Crime and Punishment in the medieval period Flashcards
How were areas divided in the Anglo-Saxon period?
Shires (counties) were divided into smaller areas known as hundreds, each hundred was split into ten tithings. One man from each tithing had to meet regularly at the king’s shire reeve. Their role was to prevent crime.
What was the population in 1000?
Between 1,700,000 and 2,000,000 and about 90% of which lived in the countryside.
What caused the growth of towns in 1000?
Towns like Lunderwick (London), Eoforwick (York) and Hamwick (Southampton) grew thanks to trade contacts with Europe, coined money and settled populations
Why was it easier to commit crimes in towns?
It was easier as not all people knew each other, there was a higher concentration of goods and money and there was lots of people in close contact.
What was the Anglo-Saxon system of society like?
The king was at the top and ruled the country, he decides new laws and issues code of law. Beneath him was the nobles who were given land by the king, they appoint shire reeves and were wealthy and powerful. Then there were freemen with little land and finally the serfs with almost no power and no land.
How powerful was the church in the Anglo-Saxon period?
The church was very powerful and had a responsibility for preventing moral crimes and crimes against the church. They punished those who broke the church laws like steeling church property
How was the local community responsible for crime prevention in the Anglo-Saxon period?
Anglo-Saxons believed that it was the victims responsibility to seek justice but the local community also played a part in delivering justice, loyalty to the community was seen as duty and anyone who witnessed a crime would raise hue and cry (shouting for help), everyone who heard was expected to help chase down suspects
What were crimes against authority?
They were actions that threatened the social structure
What were crimes against the person?
Crimes like assault or murder that cause physical harm to another person
What were crimes against property?
They were crimes like theft, robbery and arson that involve taking or damaging something that belongs to another person
What was taking oaths? And why was it used?
Hearings were taken place in public and the accused would swear their innocence under oaths, to decide if someone was guilty for a first offence.
It was used because people were very religious and if they swore their innocence to God then they thought that they must be innocent
What was trial by ordeal? And when was it used?
Trial by ordeal meant the accused would be tested in the eyes of God by going through a trial e.g. Water and hot iron. They did this when there was not enough evidence to prove their innocence and they believed that God would make you win if you were innocent
What was maiming? And when was it used?
It involves criminals having part of their body chopped off or have a mark on their skin. Used for lesser crimes as a deterrent
What was wergild? And when was it used?
It involved murderers being forced to pay fines to the families of the person killed. It was often done to rich families for what was seen as compensation for death, the amount depended on social class and was also done to prevent blood feuds
What was execution? And when was it used?
It meant being punished by death, people were often hanged or beheaded, used for treason and arson which was seen as very serious as a major crime deterrent