(Crim) Voluntary Manslaughter Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

s. 54 Coroners & Justice Act 2009

A

Loss Of Control:
D is NOT to be convicted of murder if
- D lost self-control
- The loss of self-control had a qualifying trigger
- A Person of D’s sex, age and with a normal degree of tolerance and self restraint would have reacted the same in that situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Jewell (2014)

A

Loss of Self-Control:
D went round to V’s house and shot him after V threatened him. D claimed he lost control but brought a gun and ammunition to his house. Sufficient cool off time. Planned attack. Not able to rely on manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Ward (2012)

A

Fear of Violence:
V attacked D’s brother so D hit V with a pickaxe handle and killed him. Ward was guilty of manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Clinton (2012)

A

Sexual Infidelity:
D killed his wife after marital and financial problems. He found explicit messages between her and another man so he beat her to death. D raised loss of control but the judge rejected the defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DPP v Camplin (1978)

A

Person of D’s Sex and Age would have reacted similarly:
D was a fifteen year old boy and V was a 50 year old man who sexually abused him. Originally D was held to the standard of an adult male but the CoA said that was wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Van Dongen (2005)

A

Person of D’s Sex and Age would have reacted similarly:
Jury thought an ordinary person would have lost self control but not have reacted as violently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Zebedee (2012)

A

Person of D’s Sex and Age would have reacted similarly:
D lost control and killed his 94 year old dad who had Alzheimer’s. Court thought that father’s behaviour was not a qualifying trigger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Byrne (1960)

A

Abnormality of Mental Functioning:
D was a sexual psychopath who strangled his victim in a hostel. D claimed he was unable to control his desires. CoA held that “Abnormality of Mind covers everything” D got manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Alhuwalia (1989)

A

Recognised Medical Condition:
She killed her husband. Courts say Battered Women’s Syndrome is a recognised medical condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Sutcliffe (1981)

A

Recognised Medical Condition:
Peter Sutcliffe got away with diminished responsibility due to paranoid schizophrenia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Vinagre (1979)

A

Recognised Medical Condition:
Got away with killing his wife due to “Othello Syndrome” (extreme jealousy for no reason)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Wood (2008)

A

Recognised Medical Condition:
Alcohol Dependency syndrome rules are lighter. D does not have to be brain damaged nor does their drinking need to be involuntary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Dietschmann (2003)

A

Recognised Medical Condition:
D suffered from depression after his aunt/lover died. D attacked V after he had been drinking. Despite the drink mental abnormality substantially impaired his mental responsibility for actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly