Critical Thinking - Lecture Twenty-Eight Flashcards

Confounding II

1
Q

Controlling confounding in the study analyses

A

Stratification
Multivariable Analysis
Standardisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Stratification

A

Calculating measure of association for each stratum of potential confounder and comparing them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Stratification steps

A
  1. Calculate the measure of association between exposure and outcome
  2. Divide potential confounder into strata (levels)
  3. For each stratum, calculate the measure of association between the exposure and outcome
  4. Compare stratum-specific measures of association
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Strengths of stratification

A

Easy for small number of potential confounders with limited strata
Can evaluate impact of confounding
Can identify effect modification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Limitations of stratification.

A

Can leave residual confounding

Not feasible when dealing with lots of potential confounders with many strata

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Multivariable analysis

A

Statistical method for estimating measure of association whilst controlling for multiple potential confounders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Potential issues: controlling in study analyses

A

Residual confounding

Can only control what you’ve measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How much change indicates confounding?

A

10% or more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Effect modification

A

The association between exposure and outcome differs across strata of the effect modifier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly