elections and referendums Flashcards
Factors evaluating electoral systems
-proportionality & fair result.
-vote value (shouldn’t be wasted).
-promoting participation & turnout.
-strong & accountable govt.
-local links (constituents relationship with representative).
-party choice & representation (encourage lots of parties to participate in elections).
-comprehensibility & transparency.
Types of electoral systems
proportional= calculates number of MPs by the actual number of votes they receive
majoritarian= candidate with the highest number of votes in each constituency is elected
what system does FPTP work on?
single-member plurality system where electors cast a single vote for an MP in their constituency and party with a simple majority in each constituency(650) wins
3 features of FPTP
-strong and accountable govt
-fair representation
-political participation and turnout
Strong and accountable govt
yes/no
-yes: Boris Johnson called the 2019 general election under FPTP to secure a stable majority government to prevent issues with Brexit deal due to hung parliament and instead have a clear mandate.
no: no clear majority in 2010, Cameron fell 20 sets short so formed coalition with Lib Dems, led to diluted policies, unclear mandate, lack of accountability
Fair representation
yes/no
yes: strong local links as every constituency has their own MP to represent issues and be held to account(letters to MP about HS2, humanitarian issues)
no: disproportionate due to winner’s bonus i.e 2019, tories got 77 more seats than vote, and green party won 2.7% of vote but one MP
Participation and turnout
yes/no
yes: not in steady decline, 65.1% in 2010 and 67.3% in 2019, not the main issues
no: disincentives voters of smaller parties to vote as their vote will be wasted
FPTP should be replaced
-distorts results in the case of winner’s bonus and landslide results
-wasted votes disincentives voters
-Many MPs are elected without majority support in their constituency
Hung parliament definition
No clear winner, no party reaches 326. So they have co-alitions, minority govt, supply and confidence deal or another general election
Winners bonus definition
Where the party gains seats despite majority not voting for them, leading to wasted votes.
E.g. 2019, 44% wasted votes.
FPTP should not be replaced
-traditionally produced strong, clear govts with a mandate
-strong link between MPs and constituents
-two main parties must have a relatively broad appeal and support i.e abortion, climate change
List PR
-Country was divided into regions electing 3-10 MEPs.
-Within each area MEPs elected on basis of their share of the vote.
-Instead of electing per constituency, areas are bigger (26 constituencies).
-Parties rank their candidates and the highest ranked candidates are almost certain to be elected.
D’hondt system works by allocating seats with 1 seat per round. At the start of each round, the total round for each party received at the start of the process was divided by the no. of seats the party has won +1. The party with highest remaining total wins.
Where was List PR used?
used in the UK for European elections
-11 regions electing between 3 to 10 MEPs each using the D’Hont system
Advantages + disadvantages of List PR
:) Proportionality & fair result: no. of seats won closely reflects the actual vote share of the parties.
E.g. brexit won 39% vote & gained 40% seats.
:) Vote value: less chance of warded votes & more parties can win seats. However since country is divided into regions, 1-5% of vote might not win seats.
:) / :( Promoting participation & turnout: in theory should boost turnout. However turnout for EU elections are historically low.
E.g. 2019 - 36.9%.
But turnout could be higher if used for general.
:( Strong & accountable govt: no party secured overall majority. Less straightforward. Disproportionate power. Coalition.
E.g. 2019 Brexit won by 29/73 seats.
:( Local links: representatives serve hundreds & thousands of constituencies so removes notion of MP serving all constituents.
:( Comprehensibility & transparency: less straightforward.
Additional member system (AMS)
-Hybrid between FPTP & List PR.
-Used in Scottish, Welsh parliaments & London assembly.
-1st vote is for constituency MP (like FPTP).
-2nd vote is list of parties for regional election.
E.g. in Scotland, 73 MSPs elected through WM style & 56 by regional proportional list.
Advantages & Disadvantages of AMS system
:) Proportionality & fair result: largely proportional result in Lothians region.
E.g. Conservatives won 25% seats & 4/16 total vote share.
:) Vote value: less chance of votes wasted for small parties.
E.g. Scottish Green Party gained 2 seats thanks to regional list MPs.
:( Promoting participation & turnout: no evidence that AMS boosts turnout.
E.g. Welsh turnout in 2019 general was 67% but 2016 AMS devolved assembly election was 45%.
:( Strong & accountable govt: almost inevitably produces minority govt.
E.g. Only once in 2011, SNP had majority.
:) Local links: offers local link not present with List PR. However, also creates potential to create a 2-tier system of elected represented & those elected at the top up regional list who lack direct mandate.
:( / :) Comprehensibility & transparency: more complicated than FPTP & uses 2 ballot papers. However relatively straightforward to count & calculate and there’s not multiple rounds.
Single transferrable vote (STV)
-Used for EU elections in NI & Scottish local council elections.
-On basis of multi member constituencies where voters rank choices in order of preference.
-Quota worked out on no. of seats + total no. of votes cast.
-Candidate who has more 1st preference votes is elected & then candidates with fewest votes are elected and their votes are transferred to 2nd preference.
Advantages & Disadvantages of STV
:) Proportionality & fair result: accurately reflect overall share of votes. Preferred by Electoral reform society (ERS) as voters don’t have to worry and eliminates tactical voting.
:) Vote value: reduces potential for wasted votes. Even voting for minor parties can be effective on overall outcome as 1st preference votes r redistributed using voters’ 2nd preference votes.
:) / :( Turnout in NI 2019 for EU elections at 45% was higher than the rest of the UK but NI typically have high turnout rates.
:( Strong & accountable govt: almost inevitably produces coalition or multiparty govt. Supporters argue that it’s a small price to pay for ‘fairer votes’.
:) Local links: all elected members represent a geographical area & people can approach range of representatives with concerns.
:( Comprehensibility & transparency: shortcoming of STV. Hard to understand and time consuming to calculate.
E.g. Republic of Ireland took 2 full days before announcing results.
Alternative vote (AV)
-Used for election of chairs to parliamentary select committee.
-Ranking of candidates.
-Majoritarian system.
-If 50% is not gained, then last candidate with lowest votes is eliminated & their 2nd preference votes are redistributed.
-2011 AV referendum.
Advantages & Disadvantages of AV
( Proportionality & fair result: not proportional. 2017 study predicted it would have a less proportionate result than FPTP. & Lib Dem’s & nationalist parties would end up with fewer MPs.
However, it requires at least 50%.
:) Vote value: no disincentive to vote for minor party or independent candidate. Votes are redistributed.
:( Promoting participation & turnout: theoretically would encourage however no country uses it.
:) Strong & accountable govt: AV is the system most likely to produce single party govt & gains 50%.
:) Local links: retains single member constituencies with 1 MP representing their constituents.
:) Comprehensibility & transparency: easy to understand with 1 MP per constituency.
Factors that affect voting behaviours
Primacy(long term issues)
-voter profile(characteristics)
-own views on policies they feel strong about
Recency(short term issues)
-party leader personality
-manifesto policies
-media presence
valence(issues that are uniformly liked i.e healthcare or disliked i.e corruption
Age as the new class?
Older votes are more conservative(60-69 are 70% more likely)
Younger(18-24) voters are 56% more likely labour.
partisan de alignment
-fewer people feel that parties are for ‘people like them’
-‘red wall collapse’ in 2019 when Labour lost approximately 20% of its 2017 general election support