Exam Questions 3 Flashcards
Question
A project manager is struggling to figure out the performance of the project teams in an agile environment. For the same scope of work, team A has calculated and delivered 100 story points and team B has calculated and delivered 125 story points.
Which team is performing better?
A.Team A as they have calculated fewer story points than team B.
B.Team B as they have calculated more story points than team A.
C.The team that completes the most stories selected from the sprint backlog.
D.The team with the least amount of defects in their deliverables.
Solution: D. The team with the least amount of defects in their deliverables.
In an agile environment, the focus is on delivering working software frequently, rather than on completing the most stories or calculating the most story points. Therefore, the team that has delivered the most working software with the fewest defects is considered to be performing better.
The other answer choices are incorrect. Team A as they have calculated fewer story points than team B: Story points are a measure of the size and complexity of a story, not of its quality. Therefore, the fact that team A has calculated fewer story points does not necessarily mean that they are performing better than team B.
Team B as they have calculated more story points than team A: As stated above, story points are a measure of size and complexity, not of quality. Therefore, the fact that team B has calculated more story points does not necessarily mean that they are performing better than team A.
The team that completes the most stories selected from the sprint backlog: While completing stories is important, it is not the only measure of success in an agile project. The quality of the deliverables is also important, and the team with the least amount of defects in their deliverables is considered to be performing better.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
O’Reilly Platform (No Date) //14.6.1.7/ [Item Book: Agile foundations]
| O’Reilly Platform (No Date) //2/ [Item Agile Metrics in Action: How to measure and improve team performance
by Christopher W. H. Davis
Published by Manning Publications, 2015
https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/agile-metrics-in/9781617292484/kindle_split_020.html]
Question
A newly-hired project manager is running a project for the first time and is worried about rising tensions. Project team members are arguing during an effort-intensive phase and stakeholders have voiced some doubts about the project’s performance. In a discussion with a senior project manager, the new project manager admits that they have a fear of conflict and asks the senior project manager how they perceive conflict.
How should the senior project manager respond?
A.Conflict in projects is inevitable - focus on managing it.
B.Conflict in projects is preventable - replan the mitigation.
C.Conflict in projects is disastrous - prepare a recovery plan.
D.Conflict in projects is healthy - refrain from interfering.
Solution: A. Conflict in projects is inevitable - focus on managing it.
Conflict happens on all projects. Fear of conflict can restrict communication and creativity. It is not uncommon to want to avoid conflict, but not all conflict is negative. How conflict is handled can either lead to more conflict or to better decision making and stronger solutions.
The others are incorrect because they are not true-to-life descriptions of conflict. Conflict is not always preventable. Certainly, there are times when it is, but there are many instances where conflict cannot be prevented. Conflicts should not be perceived as disastrous. Damage incurred from conflict can be repaired by looking for resolutions and alternatives together. It can also create more constructive relationships. Conflict is also not always healthy, conflict can be unhealthy as well. Conflicts can have a negative impact on projects. Addressing conflict inappropriately can lead to dissatisfaction, lack of trust, and reduced morale and motivation.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/project-environment-eleven-project-conflicts-7348 [Item Guan, D. (2007).
PMBOK Guide Seventh Edition (2022) /// [2.2.4 LEADERSHIP SKILLS] [4.2.7.1 Conflict Model]
Question
A new graduate recently joined a mature agile R&D team. A mentor, assigned to work with the graduate, is overwhelmed by the extra workload. Team performance and motivation are dropping.
How can the project manager help with this situation?
A.Maintain a laissez-faire leadership style with the team, but use a transactional style to give firm guidance to the graduate.
B.Ask the mentor to use a collaborative servant leader approach to perform the usual duties along with the mentor role.
C.Cancel the mentor plan and focus on keeping the graduate motivated by learning through an intensive immersion.
D.Ask three more team members to share the mentor role in order to reduce the individual mentor workload by 75%.
Solution: A. Maintain a laissez-faire leadership style with the team, but use a transactional style to give firm guidance to the graduate
The graduate is in need of authoritative and stable guidelines and positive feedback while the team must not lose their autonomy to maintain motivation.
Collaborative servant leadership approach is used for increasing team gel and motivation
Without mentor it is difficult to learn through an insensitive immersion
Asking three team members to share the mentor role is not an effective way
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/leadership-competencies-develop-strategic-roles-6627 [Item Bristol, P. & Yeatts, G. (2010) article citation: “The assumptions of transactional leadership are (1) rewards and punishments motivate; (2) a clear chain of command creates the best organizational structure; (3) the leader clarifies performance-based expectations and goals; and, (4) the leader links achievement of goals to rewards Transactional leadership has a focus on interchange of performance for rewards, management-by-exception, monitoring, and correcting mistakes”]
| Project Management Body of Knowledge (11/02/16) Project Management Institute//3.4.5.1, 9.5/ [Item 3.4.5.1: “Leadership styles: Laissez-faire (allowing the team to make their own decisions, establish their own goals, a hands-off style), Transactional (focus on goals, feedback and accomplishments, manage by exception), servant leader (put other people first, focus on growth, learning, development, autonomy and well-being)
section 9.5: “The project manager needs to be sensitive to both the willingness and the ability of team members to perform their work and adjust their management and leadership styles accordingly. Team members with low-skill abilities will require more intensive oversight than those who have demonstrated ability and experience.]
Question
A project team is working on a complex high-priority project. The project manager is informed that there is a superficial disagreement between a project sponsor and a project team member. This conflict could negatively impact the project timeline and must be resolved immediately. The team member desires to maintain a good relationship with the project sponsor and asks the project manager how they should approach the situation.
What conflict resolution approach should the project manager suggest?
A.Collaborating
B.Accommodating
C.Compromising
D.Forcing
Solution: B. Accommodating
Considering the power dynamic, desire to maintain a good relationship, and urgency of resolving the conflict, the project manager should tell the team member to adopt an accommodating posture. There is a difference in relative authority or authority between the team member and the project sponsor, the project sponsor outranks the team member, and the team member wishes to maintain a good relationship with the sponsor, so accommodating is the best approach.
Forcing is not an appropriate approach because the team member has no authority to force their will on the project sponsor.
Collaborating is not the best approach in this scenario because the disagreement is superficial, the sponsor has more relative power, and there will be an impact on the project timeline if it is not resolved immediately. Collaboration may take time to come to a consensus, but there are timeline concerns and the conflict must be resolved immediately. Further, the sponsor has more authority and may see no need to collaborate with the team member on a superficial issue.
Compromising is not the best approach in this scenario because the parties do not have equal relative power. Compromise requires a give and take and this is a superficial agreement and the sponsor may not be willing to compromise.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
PMBOK Guide Seventh Edition (2022) ///[4.2.7.1 Conflict Model]
Question
A project manager has engaged the sponsor and discussed concerns regarding noncompliance. The project manager understands that this could be a potential audit situation.
What should the project manager do?
A.Do nothing and continue to work as before, assuming there will be an audit.
B.Disengage the noncompliant department, as this is problematic.
C.Disclose the source of the problem to the auditors and let them decide.
D.Gain the commitment and approval from leadership on noncompliance.
Solution: C. Disclose the source of the problem to the auditors and let them decide.
The correct answer is to disclose the source of the problem to the auditors and let them decide because it demonstrates transparency and adherence to ethical practices. By reporting the noncompliance issue to the auditors, the project manager ensures that appropriate actions can be taken to address the situation.
The other answer choices are incorrect for the following reasons:
“Do nothing and continue to work as before since they will be an audit” is incorrect because it ignores the importance of addressing noncompliance and risks potential consequences for the project and organization.
“Disengage the noncompliant department as this is problematic” is incorrect because it suggests avoiding the issue rather than actively addressing it and finding a solution.
“Gain the commitment and approval from leadership on noncompliance” is incorrect because it does not involve the appropriate step of involving auditors who are responsible for assessing compliance. It also does not guarantee a proper resolution of the issue.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
Effective PM: Trad, Agile, Extreme (2015) Robert K. Wysocki/// [Item There will be situations where the business case has not been sufficiently made to get approval to do the project. In much the same way that we have used prototyping to help with client definition of functionality, we can use the same concept in the first cycle by making the first cycle of ECPM a proof-of-concept cycle. The proof of concept could entail any of the following: https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/effective-project-management/9781119562801/c14.xhtml]
| https://www.projectmanagement.com/blog-post/36712/Addressing-Process-Non-Compliance [Item]
Question
The project manager of an AI project leads with grace and confidence. They provide support, listen attentively, and allow their team members to work under little supervision.
What model of worker behavior does the project manager exhibit?
A.Expectancy theory
B.Theory X
C.Theory Y
D.Theory Z
Solution: C. Theory Y
Theory Y managers believe people are interested in performing their best given the right motivation and proper expectations. These managers provide support to their teams, are concerned about their team members, and are good listeners.
The other answers are incorrect. Theory X managers believe most people do not like work and will try to steer clear of it; they believe people have little to no ambition, need constant supervision, and won’t actually perform the duties of their job unless threatened. Theory X managers unknowingly also subscribe to the Expectancy Theory. If they expect people to be lazy and unproductive and treat them as such, their team members probably will be lazy and unproductive. Theory Z is concerned with increasing employee loyalty to their organizations.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
PMP: Project Management Professional Study Guide, Ninth edition (2018) Kim Heldman/Sybex/8 [Item]
Question
An internal project has delivered its scope on time, within budget, and with the expected quality. The client was satisfied with the result and it enabled them to launch the new product to market. However, the product did not attract the expected interest and did not cover the investment made. The project team is aware of these results and it is impacting their morale to deliver the next project.
How should the project manager handle this situation? Choose 2 answers.
A.Have a discussion with the team to explain that the product success is not a direct result of the project and it does not reflect their performance
B.Have a meeting with the business to make sure they understand the project met its objectives
C.No action is necessary, as the project manager is only responsible for the project deliverables.
D.Have a conversation with the business sponsor to validate the strategy for the new project based on this result.
Solution: A and D. Have a discussion with the team to explain that the product success is not a direct result of the project and it does not reflect their performance have a conversation with the business sponsor to validate the strategy for the new project based on this result
Modern Leadership: Be Accountable for Outcomes. Responsible for the team motivation, Accountable for giving the client information to enable client success but ultimately not responsible for the product result.
Maintaining good morale in any workplace setting can be a bit of a challenge, so it’s important as a virtual manager to do what you can to create an environment where morale is high, but also recognize when it’s not—and then do something about it.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
https://snippets.pmi.org/snippet/be-accountable-for-outcomes/ [Item]
| O’Reilly (October 2019) Kathy Wisniewski, Ben Bisbee/Association for Talent Development/19. Maintaining Morale/ [Item 19. Maintaining Morale]
Question
A team has been working for two months and has consistently missed planned user stories. How should the project manager address this issue?
A.Promote changing the iteration duration in order to commit as planned.
B.Ensure the sprint size is appropriate for the iteration duration.
C.Engage in recruiting a highly skilled resource to reinforce the skills.
D.Consider using a reward system to encourage timely delivery.
Solution: B. Ensure the sprint size is appropriate for the iteration duration
As the team has not yet improved in their estimates, one possible way is to split user stories to help in estimating work and also in what the team can commit to. Hence ensuring the sprint size is appropriate for the iteration duration is the correct choice.
In agile projects, the duration for each iteration is timeboxed and hence it is recommended not to change the iteration duration .Hence this is an incorrect answer.
Engaging in recruiting a highly skilled resource or considering using a reward system is not applicable as the issue is not related to lack of motivation or skills. Hence these two options are incorrect.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
O’Reilly Platform (No Date) //Essential Scrum - chapter 19 - Sprint planning/ [Item]
| The Agile Practice Guide (No Date) PMI/PMI/5/58 [Item]
Question
A project manager is creating a software project’s quality management plan. While reviewing lessons learned from past, similar projects, the project manager discovers that rework due to quality issues resulted in cost overruns.
What should the project manager do to ensure that quality is addressed throughout the software development life cycle?
A.Conduct recurring retrospectives to regularly check on the effectiveness of quality processes.
B.Assign a resource to focus solely on the project’s quality.
C.Ensure that quality is tied to performance reviews.
D.Identify new quality policies and procedures for the project.
Solution: A. Conduct recurring retrospectives to regularly check on the effectiveness of quality processes
The PM has identified that quality may be a risk in this project, based on lessons learned from past projects. In developing the quality management plan, the PM should ensure that quality checks are done regularly so that the risk is avoided. The responsibility of managing quality would typically require several skill sets that one person may not have. The team should be involved in quality management. Tying quality to performance reviews will not avoid the same quality issues that have happened in the past. The quality management plan should incorporate the organizations quality policies and procedures.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
PMBOK Guide Sixth Edition (2018) PMI/PMI/8/276 [Item]
| The Project Management Tool Kit: 100 Tips and Techniques for Getting the Job Done Right (No Date) /Amacom/Quality Process 70/Analyze Variances [Item]
Question
Which of the following project artifacts do not utilize the WBS as an input?
A.Project schedule
B.Project scope
C.Risk management plan
D.Quality plan
Solution: B. Project scope
WBS is developed based on the agreed scope.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/applying-work-breakdown-structure-project-lifecycle-6979 [Item]
Question
A customer requires knowing exactly the state of a product, the overall project, and the next steps planned for the next month each month.
How should the project manager communicate with this customer?
A.Send a weekly status email, including a complete assessment of earned value.
B.Generate a monthly status report and include technical issues as an attachment.
C.Have a monthly call with the customer to summarize what happened recently and give a general review of the product.
D.Present the project progress in monthly increments with a formal validation and comprehensive understanding of the status.
Solution: D. Present the project progress in monthly increments with a formal validation and comprehensive understanding of the status.
The best way for the project manager to communicate the required information with the customer is to present the project progress in monthly increments with a formal validation and comprehensive understanding of the status. This will ensure optimum stakeholder engagement.
The other answer choices are incorrect as they are not the best way to get validation and engagement from key stakeholders. A complete assessment of earned value does not address all requirements; the customer may not be interested in technical issues; calling the customer once a month implies disengagement with the customer.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
PMBOK Guide Sixth Edition (2018) PMI/PMI/13.2/527 [Item Plan Stakeholder Management]
| The Agile Practice Guide (No Date) PMI/PMI/2/8 [Item]
Question
A transportation company is transforming its operational processes and the main system this company uses to move freight. The scope statement is in place. An iterative delivery approach has been agreed by all stakeholders.
What does the project manager need to do next to help the team understand the work that needs to be done?
A.Start working on the project management plan with work packages, a detailed schedule, and work assignments for team members.
B.Work directly with stakeholders on the work breakdown structure (WBS) and assign tasks with a required timeline for each team member to start the work.
C.Work with the team to decompose the scope into a WBS and work packages in order to create required deliverables and timelines.
D.Create the requirements management plan to outline how project requirements will be collected, analyzed, and documented, and then assign requirements to team members.
Solution: C. Work with the team to decompose the scope into a WBS and work packages in order to create required deliverables and timelines
To understand the work, the scope needs to be decomposed into a work breakdown structure with specific work packages included. Then the detailed requirements documentation is completed based on the agreed scope and the WBS.
Without the detailed scope statement, it is not possible to proceed with creating a detailed schedule or work assignments . Hence all the remaining options are incorrect.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
O’Reilly Platform (No Date) //2 WBS fundamentals/ [Item The government manager’s guide to the WBS]
| PMBOK Guide Sixth Edition (2018) PMI/PMI/5/129 [Item Used the entire chapter as reference.]
Question
During project implementation, an issue arises that requires the execution of the project’s contingency plan, which will impact the project schedule. What should the project manager do?
A.Initiate a risk audit.
B.Issue a change request.
C.Review the cost impact.
D.Update the contingency plan.
Solution: B. Issue a change request
Issuing a change request is the formal process for enacting changes on an established project. If there are challenges that could impact the project schedule and budget, issuing a change request can help formalize the need for changes to the project plan, including adjustments to the schedule and budget. A change request will formally document and manage the change and help ensure that the project remains on track and that all stakeholders are aware of the changes.
The other options are incorrect because they are not the best course of action in this situation. While other actions like risk audits, cost impact reviews, and contingency plan updates may follow, issuing a change request is the initial step in managing the change effectively within a project.
Initiating a risk audit is incorrect because risk audits are not the immediate response to an issue that has already occurred. A risk audit is more appropriate for a proactive assessment of the project’s risks rather than for responding to an issue that has already arisen.
Reviewing the cost impact is incorrect because it should be done after the change request has been issued and the impacts of the issues are assessed.
Updating the contingency plan is incorrect because it should be done after the change request has been approved and the changes to the project have been implemented.
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
PMBOK Guide Seventh Edition (2022) PMI/PMI/ [2.4.7 CHANGES]
| Practical Project Risk Management: The ATOM Methodology (2007) David Hillson and Peter Simon/Management Concepts/7/ [Item]
| Project Management: The Managerial Process (2015) Clifford F. Gray & Erik W. Larson/McGraw-Hill Irwin/Chapter 7 - Managing Risk/p 231 [Item]
Question
A pharmaceutical project in the initiation phase is likely to be impacted by new market regulations. Which stakeholder categories should the project manager assign to the relevant regulatory body?
A.External with high power/influence
B.Internal with high power/influence
C.Internal with antagonist/resistant support level
D.External with antagonist/resistant support level
Solution: A. External with high power/influence
External with high power/influence is the right choice for the given context. A regulatory body is an external organization which could have high impact on a project even if they are not directly involved.
The project is likely to be affected by external market regulations.
So, the Rest of the options “Internal with high power/influence”, “Internal with antagonist/resistant support level” and “External with antagonist/resistant support level” are obviously not right choices
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/stakeholder-management-plan-6090 [Item Forman, J. B. & Discenza, R. (2012) article citation: “External stakeholders are individuals or groups outside the organization who could be impacted by the project or those who govern policy that influences and could affect the project.”]
| Project Management Body of Knowledge (11/02/16) Project Management Institute//1.6/ [Item “A stakeholder is an individual, group or organization that may affect, be affected by or perceive itself to be affected by a decision, activity or outcome of a project. Project stakeholders may be internal or external to the project, they may be actively involved, passively involved or unaware of the project…. Examples of external stakeholders: customers, end users, suppliers, shareholders, regulatory bodes]
Question
A project manager is working on a complex, political project with many stakeholders having conflicting priorities. Senior management asked the project manager to ensure that there was no “noise” regarding the project. During a stakeholder meeting, the project manager asked a series of questions to confirm acceptance for each deliverable before asking for acceptance of the whole project.
What did the project manager do to satisfy stakeholders?
A.Responded to positive actions of the stakeholders to reward actions
B.Acted in a manner that was consistent in the use of words and actions
C.Engaged with stakeholders by cooperating toward mutual goals
D.Acted based on the power authorized by senior management
Solution: B. Acted in a manner that was consistent in the use of words and actions
Law of Commitment and Consistency can be called “Get the other person saying ‘yes, yes’ immediately.” This occurs when one party asks the other side to make a number of “small” decisions that lead to only one obvious conclusion: to accept the general concession.
The approved project charter formally initiates the project.
A project charter may still be used to establish internal agreements within an organization to ensure proper delivery under the contract.
The Project Manager has to negotiate project agreements. Project Manager has to persuade the Stakeholders and achieve acceptance.
The correct answer is: “Acted in a manner that was consistent in the use of words and actions”
The Distractors are accepted
This question and rationale were developed in reference to:
PMBoK, Sixth edition (2021) PMI/PMI/4/ [Item Persuasion and Project Charter]
| PMI.com (2010) //How to use the six laws of persuasion/Brown, S. T/ [Item https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/laws-concept-persuasion-negotiation-strategies-6516]