Criminal Law 3 - General Defences Flashcards

1
Q

When can intoxication negate mens rea?

A

Involuntary intoxication, Bona fide medical treatment, Voluntary intake of non-dangerous drugs

These scenarios can potentially negate the mental state required for criminal liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must prosecution prove when intoxication is raised?

A

Beyond reasonable doubt that D committed actus reus with necessary mens rea

This means the prosecution needs to demonstrate that the defendant performed the guilty act with the requisite mental state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is it enough that the defendant was incapable of forming mens rea?

A

No, the question is whether they actually did form the mens rea

The focus is on the actual mental state of the defendant at the time of the offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Voluntary intoxication is a defence to what kind of offences?

A

Crimes of specific intent only

Specific intent crimes require a particular mental state, which intoxication can negate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happens if D lacks specific intent due to intoxication?

A

D may still be guilty of a basic intent offence

Basic intent offences do not require a specific mental state and can still result in liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Examples of basic intent offences?

A
  • Battery
  • Assault
  • Unlawful act manslaughter
  • Criminal damage
  • s20 GBH
  • s9(1)(b) Burglary (if GBH caused)

Basic intent offences are generally less severe and do not require specific intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Examples of specific intent offences?

A
  • Murder
  • Theft
  • Robbery
  • s18 GBH
  • s9(1)(a) Burglary
  • Attempted crimes

Specific intent offences require a certain mental state or intention to commit the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can voluntary intoxication help with loss of control or diminished responsibility defences?

A

Yes, intoxication does not bar these defences

These defences can still be applicable even if the defendant was intoxicated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Can intoxication affect consent?

A

Yes, if D honestly believed in consent, even if wrongly due to intoxication

Intoxication can complicate issues of consent in legal cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can intoxication affect statutory defences?

A

Yes, if the statute allows for an honest mistake

Certain laws may permit defendants to claim a defence based on a genuine but mistaken belief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When can self-defence/defence of another be used?

A
  • Protecting oneself or another
  • Protecting property
  • Preventing crime
  • Assisting arrest

These are the primary circumstances under which self-defence is justified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the two parts of the self-defence test?

A
  • Trigger: D honestly believed force was necessary
  • Response: Force used must be objectively reasonable

This test assesses both the subjective belief of the defendant and the objective reasonableness of their response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can a mistaken belief justify self-defence?

A

Yes, if honest — unless the mistake was due to voluntary intoxication

Honest mistakes can support a self-defence claim, except when caused by intoxication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Can self-defence include pre-emptive strikes?

A

Yes, if D honestly and imminently anticipated an attack

Pre-emptive action can be justified if there is a genuine belief of an imminent threat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is there a duty to retreat before using force?

A

No duty, but attempts to retreat can support the defence

The law does not require a person to retreat, but evidence of such attempts can strengthen a self-defence claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the rule for householder cases?

A
  • Force must not be grossly disproportionate
  • D must not be a trespasser
  • D must believe V is an intruder

These criteria establish the parameters for using force in one’s home.

17
Q

What places are considered dwellings for householder defence?

A
  • Houses
  • Flats above shops
  • Boats and vehicles used for residence

These locations qualify for enhanced self-defence protections.

18
Q

How is force judged in non-householder cases?

A
  • Based on D’s honest belief
  • Objectively assessed by jury
  • Heat-of-the-moment considered

This assessment involves both subjective and objective considerations regarding the use of force.

19
Q

What happens if self-defence fails completely?

A

D is convicted; no partial defence (except voluntary manslaughter for murder via loss of control)

A complete failure of self-defence results in full liability for the crime.