Conflict of Laws Flashcards

1
Q

Domicile is established by

A

(1) Physical presence and
(2) intent to remain indefinitely

Note: look to person’s actions or statements taken as a whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Children generally take the domicile of

A

their parent (or custodial parent)

Emancipated minors can choose own domicile

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 general approaches to Choice of Law

A

(1) Traditional approach (vested rights)
(2) Governmental Interest Analysis
(3) Most significant relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Territorial Approach to Choice of Law means

A

Each state determines the legal effect of events that occur within its territory.

Legal right occurs after significant event, vests under the laws of WHERE the event occurred

(significant event = where last act took place necessary to give P cause of action)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Governmental Interest Analysis applies

A

to a set of facts if its application to those facts would promote the underlying purpose of the law (if the law of the state applies, it is said to be interested)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Interest by states in governmental interest analysis is done by

A

balancing state interests

Both stated interested? True conflict, apply law of forum state

Only one state interested? False conflict, apply law of interested state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A conduct regulating law is a law

A

designed to regulate conduct (e.g. declare some conduct as wrongful)

Most laws are conduct regulating

States have an interest in applying when wrongful conduct occurs within that state’s territory or when state domiciliary is injured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A loss-shifting law determines

A

who can or cannot be liable (e.g. vicarious liability, immunity)

States have an interest in applying loss-shifting when doing so would benefit a state domiciliary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The guiding principles for the Most Significant Relationship test are

A

(1) Promoting relevant policies of the forum and other interested states
(2) Systemic interests (Certainty, uniformity, predictability, simplicity - CUPS)
(3) Protecting the justified expectations of the parties (applies to planned transactions like contracts, trusts, real property)

Balancing contacts when considering whether to apply guiding principles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Depecage is the application of

A

different states’ laws to different issues within the same case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Renvoi is

A

the applying of the whole law of another state when applying the law of another state, including that state’s choice of law

(generally rejected by all 3 approaches to conflicts of law EXCEPT with regards to real property)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Under the traditional approach, issues regarding tort law are resolved by

A

the law of the place where the tort occurred (injury happened)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Under the governmental interest analysis approach, issues regarding tort law are resolved by

A

the state with the greatest interest in the case - look to Conduct Regulating and Loss Shifting

Conduct regulating:
(1) Occurs within territory
(2) Causes injury within territory, or
(3) Injures a domiciliary of that state

Loss Shifting
(1) Interest when it would benefit a domiciliary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under the most significant relationship approach, issues regarding tort law are resolved by

A

the state with the most significant relationship
(1) Place where injury occurred
(2) Place where conduct causing injury took place
(3) Domicile, residence, or state of incorporation
(4) Place where relationship between parties is centered

Note: presumption in favor of where tort occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Choice of law clauses are

A

generally enforceable (so long as valid, applicable, related)

Exception: resolving the VALIDITY of a contract based SOLELY on choice of law clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Parties may choose law to apply to contract validity issues if

A

(1) Chosen state has a substantial relationship to the parties or transactions, OR
(2) There is some other reasonable reason for the choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The Traditional approach to resolving Contract Issues is to look to

A

place of contracting (where last act occurred - generally place of acceptance)

Note: Issues relating to performance are governed by the place of performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The most significant relationship test to issues involving contracts considers

A

(1) place of contracting, negotiation, and performance
(2) Place where subject matter of contracts is located
(3) Parties’ domicile / place of business or incorporation

If place of negotiation and performance are the same, presumption in favor of that place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Immovable land is generally governed by

A

the law of the place where the property is located (situs)

Note: Apply the WHOLE law of the state, including state’s choice of law rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Tangible movable property is governed by

A

the UCC (mostly) otherwise apply the law of the state where the property was located at the time of the transaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Intangible movable property is governed by

A

the law of the state in which the tangible property was created

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Issues concerning moveable property at the time of a decedent’s death are governed by

A

the laws of the decedent’s domicile at the time of death

Exceptions:
(1) Choice of law specified in will or trust
(2) Preference in favor of validity

23
Q

Internal v. External affairs of a corporation

A

Internal: Concern the rights and obligations of participants in a venture, governed by laws of state of incorporation

External: Involve transactions with 3rd parties, treat corporation like a natural person (e.g. tort / contract issues)

24
Q

Validity of a marriage under the Traditional Approach is governed by

A

the law of the place where the marriage was celebrated

Exception:
-Violates a particularly strong public policy

25
Validity of marriage under 2nd restatement (most significant relationships test) is governed by
the law of the place where the marriage was celebrated (if valid there, valid everywhere) UNLESS it violates public policy of the state with the most significant relationship
26
Movable marital property is governed by
the law of the state where the couple was domiciled at the time of acquisition
27
Property acquired during marriage has
the same character as the funds or property used to acquire it
28
Proof of Foreign Law is
not considered law under Traditional approach (must be pleaded) is permitted under modern approach (through judicial notice) though may require pleading and proof for foreign country's law
29
Defenses to Foreign Law
(1) Penal Law (2) Public Policy Exception (3) Substance v. Procedural Distinction
30
Under penal law exception, a court will
not enforce the penal law of another state Note: This does NOT contain civil recovery (or punitive damages) or tax laws
31
Under the public policy exception, a court may
refuse to apply foreign law if that law violates a fundamental land strongly held public policy of the forum state (both traditional and modern approach) NARROW defense, court would dismiss without prejudice
32
Substance v. Procedure Distinction
Substantive laws regulate behavior outside court and procedural laws regulate people's behavior within courts Note: Forum law always govern procedural
33
Parole Evidence is a
substantive rule
34
Evidentiary privileges is a
procedural rule under Traditional approach and governed by Forum law Modern approach: apply law of state with most significant relationship
35
Damages is
a substantive issue as to measure and types of damages under Traditional approach (Note: statutory limits are procedural) assessed under a significant relationship test in the Modern approach
36
Statutes of Limitations are considered
procedural except if inextricably bound up with a statutory right making it substantive under Traditional approach under the law of the forum state in the Modern approach unless it would serve no substantial interest of the forum and the claim would be barred under SoL of state with the most significant relationship
37
Constitutional limitations on Conflict of Laws allow
a state to apply its own substantive law only if it has a significant contact or an aggregation of contacts with the issue such that the application of its own law is neither arbitrary nor fundamentally unfair Always include in an answer, it's always applicable
38
Under the Full Faith & Credit clause, a state may not
refuse to entertain claims under another state's law SIMPLY because that law comes from another state (must have a reason)
39
Under Erie a federal court sitting in diversity applies
the substantive law of the state in which the federal court sits
40
SoL under Traditional Choice of Law v. Erie
Traditional Choice of Law: Procedural Erie: Substantive
41
2 wrinkles to Erie
(1) When a state law is arguably substantive, balancing test is considered and federal court may apply federal common law (2) A Codified federal rule (e.g. FRCP or Rule of Evidence) must be applied in federal court
42
Klaxton Rule
Federal court sitting in diversity must apply the choice of law rules for the state in which it sits Exception: If case is filed in State A but is properly transferred to Federal court in State B, federal court will apply conflict of law rules for State A
43
There is no public policy defense to
enforcing sister state judgments
44
When a final judgment is inconsistent with another final judgement, the
most recent (last judgement to be made) ie entitled to full faith and credit
45
A judgment will NOT be on the merits if
it is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, or it was dismissed without prejudice
46
Workers compensation awards may be supplemented by other states' awards unless
the law of the initial state bars additional recovery using unmistakeable language
47
Bilateral v. Ex Parte Divorce
Bilateral = Court has Jx over both parties Ex Parte = Court has Jx over just one party (can only issue divorce, no distribution of property)
48
The issue of domicile in an ex part divorce may
be challenged in enforcement of the divorce decree (a judgement) be conditional on a durational residency requirement (prevent going a state for 1 day to get an ex part divorce)
49
Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) establishes
one home state which makes initial custody decision for children (child's home state or state of domicile) and must be given full faith and credit only modify if state no longer has significant connection to child / parents and new court meets test for exclusive jurisdiction
50
Foreign country judgement are
usually enforced as a matter of comity (mutual respect) unless repugnant to forum's public policy
51
Uniform Foreign Money Judgement Recognition Act generally allows
foreign money judgements to be enforceable in same manner as sister state judgements and non-money judgements not explicitly covered but enforced as a matter of comity
52
Default rules for types of contracts
(1) Land contracts - law of situs (2) Personality contracts - where delivery occurs (3) Life insurance contracts - insured's domicile (4) Casualty insurance contracts - where insured risk is located (5) Loans - where repayment is required (6) Suretyship contracts - state governing principal obligation (7) Transportation contract - law of state of departure
53
A state may apply its worker's compensation claim if
there's a legitimate interest in an injury and its consequences
54
When a conflict of law involves a secured transaction, the law
of the state in which the debtor is located will control