Crime - Media, Globalisation, Green and State Crime Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the media representations of crime? 6

A
  • OVER-REPRESENTS VIOLENT/SEXUAL CRIMES (Ditton and Duffy 1983, 46% of crimes reported by media are violence/sex but is only 3% of official crime stats).
  • SHOWS VICTIMS/CRIMINALS TO BE OLDER AND M/C (Felson 1998, ‘age fallacy’).
  • EXAGGERATES SUCCESS RATES OF POLICE (over reports violent crimes which has higher clear up rate than property crimes).
  • VICTIM RISK EXAGGERATED (women, white and m/c more victimised than truth).
  • SERIES OF SEPARATE EVENTS (ignores underlying causes such as social structures).
  • OVERPLAYS EXTRAORDINARY CRIMES (Felson, ‘dramatic fallacy’, solved/carried out by daring, clever people, ‘ingenuity fallacy’).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What examples are there that crime reporting changes over time?

A

1960’s - focus on murder and petty crime.
1990’s - sex crimes (1951, under quarter of reporting for sex crimes, 1985, over a third).
– language choices: ‘sex fiend’ suggests psychopathic strangers rather than truth of rapists being known by victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reasons for reporting of crime changing?

A

Schlesigner 1994
abolition of death penalty
crime rate rose so crime had to be more extraordinary to make news.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why is the media coverage of crime distorted compared to official statistics?

A

SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
Journalists have to decide whether a story is ‘newsworthy’.
- crime is seen as newsworthy so has a high percentage of news coverage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are some criteria which makes a story ‘newsworthy’? 6

A
  • Dramatisation (action/excitement)
  • Personalisation (human interest)
  • High Status (rich and famous)
  • Novelty
  • Risk (victim and fear centred
  • Violence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the fictional representations of crime?

A

Surette (1998) ‘law of opposites’ - fictional representations of crime are opposite of official stats.

  • property crime is under-represented but violence/drugs/sex crimes over-represented.
  • murder presented as result of greed and calculation not fights go wrong or domestic abuse.
  • police always find criminal.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How has the fictional representations of crime changed?

A

Focus of reality shows.

  • offenders usually not white, young, belong to ‘underclass’.
  • police brutal and corrupt.
  • victims centre of drama as public identify with suffering.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the ways media causes crime? 7

A
  • desensitisation
  • age restrictions (gaming, films)
  • bullying (social media)
  • copycatting
  • dark web
  • illegal downloading
  • hate crime rap
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Examples of media causing crime? 2

A

Jamie Bulger case - two 10 year old boys kidnapped, tortured and killed 2 year old Jamie Bulger - blamed watching ‘Chucky’ and playing violent video games.
Banduras bobo doll study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is zemiology?

A

The study of harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Ian Taylor (1997) argue about globalisation and crime?

A

LEFT REALIST
Globalisation has led to changes in the pattern and extent of crime - by giving free rein to the market forces, globalisation has created inequality and rising crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Example of crime increasing for poor as a result of globalisation? 1

A
  • Lack of legitimate job opportunities therefore creates more illegitimate job opportunities e.g. drug trade.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Examples of crime increasing for rich as a result of globalisation? 3

A
  • Allowed trans national corporations to switch manufacturing to low wage countries (produces job insecurities, unemployment and poverty - linking to increase in crime for poor).
  • Markets create opportunities insider trading.
  • Deregulation creates movement of funds around globe to avoid taxation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation of crime and globalisation? 2

A

+ useful for linking global trends in capitalist economy to changes in pattern of crime.

  • does not explain how the changes make people behave in criminal way e.g. not all poor people turn to crime.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Hobbs and Dunningham ‘Glocal System’?

A

What happens globally affects people locally e.g. drug industry - drop in availability of drugs abroad affects local dealers.
– organised crime is 15% of worlds GDP.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are White’s (2008) key terms on green crime?

A
Anthropocentric = humans have a right to control the environment for their own ends and put profit first.
Ecocentric = humans and environment are interdependent, harming the environment harms everyone.
17
Q

What are South’s (2008) key terms on green crime?

A

Primary Green Crime = results directly from destroying earths resources.
Secondary Green Crime = flouting rules that aim to protect the environment.

18
Q

Examples of green crime?

A

Coca Cola water pollution (primary green crime)
BP oil spill, Gulf of Mexico (secondary green crime)
Chernobyl nuclear plant explosion (ecocentric)
Union Carbide Cyanide Gas Leak, India - 20,000 people died, 120,000 injured.

19
Q

What is green criminology?

A
Rob White (2008) = any action which harms the physical environment/animals and humans is a crime even if no law has been broken. 
Subject matter is: wider, transgressive theory (over steps boundaries to include new issues), zemiology.
-- laws cannot provide consistent standard of harm as the law is different in all places. (global perspective).
20
Q

What is traditional criminology and their view on green crime?

A

Not usually concerned with green crime as subject matter is defined by criminal law.
Situ and Emmons (2000) = environmental crime is an unauthorised act that violates law.
– investigates patterns and causes of law breaking.

21
Q

What does traditional criminology focus on?

A

‘Crimes of the street’ and ignores ‘crimes of the suits’.

22
Q

How do Green and Ward (2005) define state crime? Examples?

A

State crime is an illegal or deviant activities perpetrated by or with the complicity of state agencies.
- Genocide
- War Crimes
- Torture
- Imprisonment without trial
- Assassination
Does NOT include acts which benefit individuals who work for the state.

23
Q

What are McLaughlin’s (2001) 4 categories of state crime?

A
  • Political crimes (corruption and censorship)
  • Crimes by security and police forces (genocide, torture and disappearance of dissidents)
  • Economic crimes (violations of health and safety laws)
  • Social and cultural crimes (institutional racism)
24
Q

What is Stan Cohen’s (2006) ‘spiral of denial’?

A

Explains justifications to legitimate state actions.

  • Stage 1: “it didn’t happen” e.g. state denies - then human right organisations, victims and media show it did (sousveillance).
  • Stage 2: “if it did happen, it is something else” e.g. self defence not murder.
  • Stage 3: “even if it is that, it is justified” e.g. fight war on terror.
25
Q

What are the techniques of neutralisation? 5

A

HOW they justify state crimes.

  • Denial of victim = exaggeration e.g. terrorists.
  • Denial of injury = “we are real victims, not them”.
  • Denial of responsibility = obeying orders (usually used by individual police or guards).
  • Condemning of condemners = “they are condemning us, their racists”.
  • Appeal to higher loyalty = self righteous justifications that claims to serve a higher cause.
    • These techniques do not deny event but ‘they seek to impose a different construction of the event from what appears to be the case’.