(Crim) Property: Theft Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

R v Morris (1983)

A

Appropriation:
D changed the price of the item in a supermarket. Placed it in his basket but was stopped before leaving the shop. D’s assumption of any right of the owner counts as an appropriation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lawrence v Metropolitan Police Commissioner (1972)

A

Appropriation with consent:
Italian student got into a taxi. Journey should’ve cost 50p but the taxi driver took £6 out of the students wallet when he got out. HoL unanimously decided that this was theft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Hinks (2001)

A

Appropriation with consent:
D befriended a rich man of low intelligence. She convinced him to give her £300 a day. HoL said that it was appropriation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Kelly & Lindsay (1998)

A

Personal Property:
Lindsay was an artist who asked Kelly to steal body parts from her job. Both found guilty of theft even though body parts aren’t usually seen as property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Oxford v Moss (1979)

A

Things in Action:
A student took an exam paper, read the questions and returned it. D could not be charged with theft as intellectual property is not real property. Information cannot be stolen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Akbar (2002)

A

Things In Action:
Teacher gave her students exam papers and as it was the physical thing she was giving, she was charged with theft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Dyke & Munro (2002)

A

Belonging To Another:
D’s collected and kept money intended for charity. CoA quashed their convictions as they should have been charged with stealing from the charity not the people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Marshall, Coombes & Eren (1998)

A

Belonging To Another:
D’s took one-day London Underground tickets from people who didn’t need them anymore. They then sold them to other passengers for a reduced prince. CoA upheld conviction as tickets remained property of the underground.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Rostron (2003)

A

Property Being Owned:
D retrieved golf balls from the lake of the golf course. Conviction was upheld. It is a question of fact whether the golf balls were abandoned or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Turney (No. 2) (1971)

A

Person can steal their own property:
D took car to garage to get it fixed and then drove home without paying. He was found guilty of theft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Davidge v Bunnett (1984)

A

Who’s Property:
D was given money by her flatmates to pay the gas bill. She spent the money on Christmas gifts instead. D was guilty of theft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Wain (1995)

A

Who’s Property:
D raised money for charity. He was allowed to transfer it into his bank account to write a cheque. He spent the money. He was guilty of theft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Attorney-General’s Reference (No. 1 of 1983)

A

Acquired By Mistake:
D was overpaid by his employers. CoA decided she was legally obliged to return it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Gilks (1992)

A

Acquired By Mistake:
D placed a bet on a horse. His horse lost but a horse with a similar name won. He was mistakenly paid £106. No legal obligation for D to pay money back in a betting scenario.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ivey v Genting Casinos (2017)

A

Dishonesty:
Ivey won £7.7 million in poker. Casino refused to pay as he “Cheated” UKSC found in favour of Genting Casinos and did not pay Ivey.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Barton & Booth (2020)

A

Dishonesty:
Care home owner exploited their relationship with elderly residents to obtain gifts. They were guilty of theft. Ivey test was correct.

17
Q

R v Velumuyl (1989)

A

Intention To Permanently Deprive:
D was manager of 2 car parks. He took some money from the safe to lend to a friend who returned the same amount. D was charged with theft as he was not going to replace the same money. It is different money.

18
Q

R v Lloyd & Others (1985)

A

D worked at a cinema. Gave the films to a friend to copy and then return them straight away. There was no theft as the films had not reduced in value nor had they changed state.

19
Q
A