Decision making and Reasoning Flashcards

1
Q

fallacy

A

faulty reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The Model of Economic Man and Woman

A
  1. Decision makers are fully informed regarding all the possible options for their decisions and of all possible outcomes
  2. They’re infinitely sensitive to the subtle distinctions among decision options
  3. They are fully rational in regard to their choice of options
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Subjective Expected Utility Theory

A

The goal of Human Action is to seek pleasure and avoid pain. in doing so we calculate subjective utility and subjective probability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

bounded rationality

A

Humans are rational, but within limits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

7 types of heuristics

A

satisficing- selecting the first good enough option

elimination by aspects - eliminating options that don’t meet the Criterion

representativeness - judging the probability of an uncertain event

availability - making judgments based on how easily we can call to mind what we perceive as relevant instances of a phenomenon

anchoring-and-adjustments - adjusting evaluations of things by means of reference points

framing - the way options are presented

fast-and-frugal / take-the-best - based on little information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Biases 3 types

A

Illusory Correlation - we see particular events or attributes and categories as going together even when they do not
Overconfidence
Hindsight bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

4 fallacies

A

Gambler’s fallacy - a belief that the probability of a random event is influenced by previous random events

The hot hand effect - a belief that a certain course of events will continue

conjunction fallacy - giving a higher estimate for a subset of events

sunk-cost fallacy - the decision to continue to invest in something simply because one has invested in it before in hopes to recover one’s investment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Benefits and characteristics of good group decision making

A

Benefits: different expertise of each member increase in resources and ideas improved group memory

Characteristics : small group, open communication, common mindset, members identify with the group and agree on acceptable behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Groupthink and conditions that lead to it

A

Premature decision making

An isolated homogeneous group, absent objective leadership, high levels of stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Symptoms of groupthink (6)

A
  1. Close-mindedness
  2. rationalization
  3. squelching of dissent
  4. formation of a mind guard for the group
  5. feeling invulnerable
  6. feeling unanimous
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Antidotes to groupthink

A

The leader should encourage constructive criticism be impartial and insure seeking of input from outside of the group; forming of subgroups that meet separately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Reasoning

A

The process of drawing conclusions from principles and from evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Deductive reasoning

A

Deductive reasoning is the process of drawing a logical conclusion based on logical propositions (assertions which may be true or false).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conditional reasoning

A

drawing a conclusion based on an if-then proposition.
if p, then q. p. therefore q. - deductive validity

if p, then q. p. therefore q. -modus ponens
if p, then q. not p. therefore, not q. - modus tollens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Wason Selection Task

A

“if a card has a consonant on one side, then it has an even number on the other side”

must use both modus ponens and modus tollens - trouble recognising the need for modus tollens. only after modified version

influenced by perspective effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

pragmatic reasoning schemas

A

General organizing principles or rules related to particular kinds of goals - prior beliefs matter in reasoning

17
Q

Syllogisms

A

Deductive arguments that involve drawing conclusions from two premises. they comprise a major premise, a minor premise and a conclusion

18
Q

Categorical Syllogisms

A

The premises may be Universal affirmatives, Universal negatives, particular affirmatives, or particular negatives

a syllogism contains a middle term common to both premises

19
Q

How do people solve syllogisms? (4)

A
  1. Atmosphere bias theory - people will prefer a particular solution if there is a particular in the premises
  2. by conversion of premises
  3. mental models
  4. circle diagrams
20
Q

Obstacles in Deductive reasoning (3)

A
  1. overextension errors ( strategies that may not work in all kinds syllogisms)
  2. failure to consider all the possibilitoes before reaching a conclusion
  3. confirmation bias
21
Q

Inductive reasoning

A

The process of reasoning from specific facts or observations to reach a likely conclusion that may explain the facts. often involves the processes of generating and testing hypotheses.

22
Q

Causal Inferences

A

How people make judgments about whether something causes something else

23
Q

Causal Inferences failures

A
  1. correlation ≠ causation
  2. discounting error - when something has multiple causes
  3. self-fulfilling prophecy
24
Q

People draw categorical Inferences from:

A
  • their sensory experiences (bottom-up) : observing and considering the degree of variability across various instances. From these observations abstract a prototype or a category and then add new instances to them
  • information based on what they already know (top-down) : selectively searching in combining existing Concepts and categories
25
Q

Reasoning by analogy

A

One must observe the first pair of items and induce from them 1 or more relations. Then apply that relation in the second part of the analogy.