core studies- individual differences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

background of freud?

A

Freud was interested in the role of infant sexuality in child development.
The case therefore focused on little Hans’s psychosexual development.
Hans was in the phallic stage if development.
Oedipus complex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

aim of freud?

A

Opportunity for Freud to develop his theory of infantile sexuality and the Oedipus complex. Also, to investigate the genesis of phobias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

sample of freud?

A

Hans was 3 years old when the study started. Born in 1903 in Vienna Austria. Freud was friends with Hans’ parents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

research methods of freud?

A

Case study
Longitudinal from when has was 3-5 years old.
Observations made by Hans’s father who wrote weekly reports by letter to Freud about their conversations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the widdler dream?

A

At three years old, Hans started to develop an interest in his ‘widdler’, and he started to masturbate. This caused his mother to threaten to send for Dr A. to cut it off. This made him fear the loss of his penis (castration anxiety)
Hans made 2 attempts to seduce his mother. 1st his mum was powdering around his penis, and he said, ‘why don’t you put your finger there?’ and she replied ‘it’s not proper’ with Hans replying ‘its great fun’ 2nd seduction happened when Hans climbed down into his mother’s bed one morning and said “Do you know what Aunt M said? He has got a dear little thingummy”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the giraffe dream?

A

in the night there was a big giraffe in the room and a crumpled one. the big one called out because I took the crumpled one away from it. Then it stopped calling out and then I sat down on top of the crumpled one” The Big giraffe –the dad.
The crumpled giraffe – his mum or rather her genital organs. Showing a lust for his mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

where did the horse phobia come from?

A

In January 1908 Hans suddenly developed a fear of being bitten by horses and became afraid of going out into the street. It occurred when Hans had heard someone say “Don’t put your finger to the white horse or it’ll bite you” Freud believed this fear of the white horse was a fear of having his ‘widdler’ cut off. (Castration anxiety)
Hans was disturbed by what horses wear in front of their eyes and by the black round their mouths. Freud interpreted this as Hans having a fear of his father, with the horses’ blinkers being like his father’s glasses and their muzzle being like his father’s moustache. He admitted that he was also afraid of carts, furniture and buses because he was worried, they would all fall over. There was a possibility that Freud saw the Horses and his father and Hans wished that his father would fall down in the same way so he could have his mother to himself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the defacation fear?

A

Hans had a fear of defecation and he had often been in the toilet with his mother when she ‘widdled’ or ‘lumfed’. Hans’ father believed this was a fear of defecation coming from his fear of heavily loaded carts from where the horse and cart fell over.
Hans was also grappling with where do babies come from? The ‘lumf’ represented the birth of a baby and children were lumfs.
To support this Hans invented the name ‘lodi’ for a child. From this the heavily loaded cart could represent the fear of his father but also his mother during childbirth.
Freud also believed that Hans’ phobia could trace back to the birth of his baby sister.
Hans also had a fantasy about becoming a father with his mother as his wife, and his father as a grandfather. Having children of his own with his mother showing how he wanted to be like his father and lust for his mother.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the plumber fantasy?

A

1st Hans recalled “I was in the bath and then the plumber came and unscrewed it. Then he took a big borer and stuck it into my stomach “Later that day he admitted that when he was in the big bath, he was afraid that his mother would let him go and that his head would go under the water. Hans’ father said, “Perhaps you’ve been naughty and thought she didn’t love you anymore?” Hans replied “Yes”. Hans’ father then asked, “when you were watching mummy give Hanna her bath, perhaps you wished she would let her go and she would fall in” – Hans replied “yes”. His fear of the bath was seen as a fear that he would be punished for the death wish he had towards his sister. Arising from a desire to have his mother to himself.
2nd “The plumber came; at first, he took away my behind with a pair of pincers; and then gave me another and then the same with my widdler” Hans also admitted “I’d like to have a moustache like yours and hair like yours.” The plumber fantasy was now interpreted as an overcoming of his castration complex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

results of freud?

A

Fear of horses= fear of his father
Widdler= Oedipus complex and castration anxiety
Giraffe= lust for mother
Becoming a father= Oedipus complex
Plumber= identifying with his father

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

conclusions of freud?

A

The study supported:
his theory of psychosexual stages and infant sexuality
his concept of the Oedipus complex
the nature of phobias and Freud’s theory that they are the product of unconscious anxiety placed onto external objects.
unconscious determinism- people aren’t aware of the causes of their behavior.
his use of psychoanalytic therapy to treat disturbed thoughts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

background of gould?

A

Robert Yerkes was interested in promoting psychology as a hard science. When America became involved in WW1 he combined his early ideas of inherited intelligence and the development of mental testing and developed the Army Alpha and Beta tests as a way of selecting recruits. These tests would produce objective results, proving psychology to be seen as a more rigorous science. however they were westernly biased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the aim of gould?

A
  • examine the early history of intelligence testing.
    -identify problems with specifically IQ tests.
    -Bias in psychological theories on the inheritance of intelligence and the
    -prejudice of a society which can remove the objectivity of intelligence testing.
  • ethical implications of research and using data to discriminate between people in suitability for occupation and even admission to a country.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

method of Gould?

A

This study is not a piece of empirical research, but an extract from Gould’s book. Therefore, this is a review article that examines the history of Yerkes’ intelligence testing of recruits for the US army in WW1, The sample was 1.75 million US army recruits
Yerkes developed three types of intelligence test, two of which could be given to large groups and took less than an hour to complete.
Alpha Test was an 8 part test designed for literate recruits and included questions about number sequences, analogies and other questions. the test was criticized for being very culturally biased and included

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the beta test?

A

The Army Beta Test was designed for people who were illiterate or failed the Army Alpha Test it had seven parts and consisted of picture completion tasks. The pictures used were culturally specific and if participants had no knowledge of the items, they would have been unable to the answer questions correctly. Furthermore, instructions were written in English and three parts of the test required written answers – hardly suitable for illiterate people!

17
Q

what did participants do if they failed both the alpha and beta test?

A

If recruits failed on the other two tests, they were required to take part in the spoken examination, but actually this rarely happened. After testing individuals were graded from A to E, which indicated suitability for the army; for example, a grade D indicated a person rarely suited for tasks requiring special skill, forethought, resourcefulness or sustained alertness.

18
Q

what did yerkes find?

A

The average white American man had an average mental age of just 13, which is just above that of a ‘moron’. Eugenicists suggested this was due to how ‘the poor, Negroes and feeble-minded’ had interbred and lowered the overall intelligence of the population. as black people scored more poorly than those from northern Europe.

19
Q

what effects did Gould find due to the research?

A

In1924 the Immigration Restriction Act was passed and Europeans who had scored very poorly on the tests were no longer welcome in the country. It also decided that the quota of immigrants allowed into America would be 2% of each recorded nation taken from the 1890 census figures, rather than the 1920 census which had higher numbers of immigrants. As a result the numbers of ‘the unwanted’ was very low. This also had a massive effect on Jews who were trying to flee Europe before and during WW2, as they couldn’t immigrate to America for safety.

20
Q

conclusions of gould?

A

IQ tests are both culturally and historically biased; IQ tests do not measure innate intelligence; they are often unreliable and do not produce valid results. Inappropriate and poorly administered IQ tests have led to tragic consequences. Nations can be ranked by their intelligence and America is a nation of morons!

21
Q

background to Hancock?

A

language can provide useful insight into our underlying cognitive and emotional processes. Disfluencies in speech can show how emotionally coloured our speech is
Psychopaths show little need for others are more concerned with basic needs (food and sex) and language should focus upon these basic needs.

22
Q

aims of hancock?

A

Instrumental/ predatory view of world
Unique socioemotional needs
Poverty of affect

23
Q

what does Instrumental/ predatory view of world mean?

A

Psychopaths are more likely to be motivated by an external goal, therefore they use language which connects mains clauses to dependent clauses e.g., because and so that to justify their actions

24
Q

what does unique socioemotional needs mean?

A

Psychopaths show little need for others are more concerned with basic needs (food and sex) and language should focus upon these basic needs

25
Q

what does poverty of affect mean?

A

Psychopaths have difficulty, for example identifying emotional faces. Their lack of emotional intelligence may be reflected in using fewer emotional words, more disfluencies and psychological distancing (past tense verbs)

26
Q

what was the sample of hancock?

A

52 Male murderers in Canadian correctional facilities volunteered to take part.
14 were psychopaths
38 non psychopaths
Mean age at time of murder was 28 years
There was no difference in the type of murder

27
Q

what were the materials in hancock?

A

Assessment of psychopathy: The PCL-R which had 20 criteria each scored from 0 – 2 giving a max score of 40
Factor 1 – affective/interpersonal
Factor 2 – Impulsive and antisocial traits –
A score of 25+ would indicate psychopathy.
Text Analysis:
Wmatrix -It classifies speech in relation to nouns, verbs etc and also semantic categories (such as money etc)
DAL- to classify emotional content.
Affect of tone of words, positive and negative use of language use of imagery and high and low intensity of words.

28
Q

procedure of hancock?

A

PCL – R was completed by trained prison psychologists. Inter rater reliability was gained by having a trained graduate student re code 10 randomly selected case files.
Interviews:
All audiotaped, ppts told at start the study was to examine the manner in which homicide offenders recall their homicide offence.
Stepwise technique – asked to describe their offence in as much detail from beginning to end.
Conducted by two senior psychology graduate students and one research assistant all of whom were blind to the psychopathy scores of the offenders and lasted about 25 mins.
These were then transcribed including all disfluencies.

29
Q

results of hancock?

A

predatory view of world-Psychopaths produced more subordinating conjunctions suggesting they were describing cause and effect relationships between events of their murder.
socioemotional needs-Psychopaths used twice as many Maslow ‘basic needs’ (food clothing etc) words compared to non-psychopaths who used words related to higher social needs (family, religion etc)
poverty of affect-Psychopaths used more past tense verbs and used more concrete nouns suggests that theyviewed their murder more in the past and were emotionally more distant from their crime

30
Q

what wasn’t a difference between psychopaths and non psychopaths in Hancock?

A

No difference was found between psychopaths and non-psychopaths in terms of emotional language (DAL scores).

31
Q

conclusions of hancock?

A

Psychopaths focus more on basic physiological needs than higher level social needs than non-psychopaths.
- Psychopaths are more emotionally detached from their crimes.
- Psychopaths are less emotional and less positive in their speech.
Psychopaths’ language was less fluent, more disfluencies than non-psychopaths.