Exam IV: Pharmacodynamics Flashcards
Pharmacodynamics
The study of drug effects on the body
Therapeutic and toxiceffects of drugs result fromthe interactions with physiological molecules in the body
The receptor concept isimportant for the development of drugs and for making therapeutic decisions in clinical practice
Drug + receptor (physiological molecules) = therapeutic and toxic effects
Importance of Receptors: Dose vs. Effect
Receptors largely determine the quantitative relationship between dose (or concentration) of a drug and the pharmacological effect
Binding affinity determines concentration required to form drug-receptor complexes
Maximal effect of drug is limited by number of receptors
Less receptors have less responses
Affinity: how well the drug binds to the receptor; well bound = good effect/action and vice versa
Number of receptors within the body determines effect
Importance of Receptors: Selectivity
Receptors are responsible for selectivity of drug action
Drug structures determine affinity for different classes of receptors
Non-selective drugs can cause side-effects
Importance of Receptors: Agonist vs. Antagonist
Receptors mediate actions of pharmacologic agonists and antagonists
Drugs binding to receptors can activate or interfere with normal physiological processes
Receptors: Occupancy Theory
Intensity of a drug’s response is proportional to the amount of receptors occupied by that drug
When you have a drug it will bind to receptors and form complex to activate receptors causing transduction of signals to cause effects in cells
K1 is the rate of association and K2 is the rate of disassociation aka binding and unbinding of drug to receptors
Kd= K2/K1 = affinity of the drug itself
Drug binding to receptor will activate effector molecules on receptor itself
Efficacy= maximal effect of drug binding to receptor
Occupancy Theory Issues
Maximal response is achieved when all receptors have been occupied
Does not explain “potency”
When two drugs bind to the same receptor and bind maximally to all receptors, how does one drug achieve the same effect with a lesser dose?
Lock and Key vs. Induced Fit
Depending on the receptor’s conformational change, a better fit will increase the drug-receptor binding affinity and drug efficacy
A better fit can also explain the difference in potency
Lock and Key: the shape of the drug MUST fit the receptor
Induced fit: drug is not 100% similar to receptor, just need to be mostly similar to activate the receptor via binding causing a conformational change to the shape of the drug itself
A drug has more affinity when closer to the receptor shape because less time is needed to conform to the shape
The better the fit the better the activation of the receptor because less time is required for the conformational change
Spare Receptor Concept
Occupancy theory assumes that a maximal effect is achieved when all of the receptors are occupied
Physiologically, maximal effect can be obtained when only a fraction of the receptors are occupied
“Spare” receptors (EC50<Kd)
aka less receptors are bound to provide the same effect
Spare Receptor Concept Examples
A cell with 4 receptors and 4 effectors. A high drug concentration is needed to “find and bind” those limited receptors to activate effectors for the drug response
A cell with many receptors and 4 effectors. Increased (spare) receptors increase sensitivity for drug binding. Therefore, less drugs are needed to activate effectors for the drug response
Affinity, Efficacy, Potency
Kd = free drug concentration at which 50% of drugs are bound; affinity is inversely proportional to Kd; low Kd = high affinity
Bmax is 100% of receptors bound
EC50 = free drug concentration at which 50% of maximal effect is achieved; potency depends on affinity and efficacy (require two-drug comparison) Emax = maximal response that can be produced by the drug (efficacy)
EC50 and Kd may be identical (occupancy theory) or different (spare receptors)
Normal: Kd=EC50 when 50% are bound = 50% of response
Spare receptor concept: 50% of the maximal response without binding to 50% of the receptors (less than 50%)
Drug-Response Relationship
Graded dose-response curves:
1. Linear dose-response curve for two drugs- concentration of the drug varies widely; need large concentration to reach certain effects; sometimes have curves that are beyond the size of the graph.. Therefore linear is not helpful
- Semilogarithmic dose-response curve for two drugs
EC50 determines potency
Drug A more potent than B because it takes less of A to reach 50% compared to drug B
Drug A = Drug B in efficacy (maximal response)
Potency ≠ Efficacy
We are interested as clinicians in the efficacy, not potency
Receptor Antagonists: Competitive vs. Non-Competitive
A. Unbound inactive receptor
B. Receptor activated by agonist
C. Competitive ntagonist does not activate receptor but “competes” with the agonist for the binding site, reversible
D. Non-competitive antagonist binds to allosteric site to cause conformational change to the receptor and inhibits agonist activation of the receptor, highly irreversible
Competitive Antagonist
Agonist alone can reach 100% of the response
Antagonist alone does not cause a response
Agonist + antagonist, more agonist is required to overcome the antagonism; due to competitive nature, changes agonist potency- increases EC50
Competitive antagonist causes a shift right on graft, but reaches 100% response anyway
Based on Occupancy Theory
Non-Competitive Antagonist
Agonist alone can reach 100% of the response
Antagonist alone does not cause a response
Agonist + antagonist, no matter the concentration of the drug you add, it will not overcome the antagonist
Due to non-competitive nature, changes agonist efficacy (reduces)
Based on Occupancy Theory
Spare receptor model: reach efficacy with less receptors bound
Non-competitive antagonist causes a rightward shift followed by a downward shift
Non-competitive: changes efficacy because EC50 does not change, just won’t reach 100% efficacy/maximal response
Functional/ Physiological Antagonist
Functional antagonism shows the same kinetic response as non-competitive antagonism
Although agonists can bind to allavailable receptors (and supposedly reach 100% maximal response),functional antagonism binds to another receptor and antagonizes theresponse
While agonist-receptor binding may reach 100%, effect is antagonized by a separate receptor and does not reach 100% efficacy
Example: If drug A itself can cause 100% effect on heart rate, but drug B 100% in opposite direction
Partial Agonist
Partial agonist may be more or less potent than a full agonist; partial agonists do not reach 100% efficacy
Clinical relevance: can use partial agonists to blunt physiological response in diseased population
Eg. Use partial agonist in patient with exertion angina (heart attack)
Exercise increases heart rate, which causes a higher O2 demand > O2 supply leading to a heart attack
Partial agonist increase heart rate at baseline, but exercise will not increase heart rate rapidly to reduce incidence for heart attack; reduces efficacy
Partial Agonist vs. Full Agonist + Antagonist
With antagonist + full agonist have drug tolerance causing upregulation and downregulation of the medication, and both together would cause an in between effect
Antagonists bind receptors too much and the body wants to fight back
Partial agonist: no drug tolerance with no upregulation or downreguation of medication
Because don’t reach 100% efficacy with partial agonist = no drug tolerance
Inverse Agonist
Some unoccupied receptors have intrinsic activity (baseline activity level)
Inverse agonists bind and abrogate (eliminate) the intrinsic activity
Quantal Dose-Response Curves
Quantal (all-or-none-response) dose-response curves
ED50-dose at which 50% of subjects exhibit a therapeutic response to a drug
TD50-dose at which 50% of subjects exhibit a toxic response to a drug
LD50-dose at which 50% of subjects die
Demonstrate average effect of a drug as a function of its concentration in a population of individuals and determine how safe a drug is