consequences of migration Flashcards
changes in the host country
- these large scale migrants also lead to significant cultural change in the host country, such as increased diversity of religious ideas
- eg, the british Indian Sikh community is now the largest Sikh community outside India
- gurdwara temples can be found in Cardiff and other major cities
- an exchange of ideas can also be seen in the impact young British asians have had on popular culture: london’s jay sean (who’s real name is kamaljiey singh shooti) has brought elements of south Asian music into British mainstream
high skilled workers
- the movement of smaller numbers of high skilled workers and high wealth individuals also has a significant effect for both source and host countries
- the variety of these elite-migrants (highly skilled and/or socially influential individuals) include: property developers, musicians, academics, computer programmers, health professionals and bankers
- their wealth derives from their profession or inherited assets
- some elite migrants live as ‘global citizens’ and have multiple homes in different countries
- most governments welcome highly skilled and extremely wealthy migrants
- skilled IT professionals from the USA, India and elsewhere work in the UK’s quaternary industry clusters in cities such as Bristol, London and Cambridge
migration flows that lead to interdependence
Russian migrant millionaires buying properties in London:
- during the early 2000s, Russian investment in London’s housing market helped push up property prices in fashionable districts such as Kensington
- property developers became very reliant on Russian money while homeowners throughout London enjoyed seeing their own house values increase
- in turn, London provided Russian oligarchs with a secure place to invest their cash
- thus, certain elements of UK and Russian society became economically interdependent
consequences of global movement
- fewer workers paying tax is an economic cost for the government of the source country (taxes fund the public sectors, eg health and education)
- increased pressure on schools brings a social cost for communities in the host country
- more people buying goods in shops is an economic benefit for the host country
- increased traffic congestion is an environmental cost for cities in the host country
- higher wages for workers due to undersupply of labour may be an economic benefit for communities in the source countries
- closing schools due to falling numbers is a social cost or communities in the source country (education allows for sustainable development)
- the introduction of rules to limit further immigration is a political change affecting the host country
- rising property prices due to high demand is an economic cost for home buyers in the host country (fosters a social divide and its a problem that takes a long time to fix)
- lower carbon emissions due to fewer people using local transport services is an environmental benefit for the government of the source country
remittances
- around US$500 billion of remittances are currently sent home by migrants annually, this is 3-4 times the value of overseas development aid
- 1in 9 people globally rely on remittance money to survive
- migrants send on average 15% of what they earn as a remittance
- around half the money goes to rural areas, where it is needed the most
- the UN estimates that remittances are 3x more important than international aid
- US$68.968 billion was sent to India in remittances in 2017
positive effects (reducing inequality and promoting growth) for the host regions
- fill particular skill shortages (eg Indian doctors arriving in the UK in the 1950s)
- economic migrants willingly do labouring work that locals may be reluctant to (eg Romanian fruit pickers on UK farms)
- working migrants spend their wages on rent, benefiting landlords and pay tax on legal earnings
- some migrants are ambitious entrepreneurs who establish new businesses employing others (in 2013, 14% of UK start up businesses were migrant owned)
negative effects (exacerbating inequality and promoting tension) for the host regions
- social tensions arise if citizens of the host country believe migration has led to a lack of jobs or affordable housing (a view adopted by some UK newspapers)
- local shortages of primary school places due to natural increase among a young migrant community (eg London boroughs that have become eastern European migration hotspots) and this places financial burden on local authorities
- employers may favour using migrants instead of native workers and working class communities may suffer unemployment as a result
positive effects for the source regions
- in time, migrants or their children may return, bringing new skills (young British Asians have relocated back to India to start health clubs and restaurant chains)
- in Bangladesh, the value of remittances exceeds foreign investment; unlike international aid and lending, remittances are peer to peer finance flow: money travels more or less directly from one family member to another; the money helps the social development of communities that have previously been excluded financially from access to education and healthcare
negatives effects for the source regions
- the economic loss of a generation of human resources, schooled at government expense, including key workers such as teachers and computer programmers (Poland has lost young people every year since the 1960s)
- the increased proportion of aged dependants creates a long term economic challenge
- there is reduced economic growth as consumption falls (especially urban services and entertainment for as young adult market: many nightclubs closed in Warsaw in 2004 when Poland joined the EU)
how migration can foster economic and social interdependency
- remittances sent home to a source country generate as much as 40% of GDP for some poorer states (eg Tajikistan), this can help pay for education and health
→ can lead to (vice versa), its a cycle - much needed migrant workers are often an essential part of some host country populations; they provide many vital economic and social services
(every country depends, to some extent on the economic health of others for its own continued wellbeing)
how migration can foster increased political and environmental interdependency
- in time, a closer political partnership may develop between states that have become socio-economically interdependent, such as EU states
→ can lead to and vice versa, its a cycle - this increases cooperation to tackle shared environmental threats, such as climate change; many European scientists have migrated to work in universities in other EU states
Indian workers moving to the UAE
(how migration and remittance flows create economic interdependency)
- over 2 million Indian migrants live United Arab Emirates, making up 30% of the total population
- many live in Abu Dhabi and Dubai
- an estimated US$15 billion is returned to India annually as remittances
- most migrants work in transport, construction and manufacturing industries
- around 1/5 are professionals working in service industries
Filipino workers moving to Saudi Arabia
(how migration and remittance flows create economic interdependency)
- around 1.5 million migrants from the Philippines have arrived on Saudi Arabia since 1973, when rising oil prices first began to bring enormous wealth to the country
- some work in construction and transport industries, others as doctors and nurses in Riyadh
- US$7 billion is returned to the Philippines annually as remittances
- reports of ill treatment of some migrants suggests there is a human cost to interdependency
examples of interdependency
- when large scale migrant labour flows become focused on core or hub regions, a process called backwash is said to be taking place, which can drain peripheral places of young workers
- the Schengen agreement has accelerated the backwash at an international level
- many economists believes backwash works in everyone’s interest because it provides EU governments with greater tax revenues to pay for road building projects, payments for farmers and grants for new businesses
- core periphery theorist John Freidmann said that backwash is balanced out by the trickle down of wealth to every country
- critics argue that backwash migration ‘losses’ for peripheral states in eastern European are really far greater than any trickle down gains they may
- in reality, its hard to either accept or reject the hypothesis because of the sheer complexity of the economic and demographic processes involved
benefits of interdependency
- can strengthen the friendship between states, reduces prospects for geopolitical conflict and deliver mutually shared growth and stability instead
- less conflict: the first steps towards the EU were taken shortly after the WW2 ended, European state governments believed that greater interdependency would end conflicts
- economics and politics working together: Friedman argued that economic and political interdependency are linked, in the golden arches theory of conflict prevention; two countries with McDonald’s restaurants would never wage war because their economies had become interlinked (the recent conflict between Russia and Ukraine has weakened this theory but it remains an idea worth exploring)
- states that are home to a large diaspora population often have strong geopolitical ties: with the diaspora’s country of origin (eg the arrival of a large Korean diaspora population in the USA has deepened the country’s friendship with South Korea)