Exam Two - RCT Part Two Flashcards

1
Q

RCTs are level:

A

1b and 2b

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does PEDro score?

A

internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how many questions does PEDro have? What is it scored out of? What does a higher score mean?

A

11
scored out of 10
higher score means greater internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is considered a good PEDro score for this class?

A

greater than or equal to 6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

1

A

eligibility criteria was specified
* this question doesn’t get actual points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

2

A

subjective were randomly allocated to groups
“random number generator”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3

A

allocation was concealed
“opaque, nontranslucent, numbered envelopes”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

4

A

the groups were similar at baseline regarding the most important prognostic indicators
(was random assignment effective??)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

5

A

there was blinding of all subjects
(must be blind at all points)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

6

A

there was blinding of all therapists who administered therapy
(must be blind at all points)
*very difficult to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

7

A

there was blinding of all assessors who measured at least one key outcome
(must be blind at all points)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

8

A

measures of al least one key outcome were obtained from more than 85% of the subjects initially allocated to groups
- addresses potential loss of stat power and survivorship bias
- if several follow up time points, only required at one of the post tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

10

A

results of between-group stats comparisons are reported for at least one key outcome
(could be between two different groups or a pre/post test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

9

A

bonus points for NO drop outs
If no dropouts, you still get point if you used ITT analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

11

A

study provides both point measures and measures of variability for a least one key outcome
- average & SD most common. probs provided via graph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

survivorship bias

A

you stay in the study because you’re doing well

16
Q

is a p value required for a between group comparison?

A

no

17
Q

what could you use instead of a P value for a between group comparison?

A

confidence interval AND
- between group mean diff
- diff in proportions
- number needed to treat
- relative risk

18
Q

In PEDro, what is the mean score? how many article are a 6 or above?

A

5.2
40%

19
Q

what are the most common missing elements in PEDro?

A

1 - blind therapist
2 - blind subjects
3 - ITT analysis
blind assessors and concealed allocation tied for 4th

20
Q

does PEDro sub for your critical appraisal?

A

no

21
Q

does PEDro recognize inappropriate stats?

A

no

22
Q

does PEDro establish clinical relevance/magnitude of effect

A

no

23
Q

does PEDro evaluate for external validity

A

no

24
Q

does PEDro provide a comprehensive assessment of internal validity?

A

no (it won’t establish if the research design is even appropriate for the research question)

25
Q

does PEDro assess if outcomes were appropriate, reliable, and valid for the purpose of the study?

A

no

26
Q

does PEDro assess if groups were treated the same way (except for experimental intervention)

A

no

27
Q

What questions should you ask yourself when trying to integrate RCT results into your clinical practice?

A
  • is it a high quality RCT? (appropriate stats? effect size?)
  • is there a preponderance of evidence?
  • does the study generalize well to my practice/pts?