Device & feature selection Flashcards
Arms the student with the knowledge to interpret why certain devices / programming are applicable to their respective patient groups. Currently weighted 3% in the CCDS exam.
What percentage of SND patients also present with AV conduction disturbances?
20%
Thus consider DDD vs. AAI device.
What is the 5yr risk of progression to AV block for patients presenting with SND?
5-35%
Thus consider DDD vs. AAI device.
Yes / No
When selecting a pacing mode for SND - is DDD considered better than VVI.
Yes.
DDD is better than VVI as it maintains AV synchrony - Class I indication.
True
Programming to minimise RV pacing is beneficial for reducing risk of AF onset.
True.
Reduced RV pacing is associated with reduced AF incidence - Class IIa indication.
True / False
AAI may be considered in patients with SND with normal AV conduction.
True.
This is a class IIb indication, thus the research is debateable.
What is the likely device implanted and mode programmed for the following patient?
Patient has permanent AF and AV conduction disease.
Single chamber device - Programmed VVI/VVIR.
Patients who present with AV block should recieve a DR PPM over a SR PPM unless its clinically impossible to pass multiple leads.
True
This is a Class I indication
True / False
A DR device should be implanted in patients with permanent AF.
False.
This is a Class III indication. Only a SR device should be considered.
Overdrive ventricular pacing at rates >100bpm is preventative for what arrhythmia?
Torsades (TdP).
List 5 reasons why His Bundle pacing systems are inferior to conventional pacing systems?
- Longer implant time
- Higher risk of lead dislodgement
- Steep learning curve - Operator skill
- High Thresholds
- Not applicable to patients with BBB
Yes / No
Can AAI mode be considered in patients with AVB?
No.
AAI will pace the Atria - however conduction will not continue to the ventricles due to the AVB, which will result in ventricular standstill if no intrinsic escape is present.
When selecting a pacing mode for SND - is AAI better than VVI?
Yes.
AAI is considered better than VVI due to maintenance of AV synchrony - This is a Class I indication.
Yes / No
When selecting a device for SND - is a DR device better than an SR device?
Yes - DR > SR (Atrial).
This is due to the risk of developing AVB further down the track and having to revise to a DR system if an SR system is chosen. This is a Class I indication.
Yes / No
Would you program an RV reduction algorithm in an AVB patient?
No.
Depending on algorhythm this will result in extended AV delays or pauses to which the patient will be symptomatic. Both will cause significant AV dyssynchrony and potentially pacemaker syndrome.
Yes / No
Would you program negative hysteresis in a patient with intrinsic conduction?
No.
Negative hysteresis denies intrinsic conduction by shortening the AVD when an R-wave is sensed, thus ensuring as close to 100% pacing as possible. Useful in CRT, however if a patient has intrinsic conduction this is not only unnecessary but hightens risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.
Yes / No
Would you program positive hysteresis in a patient with CRT?
No.
Positive hysteresis promotes intrinsic conduction via lengthening of the AVD. The target for CRT is to achieve as close to 100% CRT-pacing as possible. Suppression of intrinsic conduction is achieved via negative hysteresis.
True / False
For carotid sinus hypersensitivity, DDDR pacing with a rate-drop/sudden brady response feature is advisable.
True.
True / False
Sinus node dysfunction (SND) and atrioventricular (AV) block are the primary indications for pacing.
True.
True / False
AAI/AAIR pacing is indicated for the following.
‘Patients who have isolated SND and no known / anticipated AV block’.
True.
True / False
AAI/AAIR pacing in patients with SND results in a lower indicence of AF, CHF and mortality vs. VVI/VVIR pacing.
True.
True / False
AAI/AAIR pacing can be considered a cost-effective alternative in patients with isolated sinus node dysfunction.
True.
The incidence of clinically significant AV node disease being less than 2% per year.
True / False
VVI/VVIR pacing is indicated for patients with chronic atrial arrhythmias that are expected to return to sinus rhythm.
False.
VVI/VVIR devices would be applicable if the arrhythmia was permanent and sinus rhythm was not expected to return.
True / False
VVI/VVIR protects patients from lethal bradyarrhythmias, while maintaining AV synchrony.
False.
This lack of AV synchrony may lead to pacemaker syndrome.
AAI or DDD pacing maintains AV synchrony. This substantially reduces stroke, atrial fibrillation, heart failure and mortality indicators when compared to VVI pacing.
True.
