education Flashcards
cultural deprivation
wc fail to socialise their children adequately as they lack the cultural equipment needed to succeed in education.
3 main aspects: language, parents’ education and wc subcultures
Language (cd)
Hubbs-Tait et al where parents use language that challenges their children to evaluate their own understandings e.g ‘what do you think’ cognitive performance improves
By contrast less educated parents use simple language that requires children to make small descriptive statements e.g ‘whats this animal called’
Feinstein- educated parents more likely to praise and encourage independence and competence
speech codes (cd)
Bernstein
restricted code- wc, limited vocabulary, short, unfinished, predictable, context bound
elaborate code- mc, wider vocabulary, complex, abstract, context free
gives mc an advantage and wc disadvantage as elaborate code is used by teachers, textbooks and exams
early socialisation into elaborate code make mc already fluent users enabling them to feel at home and more likely to succeed unlike wc.
Parents’ education (cd)
Douglas
-wc parents place less value on education and as a result are less ambitious and encouraging towards their children showing less interest. Leads to lower motivation levels from children
parenting style
-educated = consistent discipline and high expectations, encourages active learning
-less educated= harsh or inconsistent discipline, prevents independence and self control
parents’ educational behaviour
-educated= more aware of what child needs, good relationship with teachers, educational value of activities e.g museums
use of income
-better educated= higher incomes, promote education, educational toys, private tutors, better nutritional understanding
working class subcultures (cd)
Sugarman
4 key features
1- Fatalism (belief of fate)
2- Collectivism (group over individual)
3- Immediate Gratification (pleasure now)
4- Present time orientation (present as more important)
why these values exist- *stem from mc jobs being secure and offering individual advancement. *Encourages ambition and long term planning
*wc jobs are less secure and have no career structure
*parents pass on the values of their class to their children
A03 cultural dep
*Keddie, ‘myth’ of cultural deprivation. victim blaming explanation.
Children cannot be deprived from their own culture it’s simple culturally different not deprived.
They fail because education favours mc culture
*Troyna and Williams, not language but schools attitude. ‘speech hierarchy’ where mc is at the top followed by wc
*Blackstone and Mortimore, wc attend less parents evenings due to longer or less regular hours or put off by schools mc atmosphere
Material deprivation
Poverty and lack of necessities
1/3 of FSM pupils achieve 5 or more A*-C against nearly 2/3 others
90% ‘failing schools’ from deprived areas
Housing (md)
overcrowding, lack of spaces to do homework, disturbed sleep, lack of safe space, temporary accommodation, constant change and disturbed education, damp or cold, ill health, infections and accidents
Diet and Health (md)
Howard
lower intakes of energy, vitamins and minerals. Weakens immune system, lower energy levels = more absences and difficulty concentrating
Wilkinson
more likely to have emotional or behavioural disorders , among 10 year olds the lower the social class the higher rate of hyperactivity, anxiety and conduct disorders
financial support and costs of education (md)
Bull ‘costs of free schooling’
transport, uniform, resources, textbooks place heavy burden on wc families
make do with hand me downs ending in bullying
Flaherty fear of stigmatisation is why 20% of FSM don’t take up the offer
lack of private tuition and often need to work
Fear of debt (md)
uni = debt
wc debt adverse (avoid)
5x less likely to apply than debt tolerant (mc)
81% higher class recieve help from home vs only 43% of lower classes
3 types of capital
Bourdieu
material and cultural factors are interrelated
–economic capital
–cultural capital
–educational capital
cultural capital
-knowledge, attitudes, values, language and abilities of mc
-advantages those who possess it
-more likely to develop intellectual interests and understanding of what education system requires for success
-gives mc advantage
-school devalues wc culture as ‘rough’ and inferior. Lack of cultural capital leads to exam failure , many wc ‘get the message’ that education isn’t meant for them and truant
educational and economic capital:
-can all be converted into one another
-mc children with cultural capital are better equipped for school and parents can convert their economic capital into educational capital through private schools or tutors
A03- Sullivan, where pupils had same level of cultural capital, mc still did better.
Greater resources and aspirations that make the difference
labelling - becker and rist
(internal)
Becker
sfp, master status
ideal pupil
Dunne and Gazeley
schools produce wc underachievement due to labels and assumptions from teachers
teachers normalise wc underachievement and seem unconcerned by it
teachers believed wc backgrounds played a part as parents were uninterested whereas mc parents were supportive
lead to differences in treatment of children e.g giving mc extension work but wc easy work and if they did well they were overachieving
Rist
teachers use info of home background and appearance to label children
tigers- mc and clean appearance = closest
clowns- wc = furthest away with least opportunities e.g reading as a group not individuals
A03-
determinist - Fuller rejecting labels
self fulfilling prophecy
(internal)
teacher labels, pupil acts accordingly, label becomes master status
teachers expectations - Rosenthal and Jacobson ‘spurters’
47% made progress
Pygmalion effect (high expectations = high performance)
teachers beliefs of pupil influence the attention they get
streaming
(internal)
separating into different ability groups or classes (all subjects)
A-C economy
(internal)
Gillbourn and Youdell
teachers less likely to see wc and black pupils as having ability and therefore these pupils are more likely to be in lower streams and entered for lower exams
they link streaming to the policy of publishing exam league tables as this creates an A to C economy, a system in which schools focus their time, effort and resources to ensure the pupils they believe can will achieve so their league table looks good
Educational triage
(internal)
Gillbourn and Youdell say an A-C economy produces an educational triage
normally used to describe a battles field or major disaster and includes three categories
1-‘walking wounded’ who can be ignored as they’ll survive = those who will pass anyway
2- those who will die anyway so also ignores = hopeless cases
3-those with a chance of survival who are given treatment = potential to get good grade
stereotypical view of wc and black pupils automatically leave them at the hopeless cases category
pupil subcultures, Lacey
(internal)
group of pupils who share similar values and behaviour patterns, often emerge as a response of being labelled
Lacey-
differentiation = process of teachers categorising pupils according to how they perceive their ability. e.g streaming
polarisation = process in which pupils respond to streaming by moving towards one of two opposite poles. In his study he found streaming polarised boys into either an anti or pro school subculture
pro- high streams, mc, academic success to gain status, committed to school values
anti- low streams, wc, inferior status which undermines self worth, find other ways of gaining status which are usually disruptiv. joining an anti school subculture often leads to sfp of educational failure
Hargreaves found similar response to labelling and streaming . boys in lower streams were triple failures due to failing 11+, being in lower steams and being labelled as ‘worthless louts’
Abolishing streaming
(internal)
Ball- in favour of mixed ability teaching as when banding was abolished, polarisation into subcultures was removed and anti school subcultures declines
differentiation continued, teachers continues to categorise pupils differently and labelled mc as cooperative and able.
positive labelling was evident in pupils exams . this shows teacher labelling continues to have an effect even of subcultures/streaming is removed
habitus
(internal)
‘dispositions’ or learned ways of thinking, being and acting that are shared in a social class
e.g tastes, lifestyle preferences, consumption
mc have power to define their habitus as superior and to impose it on the education system and as a result school puts higher value on mc tastes and preferences
symbolic capital/violence
(internal)
due to mc habitus, pupils socialised into this gain symbolic capital or status/recognition from the school and are deemed worthy
by contrast wc habitus is devalued and deemed worthless
Bourdieu calls this symbolic violence, by devaluing wc habitus it reinforces the class structure keeping them at the bottom
Archer found in order for wc to be successful within education they had to change how they spoke and looked to align with mc habitus, therefore ‘losing themselves’
nike identities
(internal)
many conscious that society looked down on them so turned to alternative ways to gain status
they constructed class identities that invested heavily on styles especially through consuming branded clothing
styles performances was heavily policed by peers, if not conforming it was ‘social suicide’ and symbolic capital would be denied
teachers opposed street style and pupils who dressed like it were labelled as rebels
Archer- mc habitus stigmatises wc identities.
wc style = struggle for recognition but mc see it as tasteless however young see it as self worth
also play a part in wc view of rejecting higher education as:
-undesirable, would not suit their habitus, cannot live on student loan as would be unable to afford street style
-unrealistic, not for ‘people like us’ but for more intelligent and posh individuals. Unaffordable and risky investment
wc identity and educational success
(internal)
Ingram
2 groups of wc boys from same deprived neighbourhood
one group went to grammar, the other didnt
those who went to the grammar felt a pressure to fit in and conform, one boy from the grammar wore a tracksuit on non school uniform day and was ridiculed by mc peers
wc can achieve with nike identites
cultural deprivation
(ethnic differences, external)
3 main aspects:
-intellectual and linguistic skills
-attitudes and values
-family structure and parent support
intellectual and linguistic skills:
-low income black families lack intellectual stimulation and enriching experiences leaving children poorly equipped for school.
-Moreover not speaking English at home held back educationally (however, only 3.2 points ahead)
Attitudes and values:
-lack of motivation, black children socialised into fatalistic subcultures with ‘live for today attitudes’ leaving them unequipped for educational demands
Family structure and parental support:
-Moynihan, many black families headed by lone mother, struggle financially and absent of father role model. CD is a cycle where inadequately socialised children from unstable families fail at school and become inadequate parents themselves
- New right, Murray high rates of lone parenthood = lack of positive male role model
-Sewell, disagrees with Murray, lack of fatherly tough love. results in black boys finding it hard to overcome emotional and behavioural difficulties. Turn to street gangs of other fatherless boys with media inspired role models of ‘anti school black masculinity’ (Arnot- an ultra tough ghetto superstar, an image constantly reinforced through rap lyrics). Greatest barrier to success = pressure from other boys, if they did well in school they would be seen by their black peers as ‘selling out’ to the white establishment. Sewell- blacks doing worse than asian as whilst they are nurtured by MTV the asians are getting up educational hours
AO3- not peer pressure but institutional racism (Gillborun)
Lupton- adult authority in Asian communities = respectful towards adults = supportive of school policies
AO3
-Keddie, victim blaming, culturally different not deprived. underachieve due to ethnnocentrism