Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

CA Bar Outlined and Numbered (with prompts) > deck Z (1238-1288) > Flashcards

deck Z (1238-1288) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards
1
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3

DEEP ROCK DOCTRINE

A
  1. CORPORATION IS INSOLVENT
  2. 3RD PARTY CREDITORS PAID FIRST
  3. SHAREHOLDER CLAIMS SUBORDINATE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

4

AGENT’S DUTY OF LOYALTY - CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITIONS

A
  1. NO SELF -DEALING
  2. NO USURPING OPPORTUNITIES
  3. NO SECRET PROFIT
  4. NO COMMINGLING FUNDS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3

FIDUCIARY DUTIES OF PARTNERS IN A LLP

A
  1. DUTY OF CARE
  2. DUTY OF LOYALTY
  3. DUTY TO DISCLOSE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

5

DISSOLUTION OF LLC

A SPLIT AUTHORITY

A
  1. COMMON LAW - DISSASSOCIATE A MEMBER AND IT DISSOLVES THE LLC
  2. MODERNLY, DISSOLUTION ONLY CAUSED BY OPERATING AGREEMENT
  3. OR CONSENT BY ALL MEMBERS
  4. OR EVENT MAKING LLC’S BUSINESS ILLEGAL
  5. JUDICIAL DECREE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3

COMMUNITY PROPERTY - CONTRIBUTIONS USED TO IMPROVE SPOUSE’S OWN SEPARATE PROPERTY - COMMUNITY IS REIMBURSED FOR

A
  1. INCREASED VALUE OF SEPARATE PROPERTY
  2. OR REIMBURSED FOR AMOUNT CONTRIBUTED
  3. WHICHEVER IS GREATER
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

5

APPORTIONMENT PARAGRAPH FOR DIVISION OF

SP BUSINESS ASSETS

A
  1. TO APPORTION BETWEEN
  2. SP SHARE OF BUSINESS MANAGER SPOUSE BROUGHT TO MARRIAGE
  3. AND VALUE ADDED TO SP BUSINESS AFTER MARRIAGE BY COMMUNITY RESOURCES,
  4. COURTS HAVE DEVELOPED TWO ACCOUNTING METHODS:
  5. VAN CAMP AND PEREIRA.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2

FRAUD IN THE EXECUTION OCCURS WHEN TESTATOR IS UNAWARE

A
  1. HE IS SIGNING A WILL
  2. HE IS SIGNING A FORGED WILL
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

4

OUTSIDE WRITING MAY BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE WILL WHERE:

A
  1. WRITING EXISTED WHEN WILL EXECUTED
  2. WILL MANIFESTS INTENT TO INCORPORATE WRITING
  3. WILL SUFFICIENTLY DESCRIBES WRITING TO IDENTIFY IT
  4. WRITING ITSELF NEED NOT BE VALID
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

4

CODICIL - ELEMENTS

A
  1. AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING WILL
  2. MADE TO CHANGE, EXPLAIN OR REPUBLISH
  3. SAME FORMALITY REQUIREMENTS AS WILLS AND HOLOGRAPHIC WILLS
  4. REPUBLISHES WILL AS OF THE DATE OF THE CODICIL
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

3

REVIVAL OF WILL

A
  1. A WILL IS REVOKED
  2. A SUBSEQUENT WILL IS REVOKED
  3. REVIVAL OF FIRST WILL WHERE CLEAR EVIDENCE OF TESTATOR’S INTENT TO REVIVE.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

4

WILL CONTRACTS - METHODS OF PROVING VALIDITY OF CONTRACT

A
  1. PROVISION IN WILL STATES MATERIAL PROVISIONS OF CONTRACT OR
  2. EXPRESS REFERENCE IN WILL OR OTHER INSTRUMENT TO A CONTRACT W/EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE PROVING TERMS OR
  3. WRITING SIGNED BY DECEDENT EVIDENCING CONTRACT OR
  4. CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE OF AGREEMENT ENFORCEABLE AT EQUITY
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

1

LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ARE AGREED TO BY

A
  1. STIPULATION IN THE CONTRACT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

4

ELEMENTS OF ADVERSE POSSESSION

A
  1. OPEN AND NOTORIOUS POSSESSION
  2. ACTUAL AND EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION
  3. CONTINUOUS POSSESSION FOR STATUATORY PERIOD
  4. HOSTILE POSSESSION
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2

ADVERSE POSSESSION - CONTINUOUS REQUIREMENTS

A
  1. OWNER MAY NOT ENTER LAND DURING STATUATORY PERIOD TO REGAIN POSSESSION
  2. CONSTANT USE NOT REQUIRED AS LONG AS OCCUPIER’S USE IS TYPICAL OF AN OWNER OF SUCH LAND.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

1

REAL COVENANT - VERTICAL PRIVITY REQUIREMENT

A
  1. SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST MUST OWN THE ENTIRE ESTATE OWNED BY THE ORIGINAL COVENANTING PARTY.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

1

WATER RIGHTS - CIVIL LAW RULE

A
  1. OWNER HAS STRICT LIABILITY FOR INTERFERENCE WITH NATURAL WATERWAYS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

2

TYPES OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

A
  1. ANCILLARY JURISDICTION - COURT ASSERTS JX OVER DEFENDANT’S CROSS CLAIM OR COUNTERCLAIM.
  2. PENDENT JURISDICTION - INSUFFICENT SUBJECT MATTER JX CLAIM JOINED TO A SUFFICIENT SUBJECT MATTER JX CLAIM.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

3

CALIFORNIA REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES IN ANSWER - DEFENDANT MUST PROVIDE

A
  1. FACTUAL DETAIL
  2. FOR EACH ELEMENT
  3. OF EACH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

2

INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL MAY BE ORDERED BY THE COURT FOR

A
  1. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
  2. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

4

COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL WILL APPLY WHERE

A
  1. ISSSUE IS IDENTICAL TO ISSUE IN PRIOR CASE.
  2. ISSUE WAS ACTUALLY LITIGATED IN PRIOR CASE.
  3. FINAL JUDGMENT ON THE MERITS IN PRIOR CASE
  4. ISSUE WAS ESSENTIAL TO THE JUDGMENT
22
Q

3

SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS LIMITS GOVERNMENT’S ABILITY TO REGULATE

A
  1. PERSONAL AUTONOMY
  2. PRIVACY
  3. RIGHTS SUBSTANTIVE INTERESTS IN LIFE, LIBERTY AND PROPERTY
23
Q

2

TAKINGS CLAUSE - PER SE TAKING OCCURS WHEN

A
  1. PERMANENT PHYSICAL INVASION OF PROPERTY
  2. TOTAL DENIAL OF ECONOMICALLY BENEFICIAL USE OF PROPERTY
24
Q

3

FREE SPEECH REGULATION LIMITATION - PRIOR RESTRAINT ONLY ALLOWED WHERE

A
  1. IRREPERABLE AND SERIOUS HARM TO PUBLIC WILL OCCUR
  2. NARROWLY DRAWN STANDARDS
  3. FINAL DETERMINATION OF VALIDITY
25
Q

2

FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION

A
  1. NOT EXPRESSLY STATED
  2. BUT THE RIGHT TO EXPRESSIVE ASSOCIATION WITH GROUPS ENGAGING IN CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED ACTIVITIES.
26
Q

3

MILLER TEST FOR OBSCENITY

A
  1. APPEALS TO PRURIENT INTERESTS (COMMUNITY STANDARD)
  2. PATENTLY OFFENSIVE UNDER LAWS LIMITING OBSCENITY (COMMUNITY STANDARD)
  3. SERVES NO SLAP VALUE (NATIONAL STANDARD)
27
Q

4

INVASION OF PRIVACY TORTS

A
  1. INTRUSTION INTO SECLUSION
  2. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF PRIVATE FACTS
  3. FALSE LIGHT PUBLICITY
  4. APPROPRIATION OF NAME OR LIKENESS
28
Q

1

JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY AND U.S. SUPREME COURT RULING ON JOINDER - POTENTIAL DEFENDANT WHO MAY BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE - IS NOT

A
  1. A NECESSARY PARTY WHO MUST BE JOINED.
29
Q

3

COMMON LAW CONSPIRACY

A
  1. A SPECIFIC INTENT CRIME
  2. TWO OR MORE PERSONS AGREE
  3. TO WORK TOGETHER TO ACCOMPLISH AN ILLEGAL GOAL
30
Q

2

COMMON LAW SOLICITATION

A
  1. A SPECIFIC INTENT CRIME
  2. WHERE DEFENDANT URGES ANOTHER PERSON TO COMMIT A CRIMINAL ACT.
31
Q

4

COMMON CARRIER DOCTRINE AND EMBEZZLEMENT

A
  1. UNDER THE COMMON CARRIER DOCTRINE
  2. COMMON CARRIERS ARE LAWFULLY ENTRUSTED WITH POSSESSION OF PASSENGERS’ PERSONAL PROPERTY
  3. MAKING THEFT BY CARRIER’S EMPLOYEES EMBEZZLEMENT
  4. EVEN WHERE PROPERTY IS “LOST”.
32
Q

2

DEFENSE OF SELF

A
  1. DEFENDANT IS PRIVILEGED TO USE REASONABLE FORCE TO DEFEND HIMSELF
  2. WHERE HE IS NOT THE AGGRESSOR.
33
Q

3

PERJURY IS THE CRIME OF

A
  1. WILLFULLY GIVING A FALSE STATEMENT
  2. WITH THE SPECIFIC INTENT TO LIE UNDER OATH
  3. IN A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING.
34
Q

1

MALICIOUS MISCHIEF

A
  1. MALICIOUS MISCHIEF IS THE WILLFUL OR WANTON DESTRUCTION OF VICTIM’S PROPERTY.
35
Q

1

IMPERFECT SELF-DEFENSE - A DEFENDANT MAY RAISE THE DEFENSE OF AN IMPERFECT SELF-DEFENSE WHERE HE ACTED

A
  1. TO DEFEND HIMSELF BASED ON AN UNREASONABLE BELIEF.
36
Q

3

TRANSFERRED INTENT

A
  1. UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF TRANSFERRED INTENT, DEFENDANT’S CRIMINAL INTENT WILL BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE INTENDED PERSON OR OBJECT
  2. TO THE INJURED PERSON OR OBJECT
  3. AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY WILL FOLLOW.
37
Q

4

PRESENT RECOLLECTION REFRESHED

A
  1. WITNESS HAS INCOMPLETE RECOLLECTION
  2. LEADING QUESTION OR WRITING
  3. WITNESS REVIEWS WRITING AND RETURNS TO COUNSEL
  4. WITNESS TESTIFIES AS TO PRESENT RECOLLECTION
38
Q

1

PUBLIC RECORDS EXCEPTION AND CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION

A
  1. MATTERS OBSERVED BY POLICE OFFICERS AND OHTER LAW ENFORCEMENT ARE NOT ADMISSIBLE UNDER THE PUBLIC RECORDS HEARSAY EXCEPTION.
39
Q

2

MBE - DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE AND MARKET PARTICIPANT STATE EXCEPTION

A
  1. WHERE STATE IS A MARKET PARTICIPANT
  2. IT MAY PREFERENCE IN STATE PARTIES.
40
Q

3

GRATUITOUS ASSIGNMENTS ARE REVOCABLE UNTIL

A
  1. THE ASSIGNMENT IS MADE IN WRITING
  2. OR A TOKEN CHOSE IS DELIVERED
  3. OR DETRIMENTAL RELIANCE OCCURS
41
Q

1

CONDITION PRECEDENT

A
  1. A CONDITION THAT MUST OCCUR FOR THE PERFORMANCE DUTY TO RIPEN.
42
Q

2

OFFER

A
  1. A MANIFESTATION OF PRESENT CONTRACTUAL INTENT
  2. SO CERTAIN IN TERMS THAT A REASONABLE PERSON WOULD CONCLUDE ASSENT WOULD FORM A BARGAIN
43
Q

2

ABA - CONTINGENCY FEES NOT ALLOWED WHERE

A
  1. DIVORCE OR DOMESTIC RELATIONS
  2. CRIMINAL
44
Q

5

EXCEPTIONS TO ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

A
  1. DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
  2. CRIME OR FRAUD
  3. SUIT AGAINST CLIENT
  4. COMPETENCY OR INTENTION OF TESTATOR
  5. CA - PREVENT SUBSTANTIAL BODILY INJURY OR DEATH
45
Q

1

DUTY BASED ON PERIL ARISES WHERE DEFENDANT CREATES

A
  1. REASONABLY FORESEEABLE DANGER TO OTHERS
46
Q

4

LIABILITY FOR INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT ARISES WHERE DEFENDANT

A
  1. KNEW CONTRACT EXISTED BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND THIRD PARTY
  2. INTENTIONALLY DISRUPTED PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT
  3. PREVENTED PERFORMANCE OR MADE IT MORE DIFFICULT
  4. WAS A SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR IN PLAINTIFF’S RESULTING HARM
47
Q

3

DEED DELIVERY AND PASSING OF TITLE TO PROPERTY - TITLE PASSES

A
  1. UPON PROPER DELIVERY OF DEED
  2. ACCEPTANCE IS PRESUMED IN MOST JURISDICTIONS
  3. BUT REJECTION BY GRANTEE DEFEATS DELIVERY
48
Q

3

PERIODIC TENANCY - TERMINATION NOTICE REQUIREMENT

A
  1. WRITTEN NOTICE
  2. EQUAL TO LENGHTH OF LEASE
  3. UNLESS YEARLY LEASE, THEN SIX MONTHS NOTICE IS REQUIRED
49
Q

1

FOR FINDING INTENT TO OPERATE AS CO-OWNERS OF A BUSINESS FOR PROFIT - THIS WILL NEVER BE USED

A
  1. SHARING JOINT REVENUE
50
Q

2

IN CRIMINAL CASES, DEFENDANTS ARE GRANTED A RIGHT TO CONFRONT ADVERSE WITNESSES UNDER THE

A
  1. CONFRONTATION CLAUSE
  2. OF THE SIXTH AMENDEMENT
51
Q

1

PROPERTY ACQUIRED POST SEPARATION IS TREATED AS

A
  1. SEPARATE PROPERTY
52
Q

2

OBJECTION - CALLS FOR SPECULATION IS USED WHERE A QUESTION

A
  1. INVITES WITNESS TO SPECULATE
  2. OR ANSWER ON BASIS OF CONJECTURE

CA Bar Outlined and Numbered (with prompts) (43 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions