Ethics - Duties to Third Parties (8) Flashcards

1
Q

What is the need for undertakings in a solicitor/client relationship?

A

Undertakings are often given by solicitors in order to smooth the path of a transaction. They are a convenient method by which some otherwise problematic areas of practice can be avoided.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does undertaking mean?

A

In essence, an undertaking is an enforceable promise. For the purposes of the SRA Standards and Regulations, the SRA Glossary defines an undertaking as:

a statement given orally or in writing, whether or not it includes the word ‘undertake’ or ‘undertaking’ to someone who reasonably places reliance on it, that you or a third party will do something or cause something to be done, or refrain from doing something.

A solicitor must perform all undertakings given by them and do so within an agreed timescale or, if no timescale has been agreed, then within a reasonable amount of time.

The SRA Glossary definition of an undertaking is quite wide. Any oral or written statement made by a solicitor to do or not do something, whether given to a client or to another third party (such as another solicitor), may be an undertaking. Indeed, even if such a promise is made on a solicitor’s behalf by a member of their staff, it may constitute an undertaking. It is not necessary to use the word ‘undertake’ for the promise to amount to an undertaking. Even a promise to give an undertaking will usually be interpreted as an undertaking, and therefore will be binding on the solicitor concerned.

A solicitor is not obliged to give or accept an undertaking. A solicitor should think carefully when considering whether to give an undertaking. Once the undertaking has been relied upon by the recipient, it can be withdrawn only by agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the consequences if a solicitor breaches an undertaking?

A

Where a solicitor gives an undertaking, the terms of that undertaking will usually be personally binding on the individual solicitor concerned.

If a solicitor fails to comply with an undertaking, the solicitor may be sued personally by the recipient. The solicitor will also breach the Code of Conduct for Solicitors and may be disciplined by the SRA or the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.

The obligation in Paragraph 1.3 is replicated in the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms.

Undertakings given by solicitors, non- admitted staff, and also undertakings given by anyone held out by the firm as representing the firm are binding on the firm. For example, if an undertaking given by an assistant solicitor is not honoured, there will be a breach of professional conduct by the solicitor and also by the partners of the firm.

Solicitors must be able to be able to justify their decisions and actions and demonstrate their compliance with their obligations under the SRA’s regulatory arrangements (Paragraph 7.2).

A solicitor should therefore maintain an effective system that records when undertakings have been given and when they have been discharged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What should a solicitor consider regarding the terms of an undertaking?

A

An undertaking is binding regardless of whether it is given orally or in writing. From the solicitor’s point of view, it is advisable to give undertakings in writing, so that there can be no dispute as to the terms of the undertaking. If, however, it is necessary in the circumstances to give an oral undertaking, the solicitor should ensure that an attendance note recording the undertaking is placed on the client’s file and that it is confirmed in writing as soon as possible.

An undertaking need not be contractual in nature. For example, there is no obligation for consideration (whether in monetary or other forms) to be present for an undertaking to be enforceable against a solicitor. However, given the binding effect of undertakings, and the consequences for breach, solicitors should take just as much care in drafting undertakings as they would do when drafting a contract for a client. Although not expressly stated in the Code for Solicitors, it is likely that any ambiguity in the wording of the undertaking will be interpreted in favour of its recipient.

The Law Society has agreed standard wording for undertakings which commonly arise in practice, for example an undertaking required from the seller’s solicitor in a conveyancing transaction to discharge the mortgage over the property on completion. Even when presented with an undertaking on the ‘standard’ form, the solicitor must check the wording carefully in the light of the particular transaction to ensure that it is appropriate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happens if a solicitor is called upon to undertake an act which is outside of the solicitor’s control?

A

A solicitor may be called upon to undertake to perform an act which is outside the solicitor’s control, such as to forward documents which are not in the solicitor’s possession. The simple fact that the solicitor is unable to perform the undertaking without the cooperation of the client or another third party does not discharge the solicitor’s obligation to perform, and the undertaking remains enforceable.

Providing an undertaking which is wholly reliant on the action/ inaction of a third party should be avoided given the binding nature of such an undertaking. In other appropriate circumstances, a solicitor may seek to give an undertaking that, in respect of the example above, they will use their ‘reasonable endeavours’ to obtain and provide the documents requested. This will impose a lesser obligation upon the solicitor, just as such a ‘reasonable endeavours’ obligation in contract imposes a lesser obligation on the contracting party.

However, it may not give the party who might seek to rely on it the same comfort as an absolute undertaking, and the recipient may therefore choose not to accept it, which may cause delay to the transaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is meant if an undertaking is ‘on behalf’ of a client?

A

(1) Will not prevent the undertaking from being enforceable as against the solicitor, who will remain personally liable.

(2) It is possible for a solicitor to give an undertaking ‘on behalf’ of a client and exclude personal liability by expressly disclaiming in clear terms.

(3) Unlikely to be accepted by the proposed recipient, as their ability to enforce it (and therefore rely on it) will be greatly reduced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In what timescale do undertakings need to be performed?

A

(1) Undertakings must be performed ‘within an agreed timescale’, which is expressed when the undertaking is given.

(2) Where no timescale has been agreed, the undertaking must be performed within a ‘reasonable amount of time’.

(3) What is ‘reasonable’ will depend upon the facts of each case, and so this element of uncertainty should be a consideration when preparing to give or receive such undertakings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When an undertaking is given in respect of the payment of costs, what does this mean?

A

The term ‘costs’ will be implied to mean proper costs unless a specific amount is agreed. Therefore, a solicitor is able to request an assessment of the costs by the court if costs are not agreed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What kind of authority must be given by a client before the solicitor gives an undertaking?

A

(1) An undertaking is a personal obligation on the solicitor who gave it, and therefore the solicitor will be held liable for it, even if performance would put the solicitor in breach of his duty to the client.

(2) A solicitor must have clear and express authority from the client before giving any undertakings.

(3) When such authority has been received, it may be withdrawn by the client at any time until the solicitor has acted upon it, even if it is expressed to be irrevocable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can a solicitor’s undertaking be enforced in the courts?

A

(1) Court Enforcement/Compensation: Where a solicitor’s undertaking has been breached, an aggrieved party may seek summary enforcement or compensation for any loss.

(2) Indemnity Insurance: Firms are obliged to carry indemnity insurance to cover such claims. However, the value of such claims may well fall within the excess of those policies, leading to personal liability for the solicitor concerned.

(3) Solicitor’s Undertaking: The fact that an undertaking was given by a solicitor does not make it a ‘solicitor’s undertaking’ capable of enforcement by the court. A ‘solicitor’s undertaking’ for these purposes must have been given by an individual in their capacity as a solicitor (as opposed to in a personal or business capacity).

The rationale is that the court’s inherent jurisdiction is aimed a disciplining those performing the role of a solicitor. However, in practice most undertakings will satisfy this requirement.

In Harcus Sinclair v Your Lawyers [2021] UKSC 32, the Supreme Court confirmed that an undertaking given by an incorporated law practice, ie a limited company or LLP (or an undertaking given by an individual solicitor as agent for such a practice), is not capable of being enforced against that practice by the court under its inherent jurisdiction.

This is because an incorporated practice is a separate legal entity. This case has highlighted a sharp divide on the enforcement of undertakings which Parliament may or may not address in due course. Certainly, for the time being, individual solicitors should refer to their firm’s policy on accepting undertakings from incorporated practices.

Where an undertaking is not enforceable by the court, the redress for its breach will be a claim under contract, negligence or breach of statutory trust depending on the facts.

A breach of any undertaking is likely to be a breach of professional conduct. However, given the court’s jurisdiction over solicitors concerning undertakings, the SRA does not usually investigate a breach of an undertaking given to the court itself, unless the court reported the matter to the SRA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can a solicitor’s undertaking be enforced in the SRA and Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal?

A

(1) Professional Conduct Breach: Breach of an undertaking by individuals and firms (including solicitors and incorporated practices) is a breach of professional conduct.

(2) Enforcement of Undertaking Jurisdiction: The Legal Ombudsman, the SRA and the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal have no power to enforce the performance of an undertaking. Neither can these organisations direct that a solicitor pay compensation to an aggrieved third party.

(3) Investigatory Powers: They may investigate the matter and impose disciplinary sanctions, as appropriate, against the solicitor, the firm, its members or directors (up to and including, in the case of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, striking a solicitor off the roll of solicitors).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What duties does a solicitor have to the court?

A

(1) Upholding Rule of Law and Proper Administration: A solicitor has a duty to act in a way that upholds the constitutional principle of the rule of law and the proper administration of justice (Principle 1).

(2) Client Best Interests: A solicitor also has a duty to act in the best interests of each client (Principle 7). The potential for conflict between these duties can present itself particularly in the context of conducting litigation.

(3) Conflict of Principles: The Principles which safeguard the wider public interest take precedence over an individual client’s interests. Principle 1 is therefore the overriding duty.

(4) Informing Client: The introduction goes on to provide that a solicitor should, where relevant, inform the client of the circumstances in which the solicitor’s duty to the court and other professional obligations outweigh his duty to the client.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the solicitors duty not to mislead the court?

A

(1) Duty Not to Mislead the Court: You must not mislead or attempt to mislead the court (or others), either by your own acts or omissions or allowing or being complicit in the acts or omissions of others (including your client).
Examples: Helping a client to create a false alibi or making false statements to the court.

(2) SRA Principles: This duty is part and parcel of the fundamental requirements for a solicitor to act with honesty (Principle 4) and integrity (Principle 5) and uphold public trust in the profession (Principle 2).

(3) Criminal Litigation Context: Frequent consideration for solicitors acting for the defence in criminal cases. For example, a solicitor may be faced with a client who admits their guilt to the solicitor during the course of the legal proceedings, but nevertheless insists on pleading not guilty and on giving evidence in the witness box, denying guilt. The duty not to mislead the court would require the solicitor to decline to act in such circumstances.

(4) Sanctions: Regarded by the court and must be regarded by any disciplinary tribunal as one of the most serious offences that an advocate or litigator can commit. It is not simply a breach of a rule of a game, but a fundamental affront to a rule designed to safeguard the fairness and justice of proceedings. Such conduct will normally attract an exemplary and deterrent sentence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What professional conduct obligations does a solicitor have during litigation?

A

(1) Evidence: A solicitor must not misuse or tamper with evidence or attempt to do so.

(2) Submissions: Must only make assertions or put forward statements, representations or submissions to the court or others which are properly arguable.

Examples of breaches of these duties are wide- ranging and include:
(a) calling a witness whose evidence the solicitor knows is untrue;
(b) continuing to act for a client if the solicitor becomes aware that the client has committed perjury or deliberately misled (or attempted to mislead) the court;
(c) constructing facts to support a client’s case or drafting documents relating to proceedings containing statements or contentions which the solicitor does not consider to be properly arguable before a court.

(3) Contempt of Court: A solicitor must not place themselves in contempt of court and must comply with court orders which place obligations on the solicitor and must not waste the court’s time.

Examples include:
(a) Making allegations without merit. This occurs when a solicitor brings a claim with insufficient investigation of the merits or the underlying legal background. There is little or no legal merit, or the solicitor may threaten/ initiate litigation in such a case in the hope that the opponent will pay a settlement rather than incur the costs of defending the case.
(b) Pursuing litigation for improper purposes. This occurs when a solicitor uses the court process for purposes not directly connected to resolving a dispute, for example to run up high costs for the client’s commercial rival or silencing criticism.
(c) Conducting excessive or aggressive litigation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What professional conduct obligations does a solicitor have with regards to a solicitor gathering evidence by interviewing witnesses?

A

(1) Influencing: A solicitor must not seek to influence the substance of evidence, including generating false evidence or persuading witnesses to change their evidence. e.g. Where solicitors have knowingly helped criminal clients to create a false alibi and, where they have known that their client has obtained information to help their case by illegal means, helped them provide a false explanation as to where it came from.

(2) Bribing: A solicitor must not provide or offer to provide any benefit to witnesses dependent upon the nature of their evidence or the outcome of the case.

(3) Interviewing with Legal Representative: To avoid any suggestion of impropriety, it may be prudent to interview a witness in the presence of their legal representative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What duties does a solicitor have to disclose law and fact?

A

(1) Defence Evidence/Witnesses: A solicitor who appears before the court for the defence in a criminal case, or for either party in a civil case, has no duty to inform the court of any evidence or witnesses which would prejudice the solicitor’s own client.

(2) Material Effect on Outcome of Proceedings: However, there is a duty on the part of a solicitor to draw the court’s attention to relevant cases and statutory provisions or procedural irregularities of which the solicitor is aware and which are likely to have a material effect on the outcome of the proceedings. This is a situation in which the duty to uphold the rule of law and the proper administration of justice is likely to take precedence.

(3) Prosecution Evidence/Witnesses: The prosecution solicitor must put all relevant facts before the court and notify the defence of evidence which may assist the defendant.

17
Q

Can a solicitor refuse to act on instructions?

A

(1) Refusing to Act: A solicitor is generally free to decide whether or not to accept instructions in any matter, provided that the solicitor does not discriminate unlawfully.

(2) Link to Witness: If it is clear to a solicitor appearing as an advocate, or acting in litigation, that the solicitor or anyone else in the firm will be called as a witness in the matter, the solicitor should decline to appear/ act unless satisfied that this will not prejudice the solicitor’s independence as an advocate or a litigator, the interests of the client or the interests of justice.

18
Q

What does a solicitor need to consider in terms of professional conduct when instructing counsel?

A

(1) Instructing Counsel: Instructing counsel should not be done automatically or as a matter of routine. A solicitor is obliged to act in the best interests of the client and ensure that the service provided is competent and delivered in a timely manner. Accordingly, where the client requires advocacy services, the solicitor must consider, based on the complexity of the case and the solicitor’s own experience, whether it would be in the best interests of that client to instruct counsel (or another solicitor within the firm) to act as the advocate in the proceedings.

(2) Choice of Advocate: A solicitor must exercise care in choosing the appropriate barrister for the case, taking into consideration the experience and seniority of counsel available. A solicitor must not discriminate by allowing their personal views to affect their professional relationships and the way in which the solicitor provides services and must act in a way that encourages equality, diversity and inclusion.

(3) Client Input: A solicitor may consult with the client when choosing a barrister, however the solicitor must consider the motivation behind any input from the client. The client’s request may appear to be based on discriminatory grounds. For example, a male client defending himself in an employment tribunal against an allegation of sex discrimination may request to be represented by a female advocate.

(4) Ceasing to Act: In such circumstances, the solicitor should discuss the issue with the client and, if necessary, ask the client to change their instructions. Where the client refuses, it will usually be appropriate for the solicitor to cease to act.

19
Q

If it is in the client’s best interests to instruct counsel, what does the solicitor need to ensure?

A

(1) Adequate Instructions: If it is in the client’s best interests to instruct counsel, it remains the solicitor’s duty to ensure that adequate instructions are provided to the chosen barrister.

(2) Provided in Good Time: As an extension of the solicitor’s duty to the client, the solicitor should ensure that these instructions, including any relevant supporting statements, information or documents, are provided in good time to allow adequate preparation of the case.

(3) Conference with Counsel: In order to provide such information, it may be necessary, if practicable, to arrange a conference with counsel, either with or without the client, to enable the barrister to discuss directly the nature of the case, obtain instructions or further information and provide advice in a direct manner. It is a matter for the solicitor to ascertain whether such a conference would be appropriate, and in the client’s best interests, and if so, to arrange it.

20
Q

If it is in the client’s best interests to instruct counsel, what duty does the solicitor have to the client?

A

(1) Duties to Client: Instructing counsel does not relieve the solicitor of those duties, particularly the duty to act in the best interests of the client. When instructing counsel, the solicitor must be satisfied with the quality of the advice given and ensure that there are no obvious errors or inconsistencies. If such errors are apparent, clarification should be requested or a second opinion obtained.

(2) Independant Judgment: In general, a solicitor is entitled to rely upon the advice of counsel properly instructed however, the solicitor must not rely on such advice without exercising his own independent judgement. If he thinks the advice is obviously wrong, it is his duty to reject it.

21
Q

Who is responsible for paying counsel’s fees?

A

(1) Solicitor’s Responsibility: A solicitor is responsible for appointing counsel and (subject to limited exceptions) is therefore responsible personally for the payment of counsel’s fees.

(2) Money on Account: This applies regardless of whether the solicitor’s client has provided the requisite monies. Many solicitors therefore request that their clients provide money on account to cover prospective barristers’ fees.

22
Q

What duties does a solicitor owe to third parties?

A

(1) Not Taking an Unfair Advantage: A solicitor must not abuse their position by taking unfair advantage of not only the client, but also others. Although of general application, this Principle may be of particular relevance in the context of dispute resolution and conducting proceedings before the court.
Litigant in Person/Vulnerable: Particular care must be taken in situations where the opponent is unrepresented or is vulnerable, for example due to age or mental capacity. Examples include overbearing threats of claims or poor outcomes, legalistic letters to minors or others who might be vulnerable and threats of litigation where no legal claims arises.
Sanctions: The SRA will consider an allegation to be ‘particularly serious’ where the vulnerability of the client or third party is relevant to the solicitor’s behaviour.

(2) Improper Use of NDAs: The SRA has issued a warning notice on the use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) following concerns about their improper use, for example, in relation to allegations of harassment.

(3) Public Office and Personal Interests: Solicitors may sometimes be appointed to a public office, such as being a member of a planning committee or a district judge. The public office may provide the solicitor with confidential information or inside knowledge of, for example, policy, which may affect the solicitor’s advice to a client or the solicitor’s approach to the matter.
Inside Information: Might also be available to the solicitor if another individual at the solicitor’s practice (whether partner, member or employee) held such an office, or indeed if it was held by a member of the solicitor’s family.
Breach of Principles: If a solicitor takes unfair advantage of a public office held by the solicitor, a member of their family or their firm, it is unlikely that the solicitor will be acting in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors’ profession or with integrity. This would place the solicitor in breach of Principles 2 and 5.

(4) Giving References: Under the general law of negligence, a solicitor will owe a duty of care to the subject of any reference given by that solicitor. Owed a duty of care to the employee in respect of the preparation of the reference and was liable in damages for economic loss suffered as a result of the negligent preparation of the reference.
Firm Policies: Many firms have in place policies with regard to the giving of references, covering who may give them and the nature of the content.
False Refernce: Giving a false reference would almost certainly breach the Code of Conduct for Solicitors, for example for damaging the public trust and confidence in the solicitors’ profession (Principle 2).

(5) Offensive Communications: A solicitor is under a duty to act with integrity and in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors’ profession. Accordingly, a solicitor must not communicate with any third party in a manner that could be considered to be offensive.
Offensiuve: A communication does not have to be discriminatory in order to be offensive. This could occur, for example, if a solicitor were to pass on or be seen to endorse derogatory remarks made by the client. Similarly, a solicitor should not allow their independence to be compromised by employing abusive or inflammatory language at the client’s behest.

(6) Beneficiaries: Where a solicitor is instructed to administer a probate estate, the solicitor’s client will be the personal representative of the deceased’s estate. However, in certain circumstances a solicitor will also owe a duty of care to the beneficiaries of that estate.

(7) Contacting a Represented Third Party: Where a client instructs a solicitor, it is often because the client lacks legal knowledge and skills and therefore seeks the assistance of a legal expert. Care must be taken, therefore, in the context of a solicitor communicating with another party when the solicitor is aware that the other party has retained a lawyer in a matter. There is nothing specific in the Code of Conduct for Solicitors dealing with this situation; it will be prudent to avoid such communication except:
(a) to request the name and address of the other party’s lawyer; or
(b) where the other party’s lawyer consents to the solicitor communicating with the client; or
(c) where there are exceptional circumstances.

(7) Agents’ Costs: As with counsel’s fees, a solicitor is personally responsible for meeting the fees of agents or others appointed by the solicitor on behalf of the client. This extends only to costs properly incurred. Again, this applies whether or not the solicitor has been put in funds, and therefore the solicitor may ask for monies on account prior to incurring such expenditure. Alternatively, the solicitor and agent may agree that the agent’s fee will become payable on receipt by the solicitor of the client’s payment.