Tort 2 - Pure Economic Loss Flashcards

1
Q

What are the challenges courts face regarding claims for pure economic loss?

A

Courts limit claimants’ ability to recover pure economic loss due to concerns about:
* Overwhelming liability for defendants
* Encouraging fraudulent claims
* Interfering with contract law by imposing tort-based liabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the types of loss in negligence?

A

Types of loss in negligence include:
* Personal injury/property damage (physical damage)
* Consequential economic loss
* Pure economic loss
* Psychiatric damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define pure economic loss.

A

Financial loss without any physical damage or property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give examples of pure economic loss.

A

Examples include:
* Bad investment
* Missed contractual opportunity
* Loss of inheritance
* Economic loss from damage to others’ property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the general rule for pure economic loss?

A

No duty of care is owed in respect of pure economic loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the key case associated with pure economic loss?

A

Murphy v Brentwood District Council [1990] 2 All ER 908

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co, what type of loss was recoverable?

A

The loss of profit on damaged metal was recoverable as it was consequential economic loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the three main exceptions to the general rule for pure economic loss?

A

Exceptions include:
* Negligent statement
* Wills
* References

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What established the liability for negligent misstatements?

A

Hedley Byrne v Heller [1964] established liability in cases of reliance on negligent misstatements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In White v Jones, who suffers a loss due to negligence in relation to a will?

A

The beneficiary suffers a loss, not the testator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the significance of Spring v Guardian Assurance plc?

A

Employers owe a duty to provide accurate references for employees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the three key concepts/tests discussed in Hedley Byrne regarding duty of care?

A

The concepts/tests are:
* Reasonable reliance
* Assumption of responsibility
* Special relationship of trust and confidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is required for reasonable reliance to establish duty of care?

A

Requirements include:
* Claimant relied on the advice
* It was reasonable to rely on the advice
* Defendant knew or ought to have known of the reliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does special skill or knowledge held by the defendant imply?

A

If the defendant has expertise, a special relationship may exist, establishing duty of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In Stevenson v Nationwide Building Society, why did the claimant’s action fail?

A

The claimant was an expert and should have obtained an independent structural survey.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the general rule regarding advice given in social situations?

A

Generally, no duty of care is owed in social situations.

17
Q

What is the significance of Chaudhry v Prabhakar?

A

It established that a duty of care could exist even in social situations if the defendant assumed responsibility.

18
Q

What is the concept of voluntary assumption of responsibility?

A

It refers to the defendant voluntarily taking on responsibility for the correctness of their statement.

19
Q

What criteria were established in Caparo Industries plc. v Dickman for assuming responsibility?

A

Criteria include:
* Communication of advice to the claimant
* Knowledge of the purpose for which the advice is used
* Knowledge that the claimant will rely on the advice
* The claimant acted on the advice to their detriment

20
Q

What was the outcome of Caparo Industries plc. v Dickman regarding duty of care?

A

No duty was owed by the defendants to the claimants in their capacity as investors.

21
Q

What was the main issue in the case regarding the auditors and shareholders of Fidelity?

A

Whether the auditors owed a duty of care to the shareholders and potential investors

22
Q

What was the House of Lords’ decision regarding the duty of care owed by the auditors?

A

No duty was owed to the claimants in their capacity as investors

23
Q

What was the main reason for the House of Lords’ decision on the duty of care?

A

It was not reasonable for Caparo to have relied on the accounts for the purpose to invest

24
Q

What was the purpose of the audit according to the House of Lords?

A

To assist the shareholders in exercising their rights of control over the company

25
Q

What does Hedley Byrne state about a special relationship of trust and confidence?

A

It arises when the party seeking advice trusts the other to exercise care, where it is reasonable to do so

26
Q

What can defendants do to limit their liability?

A

Disclaim responsibility

27
Q

What acts govern the reliance on disclaimers in business?

A

Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) and Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA)

28
Q

In the case of Smith v Eric S. Bush, what key factors determined the duty owed by the defendant surveyor?

A
  • The claimant was a first-time buyer
  • The claimant was purchasing a house of modest value
  • The defendant should have known the claimant would rely on their survey
  • The reliance was reasonable and foreseeable
29
Q

What was the outcome regarding the disclaimer in Smith v Eric S. Bush?

A

The disclaimer was invalid as it was unreasonable under s 2(2) of UCTA 1977

30
Q

What factors are considered to determine if a disclaimer is reasonable?

A
  • Were the parties of equal bargaining power?
  • Was it practicable to obtain advice from an alternative source?
  • How difficult was the task undertaken by the defendant?
  • What are the practical consequences regarding loss and insurance?
31
Q

True or False: A disclaimer can exclude liability for economic loss or property damage if it is fair and reasonable.