deck P (MBE EXTRA SUBJECTS AND MISSED) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

2

REMOVAL JURISIDICTION

A
  1. DEFENDANT’S RIGHT
  2. TO REMOVE CASE FROM STATE COURT TO FEDERAL COURT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3

RULE 11 - FEDERAL COURT - A PARTY PRESENTING FILING ANY PAPER CERTIFIES/WARRANTS THAT THE FILING

A
  1. IS NOT FOR AN IMPROPER PURPOSE
  2. LEGAL CONTENTS ARE WARRANTED BY EXISTING LAW
  3. OR CONTAIN AN ARGUEMENT FOR MODIFYING LAW
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3

RULE 11 - FEDERAL COURT - FILING PARTY CERTIFIES EVERY PAPER FILED WITH COURT HAS EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT FOR

A
  1. ITS CONTENTIONS/ARGUMENTS
  2. ITS DENIAL OF OTHER PARTY’S CONTENTIONS
  3. OR REASONABLE BASIS FOR DENIAL BASED ON LACK OF INFORMATION OR BELIEF
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

2

RULE 11 - FEDERAL COURT PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION - SANCTIONS INCLUDE

A
  1. MONETARY PENALTIES
  2. NONMONETARY DIRECTIVES
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2

RULE 11 - THE MATTER OF VIOLATION MAY BE RAISED BY

A
  1. THE COURT
  2. OPPOSING PARTY
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

2

TIMING REQUIREMENTS FOR 26F CONFERENCE

A
  1. AT LEAST 21 DAYS BEFORE 16B CONFERENCE
  2. DISCOVERY PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF CONFERENCE.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3

FEDERAL - OBJECTIONS TO JURY INSTRUCTIONS REQUIREMENTS

A
  1. ON THE RECORD
  2. DONE WHEN COURT GIVES OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO
  3. OR AFTER LEARNING INSTRUCTION WILL BE INCLUDED OR OMMITTED
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

2

REMAINDER INTEREST (TRUSTS)

A
  1. A FUTURE INTEREST
  2. IN THE PROPERTY LEFT IN TRUST AFTER DEVISES ARE GIVEN TO THE INTENDED BENEFICIARIES
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2

INTER VIVOS DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY THROUGH POUR OVER REQUIREMENT - TRUST MUST BE

A
  1. CLEARLY IDENTIFIED IN THE WILL
  2. EXECUTED BEFORE/CONCURRENTLY WITH THE WILL
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2

INTER VIVOS TRUST - POUR OVER TO WILL - TRUST MAY BE

A
  1. AMENDED OR REVOKED AFTER EXECUTION OF THE WILL
  2. UNFUNDED DURING GRANTOR’S LIFETIME
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

3

LOGICAL RELEVANCE - EVIDENCE IS LOGICALLY RELEVANT WHERE IT

A
  1. TENDS TO MAKE THE EXISTENCE OF ANY FACT OF CONSEQUENCE
  2. MORE OR LESS PROBABLE
  3. THAN IT WOULD BE WITHOUT THE EVIDENCE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

2

LIMITATIONS ON RELEVANCE

A
  1. DISCRETIONARY EXCLUSION
  2. PUBLIC POLICY EXCLUSIONS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

5

PUBLIC POLICY EXCLUSIONS TO LEGAL RELEVANCE

A
  1. EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
  2. SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL MESAURES
  3. SETTLEMENT OFFERS
  4. GUILTY PLEAS WITHDRAWN
  5. OFFERS TO PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2

TO QUALIFY AS A HABIT, CONDUCT MUST BE

A
  1. HIGHLY SPECIFIC
  2. FREQENTLY REPEATED
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

2

CRIMINAL CASES - RAPE - SPECIFIC INSTANCES OF VICTIM’S CONDUCT ARE ONLY ADMISSIBLE TO SHOW

A
  1. THIRD PARTY IS THE SOURCE OF INJURY
  2. PRIOR ACTS OF CONSENSUAL INSTERCOURSE BETWEEN D AND ALLEGED VICTIM
17
Q

3

RIGHT TO ADEQUATE ASSURANCE - WHERE REASONABLE GROUNDS ARISE WITH RESPECT TO THE PERFORMANCE - A PARTY MAY

A
  1. DEMAND ADEQUATE ASSURANCE IN WRITING
  2. SUSPEND PERFORMANCE UNTIL ASSURANCE IS RECEIVED
  3. REPUDIATE CONTRACT AFTER 30 DAYS OF NO RESPONSE TO DEMAND
18
Q

2

UNDER FRCP, A MENTAL OR PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS APPROPRIATE WHERE

A
  1. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR THE EXAMINATION
  2. PARTY’S MENTAL OR PHYSICAL STATE IS AT ISSUE
19
Q

3

UNDER FRCP, GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR AN EXAMINATION WHERE

A
  1. LOGICAL RELEVANCE
  2. LEGAL RELEVANCE
  3. EXAMINATION NOT OVERLY INSTRUSIVE
20
Q

2

RULE 19 EVALUATION FACTORS

A
  1. REQUIRED JOINDER IF FEASIBLE (19A)
  2. SHOULD CASE BE DISMISSED IF JOINDER NOT FEASIBLE? (19B)