Defining Stuttering Flashcards
Normal speech is filled with…
hesitations, pauses, revisions, etc.
-all aspects of speech that are also contained in the speech of stutterers
flowingness
is forward movement, not getting stuck
normally fluent, normally disfluent
mean the same thing, normal speech has a lot of errors, hesitations, revisions
it is almost abnormal to be perfectly fluent
disfluent/disfluency
any break in fluency, normal disfluency or abnormal break
nonfluent/nonfluency
any break in speech, normal or abnormal break
dysfluent/dysfluencies
abnormal break in speech
with a “y”=stutter
stutter/stuttering
description of the speech behavior and disorder itself
why is a good definition of stuttering important?
- important for correct dx
- reduces subjectivity
- treatment and tracking progress
- research (ie, comparing between studies)
- sharing w. colleagues
- explaining to clients and family
terminology we will use:
normal disfluencies (non-stutters)
vs.
stutters
stuttering definition #1 (Johnson and Knott, 1936)
- the indentifiable “moment of stuttering” is speech nonfluency PLUS reaction by the speaker or listener
- for this definition, someone needs to notice the stutter
disfluency typology:
- interjections, partword, word, phrase repetitions
- revisions, incomplete phrases
- broken words
- prolonged sounds
whats wrong with Johnson and Knott’s (1936) stuttering definition?
he doesn’t define what is normal vs abnormal
stuttering definition #2 (Wingate, 1964)
3 part definition
- disruption in verbal expression characterized by repetitions, prolongations in sounds, syllables, and words of one syllable. they occur frequently and are not controllable
- sometimes are accompanied by accessory behaviors of speech apparatus or unrelated bodily structures
- presence of an emotional state ranging from “excitement” or “tension” to fear, embarrassment, irritation
=immediate source of stuttering is incoordination and the ultimate cause is unknown
what’s lacking?
-phrases? no short SPCH elements included
stuttering definition #3 (Martin and colleagues, 1960s)
- a “perceptual definition” of stuttering-that which a qualified observer perceives as stuttering
- if you perceive it to be a stutter is it a stutter
- this definition does not focus on a type of disfluency
- this is the definition we will use
whats wrong with Martin and colleagues (1960s) definition?
- doesn’t consider the opinion of the speaker
- subjective because people may perceive different thresholds of normal vs stuttering
stuttering definition #4 (Perkins, 1980s)
-the speakers feeling of “loss of control of the ability to move forward fluently in…speech”