Crim Pro Flashcards
A seizure occurs when
an officer by means of (1) physical contact or (2) show of authority intentionally terminates or restrains a person’s freedom of movement
Test: would a reasonable person feel free to disregard the officer?
Terry Stops (Stop and Frisk) require
a reasonable suspicion based on articulable facts to believe suspect is or is about to engage in criminal conduct
During a Terry stop an officer can
pat down a detainee for weapons but cannot frisk for evidence (unless identity of contraband is obvious to the officer)
If probable cause arises during a Terry stop the officer can
make an arrest
Traffic stops require
reasonable suspicion
Note: Not needed if everyone is pulled over (e.g. sobriety checkpoint)
Arrests require
probably cause to believe that the arrested individual has committed a crime
Note: Pre-text stops are OK
Elements of an Arrest Warrant
(1) Neutral and detached magistrate
(2) Based on a finding of probable cause to believe named individual committed a particular crime
(3) Name person and identify offense
Arresting an individual in a 3rd party’s home requires
a search warrant for the 3rd party’s home
Absent an arrest warrant officers can only make an arrest inside a dwelling if
(1) There are exigent circumstances (e.g. felony hot pursuit / danger to others), OR
(2) There is consent to enter
Warrantless arrests are OK when
(1) Crime was committed in officer’s presence or based on probable cause to believe individual committed a felony, OR
(2) For a felony if crime was not committed in officer’s presence
An illegal arrest does not
prevent prosecution of the defendant but may lead to an exclusion of evidence
Purpose of SILA
(1) Protect officers from weapons or other danger, and
(2) Prevent destruction or concealment of evidence
Allowable search areas of SILA
On the street: Suspect + their wingspan
At home: Suspect + immediate arrest area
In a car: May search passenger compartment as long as suspect still has access to the vehicle at the time
Impounded cars may be searched if
done in accordance with inventorying purposes
A “Search” occurs when
government conduct violates a reasonable expectation of privacy
Government conduct constituting a search can be either
By physical intrusion (e.g. drug smelling dog) or non-physical intrusion (thermal imagining)
Search warrants must
(1) be issued by a neutral magistrate
(2) Be based on showing probable cause to believe items sought are fruits, instrumentalities, or evidence of crime
(3) Must describe the property and place to be searched with particularity
Places where people enjoy an expectation of privacy
(1) houses
(2) hotel rooms
(3) offices
(4) luggage
(5) Curtilage
Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement
ESCAPES
Exigent Circumstances, SILA, Consent, Automobiles, Plain View (No REP), Evidence obtained from administrative searches, Stop and Frisk
Exigent circumstances are
hot pursuit / immediate danger (cannot be created BY the police)
Voluntary consent (e.g. to enter a dwelling) is applicable only to
the individual who gave consent (officer need not inform person they have the right to refuse)
Think roommates where one gives consent and the other doesn’t
Automobile Exception allows for
Search within passenger compartment (SILA) and
If there’s probable cause to believe Automobile contains contraband, can search those parts of the vehicles that might contain contraband even without an arrest
Plain view / Plain smell requires
Officers to be legally present
Evidence obtained by Administrative searches refers to
(1) Administrative warrants (e.g. fire or health inspections)
(2) Airplane boarding areas
(3) International borders
(4) Highly regulated industries (e.g. liquor stores, gun shops, searches of students in public schools)
Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination is limited to
Natural persons and testimonial evidence (not physical i.e. blood tests or handwriting exemplars) made to the government
Note: Does not apply to evidence which may subject person to CIVIL liability or to corporations (e.g. custodians of corporate records)
Miranda warnings attach once there is
custodial interrogation
Custodial means
defendant has been arrested or is not otherwise free to leave
“Interrogation” involves
Asking questions or engaging in words or conduct known or should have been known to elicit a response
Does not include voluntary statements or routine booking questions
Miranda warnings
(1) Right to remain silent
(2) Anything statement made may be used against you in court of law
(3) You have right to consult an attorney and have an attorney present at questioning
(4) If you cannot afford one an attorney will be appointed for you
Note: D must UNDERSTAND the rights (hear and comprehend)
Are exempted if public safety is at risk
Police must cease questioning if
(1) D affirmatively invokes right to remain silent, OR
(2) D affirmatively invokes right to counsel
Police can resume interrogation after right to remain silent is invoked if
A substantial period of time has passed and fresh warnings are given
Police can resume interrogation after right to counsel is invoked if
Defendant affirmatively initiates contact (or lawyer is present)
Confessions must be
voluntary but CAN be the product of deceit
Involuntarily obtained statements are
never admissible against a defendant and convictions may be overturned depending on harmless error rule
Statements in violation of miranda are
admissible to impeach D credibility but inadmissible in prosecutor’s case in chief
The 6th and 5th Amendment rights to counsel differ in that
6th amend attaches automatically if there has been indictment or other formal charges (unless knowingly and voluntarily waived)
5th amend must be affirmatively invoked
6th amendment right to counsel is
offense specific and applies whether D is in custodial interrogation or not
(compare with 5th amendment miranda which applies to any charge)
Critical stages of prosecution include
(1) Evidentiary hearings (i.e. suppression hearings)
(2) Post-indictment lineups
(3) Post-indictment interrogations
(4) All parts of trial process including plea and sentencing
Neither defendant nor lawyer has right to be present during
photo array identification (but police must turn over the array to the defendant and lawyer after)
Evidence of identification by lineup may be suppressed if
the lineup was impermissibly suggestive AND there is a substantial likelihood of misidentification because of such suggestiveness
Generally, evidence obtained illegally either by search, statement or physically identified is
inadmissible at the criminal trial of the person who’s rights were violated
Standing requires violation of
defendant’s rights, not a third party
Exception: Passengers in a car where stop was unconstitutional