Exam 3 Review Flashcards
Social Psychology
- The study of how people influence thoughts, behaviors, and attitudes
- Humans are highly social
Attitudes
- fundamental attribution error (FAE)
- cognitive dissonance
Attribution:
- Process by which we assign causes to behavior
- (as humans we are prone to trying to explain why something occurs)
FAE:
- tendency to overestimate dispositional influences on others’ behavior
and underestimate situational influences on others behavior
Jones and harris (1967):
The castro study
-Debators: students were randomly assigned to defend pro- or anti- Castro positions in a debate
- REGARDLESS of their actual feelings
- Raters: subjects were asked to rate how actually pro- Castro they thought the debators were
- Raters thought pro- castro debators were actually pro- castro, DESPITE knowing topics were assigned
attributes behavior to internal rather than external causes
- When reasoning about ourselves, we do the opposite!
-Overestimate situational factors
- Underestimate dispositional factors
Cognitive dissonance theory
- Unpleasant feeling of tension or unrest that results from conflicting thoughts or beliefs
- Humans dont like to feel this way. So, we use clever strategies for getting around it
dissonance reduction strategies
(all involved changing our minds after an action)
-Avoid dissonant information
-Firm up beleifs to justify an action (preference reports)
-Generate a new belief to reconcile the conflict (seekers cult)
-Change a beleif to justify an action (insufficient-justification effect)
Conformity
- tendency to alter behavior as a result of group pressure
o Face the rear video: confederates all face away from the elevator door and the candid subject will eventually turn away as well due to conformity
Festinger and Carlsmith (1959):
- Participants completed extremely boring task
- Were paid to lie about experiment to next subject (either $1 or $20)
- Then they were asked to rate the study’s enjoyableness
- People offered $1 to lie rated the experiment as more enjoyable
(insufficient justification)
Social Influence
- When the presence of others influences our behaviors
- Conformity
o Asch’s conformity experiment - Bystander Non-intervention
Why do we conform?
Two general reasons:
- Information influence: Others might know better
- Normative influence: we want to fit in
Asch Experiments
- Tested whether people conform and why
- Subjects seated in a group of 6-8 people
- Asked to perform a simple visual perception task
- BUT – all other people are confederates (actors)
- Confederates were instructed to give the wrong answer
- Actual subject seated second-to-last
Results: (asch)
- 75% of subjects conformed at least once
o Some on all, some only 1 or 2 trials - On average, subjects conformed about 40% of the time
Factors that influenced conformity:
Unanimity: if another person gave the correct answer, conformity dropped
* Differences in wrong answer: if others differed from the majority, conformity dropped
* Group size: a larger group resulted in greater conformity, up to ~5-6 people
But why did subjects conform?
- In another version, subjects were asked to write down their answers, instead of saying them out loud
o Much less conformity in written answers
o Suggests NORMATIVE influence is responsible
Kitty Genovese
- “37 who saw murder didn’t call the police”
- She was attacked and chased after by a man. Tried to get away and get help but everyone just watched. Nobody helped.
Bystander Nonintervention
the presence of others makes us less likely to act in emergencies
Bystander nonintervention…why?
Two reasons:
- Pluralistic ignorance: error of assuming no one in a group perceives things as we do
When something strange happens:
o Social referencing: looks to others for cues
o We tend to act in accordance with others - Diffusion of responsibility: the presence of others makes each person feel less personally responsible
Personality
e.g.
-Genetic & Environmental Influences
-Minnesota twin studies
-Adoption studies
Traits
- Relatively consistent predispositions that influence our behaviour across situations
- Individual characteristics rather than overarching set of characteristics
How do we develop traits?
Interplay between genes & environment
Genetic factors:
Genetic influence on personality
- ½ from each parent
Shared Environmental factors:
Experiences individual share (and make us more alike)
Example: Birth Order matters
- Early born
–> Achievement driven, tend towards status quo - Middle born
–>Diplomacy driven, experiences aligned with both sides - Late born
–> More likely to take risks, rebel, support radical ideas
Non-shared environmental factors:
Experiences individuals do not share (and make us less alike)
Twin Studies
- Fraternal (Dizygotic twins)
–> Share 50% genetic info
–> Same as if 2 siblings born at once - Identical (Monozygotic twins)
–> Share 100% genetic info - Allows for study of genetic contributions to personality
–> Test how traits vary when genes don’t vary
Minnesota Twin Studies
- Longitudinal study of twins conducted by minnesota university
–> Investigating genetic and environmental influences on the development of psychological traits
–> Put together registries of twins for study
–> 130 pairs of twins that were raised apart
How much of personality is genetic?
How well do the traits of identical twins correlate?
- About 50% similar
- Genetic factors DO influence personality, but not all of it
Does a shared environment influence personality?
Do traits of monozygotic twins raised apart differ more than traits of monozygotic twins raised together?
- Nope.
- Shared environment has very little influence on personality
Adoption Studies
- Children adopted at birth are compared to adopted parents and birth parents
–> More similar to their biological parents despite them being raised by their adopted parents - Separated biological siblings are more alike than adopted siblings raised in the same home
- Genes appear to influence personality but do not determine it
- Causes of personality aren’t simple
–> Personality: “Polygenic trait”
° Influenced by sets of genes
–> No evidence for single “trait genes”
–> Many different genes and factors involved
Takeaways
Genetics do influence personality, but not all of it
What is a psychological disorder?
- Difficult to define, even for professionals
- Psychological disorders are complex and diverse
- What we consider “abnormal” isn’t stable
- Varies across time and culture
- Family-resemblance view: members of a category share some, but not necessarily all, features
Statistical rarity:
are uncommon in the population
Subjective distress:
causes the person distress
Impairment:
interfere with daily functioning