Epidemiology 2.5 Flashcards
How do you estimate risk on case control study?
estimate likelihood on having the exposure in those who have the disease relative to those that do not
How do you calculate the odds ratio?
odds of exposure among cases / odds of exposure among control
Where does outcome go?
top of table
Where does exposure go?
side of table
What are cohort studies?
Group of people without disease, observed over period time
What do you do in cohort studies?
Selective target population and asses target exposure
What is the defining charctersotc of cohort studies?
track people forward in time from exposure to outcome
Why might the population be smaller at the end of a cohort study?
- people die
- move away
- depending on type of people enrolled or end doing, some people healthy, or developed disease interest or different one or died
How do you select target population?
- If want to study chronic disease associated with ageing, may want to restrict target population
- Exposure of interest may be rare so may need to target a specific population e.g. farmers for pesticides
- Should initially attempt to identify as many subjects as possible without invoking any restrictions as want study finding to be generalisable
How is a cohort assembled?
- By geographic region
- By occupation
- Based on disease
- By risk group
- Birth cohort
How are exposure defined?
=Multiple exposure often assessed as analysis want to be able to control for exposures
-Exposures must be well defined: can be binary or all individuals exposed but at different levels or continuous variable
What are ways to assess exposure?
- Self report
- Taking physical measurements
- Using existing records
How do you ascertain the outcome?
- Routine surveillance
- Death certificates
- Medical record
- Directly from participant
- Method used to assassin outcome must be same for exposed and unexposed group
How do you calculate relative risk?
ncidence in the exposed / incidence in unexposed
What are historical cohort studies?
group of individuals form the cohort, with a distribution of exposures and outcomes which are measured contemporaneously or extracted from health records.
Why are historical cohort studies not great?
Greater risk of selection and information bias
How do you cope with loss to follow up?
- Be transparent: it’s critical that participants lost to follow up in a study are reported as such. Loss to follow up is almost unavoidable, but where large proportions of participants are lost, one must consider the quality of the study, and whether the loss represents a potential bias. You’ll learn more about bias later.
- Be conservative: if there’s the potential for the loss to bias away from the null hypothesis, then reporting the output statistic which biases towards the null is generally the more sensible course of action.
When is case control used?
outcome already determined but exposures not understood