Tort 4 - Defences Flashcards

1
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does ‘Volenti non fit injura’ mean?

A

That to which a man consents cannot be considered an injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What must a defendant show to succeed with the defence of consent?

A

The claimant had capacity, full knowledge of the risks, agreed to the risks, and agreed voluntarily.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the significance of a claimant’s capacity in consent?

A

The claimant must have mental capacity to consent to the risks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is required for a claimant to have full knowledge of the risks?

A

The claimant must understand the nature and extent of the risks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

True or False: Knowing a risk is the same as consenting to it.

A

False.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is an example of implied consent?

A

Engaging in dangerous activity such as walking on the edge of an unfenced cliff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case illustrates that employees do not necessarily voluntarily consent to risks?

A

A doctor who died trying to save workmen from a trapped mine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the effect of a successful consent defence?

A

It is a complete defence and the claimant can claim no damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does contributory negligence mean?

A

Where the claimant is at fault too and that fault contributed to the claimant’s loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What must a defendant establish to find contributory negligence?

A

The claimant failed to take reasonable steps for their own safety and this failure contributed to the claimant’s damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the result of finding contributory negligence?

A

It reduces the liability of a defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the standard of care expected from a claimant?

A

Some degree of care as a reasonable and prudent person would have done.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does age affect the determination of contributory negligence?

A

The court will take into a child’s age to determine the standard of care expected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Are rescuers generally protected from contributory negligence?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the test for the defence of illegality?

A

Whether the claimant committed an illegal act at the time of loss.

17
Q

What factors are considered in the Patel v Mirza test?

A
  • Underlying purpose of the prohibition
  • Other public policy considerations
  • Proportionality of denying the claim
18
Q

What is the nature of the defence of necessity?

A

Applicable where the defendant acted to save life, limb, or property.

19
Q

What must a defendant prove to use the defence of necessity?

A
  • Acting in an emergency to prevent harm
  • Not at fault in causing the emergency
20
Q

What does the emergency in necessity typically involve?

A

Preventing death or serious injury.

21
Q

What happens if the emergency arose out of the defendant’s negligence?

A

The defendant cannot rely on the defence of necessity.

22
Q

Provide an example case where necessity was successfully argued.

A

The captain of an oil tanker discharged oil to prevent the ship from sinking.