Deviance and Crime (Lecture 13) Flashcards
Social Structure
- regular, predictable, repeated forms of social relations in operation most of the time
- makes society possible: it’s the common framework we all operate within
How is Social Structure seen in theoretical paradigms?
- Structural Functionalists: sees social structure as created by needs of society, operating above individual control
- Symbolic Interactionists: argue that such structure rely on constant re-creation by meaningly acts
- Critical Theorists: sees structures as serving the interests of one group by repressing another
Deviance
behaviour that contradicts normal social structures or values to a degree that leads others to condemn or punish it
• doesn’t necessarily mean open revolt against social structure, but the deviant is usually aware of being deviant
• make take forms of criminal deviance (eg: theft, murder, racism) or non-criminal deviance (eg: unusual appearance, mental illness etc..)
Conformity
adjustment of individual behaviour, attitudes and beliefs so as to meet social norms and the expectations of others in your society
• more in response to wishes of others and may not entail ‘inner’ change
•Durkheim suggests that society requires us to be sufficiently similar that society remains stable (absence of similarity, society may enforce it punitively)
Social Stigma
- personal characteristic that sharply distinguishes an individual form ‘ norm’ in the yes of society, and leads to them being viewed as ‘lesser’
- may include appearance, behaviour, ethnicity, health (mental and physical)
- people exhibiting these features are often excluded, and consequently, they try to hide their stigma and try to appear ‘normal’
Primary Deviance
the basic act of deviating from the norm or committing an often -minor crime (eg: speeding), without identifying oneself as ‘deviant’
• may lead to secondary deviance
Secondary Deviance
the (willing or unwilling) incorporation of deviancy into your sense of self and you gradual identification as a ‘deviant’
Anomie (Durkheim)
- ‘normlessness’ or ‘lawlessness’- a state in which social norms that normally regulate us are weaker and less binding
- for Durkheim, individuals need such guidance to help order their own lives
- society is dysfunctional when it fails to regulate individuals’ behaviour
Differential Association theory
- explanation of crime by looking at how we learn from peers as to how to become criminals
- focuses both on methods of crime and also (more crucially) on attitudes towards law and authority learnt from peers (motives and values learnt from reference group)
White Collar Crime (Edwin Sutherland)
- extremely high rates of crime in ‘white-collar’ professions (eg: bankers, executives etc..), showing similar levels to those in poverty
- white-collar criminals often worked in a ‘culture of criminality’ in which it was seen as good to cheat the law
Social Control theory (Travis Hirschi)
- explains crime as a result of weak bonds between parents and children, including disciplinary
- by developing a strong bond between individual and society, crime can be reduced
- potential delinquents didn’t feel a ‘bond’ with or stake in society
What do ‘bonds’ entail?
- BELIEF in social norms
- ATTACHMENT to others (eg: parents)
- COMMITMENT to the rewards offered by conformity
- INVOLVEMENT in conventional activities (eg: volunteer, sports team)
Strain Theory (Robert Merton)
- Society applies pressure on individuals to achieve certain goals (success, money, power), but doesn’t provide adequate means to all people
- excluded groups feel anomie and are forced to turn to illegal means to goal (deviance)
- social structures that force people into acts of criminality to achieve socially-defined goals
Victimology (CT Fischer)
- the study of what sort of people become victims and under what circumstances
- helps identify where aid is most needed to remedy problems of crime
- he suggests that victims of crimes may fall into crime themselves as a result.
- eg: victims of child sexual abuse may more likely view others as threats and lose a sense of personal agency
Routine Activity Theory (Theories of Victimology)
- becoming a victim mostly depends on where and how you routinely spend time
- looks for situations with suitable vulnerable targets, a lack of guardians or overseers and presence of potential offenders
- eg: people in total institutions (eg: prisons) are at risk