Essay plans - Congress Flashcards

1
Q

What is the structure of Congress?

A

BICAMERAL

Senate: 100 senators, 2 from each state regardless of population size, each serves 6 years before coming up for re-election & 1/3 of Senate is up for election at one time.

House of Representatives: 435 representatives, each represents a district, no. of districts depends on population size – e.g. California has 53, Wyoming has 1 – they serve 2 years before going up for re-election.

SENATORS/CONGRESSMEN

Senators – must be 30, been US citizen for 9 years, residents of state in which they have been elected, they serve 6-year terms with 1/3 being elected every two years (the 2 senators for each state not up for election at same time).

Congressmen – must be 25, been a US citizen for 7 years and residents of the state in which they have been elected. They serve 2-year terms (mid-term elections). They represent districts within a state.

IMPORTANT ROLES

President of Senate: preside over sessions, appoint committee members - the vice pres takes this role – Mike Pence has cast 13 tie breaking votes since Jan 2017.

Speaker of the House – same role – elected by House after a GE.

Majority/minority leaders – lead debate for maj/min.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the powers of Congress?

A

SENATE’S ENUMERATED POWERS

Confirm many of the president’s appointments e.g. to fed judiciary with 2/3 majority, ratify all of the president’s treaties with 2/3, power to impeach – to hear the trial and find the person (not) guilty with 2/3 vote – Senate held impeachment trial in 2020 and found him not guilty, to elect VP if EC in deadlock.

HofR’S ENUMERATED POWERS

Initiate money bills, impeachment – formally accuse - in Sep 2019 they announced they were making an impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump because he’s though to have pressured foreign leaders into investigating Joe Biden, to elect the president if EC in deadlock – 1800 and 1824.

CONCURRENT POWERS

The two chambers are equal in the passage of legislation – all bills must pass through stages in both Houses and neither chamber can override the other. Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill before it goes to the president.

Both chambers must vote – with super-majorities to override a president’s veto – JASTA.

A constitutional amendment must be approved by super-majorities in both chambers of Congress before it is sent to the states for ratification.

Both chambers must agree on a declaration of war – this has happened five times Eg. in 1941 when America declared war on Japan.

The 25th Amendment gave both chambers the power to confirm a newly appointed

vice-president. This has happened twice (1973 and 1974).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is the legislative process effective?

A

LONG, COMPLEX PROCESS ALLOWS FOR DETAILED SCRUTINY

5 or sometimes even 6 stage process which involves standing committees with policy specialists, debates in both chambers with amendments introduced – filibustering –Chris Murphy 14 hours in supp of gun control in 2016, 2/3 votes in both, back and forth between chambers if no agreement, conference committee and presidential action – can veto it – JASTA 2016.

NOT PRODUCTIVE

Can take up to 2 years to pass legislation.

A significant number are pigeon-holed (put to one side, no action taken)

in a typical Congress between 10,000 and 14,000 bills are introduced – only around 3-5% of these actually make it to law – 113th Congress 8,565 bills referred to standing committees and 296 signed into law.

A LOT OF SUPPORT IS NEEDED FOR SUCCESS

A supermajority of 2/3 is needed in both chambers in the second reading.

Only Those with a good deal of support/ heavily lobbied, eg. from members of Congress or the White House are given hearings either in the full committee or in sub-committees.

Need support of Pres – can veto – Trump vetoed bill in 2020 to terminate AF action in Iran that hadn’t been authorised by Congress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Does Congress effectively oversee the Executive?

A

Does Congress effectively oversee the Executive?

STANDING COMMITTEES

Investigate scandals + (in house) recommend impeachment, e.g. House Energy and Commerce Committee investigated the creation of health insurance exchanges in Oct 2013. In 2019 the House Judiciary Committee approved 2 articled of impeachment against Trump.

Can subpoena documents/testimony – House judiciary committee subpoenaed the Mueller Report in 2019.

COMMITTEES AND OFFICES

House Committee on Oversight and Reform: in 2019 a hearing was held on the treatment of children in child detention centres on the southern US border.

The Government Accountability Office is a gov agency that releases around 900 reports annually.

UNITED GOVERNMENT

Many say that during Bush presidency, where for the majority there was Republican maj. in both chambers, there was not enough oversight of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan - allegations of torture by intelligence agencies.

BUT some say divided gov leads to ineffective point scoring – parties seek to score points against the opposition rather than improve outcomes – 2002: 13 nominations pending, 2010: 108 nominations pending and when Ebola broke out in 2014 there was no surgeon general.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the committee system?

A

STANDING COMMITTEES

They exist in both chambers and are permanent, specialist bodies. Most standing committees are divided into sub-committees.

In the House, standing committees are made up of around 40-50 members however those in the Senate are made up of around 18 members.

The party balance in these committees is the same proportion as is in that chamber of Congress. E.g. in the 111 th Congress (Jan 09) the Democrats had majorities in both chambers, and this was reflected in the Standing Committees.

They have 2 functions: to conduct the committee stage of the legislative process and to conduct investigations within the committee’s policy area.

SELECT COMMITTEES

Temporary committees set up to investigate specific issues, when the issue doesn’t fall within the policy area of a standing committee or when a v big issue.

Some have members from both chambers.

Select Committee on Global Warming set up in 2007 and one to investigate the attack on a US compound in Libya in 2012.

HOUSE RULES COMMITTEE

Only exists in the House - Responsible for prioritising bills coming from the committee stage for their second readings.

This committee essentially has the power of deciding which Bills are the best for the nation.

13 members in 2017 and one of the most influential roles in Congress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the advantages/disadvantages of Committees?

A

EFFICIENT

Bills can go to their appropriate committee rather than being written by the whole of Congress, which would waste a lot of time.

Individuals and pressure groups have the opportunity to give their opinions on bills.

Individuals and pressure groups can be called to public hearings.

Committee members are often specialists in their committee’s policy area.

Committees have large teams of staff who are experts in their policy area.

This means that committees are often knowledgeable enough to challenge the executive branch, which is good for checks and balances.

TOO MUCH POWER OVER LEGISLATION

Set legislative agenda – pigeon holing, House Rules Committee.

A discharge petition, which forces a debate on a bill, requires an absolute majority of 218 members in the House, therefore this is very hard to achieve.

The Fair Minimum Wage Act (2013) ended up being stuck in the Education and Workforce Committee because not enough signatures could be collected for a discharge petition.

Committees having so much power over the legislative agenda can lead to high levels of pork-barrelling.

However, there have been some limits on pork-barrelling.

In 2010, the House Appropriations Committee implemented new rules that banned members from making for profit-making corporations.

POLITICAL SCRUTINY

Standing committee investigations may be conducted for political reasons.

72% of Americans believe that the Benghazi hearings (2015), which were carried out to investigate the attacks by Islamic militants on the US compound in Benghazi in September 2012, were about the Republicans attacking Obama and Hillary Clinton rather than performing effective scrutiny.

Senate committees also hold hearings in which presidential appointments are considered prior to confirmation, therefore appointments can be confirmed or blocked for political reasons.

When American was dealing with its first Ebola case in October 2014, there was no Surgeon General because the appropriate Senate committee hadn’t confirmed Obama’s nominees.

Scrutiny may also be undermined by committees forming iron triangles with the executive agencies that they are supposed to be overseeing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Do committees play a significant role?

A

LEGISLATION

Committees can often set the legislative agenda by pigeon-holing bills, meaning they don’t make it through the committees to the floor.

In the 113th Congress, only 7% of bills made it through the standing committees.

The House Rules Committee arguably has the most power because it decides whether time will be allowed for the debate of a bill on the floor of the House, without which the bill will die.

A discharge petition, which forces a debate on a bill, requires an absolute majority of 218 members in the House, therefore this is very hard to achieve.

The Fair Minimum Wage Act (2013) ended up being stuck in the Education and Workforce Committee because not enough signatures could be collected for a discharge petition.

Committees having so much power over the legislative agenda can lead to high levels of pork-barrelling.

SCRUTINY/OVERSIGHT

Some standing committees carry out scrutiny investigations in their policy area.

The Healthcare.gov Hearings (2013) were carried out to investigate health insurance website which crashed at launch.

The Benghazi hearings (2015) were carried out to investigate the attacks by Islamic militants on the US compound in Benghazi, Libya, in September 2012.

Select committees can also be formed for specific issues.

There are some standing committees which are broadly focused on oversight.

The House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform has broad jurisdiction to investigate how money is being spent and the effectiveness of government.

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has jurisdiction over homeland security but also the general efficiency of government.

NOMINATIONS

Senate committees also hold hearings in which presidential appointments are considered prior to confirmation.

When American was dealing with its first Ebola case in October 2014, there was no Surgeon General because the appropriate Senate committee hadn’t confirmed Obama’s nominees.

SC nominations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Congress’s relationship with the other branches of government?

A

EXEC

Obama issued 12 vetoes incl. Justice Against Sponsors Terrorism Act in 2016.

Congress refused to fund Trump’s wall in 2019.

Senate forced Harriet Miers to withdraw as SC nominee in 2005.

Trump impeached by House in 2019.

JUD

Congress can initiate constitutional amendments –16th Amendment overturned SC’s judgement that imposing federal income tax was unconstitutional.

Matal v Tam (2017) – SC declared provisions of the Lanham Act that prohibited the registration of certain trademarks to be unconst.

UNITED GOV

Relations can change when united – weaker oversight - many say that during Bush presidency, where for the majority there was Republican maj in both chambers, there was not enough oversight of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan - allegations of torture by intelligence agencies.

Senate hasn’t rejected a treaty of a pres of its own gov since 1935.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is Congress checked?

A

SUPREME COURT

The Supreme Court can strike down Congress’s legislation if it goes against the constitution.

United States v. Lopez (1995) – held that the federal government’s Gun-Free School Zones Act (1994) was unconstitutional because this went beyond Congress’s “Commerce Clause” powers.

United States v. Windsor (2013) – held that the Defence of Marriage Act (1996), which restricted marriage to being between one man and one woman, was unconstitutional as it infringed on the Due Process clause of the 5th Amendment.

However, the Supreme Court usually upholds Congress’s legislation - National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012) – upheld Obamacare (2010).

PRESIDENT

Trump vetoed bill in 2020 to terminate AF action in Iran that hadn’t been authorised by Congress.

Obama vetoed JASTA (2016) and 11 other bills.

Signing statements – Trump issued a signing statement on the Hong Kong Autonomy Act to say that he would treat its limitations as advisory and non-binding.

However, Congress can override veto – Jasta.

PUBLIC

The public can vote Senators or Representatives out of office.

In 2014, Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Representative for Virginia, lost his primary election to Tea Party candidate Dave Brat, arguably because Cantor was not listening to the needs of his electorate who supported the Tea Party’s policies.

Senator Elizabeth Dole’s failure to be re-elected in North Carolina in 2008 has been explained by her opponents as the result of her failure to pay sufficient attention to the interests of her state.

The media can scrutinise Congress.

The media heavily scrutinised the 2013 Government Shutdown, leading to a Continuing Resolution being passed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the powers of Congress?

A

SENATE RATIFIES TREATIES

The Senate ratifies treaties with a 2/3 vote.

In 2010, the Senate confirmed New START (the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) with Russia.

In 2012, the Senate rejected the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities treaty.

However, an increasing number of international agreements have been achieved through executive agreements, which don’t require the consent of the Senate.

In November 2013, Obama’s Iran Nuclear Program sole-executive agreement lifted sanctions on Iran if it limited nuclear technology for 6 months.

SENATE CONFIRMS APPOINTMENTS AND HOLD IMPEACHMENT TRIALS

The Senate confirms the President’s appointments with a majority vote.

In 2010, they confirmed President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan.

However, the Senate usually just confirms or rejects the President’s nominees for political reasons rather than actually scrutinising them.

Confirmed Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 with only 1 Democrat vote.

Took no action on 5 nominees - Obama nominated Merrick Garland in 2016, however Republican Senators stated that they wouldn’t confirm any of Obama’s nominations.

Obama had 108 nominations pending - When there was the first Ebola case in 2014, there was no Surgeon General because the Senate hadn’t confirmed Obama’s nominees.

BOTH HOUSES EQUAL IN LEGISLATION

Both Houses are needed to pass legislation.

E.g. in 2020 both Houses voted to pass the CARES Act to provide financial support to individuals during COVID-19 and the Rent and Mortgage Cancellation Act to suspend mortgage payments during the pandemic.

In 2013, the Senate passed the Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act, however the bill never made it through the House.

However, Congress may not be able to pass legislation because of gridlock, which occurs when Congress cannot agree on bills, so cannot pass legislation – significant gridlock in 2018 over funding for Trump’s wall led to a 35 day fed gov shutdown.

The Senate can filibuster - Chris Murphy 14 hours in supp of gun control in 2016.

BOTH HOUSES EQUAL IN VETOES, AMENDMENTS AND OVERSIGHT.

Both Houses are needed to override a president’s veto.

Obama’s veto of JASTA (2016) was overridden.

Bush’s veto of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (2008) was overridden.

However, it is hard for Congress to get the 2/3 vote needed to override the President’s veto Trump vetoed bill in 2020 to terminate AF action in Iran that hadn’t been authorised by Congress and override attempt failed in Senate 49-44.

Both Houses are needed to initiate constitutional amendments.

In 1971, the House and the Senate initiated the 26th Amendment, which lowered the voting age from 21 to 18 when it was ratified by the states three months later.

However, many constitutional amendments fail to be initiated by Congress.

In December 2011, Senator Bernie Sanders filed the Saving American Democracy Amendment, which would have overturned Citizens United v. FEC (2010), however it didn’t get through Congress.

The House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform has broad jurisdiction to investigate how money is being spent and the effectiveness of government.

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has jurisdiction over homeland security but also the general efficiency of government.

HOUSE OF REPS HAS ITS OWN POWERS

If no candidate wins a majority of Electoral College votes, the House elects the President.

In 1824, the House elected presidential candidate John Quincy Adams to be the president.

However, it is rare that this power is used due to the Electoral College usually producing a winner with a majority e.g. Trump won 304 vs 227 EC votes – clear majority.

The House impeaches officials – impeached Donald Trump in 2019, however, the Senate conducts the trial and therefore has makes final decision, - found him not guilty in 2020.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How are Senators more prestigious than Representatives?

A

SENATE’S EXCLUSIVE POWERS

The Senate ratifies treaties with a 2/3 vote.

In 2010, the Senate confirmed New START (the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) with Russia.

In 2012, the Senate rejected the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities treaty.

In November 2013, Obama’s Iran Nuclear Program sole-executive agreement lifted sanctions on Iran if it limited nuclear technology for 6 months.

The Senate confirms the President’s appointments with a majority vote.

In 2010, they confirmed President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan.

Confirmed Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 with only 1 Democrat vote.

SENATOR’S POSITION

Senators have 6 year terms, therefore they are freer to make unpopular decisions, whereas Representatives have 2 year terms, therefore they seemingly constantly have to worry about making decisions that please their electorate.

In 2013, the Senate passed controversial immigration reform with a strong bi-partisan vote on the Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act, however the bill is stuck in the House arguably because Congressmen are more concerned about pleasing their electorate.

Senators serve an entire state, therefore they arguably have a greater mandate.

SENATOR’S VOTES

There are 100 Senators, compared to 435 Representatives, therefore each vote in the Senate counts for more.

Senators’ votes also count for more because 60 votes are required to file a motion of cloture to end a filibuster, meaning that nearly all bills now require 60 votes to pass in the Senate.

In 2010, the Democrats needed Bernie Sanders (Independent) for the 60th vote in favour of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), and he would only do this once the bill was amended to include $10 billion for community health centres.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why aren’t Senators more prestigious than Representatives?

A

HOUSE INITIATES REVENUE BILLS

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (2009), Obama’s $787 billion economic stimulus, was initiated in the House.

In September 2013, the House passed the Continuing Appropriations Act 2014, which was then passed by the Senate in October 2013, leading to the end of the 2013 Government Shutdown.

However, the Senate can pass ‘Shell Bills’ - Obamacare was a shell bill because it was passed by the House as the Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act (2009) and was significantly amended by the Senate to form the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2009).

HOUSE IMPEACHES OFFICIALS

The House impeached President Bill Clinton in 1998 for perjury and obstruction of justice, however he was acquitted by the Senate in 1999.

Impeached Trump in 2019 because he was thought to have pressured foreign leaders into investigating Joe Biden.

However, the Senate is more significant because Senators try impeached officials – Republican Senate found Trump not guilty in 2020.

BOTH HOUSES EQUAL IN VETOES, AMENDMENTS AND OVERSIGHT.

Both Houses are needed to override a president’s veto.

Obama’s veto of JASTA (2016) was overridden.

Bush’s veto of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (2008) was overridden.

However, it is hard for Congress to get the 2/3 vote needed to override the President’s veto Trump vetoed bill in 2020 to terminate AF action in Iran that hadn’t been authorised by Congress and override attempt failed in Senate 49-44.

Both Houses are needed to initiate constitutional amendments.

In 1971, the House and the Senate initiated the 26th Amendment, which lowered the voting age from 21 to 18 when it was ratified by the states three months later.

However, many constitutional amendments fail to be initiated by Congress.

In December 2011, Senator Bernie Sanders filed the Saving American Democracy Amendment, which would have overturned Citizens United v. FEC (2010), however it didn’t get through Congress.

The House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform has broad jurisdiction to investigate how money is being spent and the effectiveness of government.

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has jurisdiction over homeland security but also the general efficiency of government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is Congress the ‘broken branch’?

A

INNEFFICIENT LEGISLATOR

The increase in partisanship, and election of more ideological members, has impacted productivity.

Some of President Obama’s most significant legislative achievements had almost no Republican support e.g. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010) passed without a single Republican vote.

After the Democrats lost the House in 2010, and Senate in 2014, this partisanship made it increasingly difficult to pass laws needed to address pressing issues.

Even a unified government has struggled to overcome the gridlock in Congress: In 2017, the Republican leadership had to withdraw the American Health Care Act due to opposition – including within party.

The filibuster has become so common in the Senate that practically every vote now needs a supermajority.

Chris Murphy 14 hours in supp of gun control in 2016.

Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell filed 128 cloture motions from Jan 2015 - Jan 2017.

INNEFFICIENT AT SCRUTINY

Standing committee investigations may be conducted for political reasons.

72% of Americans believe that the Benghazi hearings (2015) were about Republicans attacking Obama and Hillary Clinton rather than performing effective scrutiny.

It is hard for Congress to get the 2/3 vote needed to override the President’s veto Trump vetoed bill in 2020 to terminate AF action in Iran that hadn’t been authorised by Congress and override attempt failed in Senate 49-44.

The Senate usually confirms or rejects the President’s appointments for political reasons rather than truly scrutinising them.

Confirmed Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 with only 1 Democrat vote.

Took no action on 5 nominees - Merrick Garland in 2016,.

Obama had 108 nominations pending - When there was the first Ebola case in 2014, there was no Surgeon General because the Senate hadn’t confirmed Obama’s nominees - Republican filibusters had held up the nomination for months

APPROPRIATIONS

Congress regularly fails to pass budgets or appropriations bills and cannot reach an agreement on the deficit.

Congress was unable to pass a budget resolution for the 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, or 2015 fiscal years. Between 1977 and 2016 there were only four fiscal years where Congress passed all appropriation bills ahead of the October deadline.

2013: no compromise over Obamacare led to federal gov shutdown due to lack of appropriated funds, resulting in 400,00 people being out of work.

the two parties passed Bipartisan Budget Acts in 2013, 2015, and 2018, to simply raise the sequestration caps, taking away the incentive to compromise without addressing any of the underlying tax and spending issues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why isn’t Congress the ‘broken branch’?

A

LEGISLATION

Congress does pass a lot of legislation, even in divided government and gridlock.

2007-08 the Democrat controlled Congress faced major legislation such as additional funding to Afghanistan and a $200 Billion economic stimulus package despite George Bush as President.

Gridlock has been adverted at certain times using compromise politics.

The Bi-Partisan Campaign Reform Act (2002) was passed using compromise politics.

There have been some limits on pork-barrelling.

In 2010, the House Appropriations Committee implemented new rules that banned members from making earmarks for profit-making corporations

Filibusters ensure that minority party can influence legislation.

-The 2017 American Health Care Act gives an insight into what would happen without the filibuster, as Republicans tried to pass their Obamacare replacement bill through a special procedure called a ‘budget reconciliation’, in which filibusters cannot be used - The Senate developed several amendments / bills to modify the AHCA bill that had passed in the House, but none had received enough votes in the Senate.

SCRUTINY

The scrutiny role of Congress is still vital for preventing abuse of power and promoting efficient government.

The Healthcare.gov Hearings (2013) were vital for investigating the health insurance website which crashed at launch.

The Senate Select Committee on Campaign Practices (1973) was vital to investigate the Watergate Scandal.

Scrutinises executive – overrides vetoes – JASTA 2016, Bush’s spending in Iraq limited in 2007.

REPRESENTATION

Descriptive representation has been improving – the 116th Congress is the most racially and ethnically diverse ever.

22% of Reps are ethnic minorities and 9% of the Senate.

The most women to dare in senate – 26 – and House – 101.

2 LGBTQ+ Senators and 7 in House.

People more willing to accept the decisions as it mirrors society and it makes and improves the quality of policy output.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How do parties play an important role in Congress?

A

PARTY VOTING

Party voting has increased.

In the first term of the 113th Congress (2013-2014), the House Republicans voted with their party on average 92% of the time, and Senate Democrats voted with their party on average 94% of the time.

Rejection of Merick Garland in 2016 - reluctance to allow the Democrat president to have any nomination heard.

Eugene Scalia voted to be Sec of Labour by party-line vote in Senate with all Reps voting YES and all Dems other than 2 who didn’t vote voting NO.

The use of the Hasert Rule.

In 2013, the Senate voted 68-32 on the immigration bill but the speaker Boehner invoked the HR and so it was not voted on in the House.

INFLUENCE ON ELECTIONS

Parties can influence congressional elections.

the role of the National Committees in primary timetabling has strengthened.

In the 2012 Republican primaries, five states ignored the Republican National Committee’s rules to reduce frontloading, therefore the National Committee cut these states’ delegate allocation by half.

Super-delegates at National Conventions have increased the influence of distinguished party leaders and figures.

At the 2008 Democratic National Convention, Obama was able to have a clearer lead over Hillary Clinton using the support of super-delegates.

Leadership PACs allow party leaders to have an influence over election finance.

In the 2010 election cycle, the “Senate Conservatives Fund” leadership PAC raised $9.3 million.

Campaigns have become increasingly nationalised; therefore the national party organisation has more influence:

In the 2006 Congressional elections, Senate Democrats signed up for “A New Direction for America” (Six for ’06), which set out ideas for six broad priorities.

INFLUENCE ON LEGISLATION

They can reward loyalty by appointing members to Standing Committees, which have a much more powerful role than UK Select Committees, as, in addition to scrutiny, they also consider bills.

The Hasert rule states that the Speaker will not allow the House to vote on controversial bills, like immigration reform, unless they are supported by a majority of Republicans - gives

John Boehner resigned from his position as Speaker in September 2015, largely as a result of obstruction and opposition from Republican members of the ‘Freedom Caucus’, which wanted to force a government shutdown to defund Planned Parenthood. One powerful tool that party leaders can no longer use are earmarks, which were banned in 2011.

Following the 2016 elections, many Republicans called for the ban on earmarks to be lifted. However, House Speaker Paul Ryan soon told the 115th Congress that this was politically impossible so soon after Donald Trump ran on a promise to ‘drain the swamp’ and tackle corruption in Washington. Only a few weeks later, Republicans in the Senate voted to continue their earmark ban. Critics argue that earmarks of different forms can still be found hidden in bills, but it is clear that the ban has nonetheless greatly limited the power of the party leadership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How don’t parties play an important role in Congress?

A

PARTY VOTING

Parties have little control over voting in Congress.

When Obama stated his position on an issue, only 32% of Congressmen voted with his position in 2011, which decreased to 20% in 2012.

In June 2015, most House Democrats voted against Obama’s Trade Adjustment Assistance Act (TAA) and only 40 House Democrats voted in favour, therefore it lost by 302 to 126.

8 Republicans voted in favour (against Trump) of resolution to stop unapproved action in Iran in 2020.

INFLUENCE

Parties have little control over their candidates’ campaign messages.

In May 2014, the Nevada Republican convention voted to remove opposition to same-sex marriage and abortion from the Nevada Republican Party Platform, even though the 2012 Republican National Party Platform was firmly opposed to same-sex marriage and abortion.

The choice of party candidates for elections is now done through primaries, not parties, therefore the parties and the party conventions have lost significance.

In the 2016 Republican primary, voters chose Donald Trump to be the Republican candidate.

Candidates now have less reliance on their party because they have their own political consultants who write speeches, give policy advice, conduct polls, organise volunteers and manage finances.

Parties also have reduced influence over election finance.

The Federal Election Campaign Act (1974) limited party donations to candidates to $5000 and expanded public financing to include primaries, therefore candidates had less reliance on their party.

PORK BARRELLING AND COMMITTEES

In order to get re-elected, Senators and Representatives must please their local electorate, leading to high levels of pork-barrelling, which the parties have little control over.

Senator Robert Byrd was labelled the “King of Pork” for staying in his seat for over 50 years by pork-barrelling huge amounts of money as the chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Senator Al D’Amato for New York became known as Senator Pothole by fixing New York’s streets with pork-barrelled money.

Parties have little control over committee chairs and their decisions.

The 1995 Republican Reforms restored many full committee chair powers, meaning they could appoint subcommittee chairs and decide membership.

17
Q

What factors affect voting behaviour in Congress?

A

PRESSURE GROUPS

Lobbying:

The National Rifle Association spent $3.6 million on lobbying in 2015.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the National Rifle Association donated less than $14 million from 1998 to 2016 - far less than many other industries. However, from 1998-2017 the group also spent $144.3 million influencing elections in other ways, for example, by purchasing TV and online ads that criticise candidates that support gun controls.

Electioneering:

In 2012, PACs in the finance, insurance and real estate sector gave $71 million to candidates to help with their campaigns, 89% of which was given to incumbents.

Of the $828 million collected by Super PACS in the 2012.

However, there have been some limits on pressure groups, therefore they may be less able to influence the voting of members of Congress.

The Lobbying Disclosure Act (1995) required the disclosure of lobbying activities for each client paying over $5000.

The Honest Leadership and Open Government Act (2007) meant lobbyists had to file reports every 3 months and increased penalties for not complying with regulations.

Keeping interest groups happy is arguably even more important following the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC (2010). The Justices ruled 5-4 that corporations and interest groups have a First Amendment right to channel unlimited sums of money through Super PACs, to then spend on TV ads supporting or opposing candidates running for elections.

LOCAL ELECTORATE

There are several reasons why members of Congress are responsive to their electorate:

The frequency of elections (esp for Reps), requirement that members of Congress much reside in the state they represent, a number of states insist on a “locality rule” - House members must reside in the congressional district they represent, volume of constituent letters and emails has steadily increased over the years and by 2004 the average for each member of Congress was 1000 per day.

Ignoring their local electorate can be politically damaging for members of Congress.

In 2014, Rep House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, lost his primary election to Tea Party candidate Dave Brat, arguably because Cantor was not listening to the needs of his electorate who supported the Tea Party’s policies.

This can lead to high levels of pork-barrelling.

Senator Al D’Amato for New York became known as Senator Pothole by fixing New York’s streets with pork-barrelled money.

PARTIES

Party voting has increased.

In the first term of the 113th Congress (2013-2014), the House Republicans voted with their party on average 92% of the time, and Senate Democrats voted with their party on average 94% of the time.

Rejection of Merick Garland in 2016 - reluctance to allow the Democrat president to have any nomination heard.

Eugene Scalia voted to be Sec of Labour by party-line vote in Senate with all Reps voting YES and all Dems other than 2 who didn’t vote voting NO.

However, many argue that parties have little control over voting in Congress.

When Obama stated his position on an issue, only 32% of Congressmen voted with his position in 2011, which decreased to 20% in 2012.

In June 2015, most House Democrats voted against Obama’s Trade Adjustment Assistance Act (TAA) and only 40 Dems voted in favour, therefore it lost.

8 Republicans voted in favour (against Trump) of resolution to stop unapproved action in Iran in 2020.

Unanimous Democratic opposition helped to defeat the American Health Care Act in March 2017

THE PRESIDENT

The president can contact members and try to persuade them of a bill’s merits, or perhaps offer to help them fundraise or campaign at the next election.

These efforts will be much more effective if the president is currently enjoying popular support - lame-duck presidents can find that they have much less political power.

President Obama tried to use the bully pulpit to pressure Senators into considering his nomination of Merrick Garland for the Supreme Court, but Republicans insisted thathis mandate was weak, and therefore the next president should make the nomination. Ultimately, the president’s influence is most likely to be impacted by which party controls Congress.

In 2009, 94.4% of votes in the House of Representatives went President Obama’s way, dropping to 88.1% in 2010. But, in 2011, it dropped to 31.6%, then to 19.7% in 2012

In February 2018, the immigration reform bill proposed by the so-called ‘Common Sense Caucus’ was narrowly defeated 54-45 at least partly because President Trump had already threatened to veto it.

Despite numerous attempts to strike a deal, including threats to hold rebels accountable in the 2018 mid-terms, Trump was not able to persuade enough House Republicans to support the American Health Care Act in March 2017.

18
Q

How does Congress effectively check the executive branch?

A

CHECKS & BALANCES

Withhold funding - Bush’s spending in Iraq limited in 2007.

Trump impeached by the House in 2019.

Obama’s 2009 executive order aimed to close Guantanamo Bay within the year, but Congress passed the Supplemental Appropriations Act (2009) to block funds for transfer or release of detainees.

Congress stopping the President’s agenda promotes effective government by preventing the president from acting “imperial” and like a tyrannical dictator.

Congress has a mandate, legitimacy and authority to do this due to it being the most representative of the people.

SCRUTINY/OVERSIGHT

NOMINATIONS

19
Q

How doesn’t Congress effectively check the executive branch?

A

UNITED GOVERNMENT

Congress has only overridden a veto of its own party twice in last 50 years.

003-6: weak oversight allowed Bush to conduct war in Iraq.

In united gov, Johnson was able to pass Tonkin Gulf Resolution and do what he liked in South Vietnam.

Many say that during Bush presidency, where for the majority there was Republican maj in both chambers, there was not enough oversight of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan - allegations of torture by intelligence agencies.

Senate hasn’t rejected a treaty of a pres of its own gov since 1935.

DIVIDED GOVERNMENT

Divided government can equally lead to extremely partisan, potentially less effective, scrutiny.

In 2014, House Republicans established a new temporary ‘Select Committee on Benghazi’ to investigate whether executive incompetence led to the deaths of four Americans at the US diplomatic compound in Libya in 2012 - Democrats argued that the select committee was not about oversight but point scoring.

Similarly, in December 2014, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence released its long-awaited report on the CIA’s use of ‘enhanced interrogation’ to gain information from suspected terrorists after the 9/11 terrorist attacks - the two parties could barely agree on any details, making it less likely that future administrations will follow the report’s conclusions.

BAN OF EARMARKS

The ban transferred even more power to the executive and made gridlock even worse. elected representatives are in a better position to know where federal money would do the better than unelected bureaucrats in Washington - Congress has the power of the purse and argue that it is wrong to delegate this power to the executive.

Some argue that the president and their appointees are just as likely to be influenced by political factors when deciding where to spend federal funds. It has been suggested that the Obama Administration directed far more money to competitive swing states, than states with large Republican majorities.

They argue that Congress has only become more dysfunctional since the ban, regularly failing to pass appropriations bills, and making no progress on key issues like immigration reform. A 2016 poll found that 63% of Americans support the earmark ban, but Congress’ approval rating that year was often as low as 13%.

20
Q

Why are mid-terms simply a referendum on the President?

A

OPPOSITION TO PRESIDENT’S POLICIES

In 2014, 52% of registered voters planned on voting not based on the strengths of the congressional candidates, but to send a message to President Obama - 32% wanted to send a message of opposition to the President’s policies.

In the 2014 mid-term elections, the Democrats lost their majority in the Senate, while the Republicans increased their majority in the House of Representatives.

It was very similar in the 2010 midterm elections after several significant, but also very controversial bills.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010) reformed the nation’s healthcare system, and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (2009), approved a $787 billion stimulus to help the economy.

To the growing Tea Party movement, these laws were a sign of an overreaching government that was creating a worryingly large national deficit and debt.

SUPPORTING PRESIDENT

On rare occasions, popular support for the president can appear to help their party to gain seats at the mid-terms.

In the 2002 mid-term elections, 28% considered their vote to be one of support for President Bush - approval ratings had increased significantly following the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York, peaking at 90%.

By the time of the November elections, a year later, his approval was still at 68%, far higher than the 51% he had prior to the attacks, and, correspondingly, the Republicans gained two seats in the Senate, and 8 seats in the House.

NATIONALISED CAMPAIGNS

Congressional campaigns have become increasingly nationalised, focussing on national issues, and the president’s performance on these issues, rather than local concerns.

In the 2014 mid-term elections, Republican candidates focussed overwhelmingly on their opposition to President Obama, particularly his healthcare reforms and the economic stimulus.

By October 2014, almost 100,000 TV ads had attacked the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010), and over 120,000 ads had targeted President Obama - most of these ads came from Republican candidates, or conservative interest groups and Super PACs, but even some Democrats tried to distance themselves from the President’s performance and policies.

Democratic Senator Mark Pryor ran an ad criticising the President’s proposed new gun controls, while Democratic Senate candidate Alison Lundergan Grimes ran ads opposing Obama’s energy policies.

21
Q

Why aren’t mid-terms simply a referendum on the President?

A

GERRYMANDERING AND FPTP

Gerrymandering and wasted votes mean that few seats are actually genuinely competitive.

Gerrymandering is is done by the state legislature, so when one party has the majority, they can gerrymander the boundaries to help their party - works by purposely wasting votes for your opponent, either by packing all of their support into just a couple of districts, or by thinly spreading opposition support over a large number of districts, so that they lack the plurality needed to win.

FPTP is also used making results unproportionate and leading to wasted votes.

In 2014, the Republicans had 51.2% of the national vote, while the Democrats received 45.5% but this 6% difference gave the Republicans 247 seats, and the Democrats just 188.

FPTP also results in large numbers of safe seats, with very few competitive districts that could actually change hands - In 2014, over 380 seats were considered to be safe Republican or Democrat seats, making it harder to argue that the result reflected support or opposition to the President.

INCUMBENTS

The advantage enjoyed by incumbents means they are less affected by the president’s performance.

Despite Congress having an approval rating of around 13%, over 96% of House incumbents were re-elected in 2014 and in the House, only 11 Democrats and 2 Republicans were defeated.

Incumbents enjoy a number of advantages: have large teams of staff who can professionally manage their election campaign, have far greater name recognition and media attention and have a voting record with which they can prove their commitment to certain issues.

In the 2014 midterm elections, seats were far more likely to change hands if the incumbent had resigned, suggesting that the number of open seats being contested can have a significant influence on the final result.

DIFFERENTIAL TURNOUT

The turnout or abstention of different social groups in presidential and mid-term elections can also greatly impact the final results.

Turnout in the 2012 elections was around 58%, but, in the 2014 mid-terms it was just 36%, the lowest for 70 years.

Younger voters, who tend to vote for Democratic candidates, are much less likely to vote in the mid-terms.

Youth turnout (18-29) was estimated to have been around 45% in the 2012 presidential election, but it dropped to just 21.5% in 2014.

The electorate in mid-term elections tends to be overwhelmingly white, male and older than in presidential election years, and, as these groups are now more likely to vote Republican, this can have a significant impact on the results. In the 2012 election, around 16% of voters were over 65 years old, and 72% were white. In 2014, 22% were over 65, and 75% were white.

22
Q

How do incumbents have an advantage over challengers in congressional elections?

A

MONEY

fundraising advantage - incumbents raised 7x as much as challengers in 2016. they have a voting record in Congress that they can refer to, proving their commitment to certain areas – some will point to times when they have ‘brought home the bacon’ for their district – pork barrelling.

incumbents have existing relationships with pressure groups, lobbyists and donors who can fund and support their campaigns.

RECOGNITION

name recognition through seniority in Congress – committees – especially ones related to constituents’ interests

have far greater name recognition and media attention and have a voting record with which they can prove their commitment to certain issues.

GERRMANDERING

Gerrymandering can be seen as responsible for incumbents’ success:

Cracking – where opposition supporters are spread over multiple districts so they will always lack a plurality.

Packing – where opposition supporters are concentrated into particular districts, so other districts are uncompetitive and have many wasted votes.

BUT House Majority Leader Eric Cantor defeated by Tea Party candidate David Brat in 2014 and Alabama Senator Luther Strange lost to Roy Moore in the 2017 Republican primary, despite being the incumbent and establishment favourite.

23
Q

What is the influence of the president in mid-term elections?

A

COATTAILS EFFECT

The effect of a strong candidate for a party at the top of the ticket helping other candidates of the same party to get elected at the same time.

So weaker candidates are taken into power on the back of a stronger or more influential candidate i.e. the President.

Few presidents have enjoyed a good coattails effect - only Reagan in 1980- gained 33 seats in House and 12 in the Senate.

2016: 4 Rep Senators won their races despite Dem opponents leading in polls, however, of the 21 winning Rep senators, 16 won a higher share of vote than Trump.

Obama in 2008: 21 House seats gained and 8 Senate seats but not enough evidence for a real coattails effect - many Democrat members ran ahead of the Obama in the popular vote.

Reverse Coattails effect – when an unpopular president hurts the election chances of their party – e.g., George Bush and his narrow election victory in 2000 – Republicans lost 2 House members and 5 Senators.

OPPOSITION TO POLICIES

NATIONALISED CAMPAIGNS