Con Law Flashcards
Federal courts are empowered to decide
cases and controversies (Federal Question & Diversity Jx)
Note: Cannot decide any legal questions (e.g. proposed legislation, Ct. CANNOT opine on constitutionality until passed)
Under the 11th amendment, State’s may not be sued for monetary damages or injunctive relief for violating state law in federal court unless
(1) the State consents to the suit, OR
(2) Congress chose to abrogate (repeal) that sovereign immunity through an enumerated power
Limitations of the 11th amendment for monetary suits against States protects only
States themselves and state agencies, but NOT:
(1) local governments
(2) Individual state officers
(3) Suits for injunctive relief
Exceptions to the 11th amendment and state sovereign immunity are
(1) Congress abrogate state sovereign immunity to enforce certain individual rights (intent to abrogate must be clear and be related to federal power under the Civil War amendments - 13, 14, 15)
(2) State consents to the suit (either express or implied through ratification of the Constitution)
The Supreme Court’s docket is
Discretionary (4 justices must agree to grant cert)
The Supreme Court cannot hear a case from a state court when
there are adequate and independent state grounds for deciding the case
Adequate and Independent State Grounds (AISG) is relevant only if the case
(1) Is in the US Supreme court
(2) Arises through a writ of certiorari, and
(3) Has already been decided by a state court
In reference to AISG, Adequate means
State law controls decision, regardless of how federal issue would be decided
In reference to AISG, independent means
State court’s ruling does not depend on an interpretation of federal law
US constitution sets a floor, not a ceiling for individual rights. States can always create additional rights
Standing are limitations on
WHO can bring a suit (not the substance of the suit itself)
Constitutional Elements of Standing
(1) Injury in fact (concrete - actual or imminent and particularized (not abstract)
(2) Causation
(3) Redressability (relief requested from court must be able to prevent or remedy injury)
Common Standing Doctrines
(1) Taxpayer Standing
(2) Organizational Standing
(3) Legislative Standing
(4) Third party standing
Taxpayer standing is
taxpayers have standing to challenge their own tax assessment / liability but cannot challenge government expenditures
Exception: Can challenge if they violate the Establishment Clause (religion)
Organizational standing is
standing of an organization to sue if
(1) Members would have standing to sue in their own right, and
(2) Interests at stake are germane to the organization’s purpose
Legislative Standing
Legislators LACK standing to challenge laws they voted against but the legislature may have institutional standing if the claim has something to do with institutional functions
Third Party Standing
Generally not permitted except for:
(1) Doctors on behalf of patients
(2) School on behalf of students
(3) Bar render on behalf of customers
(4) Parent on behalf of child (but may be limited to custodial parent)
A federal court will not consider a claim if it is
unripe (brought too soon) or Moot (no real case or controversy)
A claim will not be dismissed as moot if
“capable of repetition yet evading review”
a person will be subject to same action over and over again and action will not last long enough to work its way through judicial system (think gestational period and abortion)
The political question doctrine prevents courts from hearing issues when
(1) The constitution assigns decision making authority on this subject to a different branch of government, or
(2) The matter depends on that person’s discretion such that there is no law for the judge to apply
Political questions = non-justiciable
-Note: validity of a federal statute is NOT precluded by political question doctrine
4 Abstention Doctrines
(1) Pullman: Unsettled state law
(2) Younger: Pending state criminal case
(3) Burford: Parties seeking injunctive relief that would interfere with complex state regulatory scheme
(4) Colorado River: Case is substantially similar to another case being heard in state court
Common wrong answers for source of Congressional power
(1) General Welfare Clause (there is no general power to legislate for general welfare)
(2) Police Power (only states have this power, Federal government cannot “commandeer”)
(3) Necessary and Proper Clause (no power on its own, must be used in addition to another legislative power)
Forms of Activities under the Commerce Clause
(1) Channels of interstate commerce
(2) Instrumentalities of interstate commerce
(3) Any behavior that has a substantial effect on interstate commerce (may be judged in the aggregate)
The test for assessing whether an activity in the aggregate effects interstate commerce is
rational basis (very deferential)
Note: limitations to commerce clause regard noneconomic intrastate activity
The Taxing Clause allows the federal government to
(1) Impose a tax even if doing so is done to regulate behavior (e.g. smoking tax)
Taxation need only be rationally related to raising money and can be imposed for any purpose
The Spending Clause allows the government to spend for
the general welfare (any public purpose)
Under the Spending Clause, Congress cannot
(1) Impose unconstitutional conditions
(2) Enforce conditions that are ambiguous or not related to the program
(3) Coerce state behavior with its spending conditions
The 13th Amendment gives congress broad powers to legislate against public and private
racial discrimination (badges or incidents of slavery)
Section 5 of the 14th Amendment (the “Enabling Clause”) gives Congress the power to
enforce the provisions (EPC and DPC) by appropriate legislation
To determine whether enforcement is “appropriate” and only protects individual rights and does not expand them, the test used is the
Congruence and Proportionality Test which requires a reasonable fit between the constitutional right defined by the courts and the means of enforcement
Note: If enforcement is so broad it effectively expands the right, the enforcement is unconstitutional under Section 5
15th Amendment prohibits
State and Local governments from denying any citizen the right to vote based on race
Note: Interpreted to mean the vote is “meaningfully counted”
Other Powers of Congress include
Power to declare war, raise army / navy, establish a post office, plenary power over non-citizens, exclusive power over the naturalization process, power over national election, and anything “necessary and proper” (if coupled with separate enumerated power)
Presidential pardon power is available for
federal offenses (not state) and do NOT apply to impeachments
Veto Power of President
Must be exercised within 10 days and cannot be line-item veto (sign or veto entire legislation)
Appointment Power allows the President to
Appoint all officers of the US (those who exercise “significant” authority)
Note: Inferior officers can be appointed by a department head
Congress can create
Offices but not officers
Federal officers may be removed
By the president without cause unless Congress has passed a law creating the agency and protects the head of the agency from being fired (independent agency)
Note: if has policymaking or administrative power, Congress cannot intervene
Only intervention regarding federal officers is impeachment
Executive agreements are
Agreements by President and other countries which do not require approval by senate (like treaties do).
Not binding on successive Presidents
Impoundment outlines how the President may spend funds authorized by Congress, and means
(1) If congress passes statute and gives president discretion on spending funds, the president may withhold. BUT
(2) If a statute requires that certain funds be spent on certain purposes, the President has no discretion to withhold money
Under the Delegation of Powers doctrine, Congress is allowed to
delegate many powers to administrative agencies but must provide an intelligible principle to guide agency discretion
Immunities and Privileges (president, judges, legislators)
President: Immune from civil liability for official acts, but NOT in private capacity or for acts done before becoming president
Judicial: Immune for judicial acts but not for non-judicial acts (e.g. employment discrimination)
Legislative: Immunity for anything said during regular legislative process (cannot be used as evidence and extends to congressional aids if would have been protected had it been performed by legislator)
Overriding Executive Privilege requires
Demonstrated need (e.g. ongoing criminal investigation)
The Supremacy Clause provides that
federal law trumps conflicting state law
Between the Federal Government and the States, States cannot
pass a law regulating the federal government unless congress permits it, AND
cannot directly tax the federal government or shield state officers from federal liability (may tax income of federal employees)
The Dormant Commerce Clause (DCC) limits
the power of states to legislate in ways that impact interstate commerce
DCC issues arise when
(1) states are acting in ways that disadvantage each other, and
(2) Congress is silent
Note: If Congress has passed a law in the fact pattern, DCC is not applicable
Under DCC, if congress has not enacted legislation States may regulate commerce so long as they do not
(1) Discriminate against out of state commerce
(2) Unduly burden interstate commerce, or
(3) Purposefully regulate wholly out of state activity
Discrimination against out of state commerce pertains to (+ exceptions)
State or local laws that protect local economic interests at the expense of out of state competitions
Exceptions:
(1) Law is necessary to serve an important state function or local interest (and no other non-discriminatory means are available)
(2) State is acting as market participant
(3) Congress authorizes state regulation
Pikes Balancing is
balancing test for undue burden under the DCC
Test: Burdens imposed clearly outweigh local benefits
States may tax interstate commerce only if
(1) Congress is silent
(2) Tax does not discriminate against or unduly burden interstate commerce
(3) There is a substantial nexus between the taxing state and the property or activity to be taxed
(4) There is a fair apportionment of tax liability among the states (e.g. tax corporation only for in-state portion of revenue)
Ad Valorem Property Taxes are based on
real or personal property assessed at a certain time of year and include movable commodities (e.g. cars) but may NOT be levied on goods which are just passing through
3 Forms of Federal Preemption
(1) Express
(2) Conflict (impossible to comply with both state and federal at same time OR frustrates purpose of federal law)
(3) Field (Congress has occupied the field - think immigration)
For the Full Faith and Credit clause to apply, the judgement must be
(1) Final
(2) On the Merits
(3) And have had proper jurisdiction
Action may be deemed to be governmental if it is
(1) A regulatory statute or criminal prosecution (express),
(2) A private actor carrying out traditional government function (generally exclusively government provided)
(3) State Entanglement of Private Actors (hard to see where private action ends and state begins - liquor license not enough)
(4) State facilitation of private action (affirmatively facilitate / endorse)
Procedural Due Process protects against
international governmental action which deprives people of life, liberty or property
Interests Protected under Procedural Due Process are
(1) Life (death penalty)
(2) Liberty (physical confinement / restriction of fundamental rights)
(3) Property (legitimate claim of property interest by statute, contract, or custom)
Note: Reputation is not a protected interest
Deprivation of an interest requires
intentionality (accident or negligence by governmental employee is insufficient)
Matthews v. Eldridge balancing test for Procedural Due Process
(1) Individual interest at stake (importance to the individual)
(2) Value of procedure that is protecting that interest (and risk of erroneous deprivation)
(3) Government’s interest/burden in efficiency (cost vs. degree of materially enhancing protection)
Note: This will be used for deprivation of REAL property in Civil Forfeiture actions
Generally, a person being deprived of a property interest is entitled to
(1) Notice of the government’s action by unbiased decision maker, and
(2) An opportunity to be heard
Note: Notice must be “reasonably calculated” to apprise interested parties of the action
Hearings before / after deprivation? Welfare, Disability, Termination for Cause
welfare - hearing before deprivation
disability - prompt hearing after so long as retroactive relief may be awarded
termination for cause - hearing before unless significant reason not to keep employee
Standard for Strict Scrutiny
The Government must show the challenged law was (1) necessary to meet a (2) compelling government interest
Compelling: National Security, preserving public health, remedying past discrimination
Necessary: Least restrictive means possible
Standard for Rational Basis Review
The Challenger must show the law is not (1) rationally related to (2) a legitimate state interest
Very deferential, legitimate interests include reattributing wealth, keeping highways safe
Laws receiving rational basis review are generally only struck down if
animated by prejudice or animus towards a particular group