Effects of Institutionalisation Flashcards

Roman Orphan studies

1
Q

define institution

A

refers to the place like a hospital or orphanage where children live for a long, continuous period of time
- little emotional care provided
- can lead to mental, emotional and social problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

who conducted the Romanian orphan studies?

A

Rutter & Songua-Barke
- started in the 90s with English and Romanian adoptees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was the aim of ROS?

A

to examine the long term effects of Institutionalisation in a longitudinal study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the procedure used?

A
  • 165 Romanian adoptees raised in orphanges: 111 adopted by age 2, 54 adopted by age 4
  • compared to control group of British adopted children- 52 adopted before 6 months old
  • children assessed at ages 4,6,11,15 and compared to see the effects of institutionalisation
  • assessed physical, social and cognitive development
  • interviews with teachers and parents
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

findings of ROS

A
  • at adoption: Romanians behind on all aspects compared to brit counterparts
  • age 4: those adopted by 6 months had caught up with their Brit counterparts in all aspects
  • later follow-ups: adopted after 6 months caught up but still had issues disinhibited attachment, peer relationships, minority of those adopted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

conclusions of ROS

A

effects of institutionalisation can be reversed if children are able to form attachments later - but the later they do the more likely they are to have lasting effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Zeanah et al: Bucharest early intervention

A
  • compared Romanian children who spent 90% of their lives in institutions to control group of Romanian children who had not
  • children aged between 12-30 months
  • assessed using strange situation & interviews with carers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

results of the Bucharest early intervention project:

A

control group 74% securely attached Vs institutionalised group- 19% securely attached. institutionalised group-65% disinhibited attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

disinhibited attachment

A

lack of boundaries sure to not having a secure attachment
- child is overly friendly to anyone & doesn’t discriminate between strangers and familiar ppl
- clingy and attention seeking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

damage to intellectual development

A

cognitive development is slowed by lack of emotional care
- intellectual underfunding/delayed intellectual development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

physical underdevelopment

A

deprivation dwarfism- bodies need love and care to physically grow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

poor parenting

A

grow up to be poor parents - Quinton (84) mothers who were institutionalised as children struggled when becoming mothers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

strengths of institutionalisation

A

useful applications
- those adopted pre 6mths caught up so led to changes in adoption processes
value of longitudinal studies
- study lasted for 20 years, short term suggest effects are permanent but long term shows effects can be overcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

limitations of institiutionalisation

A

confounding variables
- orphans lived in terrible conditions so we cannot directly establish c+e to being institutionalised
socially sensitive
- could lead to prejudice towards Romanians as it presents them as neglectful/ in a bad light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly