion: was effective at preventing declines in PA
Women seem to be early adopters

29
Q

Advice from Mummery and brown 2008) on implementing wider community interventions included?

A
  • important to involv the community in planning and implementation
    -seek support from a range of public, private and commercial sectors, not just health sectors
    -take time to build good relationships with all those involved in the project
    -different communication methods may be needed for different groups within the community
    -environmental factors can facilitate and impede PA - need to attend to both
    -different intervention
    strategies will need to be evaluated differently

Psychology of exercise and health (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions