(Crim) Involuntary Manslaughter Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

R v Cato (1976)

A

Unlawful:
2 drug addicts injecting each other with morphine. D injected V with morphine who dies. The unlawful act was administering the drug not supplying it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Dalby (1982)

A

Unlawful:
D supplied drugs to V who later died as a result. The act of supplying the drugs was not enough to constitute manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Kennedy (2007)

A

Unlawful:
D supplied V with heroin which V injected immediately and died an hour later. CoA upheld the conviction making D an accomplice in the injection therefore being responsible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Church (1967)

A

Dangerous:
D argued with a woman about being unable to satisfy her sexually and she slapped him. D knocked the woman out and thinking she was dead D pushed her into a river where she drowned. A reasonable person would see this as dangerous so the courts deemed it dangerous.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Newbury & Jones (1976)

A

Dangerous:
2 fifteen year old boys were throwing stones off a bridge. One which hit a train guard who later died. They were guilty as it was a dangerous act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Lowe (1973)

A

Act (Not Omission):
D deliberately neglected a child who died. Deliberate omission cannot constitute constructive manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Lamb (1967)

A

Mens Rea:
D killed his best friend with a revolver. He did not have the mens rea as both the friends though that the gun would not fire. D was not liable for his friends death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Mitchell (1983)

A

Mens Rea:
D got into an argument with a 72 year old man in a post office queue. D pushed the man who fell into an 89 year old woman who died. The malice was transferred to the old woman and CoA upheld his conviction of manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Adomako (1995)

A

Gross Negligence:
D was an anaesthetist during an eye operation. The first doctor left and D replaced him. An oxygen tube came disconnected and D failed to notice for 6 mins (An experienced doctor would’ve taken 30 seconds). D was guilty of Gross Negligence Manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Wacker (2002)

A

Duty Of Care:
D tried to smuggle 60 Chinese immigrants in his lorry to the UK. He closed the air vent to reduce suspicion. 58 were found dead. He was found guilty of GNM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Khan & Khan (1998)

A

Duty Of Care:
2 Brothers gave a girl heroin and she collapsed at their flat and they did not do anything about it. They were found NOT guilty of GNM. But only due to a misdirection of the courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Becker (2000)

A

Breach of Duty:
Patient died of an overdose from the medicine that D (a doctor) had prescribed. D was guilty of GNM as he had fallen below the standard of care expected of an ordinary doctor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Singh (1999)

A

Risk of Death:
V was a tenant who died of Carbon Monoxide poisoning. There was a foreseeable risk of death which made the landlord liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Broughton (2019)

A

Breach of Duty MUST Cause Death:
D gave his girlfriend drugs at Bestival. Filmed her over a number of hours when it was obvious she was unwell. D was convicted of manslaughter and supply of class A drugs. However after an appeal in 2020, the manslaughter conviction was quashed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly