(Crim) Murder Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Elements of Coke’s definition

A
  • Man of Sound Memory
  • Age Of Discretion
  • Unlawfully Killeth
  • Within Any Country Of The Realm
  • Any Reasonable Creature in Rerum Natura
  • Under The King’s Peace
  • Year and a Day
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Re A (2000)

A

Unlawfully Killeth:
Courts authorised the separation of conjoined twins knowing that one would have to “Die”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Attorney-General’s Reference No. 3 of 1994

A

Reasonable Creature In Rerum Natura:
D stabbed V (pregnant girlfriend) in the abdomen. Baby was born prematurely and died. Not able to transfer malice for murder of the foetus. Could transfer manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Malcherek (1981)

A

Reasonable Creature In Rerum Natura:
V was brain dead and doctors turned off life support. If V is considered to be brain dead, turning off machine did not end his life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Gibbins & Proctor (1918)

A

Mens Rea:
Father + GF living together with child. Neglected child and child died. Murder can be committed by omission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Vickers (1957)

A

Mens Rea (Malice):
D broke into shop owned by old woman. D punched old woman and killed her. Intent to cause GBH can be used as an attempt to murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

s. 8 Criminal Justice Act 1967

A

Mens Rea:
Jury will not be bound in Law to infer that they intended or foresaw a result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Cunningham (1981)

A

Mens Rea:
Made Cunningham recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

DPP v Smith (1961)

A

Mens Rea:
D was found guilty of murdering a policeman. “was death a natural and probable consequence of D’s Act”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Woollin (1998)

A

Mens Rea:
D chucked his 3 month old across the room. The child died. HoL thought that it was substantial risk even though D did not intend to kill.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Matthews & Alleyne (2003)

A

Oblique Intent:
2 D’s robbed V and pushed him into a river. D’s claimed they did not intend to kill as they did not know that V could not swim. Judge said “If drowning was a virtual certainty, they had intention to kill”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly