Exam #2 Study Guide Flashcards
Unilateral neglect: what causes it and what are the symptoms?
Unilateral neglect syndrome is caused by damage to (often the right side) of the parietal lobe. It is a disorder in which patients ignore all inputs from one side of the body. The “where” system is damaged. Neglect occurs in real time as well as in memories of images/objects.
What is selective attention?
The skill through which a person focuses on one input while ignoring other stimuli that are also present.
Know the methodology and terminology associated with the dichotic listening task
Dichotic listening is a task in which participants hear two simultaneous verbal messages – in one ear each. Participants are instructed to pay attention to one input (attended channel) and ignore the other message (unattended channel). It was found that remarkably little was remembered from the unattended channel, but words of personal importance in the unattended channel seemed to catch attention. Researchers conducted shadowing tasks to ensure participants were paying attention.
Inattentional blindness and change blindness
Inattentional Blindness: A pattern in which perceivers seem literally not to see stimuli right in front of their eyes; this pattern is caused by the participants focusing their attention on some other stimuli and not expecting the target to appear. A similar pattern of behavior can be observed in hearing (inattentional deafness) and sensory feeling (inattention numbness).
Change Blindness: A pattern in which perceivers either do not see or take a long time to see large-scale changes in a visual stimulus. This pattern reveals how little people perceive, even from stimuli in plain view, if they are not specifically attending to the target information.
What is the cocktail party effect?
The phenomenon in which people are able to focus on one stimulus in a sea of many stimuli. E.g., focus on one conversation in a room of many voices and separate conversations.
Early vs late selection models of attention
Early selection hypothesis: A proposal that selective attention operates at an early stage of processing, so that the unattended inputs receive little analysis.
Late selection hypothesis: A proposal that selective attention operates at a late stage of processing, so that the unattended inputs receive considerable analysis. Only attended channels reach consciousness.
Both hypotheses capture part of the truth. Attention can influence activity levels in the LGN. Attention changes the flow of signals within the nervous system before reaching the brain.
Broadbent model vs attenuation theory
Broadbent model: limited capacity for paying attention conceptualized as a bottleneck, which restricts the flow of information. Similar to the early selection hypothesis.
Treisman (Attenuation) Model: Attended messages pass through the attenuator at full strength, and unattended messages pass through with reduced strength. Unlike in Broadbent’s model, unattended messages are still attenuated rather than eliminated. What is attenuated to after reaching the Hierarchy of Analyzers depends on what reaches an activation threshold.
Time-course of attention in the brain (as measured by EEG)
In the brain, attended inputs increase N1 amplitudes 100ms post target presentation, but endogenous attention lasts longer.
Spatial Cueing Task and spatial attention (effects on RTs and ERPs)
A task in which participants press a button as soon as a target stimulus appears while focusing their eyes on a central fixation cue. Prior to each trial, an arrow (correct 80% of the time) would appear to indicate where the target stimulus would appear.
It was found that response times were faster for valid locations compared to invalid locations. RTs were faster for valid locations vs neutral ones. And RTs were slower for invalid locations compared to neutral ones.
As observed in ERPs and fMRI scans, attended channels are prioritized and primed in the brain while unattended channels are deprioritized, e.g., contralateral enhancement (rapid and sustained contralateral amplification of electrocortical activity) when paying more attention to one area in space.
Spotlight of attention
Factors influencing where we “shine” the “beam”
- Task goals
- Interests/Importance
- Visual prominence
- Predictability of scene
- Beliefs, cultures, expectations, etc.
- Collectivistic vs Individualistic cultures differ on time they spend looking at a central figure.
Endogenous vs Exogenous control of attention
Endogenous control of attention: A mechanism through which a person chooses (often, on the basis of some meaningful signal) where to focus their attention.
Exogenous control of attention: A mechanism through which attention is automatically directed, essentially as a reflex response, to some “attention-grabbing” input. Some inputs, especially ones with moral or emotional overtones, can seize our attention in a largely uncontrollable fashion.
Unilateral neglect and spatial vs object-based attention
Some experiments indicate that unilateral neglect syndrome is object-based rather than spatially based.
Divided attention: task specific and task general resources, executive control, and automaticity
When attention is divided, we will be able to perform concurrent tasks if we have the resources (e.g., for problem-solving, reasoning, remembering) and energy supply required for both. If resources compete, multi-tasking will be difficult. Some resources serve as an energy supply used by all tasks, while others seem to be “mental tools”, one of these being executive control.
Executive control: The mental resources and processes that are used to set goals, choose task priorities, and avoid conflict among competing resources.
- Helps to control thoughts
- Allows shifts in plans/changes in strategy.
- Can only handle one task at a time.
- Damage to PFC can lead to deficits in executive control (display preservation error and goal neglect).
Automaticity: A state achieved by some tasks and some forms of processing, in which the task can be performed with little to no attention. In many cases, automatized actions can be combined with other activities without interference. Automatized actions are also often difficult to control, leading many psychologists to refer to them as “mental reflexes”. These processes can be brought into conscious operation, but this may make performance worse. The Stroop test demonstrates this.
Primacy and Recency effects: Why do they occur and how can they be manipulated (experimentally)?
Primacy Effect: An often-observed advantage in remembering the early-presented materials within a sequence of materials. This advantage is generally attributed to the fact that research participants can focus their full attention on these items because, at the beginning of a sequence, the participants are not trying to divide attention between these items and other items in the series. Slower presentations of items enhances the primacy effect, assumedly because this increases processing of earlier items. Often contrasted with the recency effect.
Recency Effect: The tendency to remember materials that occur late in a series. If the series was just presented, the recency effect can be attributed to the fact that the late-arriving items are still in working memory (because nothing else has arrived after these items to bump them out of working memory).
Can be interrupted, delaying recall of items with a different task altogether displaces items from working memory, reducing the recency effect but not the primacy effect (as primacy relies on LTM, not WM, like recency). Often contrasted with the primacy effect.
Working memory capacity: digit-span task methodology, verbal vs visual working memory capacity
Digit-Span Task: A task often used for measuring working memory’s storage capacity. Research participants are read a series of digits (e.g., “8 3 4”) and must immediately repeat them back. If they do this successfully, they are given a slightly longer list (e.g., “9 2 4 0”), and so forth. The length of the longest list a person can remember in this fashion is that person’s digit span. Also see operation span.
“7 plus-or-minus 2”: A range often offered as an estimate of the verbal number of items or units able to be contained in working memory.
Working-Memory Capacity: A measure of working memory derived from operation span tasks. Although termed a “memory capacity”, this measure can perhaps best be understood as a measure of a person’s ability to store some materials while simultaneously working with other materials.
Visual working memory capacity is generally speaking, about 4 objects. But, this number varies depending on the complexity/novelty of the object(s).