Democracy and Participation Flashcards
direct democracy
people able to make decisions directly on an issue (yes or no response)
representative democracy
people elect person to represent their interests+decisions make on their behalf
EU referendum results
72.2% turnout
52% leave
just over half=37.7% voting population
argument against direct democracy
advantages of direct democracy
people directly giving views-more genuine
take responsibility
prevents power concentrated in hands of elite
legitimacy
political education
works (switzerland)
disadvantages of direct democracy
impratical and costly modern citizens don't have time to vote unwilling to make unpopular decisions may not have interest wealth can influence outcome undermines representatives
advantages of representative democracy
practical
representatives=greater expertise
avoid tyranny of majority
implement unpopular but neccessary policies
how much did EU referendum cost to run
£129.1 million
turnout in AV referendum 2011
41%
turnout Scottish Independence referendum
85% (relate to importance of issue?)
liberal democracy
widespread vote, representatives act in interests of everyone in society
majoritarian democracy
desire of majority of population are prime considerations of government
parliamentary democracy
executive drawn from and accountable to people’s representatives in parliament
presidential democracy
executive elected seperately from legislative body+ directly accountable to the people
parliament and referendums
referendums are not legally binding but ignoring result would undermine their legitimacy
functions of democracy
representation accountability participation power dispersal legitimacy education
initiative (USA)
people rather than government call for vote on specific issue
petition
appeal to make something happen demonstrated by popular support
governments influence over referendums
when they are held
wording of the question
why has the use of referendums increased since 1997
convention that constitutional issues should be decided by a referendum
example of petition
petition for recall election
Ian Paisley needed 7,543 votes to unseat him
got 7,099
the economist article Bagehot v Brexit
“bagehot thought MPs were wiser than the electorate in general”
“for a prime minister to entrust the future of the country to a referendum would struck him as an abomination”
elections to parliament
only half are elected (commons)
Lords appointed by Queen
difference between Parliament and Government
government-proposes new laws and implements
parliament- debates and scrutinises
population vote before 1832
1265-1832 only 5% population could vote
how can we participate
volunteering
letters
E-petitions
Pressure groups
what is a liberal democracy
free and fair elections
representatives decide issues by majority rule
clear limits on power of government
constituion
set of rules laying out powers and functions of each government institution
seperation of powers
legislative, executive and judiciary
checks and balances
checks between branches, stops one from having too much power
e.g presidential bills have to pass through congress
features of a liberal democracy
free+fair elections
constitution
entrenched civil liberties
competing parties
how does the uk conform to a liberal democracy
voters represented by MP in commons
devolved powers- scottish parliament
have fair elections
how does the uk’s liberal democracy compare to others in terms of seperation of powers (us vs uk)
weaker seperation e.g members of government also memebers of legislative branch
pluralist society
competing interests but have ability to compete equally
elitist
one group has distinct advantage over others
electoral commission
oversees and regulates referendums
YES prisoners should be allowed a vote
basic right
universal suffrage fundamental to legitimacy
exercising this right doesnt hurt others
shouldn’t be a privelage
alienates from society
NO prisoners shouldn’t be allowed to vote
basic right not an absolute
forfeit liberty
european convention nor HR law requires it
2011 retain vote 234 to 22
hirst v uk
hirst denied the vote on many occasions (prisoner) new appeal under human rights act successfully upheld by european court of human rights 2005
for voting at 16
determines their future (patronising+illogical)
more policies centred around young people
ageing population harder for younger people
against voting at 16
no mass demand from teens
not locked out make many own decision
if give it to 16-17 why not 15?
slacktivism
doing limited amount to participate
superficial level of engagement
general election results 2001+2017
2001=59% lowest ever for GE
2017= 69%
hapathy
happy with how government is running so don’t bother voting
average turnout 1945-92
usually above 75%
200 years ago franchise
2.7% of population had franchise
franchise 1832
extended to property owners
franchise 1867
skilled workers
franchise 1918
men 21+ and women 30+
franchise 1928
all women 21+
franchise 1969
18+
reason for great reform act 1832
industrialisation increased middle class middle class campaign for extension extended to 300,000 people 5.6% now vote