(Crim) Non-Fatal Offences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

ASSAULT: Tuberville v Savage (1669)

A

Actus Reus (Negation):
Defendant said “If it were not assize time, I would not take such language”. Which means he was not going to assault V he was not guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

ASSAULT: R v Wilson (1955)

A

Actus Reus:
D called out “Get out the knives” which in itself constitutes as assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ASSAULT: R v Ireland (1997) AND R v Burstow (1997)

A

Actus Reus:
A silent, menacing phone call can be classed as assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ASSAULT: R v Light (1857)

A

Actus Reus:
D held a sword above V’s head and said “Were it not for the policeman, I would split your head open. D negated his statement but seen as though the threat was so harsh he was still guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ASSAULT: Smith v Chief Superintendent of Woking Police Station (1983)

A

Actus Reus:
V saw D standing in her garden at night. V still feared immediate force even though she was locked inside. D was guilty of assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

BATTERY: Definition of Battery

A

Definition:
Intentional of Reckless application of unlawful force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

BATTERY: R v Santana Bermudez (2003)

A

Actus Reus:
D failed to inform a policeman that he had a needle in his pocket before a search from a policeman. D was guilty of battery by omission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

BATTERY: R v Thomas (1985)

A

Actus Reus:
D touched the bottom of a woman’s skirt. Judge ruled that this constituted of battery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ABH: R v Roberts (1978)

A

Mens Rea:
D gave V a lift and started touching her inappropriately. D jumped out of the car and suffered ABH. D argued he had not intended to cause ABH. But his battery was the leading cause for her ABH so he was guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ABH: R v Savage (1991)

A

Mens Rea:
D wanted to throw her drink at her ex boyfriend’s new girlfriend, as she threw the drink, she threw the glass as well. She intended to apply unlawful force which was enough mens rea for ABH.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

s. 20 GBH: C v Eisenhower (1984)

A

Actus Reus:
D fired an air pistol hitting V in the eye and causing internal bleeding. Not sufficient to constitute as wounding as the skin had not been broken.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

s. 20 GBH: R v Martin (1881)

A

Actus Reus:
D placed an iron bar on a fire exit and shouted “Fire”. The people rushed out and many were seriously injured. Difficult to view the application of the force but D was guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

s. 20 GBH: R v Grimshaw (1984)

A

Mens Rea:
D was in a pub when she heard someone insult her boyfriend. She turned around and slapped him with a glass. She was found guilty of s. 20.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

s. 20 GBH: R v Parmenter (1991)

A

Mens Rea:
D threw a baby into the air and caught it. D said that he had done this with other children and they had not been harmed. D was not guilty of GBH as he did not intend to injure the child nor did he see the risk of injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly